The Effects of Jurors’ Initial Views of Jury Service on Predeliberation Preferences for Prosecution or Defense

References

• Barkow, R. E. 2003. “Recharging the Jury: The Criminal Jury’s Constitutional Role in an Era of Mandatory Sentencing.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 152 (1):33–128. doi: 10.2307/3313061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, A. 1985. “Some Disturbing Patterns for the Georgia Death Sentence.” University of California Davis Law Review 18:1327–74.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, M. 2017. “Police Reform and the Dismantling of Legal Estrangement.” The Yale Law Journal 126:2054–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berris, K. A. 2011. “Appearance Rates of Potential Jurors Who Confirm, Postpone, or Fail to Respond to the Jury Summons: Are Postponed Jurors Saying ‘No’ or ‘Not Now’?” Duke Law Review 59:649–67.
   Google Scholar
• Bloeser, A. J., C. McCurley, and J. J. Mondak. 2012. “Jury Service as Civic Engagement: Determinants of Jury Summons Compliance.” American Politics Research 40 (2):179–204. doi: 10.1177/1532673X11419651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boatright, R. G. 1999. “Why Citizens Don’t Respond to Jury Summonses, and What Courts Can Do about It.” Judicature 82 (4):156–65.
   Google Scholar
• Boatright, R. G. 2001. “Generational and Age-Based Differences in Attitudes towards Jury Service.” Behavioral Sciences & the Law 19 (2):285–304. doi: 10.1002/bsl.440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., K. Esterling, and D. Holmes. 2014. “GOTJ: Get out the Juror.” Political Behavior 36 (3):515–33. doi: 10.1007/s11109-013-9244-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprathe, J. W., P. Hannafor-Agor, S. M. Loquvam, and S. S. Diamond. 2016. “Assessing and Achieving Jury Pool Representativeness.” The Judges’ Journal 55 (2):16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. A., and B. M. Gialopsos. 2021. “Answering the Call: An Analysis of Jury Pool Representation in Washington State.” Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society 22 (1):36–49.
   Google Scholar
• Consolini, P. M. 1992. “Learning by Doing Justice: Jury Service and Political Attitudes.” PhD diss., Berkeley, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Curley, L. J., J. Munro, and I. E. Dror. 2022. “Cognitive and Human Factors in Legal Layperson Decision Making: Sources of Bias in Juror Decision Making.” Medicine, Science and the Law 62 (3):206–15. doi: 10.1177/00258024221080655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, B. L., and D. M. Hughes. 2001. “Judging Jury Service: Results of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts Juror Survey.” Behavioral Sciences & the Law 19 (2):305–20. doi: 10.1002/bsl.439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daudistel, H. C., H. M. Hosch, M. D. Holmes, and J. B. Graves. 1999. “Effects of Defendant Ethnicity on Juries’ Dispositions of Felony Cases.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29 (2):317–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01389.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J. 2012. Jury Decision Making: The State of the Science. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., L. D. Clayton, B. B. Dunford, R. Seying, and J. Pryce. 2001. “Jury Decision-Making: 45 Years of Empirical Research on Deliberating Groups.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 7 (3):622–727. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.7.3.622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., P. C. Krouse, C. M. Cavanaugh, and J. C. Basora. 2016. “Evidentiary, Extraevidentiary, and Deliberation Process Predictors of Real Jury Verdicts.” Law and Human Behavior 40 (6):670–82. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, S. S. 1993. “What Jurors Think: Expectations and Reactions of Citizens Who Serve as Jurors.” In Verdict: Assessing the Civil Jury System. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, S. S., and M. R. Rose. 2005. “Real Juries.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1 (1):255–84. doi: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.120002.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, S. S., and M. R. Rose. 2018. “The Contemporary American Jury.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 14 (1):239–58. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113618.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, A., L. Pennington, and S. Cronin. 2013. “Juror Perceptions of the Legitimacy of Legal Authorities and Decision Making in Criminal Cases.” Law & Social Inquiry 38 (4):773–802. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01323.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, G. J. 1997. “Gender Effects on Individual Verdicts and on Mock Jury Verdicts in a Simulated Acquaintance Rape Trial.” Sex Roles 36 (7–8):491–501. doi: 10.1007/BF02766686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, R., and P. Ellsworth. 1984. “Due Process vs. Crime Control: Death Qualification and Jury Attitudes.” Law and Human Behavior 8 (1–2):31–51. doi: 10.1007/BF01044350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukurai, H., E. W. Butler, and R. Krooth. 1993. Race and the Jury: Racial Disenfranchisement and the Search for Justice. 3rd ed. London: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, S., P. Hannaford-Agor, V. Hans, N. Mott, T. Munsterman, and M. Wells. 2004. “Juror First Votes in Criminal Trials.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1 (2):371–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2004.00011.x.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., E. P. Deess, P. Weiser, and J. Meade. 2008. “Jury Service and Electoral Participation: A Test of the Participation Hypothesis.” The Journal of Politics 70 (2):351–67. doi: 10.1017/S0022381608080353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., E. P. Deess, P. Weiser, and C. Simmons. 2010. The Jury and Democracy: How Jury Deliberation Promotes Civic Engagement and Political Participation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gau, J. M. 2016. “A Jury of Whose Peers? The Impact of Selection Procedures on Racial Composition and the Prevalence of Majority White Juries.” Journal of Crime and Justice 39 (1):75–87. doi: 10.1080/0735648X.2015.1087149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramlich, J. 2017. “Jury Duty is Rare, But Most Americans See It As Part of Good Citizenship.” Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/08/24/jury-duty-is-rare-but-most-americans-see-it-as-part-of-good-citizenship/.
