Syngas cleaning for coal to methanol demo plant – H₂S and COS removal

References

• Al-Zareer M, Dincer I, Rosen MA. 2016. Effects of various gasification parameters and operating conditions on syngas and hydrogen production. Chem Eng Res Des. 115:1–18. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2016.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Amoodi N, Kannan P, Al Shoaibi A, Srinivasakannan C. 2013. Aspen plus simulation of polyethylene gasification under equilibrium conditions. Chem Eng Commun. 200(7):977–92. doi:10.1080/00986445.2012.715108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadullah M. 2014. Biomass gasification gas cleaning for downstream applications: A comparative critical review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 40:118–32. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assabumrungrat S, Phromprasit J, Boonkrue S, Kiatkittipong W, Wiyaratn W, Soottitantawat A, Arpornwichanop A, Laosiripojana N, Powell J. 2012. Energy efficiency evaluation for a “green” power generation process with minimum effort on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Chem Eng Commun. 199(12):1642–51. doi:10.1080/00986445.2012.680218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell DA, Towler BF, Fan M, Bell DA, Towler BF, Fan M. 2011. Chapter 6 – Sulfur Recovery. In: Coal gasification and its applications, p. 113–36. doi:10.1016/B978-0-8155-2049-8.10006-3.
   Google Scholar
• Boerrigter H, Calis HP, Slor DJ, Bodenstaff H. 2004 May. Gas Cleaning for Integrated Biomass Gasification (Bg) and Fischer-Tropsch (Ft) Systems; Experimental Demonstration of Two Bg-Ft Systems. In: 2nd World Conference and Technology Exhibition on Biomass for Energy, Industry and Climate Protection, p. 10–14. ECN-RX–04-041.
   Google Scholar
• Chen H, Yang L, Zhang PH, Harrison A. 2014. The controversial fuel methanol strategy in China and its evaluation. Energy Strategy Rev. 4:28–33. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2014.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiche D, Schweitzer JM. 2017. Investigation of competitive COS and HCN hydrolysis reactions upon an industrial catalyst: Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetics modeling. Appl Catal B: Environ. 205:189–200. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmielniak T, Sciazko M. 2003. Co-gasification of biomass and coal for methanol synthesis. Appl Energy. 74(3-4):393–403. doi:10.1016/S0306-2619(02)00184-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinca C, Slavu N, Badea A. 2016. Benchmarking of the pre/post-combustion chemical absorption for the CO2 capture. J Inst Energy. 91(3):445–456. doi:10.1016/j.joei.2017.01.008
   Google Scholar
• E4tech & NNFCC. (2009). Review of Technologies for Gasification of Biomass and Wastes. NNFCC project 09/008 (Vol. Final Repo). Retrieved from http://www.e4tech.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/gasification2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• El-Naas MH, Mohammad AF, Suleiman MI, Al Musharfy M, Al-Marzouqi AH. 2017. A new process for the capture of CO2 and reduction of water salinity. Desalination. 411:69–75. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2017.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García Cortés C, Tzimas E, Peteves SD. 2009. Technologies for coal based hydrogen and electricity co-production power plants with CO2 capture. doi:10.2790/23969
   Google Scholar
• Guan G. 2017. Clean coal technologies in Japan: A review. Chin J Chem Eng. 25(6):689–97. doi:10.1016/j.cjche.2016.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habgood DCC, Hoadley AFA, Zhang L. 2015. Techno-economic analysis of gasification routes for ammonia production from Victorian brown coal. Chem Eng Res Des. 102:57–68. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2015.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. B., & Højlund Nielsen, P. E. (2008). Methanol Synthesis. In Ertl G, Knözinger H, Schüth F, Weitkamp J, editors, Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis (Second, Co, Vol. Volume 1, p. 2930). Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. doi: 10.1002/9783527610044.hetcat0148
   Google Scholar
• Hofbauer, H., Rauch, R., & Ripfel-Nitsche, K. (2007). Report on Gas Cleaning for Synthesis Applications Work Package 2E: “Gas treatment” Deliverable: 2E-3. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/energy/intelligent/projects/sites/iee-projects/files/projects/documents/thermalnet_report_on_syngas_cleaning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency. 2016. World Energy Outlook 2016. http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WorldEnergyOutlook2016ExecutiveSummaryEnglish.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jadhav SG, Vaidya PD, Bhanage BM, Joshi JB. 2014. Catalytic carbon dioxide hydrogenation to methanol: A review of recent studies. Chem Eng Res Des. 92(11):2557–67. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2014.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin H, Lu Y, Liao B, Guo L, Zhang X. 2010. Hydrogen production by coal gasification in supercritical water with a fluidized bed reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 35(13):7151–60. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.01.099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohl AL, Nielsen RB. (1997). Chapter 5 - Alkaline Salt Solutions for Acid Gas Removal. In Kohl AL, Nielsen RB (Fifth E. Nielsen (Eds.), Gas Purification (5th Edition, pp. 330–414). Houston: Gulf Professional Publishing. doi: 10.1016/B978-088415220-0/50005-7
   Google Scholar
• Kolb T, Aigner M, Kneer R, Müller M, Weber R, Djordjevic N. 2016. Tackling the challenges in modelling entrained-flow gasification of low-grade feedstock. J Inst Energy. 89(4):485–503. doi:10.1016/j.joei.2015.07.007
   Google Scholar
