A novel sieve plate hole pattern: effect on gas hold-up and flow regimes in a bubble column

References

• Akita K, Yoshida F. 1973. Gas holdup and volumetric mass transfer coefficient in bubble columns. effects of liquid properties. Ind Eng Chem Proc Des Dev. 12:76–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akita K, Yoshida F. 1974. Bubble size, interfacial area, and liquid-phase mass transfer coefficient in bubble columns. Ind Eng Chem Proc Des Dev. 13(1):84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besagni G, Di Pasquali A, Gallazzini L, Gottardi E, Colombo LPM, Inzoli F. 2017. The effect of aspect ratio in counter-current gas-liquid bubble columns: experimental results and gas holdup correlations. Int J Multiphase Flow. 94:53–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besagni G, Gallazzini L, Inzoli F. 2018. Effect of gas sparger design on bubble column hydrodynamics using pure and binary liquid phases. Chem Eng Sci. 176:116–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besagni G, Inzoli F. 2016. Comprehensive experimental investigation of counter-current bubble column hydrodynamics: holdup, flow regime transition, bubble size distributions and local flow properties. Chem Eng Sci. 146:259–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besagni G, Inzoli F, Ziegenhein T. 2018. Two-phase bubble columns: a comprehensive review. ChemEngineering. 2(2):13.
   Google Scholar
• Buwa VV, Ranade VV. 2002. Dynamics of gas-liquid flow in a rectangular bubble column: experiments and single/multi-group CFD simulations. Chem Eng Sci. 57(22–23):4715–4736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camarasa E, Vial C, Poncin S, Wild G, Midoux N, Bouillard J. 1999. Influence of coalescence behaviour of the liquid and of gas sparging on hydrodynamics and bubble characteristics in a bubble column. Chem Eng Proc Proc Intens. 38(4–6):329–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaumat H, Billet A-M, Delmas H. 2006. Axial and radial investigation of hydrodynamics in a bubble column: influence of fluids flow rates and sparger type. Int J Chem React Eng. 4(1):1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson JF, Schuler BOG. 1960. Bubble formation at an orifice in an inviscid liquid. Trans Inst Chem Eng. 38:335–342.
   Google Scholar
• Deckwer WD. 1992. Bubble column reactors. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Degaleesan S, Dudukovic M, Pan Y. 2001. Experimental study of gas-induced liquid-flow structures in bubble columns. AIChE J. 47(9):1913–1931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhotre MT, Ekambara K, Joshi JB. 2004. CFD simulation of sparger design and height to diameter ratio on gas hold-up profiles in bubble column reactors. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 28(5):407–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque MW, Nigam KDP, Joshi JB. 1986. Optimum gas sparger design for bubble columns with a low height-to-diameter ratio. Chem Eng J. 33(2):63–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantarci N, Borak F, Ulgen KO. 2005. Bubble column reactors. Proc Biochem. 40(7):2263–2283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawase Y, Umeno S, Kumagai T. 1992. The prediction of gas hold-up in bubble column reactors: Newtonian and non-newtonian fluids. Chem Eng J. 50(1):1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazakis NA, Mouza AA, Paras SV. 2006. Bubble size distribution at the entrance of bubble column with pore sparger. Paper presented at: 17th International Congress of Chemical and Process Engineering (CHISA 2006); Prague; P1.37–P1.83.