   Google Scholar
• Grube, J. W., M. Morgan, and K. A. Kearney. 1989. “Using Self-Generated Identification Codes to Match Questionnaires in Panel Studies of Adolescent Substance Use.” Addictive Behaviors 14 (2):159–71. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(89)90044-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannaford-Agor, P., and V. P. Hans. 2003. “Nullification at Work? A Glimpse from the National Center for State Court Study of Hung Juries.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 78:1249–77.
   Google Scholar
• Hannaford-Agor, P., V. P. Hans, N. Mott, and G. T. Munsterman. 2002. Evaluation of Hung Juries in Bronx County, New York, Los Angeles County, California, Maricopa County, Arizona, and Washington, DC, 2000–2001, Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, Study Number 3689.
   Google Scholar
• Hans, V. P. 2003. “Lay Participation in Legal Decision Making.” Law & Policy 25 (2):83–92. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-9930.2003.00141.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, R., S. D. Penrod, and N. Pennington. 1983. Inside the Jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. S. 2015. “Race, Ethnicity, and Culture in Jury Decision Making.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 11 (1):269–88. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121723.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., B. Bradford, M. Hough, A. Myhill, P. Quinton, and T. R. Tyler. 2012. “Why Do People Comply with the Law?” British Journal of Criminology 52 (6):1051–71. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azs032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., and J. M. Gau. 2015. “Carving up Concepts? Diferentiating between Trust and Legitimacy in Public Attutudes towards Legal Authority.” In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Trust: Towards Theoretical and Methodological Integration, edited by E. Shockley, T. M. S. Neal, L. PytlikZillig, and B. Bornstein. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. R., and J. C. Creech. 1983. “Ordinal Measures in Multiple Indicator Models: A Simulation Study of Categorization Error.” American Sociological Review 48 (3):398–407. doi: 10.2307/2095231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalven, H., and H. Zeisel. 1966. The American Jury. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., and L. S. Wrightsman. 1983. “The Construction and Validation of a Juror Bias Sale.” Journal of Research in Personality 17 (4):423–42. doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(83)90070-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, D. S., and M. Matsuda. 2011. “Legal Cynicism, Collective Efficacy, and the Ecology of Arrest.” Criminology 49 (2):443–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00226.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzmann, K. M., and R. E. Emery. 1993. “Procedural Justice and Parents’ Satisfaction in a Field Study of Child Custody Dispute Resolution.” Law and Human Behavior 17 (5):553–67. doi: 10.1007/BF01045073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochel, T. R. 2019. “Explaining Racial Differences in Ferguson’s Impact on Local Residents’ Trust and Perceived Legitimacy: Policy Implications for Police.” Criminal Justice Policy Review 30 (3):374–405. doi: 10.1177/0887403416684923.
   Google Scholar
• Lecci, L., and B. Myers. 2008. “Individual Differences in Attitudes Relevant to Juror Decision Making: Development and Validation of the Pretrial Juror Attitude Questionnaire (PJAQ).” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38 (8):2010–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00378.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, J. D., R. J. Smith, and D. M. Young. 2013. “Devaluing Death: An Empirical Study of Implicit Racial Bias on Jury-Eligible Citizens in Six Death Penalty States.” New York University Law Review 89 (2):513–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M. S., A. Bryman, and T. F. Liao. 2011. “Welch Test.” In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, 1193–4. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Losh, S. C., and R. G. Boatright. 2002. “Life-Cycle Factors, Status, and Civic Engagement: Issue of Age and Attitudes toward Jury Service.” The Justice System Journal 23 (2):221–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Losh, S. C., A. W. Wasserman, and M. A. Wasserman. 2000. “Reluctant Jurors’: What Summons Responses Reveal about Jury Duty Attitudes.” Judicature 83 (6):304–10.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Z., and K. Yuan. 2012. “Welch’s t Test.” In Encyclopedia of Research Design, edited by Neil J. Salkind, 1621–3.
   Google Scholar
• MacCoun, R. J., and T. R. Tyler. 1988. “The Basis of Citizens’ Perceptions of the Criminal Jury.” Law and Human Behavior 12 (3):333–52. doi: 10.1007/BF01044389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzella, R., and A. Feingold. 1994. “The Effects of Physical Attractiveness, Race, Socioeconomic Status and Gender of Defendants and Victims on Judgements of Mock Jurors: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 24 (15):1315–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01552.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musick, M. A., M. R. Rose, S. Dury, and R. P. Rose. 2015. “Much Obliged: Volunteering, Normative Activities, and Willingness to Serve on Juries.” Law & Social Inquiry 40 (2):433–60. doi: 10.1111/lsi.12114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, G. 2010. “Likert Scales, Levels of Measurement and the ‘Laws’ of Statistics.” Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice 15 (5):625–32. doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, J. 2016. Americans’ Confidence in Institutions Stays Low. Gallup News. June 13. http://www.gallup.com/poll/192581/americans-confidence-institutions-stays-low.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado. 2017. 580 U.S. _, 137 S. Ct. 855.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, L., and M. J. Dolliver. 2021. “The Effect of Deliberation on Jurors’ Attiudes toward Jury Service in Criminal Cases.” Law & Social Inquiry 46 (2):391–406. doi: 10.1017/lsi.2020.29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, M. R., C. Ellison, and S. S. Diamond. 2008. “Preferences for Juries over Judges across Racial and Ethnic Groups.” Social Science Quarterly 89 (2):372–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00537.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottman, D. B., and R. M. Hansen. 2001. How Recent Users View the State Courts: Perceptions of Whites, African-Americans, and Latinos. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
   Google Scholar
• Sandys, M., and R. C. Dillehay. 1995. “First-Ballot Votes, Predeliberation Dispositions, and Final Verdicts in Jury Trials.” Law and Human Behavior 19 (2):175–95. doi: 10.1007/BF01499324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnell, R., T. Bachteler, and J. Reiher. 2010. “Improving the Use of Self-Generated Identification Codes.” Evaluation Review 34 (5):391–418. doi: 10.1177/0193841X10387576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicafuse, L. L., J. C. Chomos, and M. K. Miller. 2013. “Promoting Positive Perceptions of Jury Service: An Analysis of Juror Experiences, Opinions, and Recommendations for Courts.” Justice System Journal 34:85–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolnick, P., and J. Shaw. 2010. “The O. J. Simpson Criminal Trial Verdict: Racism or Status Shield?” Journal of Social Issues 53 (3):503–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1997.tb02125.x.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers, S. 2006. “On Racial Diversity and Group Decision-Making: Identifying Multiple Effects of Racial Composition on Jury Deliberations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (4):597–612. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, S. R., and P. C. Ellsworth. 2001. “White Juror Bias: An Investigation of Racial Prejudice against Black Defendants in the American Courtroom.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 7 (1):201–29. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, G., and A. R. Artino. Jr. 2013. “Analyzing and Interpreting Data from Likert-Type Scales.” Journal of Graduate Medical Education 5 (4):541–2. doi: 10.4300/JGME-5-4-18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sunshine, J., and T. R. Tyler. 2003. “The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing.” Law & Society Review 37 (3):513–48. doi: 10.1111/1540-5893.3703002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, T., and H. Hosch. 2004. “An Examination of Jury Verdicts for Evidence of a Similarity-Leniency Effect, an out-Group Punitiveness Effect or a Black Sheep Effect.” Law and Human Behavior 10:587–98.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, W. C., C. L. Cowan, P. C. Ellsworth, and J. C. Harrington. 1984. “Death Penalty Attitudes and Conviction Proneness: The Translation of Attitudes into Verdicts.” Law and Human Behavior 8 (1–2):95–113. doi: 10.1007/BF01044353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., and J. Jackson. 2014. “Popular Legitimacy and the Exercise of Legal Authority: Motivating Compliance, Cooperation, and Engagement.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 20 (1):78–95. doi: 10.1037/a0034514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visher, C. 1987. “Juror Decision-Making the Importance of Evidence.” Law and Human Behavior 11 (1):1–17. doi: 10.1007/BF01044835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, N. L., and V. Hans. 2009. “A Jury of One: Opinion Formation, Conformity, and Dissent on Juries.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 6 (3):513–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01152.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, C., M. Strube, A. Cole, and D. Kagehir. 1985. “The Impact of Case Characteristics and Prior Jury Experience on Jury Verdicts.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 15 (7):409–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1985.tb02262.x.
   Google Scholar