• Laurence LC, Ashenafi D. 2012. Syngas treatment unit for small scale gasification - application to ic engine gas quality requirement. J Appl Fluid Mech. 5(1):95–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Yoon SJ, Ra HW, Son Y, Il Hong JC, Lee JG. 2010. Gasification characteristics of coke and mixture with coal in an entrained-flow gasifier. Energy. 35(8):3239–44. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Hu S. 2017. History and future of the coal and coal chemical industry in China. Resour Conserv Recycl. 124:13–24. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li K, Leigh W, Feron P, Yu H, Tade M. 2016. Systematic study of aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA)-based CO2 capture process: Techno-economic assessment of the MEA process and its improvements. Appl Energy. 165:648–59. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.12.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Guo L, Zhang X, Jin H, Lu Y. 2010. Hydrogen production from coal gasification in supercritical water with a continuous flowing system. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 35(7):3036–45. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.07.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu K, Cui Z, Fletcher TH. (2009). Coal Gasification. In Liu K, Song C, Subramani V, Editors, Hydrogen and Syngas Production and Purification Technologies (pp. 156–218). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561256.ch4
   Google Scholar
• Liu X, Liang J, Xiang D, Yang S, Qian Y. 2016. A proposed coal-to-methanol process with CO2 capture combined Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for waste heat recovery. J Clean Prod. 129:53–64. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller BG. 2017. Introduction to Coal Utilization Technologies. In: Miller BG Editor, Clean Coal Engineering Technology (Second Edition, pp. 147–229). Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-811365-3.00004-1
   Google Scholar
• Moreira D, Pires JCM. 2016. Atmospheric CO2 capture by algae: negative carbon dioxide emission path. Bioresour Technol. 215:371–9. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NETL. 2016. U. S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory’s Gasification Plant Databases. https://www.netl.doe.gov/research/coal/energy-systems/gasification/gasification-plant-databases.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Fortes M, Schöneberger JC, Boulamanti A, Tzimas E. 2016. Methanol synthesis using captured CO2 as raw material: Techno-economic and environmental assessment. Appl Energy. 161:718–32. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porada S, Czerski G, Grzywacz P, Makowska D, Dziok T. 2017. Comparison of the gasification of coals and their chars with CO2 based on the formation kinetics of gaseous products. Thermochim Acta. 653(March):97–105. doi:10.1016/j.tca.2017.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin Y-h, Han Q-q, Zhao Z-b, Du Z-y, Feng J, Li W-y, Vassilev S V, Vassileva C G. 2017. Impact of biomass addition on organic structure and mineral matter of char during coal-biomass co-gasification under CO 2 atmosphere. Fuel. 202:556–62. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seggiani M. 1998. Modelling and simulation of time varying slag flow in a Prenflo entrained-flow gasifier. Fuel. 77(14):1611–21. doi:10.1016/S0016-2361(98)00075-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens DJ. 2001. Hot Gas Conditioning: Recent Progress with Larger-Scale Biomass Gasification Systems; Update and Summary of Recent Progress. National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL/SR-510-29952. Golden, CO (United States). https://doi.org/10.2172/786288
   Google Scholar
• TKI. 2016. 2015 Coal (Lignite) Sector Report by Turkish Coal Enterprsies (original in Turkish: “Türkiye Kömür İşletmeleri Kurumu - 2015 Kömür (Linyit) Sektor Raporu”). http://www.tki.gov.tr/depo/2017/KomurSektorRaporu2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• TUIK. 2017. Turkish Statistical Institute. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/disticaretapp/disticaret.zul?param1=24&param2=4&sitcrev=0&isicrev=0&sayac=5802
   Google Scholar
• Ünlü A, Kayahan U, Argönül A, Ziypak M, Akça A. 2017. Pilot scale entrained flow gasification of Turkish lignites. J Inst Energy. 90(1):159–65. doi:10.1016/j.joei.2015.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Van der Drift, A., & Boerrigter, H. 2006. Synthesis Gas FromBiomass for fuels and chemicals. IEA bioenergy Task 33 (biomass gasification)in conjunction with the SYNBIOS conference ECN–C-06, Stockholm, Sweden. Retrieved from https://publications.tno.nl/publication/34628595/94J6tF/c06001.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wennersten R, Sun Q, Li H. 2015. The future potential for Carbon Capture and Storage in climate change mitigation - an overview from perspectives of technology, economy and risk. J Clean Prod. 103:724–36. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Liu Y, Zhang F, Di W, Zhang Y. 2017. Clean coal technologies in China based on methanol platform. Catal Today. 298:61–8. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2017.05.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang CJ, Jackson RB. 2012. China’s growing methanol economy and its implications for energy and the environment. Energy Policy. 41:878–84. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Qian Y, Liu Y, Wang Y, Yang S. 2017. Modeling, simulation, and techno-economic analysis of Lurgi gasification and BGL gasification for coal-to-SNG. Chem Eng Res Des. 117:355–68. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2016.10.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu S, Lyu Q, Zhu J, Liang C. 2018. Experimental study on NOx emissions of pulverized bituminous coal combustion preheated by a circulating fluidized bed. J Inst Energy. 92:247–56. doi:10.1016/j.joei.2018.01.011
   Google Scholar
• Zwart R. W. R. 2009. Gas cleaning downstream biomass gasification - status report 2009. ECN Biomass, Coal and Environmental Research (ECN-E–08-078). https://www.ecn.nl/publications/E/2009/ECN-E–08-078.
   Google Scholar