   Google Scholar
• Kazakis NA, Papadopoulos ID, Mouza AA. 2007. Bubble columns with fine pore sparger operating in the pseudo-homogeneous regime: gas hold up prediction and a criterion for the transition to the heterogeneous regime. Chem Eng Sci. 62(12):3092–3103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni AV, Badgandi SV, Joshi JB. 2009. Design of ring and spider type spargers for bubble column reactor: experimental measurements and CFD simulation of flow and weeping. Chem Eng Res Des. 87(12):1612–1630.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni AV, Joshi JB. 2011. Design and selection of sparger for bubble column reactor. Part I: performance of different spargers. Chem Eng Res Des. 89:1972–1985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau R, Sim WSB, Mo R. 2009. Effect of gas distributor on hydrodynamics in shallow bubble column reactors. Can J Chem Eng. 87(6):847–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessard RR, Zieminski SA. 1971. Bubble coalescence and gas transfer in aqueous electrolytic solutions. Ind Eng Chem Fund. 10(2):260–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Yang X, Dai G. 2009. CFD simulation of effects of the configuration of gas distributors on gas-liquid flow and mixing in a bubble column. Chem Eng Sci. 64(24):5104–5116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure DD, Wang C, Kavanagh JM, Fletcher DF, Barton GW. 2016. Experimental investigation into the impact of sparger design on bubble columns at high superficial velocities. Chem Eng Res Des. 106:205–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrini G, Besagni G, Inzoli F, De Guido G. 2017. Gas holdup and flow regime transition in spider-sparger bubble column: effect of liquid phase properties. J Phys Conf Ser. 796:012041.
   Google Scholar
• Polli M, Stanislao MD, Bagatin R, Bakr EA, Masi M. 2002. Bubble size distribution in the sparger region of bubble columns. Chem Eng Sci. 57(1):197–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruzicka MC, Drahoš J, Fialová M, Thomas NH. 2001. Effect of bubble column dimensions on flow regime transition. Chem Eng Sci. 56(21–22):6117–6124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruzicka MC, Vecer MM, Orvalho S, Drahoš J. 2008. Effect of surfactant on homogeneous regime stability in bubble column. Chem Eng Sci. 63(4):951–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruzicka MC, Zahradnı́k J, Drahoš J, Thomas NH. 2001. Homogeneous–heterogeneous regime transition in bubble columns. Chem Eng Sci. 56(15):4609–4626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şal S, Gül OF, Özdemir M. 2013. The effect of sparger geometry on gas holdup and regime transition points in a bubble column equipped with perforated plate spargers. Chem Eng Proc Proc Intens. 70:259–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki S, Uchida K, Hayashi K, Tomiyama A. 2017. Effects of column diameter and liquid height on gas holdup in air-water bubble columns. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 82:359–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah YT, Kelkar BG, Godbole SP, Deckwer WD. 1982. Design parameters estimations for bubble column reactors. AIChE J. 28(3):353–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharaf S, Zednikova M, Ruzicka MC, Azzopardi BJ. 2016. Global and local hydrodynamics of bubble columns—effect of gas distributor. Chem Eng J. 288:489–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorat BN, Shevade AV, Bhilegaonkar KN, Aglawe RH, Parasu Veera U, Thakre SS, Pandit AB, Sawant SB, Joshi JB. 1998. Effect of sparger design and height to diameter ratio on fractional gas hold-up in bubble columns. Chem Eng Res Des. 76(7):823–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse K, Martin T, McFarlane C, Nienow A. 1998. Visualisation of bubble coalescence in a coalescence cell, a stirred tank and a bubble column. Chem Eng Sci. 53(23):4031–4036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis GB. 1969. One dimensional two-phase flow. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Yang JH, Yang JI, Kim HJ, Chun DH, Lee HT, Jung H. 2010. Two regime transitions to pseudo-homogeneous and heterogeneous bubble flow for various liquid viscosities. Chem Eng Proc Proc Intens. 49(10):1044–1050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahradník J, Kaštanek F. 1979. Gas holdup in uniformly aerated bubble column reactors. Chem Eng Commun. 3(4–5):413–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahradník J, Fialová M, Linek V. 1999. The effect of surface-active additives on bubble coalescence in aqueous media. Chem Eng Sci. 54:4757–4766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahradník J, Fialová M, Růžička M, Drahoš J, Kaštanek F, Thomas NH. 1997. Duality of the gas-liquid flow regimes in bubble column reactors. Chem Eng Sci. 52(21–22):3811–3826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar