Electrodialysis reversal applied to tertiary treatment of Kraft pulp mill effluent

References

• Al-Amshawee S, Yunus MYBM, Azoddein AAM, Hassell DG, Dakhil IH, Hasan HA. 2020. Electrodialysis desalination for water and wastewater: A review. Chem Eng J. 380:122231. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albornoz LL, Marder L, Benvenuti T, Bernardes AM. 2019. Electrodialysis applied to the treatment of an university sewage for water recovery. J Environ Chem Eng. 7(2):102982. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2019.102982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anupam K, et al. 2018. Antagonistic, synergistic and interaction effects of process parameters during oxygen delignification of Melia dubia kraft pulp. J Cleaner Prod. 199:420–430. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashrafi O, Yerushalmi L, Haghighat F. 2015. Wastewater treatment in the pulp-and-paper industry: A review of treatment processes and the associated greenhouse gas emission. J Environ Manage. 158:146–157. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asraf-Snir M, Gilron J, Oren Y. 2016. Gypsum scaling of anion exchange membranes in electrodialysis. J Membr Sci. 520:176–186. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2016.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babilas D, Dydo P. 2018. Selective zinc recovery from electroplating wastewaters by electrodialysis enhanced with complex formation. Sep Purif Technol. 192:419–428. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2017.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacher LE, de Oliveira C, Giacobbo A, Benvenuti T, Lacerda AB, Bernardes AM, Rodrigues MAS. 2017. Coupling coagulation using tannin-based product with electrodialysis reversal to water treatment: A case study. J Environ Chem Eng. 5(6):6008–6015. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2017.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros KS, Scarazzato T, Tenório JA, Espinosa DC. 2016. Determinação da corrente limite através da construção de curvas corrente-voltagem para o tratamento de efluente proveniente de galvanoplastia contendo cobre. 22° Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia e Ciência Dos Materiais. p. 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Batista Mendes M, Kawahigashi F, Iyomi Kuroda EK. 2013. Adsorção De Matéria Orgânica Em Carvão Ativado Granular No Pós Tratamento De Lixiviado De Aterro Sanitário. ANAP. 9(11):218–235. doi:10.17271/198008279112013673
   Google Scholar
• Benvenuti T, Krapf RS, Rodrigues MAS, Bernardes AM, Zoppas-Ferreira J. 2014. Recovery of nickel and water from nickel electroplating wastewater by electrodialysis. Sep Purif Technol. 129:106–112. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2014.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benvenuti T, Siqueira Rodrigues MA, Bernardes AM, Zoppas-Ferreira J. 2017. Closing the loop in the electroplating industry by electrodialysis. J Cleaner Prod. 155:130–138. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benvenuti T. 2017. Estudo do transporte iônico no tratamento do efluente de niquelação por eletrodiálise empregando técnicas cronopotenciométricas. Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). http://www.albayan.ae.
   Google Scholar
• Benvenuti T, García-Gabaldón M, Ortega EM, Rodrigues MAS, Bernardes AM, Pérez-Herranz V, Zoppas-Ferreira J. 2017. Influence of the co-ions on the transport of sulfate through anion exchange membranes. J Membr Sci. 542(August):320–328. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2017.08.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brink A, Sheridan C, Harding K. 2018. Combined biological and advance oxidation processes for paper and pulp effluent treatment. S Afr J Chem Eng. 25:116–122. doi:10.1016/j.sajce.2018.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Camponogara G, et al. 2017. Indicadores de referência hidroenergéticos em sistemas de abastecimento de água. In: Simpósio de hidráulica e recursos hídricos dos países de língua portuguesa. Porto, Portugal. p. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• do Carmo Precci Lopes A, Mudadu Silva C, Pereira Rosa A, de Ávila Rodrigues F. 2018. Biogas production from thermophilic anaerobic digestion of kraft pulp mill sludge. Renewable Energy. 124:40–49. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.08.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanworrawoot K, Hunsom M. 2012. Treatment of wastewater from pulp and paper mill industry by electrochemical methods in membrane reactor. J Environ Manage. 113:399–406. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CONAMA. 2005. Resolução 357/2005 do Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente (CONAMA). Brasília, Brasil: Diário Oficial da União. p. 58–63.
   Google Scholar
• CONAMA. 2011. Resolução 430/2011 do Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente (CONAMA). Brasília, Brasil: Diário Oficial da União. p. 9. doi:10.1073/pnas.0703993104
   Google Scholar
• Gally CR, Benvenuti T, da Trindade C. d M, Rodrigues MAS, Zoppas-Ferreira J, Pérez-Herranz V, Bernardes AM. 2018. Electrodialysis for the tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater: Efficiency of ion removal and ageing of ion exchange membranes. J Environ Chem Eng. 6(5):5855–5869. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2018.07.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghyselbrecht K, Silva A, Van der Bruggen B, Boussu K, Meesschaert B, Pinoy L. 2014. Desalination feasibility study of an industrial NaCl stream by bipolar membrane electrodialysis. J Environ Manage. 140:69–75. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu J, Zhang Q, Lee D-J. 2018. Kraft lignin biorefinery: A perspective. Bioresour Technol. 247:1181–1183. doi:10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2017.08.169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBÁ. 2017. Relatório Anual de 2017 da Indústria Brasileira de Árvores. Indústria Brasileira de Árvores. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• Kamali M, Alavi-Borazjani SA, Khodaparast Z, Khalaj M, Jahanshahi A, Costa E, Capela I. 2019. Additive and additive-free treatment technologies for pulp and paper mill effluents: Advances, challenges and opportunities. Water Resour Ind. 21(June):100109. doi:10.1016/j.wri.2019.100109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi L, Ghassemi A. 2015. How operational parameters and membrane characteristics affect the performance of electrodialysis reversal desalination systems: The state of the art articles in press current issue. J Membr Sci Res. 2(3):111–117. doi: 10.22079/jmsr.2016.20309.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi L, Ghassemi A, Zamani Sabzi H. 2018. Quantitative studies of electrodialysis performance. Desalination. 445(June):159–169. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2018.07.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klidi N, Clematis D, Delucchi M, Gadri A, Ammar S, Panizza M. 2018. Applicability of electrochemical methods to paper mill wastewater for reuse. Anodic oxidation with BDD and TiRuSnO2 anodes. J Electroanal Chem. 815:16–23. doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.02.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan J, Sunil Kumar S, Krishna Prasad R. 2020. Characterization of kraft pulp delignification using sodium dithionite as bleaching agent. Chem Eng Commun. 207(6):837–810. doi:10.1080/00986445.2019.1630391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunrath CCN, Patrocínio DC, Siqueira Rodrigues MA, Benvenuti T, Amado FDR. 2020. Electrodialysis reversal as an alternative treatment for producing drinking water from brackish river water: A case study in the dry season, northeastern Brazil. J Environ Chem Eng. 8(2):103719. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2020.103719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachachi Z, Kameche M, Bendjeda S, Meddah K, Hamani H, Boumediene H, Innocent C. 2016. Study of proton leakage at interface of anion-exchange membrane in solutions of acids, salts, and solvents using current/voltage characteristics. Chem Eng Commun. 203(4):566–574. doi:10.1080/00986445.2015.1048801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lide DR, et al. 2009. CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 2009 − 2010. J Am Chem Soc. 131(35):12862. doi:10.1021/ja906434c
   Google Scholar
• Luque Di Salvo J, Cosenza A, Tamburini A, Micale G, Cipollina A. 2018. Long-run operation of a reverse electrodialysis system fed with wastewaters. J Environ Manage. 217:871–887. doi:10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2018.03.110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marder L, Bittencourt SD, Zoppas Ferreira J, Bernardes AM. 2016. Treatment of molybdate solutions by electrodialysis: The effect of pH and current density on ions transport behavior. Sep Purif Technol. 167:32–36. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2016.04.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martí-Calatayud MC, Buzzi DC, García-Gabaldón M, Bernardes AM, Tenório JAS, Pérez-Herranz V. 2014. Ion transport through homogeneous and heterogeneous ion-exchange membranes in single salt and multicomponent electrolyte solutions. J Membr Sci. 466:45–57. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moura RCA, et al. 2014. Estudo da Resistência Ôhmica em membrana de troca catiônica no processo de Eletrodiálise. Revista Iberoamericana de Polímeros Volumen Iber. Polímeros. 15(151):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Nogueira V, Lopes I, Rocha-Santos TAP, Gonçalves F, Pereira R. 2018. Treatment of real industrial wastewaters through nano-TiO2 and nano-Fe2O3 photocatalysis: case study of mining and kraft pulp mill effluents. Environ Technol. 39(12):1586–1596. doi:10.1080/09593330.2017.1334093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong BHY, Walmsley TG, Atkins MJ, Walmsley MRW. 2018. Hydrothermal liquefaction of Radiata Pine with Kraft black liquor for integrated biofuel production. J Cleaner Prod. 199:737–750. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pathak S, Saxena P, Ray AK, Großmann H, Kleinert R. 2019. Irradiation based clean and energy efficient thermochemical conversion of biowaste into paper. J Cleaner Prod. 233:893–902. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrocínio DC, et al. 2019. Concentration effect and operational parameters on electrodialysis reversal efficiency applied for fluoride removal in groundwater. J Environ Chem Eng. 7(6):103491. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2019.103491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peralta-Zamora P, Esposito E, Reyes J, Durán N. 1997. Remediação de efluentes derivados da indústria de papel e celulose. Tratamento biológico e fotocatalítico. Quím Nova. 20(2):186–190. doi:10.1590/S0100-40421997000200010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfromm PH, Tsai SP, Henry MP. 1999. Electrodialysis for bleach effluent recycling in kraft pulp production: Simultaneous control of chloride and other non-process elements. Can J Chem Eng. 77(6):1231–1238. doi:10.1002/cjce.5450770621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabakar D, Suvetha K S, Manimudi VT, Mathimani T, Kumar G, Rene ER, Pugazhendhi A. 2018. Pretreatment technologies for industrial effluents: Critical review on bioenergy production and environmental concerns. J Environ Manage. 218:165–180. doi:10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2018.03.136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puigdomench I. 2001. Hydra Medusa – Make Equilibrium diagrams using sophisticated algorithms. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp HJ, Pfromm PH. 1998. Electrodialysis for chloride removal from the chemical recovery cycle of a Kraft pulp mill. J Membr Sci. 146(2):249–261. doi:10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00122-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarazzato T, Buzzi DC, Bernardes AM, Tenório JAS, Espinosa DCR. 2015. Current-voltage curves for treating effluent containing HEDP: Determination of the limiting current. Braz J Chem Eng. 32(4):831–836. doi:10.1590/0104-6632.20150324s00003511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarazzato T, Panossian Z, Tenório JAS, Pérez-Herranz V, Espinosa DCR. 2017. A review of cleaner production in electroplating industries using electrodialysis. J Cleaner Prod. 168:1590–1602. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma N, Godiyal, RD, Bhawana, et al. 2020. Insight into papermaking characteristics of D0EPD1-bleached soda, soda-AQ and kraft pulps of citronella grass (Cymbopogon winterianus Jowitt). Biomass Convers Biorefin. 1–14. doi:10.1007/s13399-020-00730-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma N, Bhardwaj NK, Singh RBP. 2020. Environmental issues of pulp bleaching and prospects of peracetic acid pulp bleaching: A review. J Cleaner Prod. 256:120338. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen L, Wang X, Li R, Yu H, Hong H, Lin H, Chen J, Liao B-Q. 2017. Physicochemical correlations between membrane surface hydrophilicity and adhesive fouling in membrane bioreactors. J Colloid Interface Sci. 505:900–909. doi:10.1016/J.JCIS.2017.06.090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun M, Wang Y, Shi L, Klemeš JJ. 2018. Uncovering energy use, carbon emissions and environmental burdens of pulp and paper industry: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 92:823–833. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong X, Shen W, Chen X, Corriou J-P. 2018. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of gaseous pollutants for cleaner production in pulp and paper mills. J Cleaner Prod. 198:1066–1075. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venzke CD, Giacobbo A, Ferreira JZ, Bernardes AM, Rodrigues MAS. 2018. Increasing water recovery rate of membrane hybrid process on the petrochemical wastewater treatment. Process Saf Environ Prot. 117:152–158. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2018.04.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viegas C. 2016. Aplicação do processo de eletrodiálise no tratamento de água industrial da indústria petroquímica [Masters dissertation]. Universidade Feevale. https://www.feevale.br/.
   Google Scholar
• Wei K, Shen C, Han W, Li J, Sun X, Shen J, Wang L. 2017. Advance treatment of chemical industrial tailwater by integrated electrochemical technologies: Electrocatalysis, electrodialysis and electro-microfiltration. Chem Eng J. 310:13–21. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2016.10.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphalen APC, Corção G, Benetti AD. 2016. Utilização de carvão ativado biológico para o tratamento de água para consumo humano. Eng Sanit Ambient. 21(3):425–436. doi:10.1590/S1413-41522016143108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabolotskiy VI, But AY, Vasil'eva VI, Akberova EM, Melnikov SS. 2017. Ion transport and electrochemical stability of strongly basic anion-exchange membranes under high current electrodialysis conditions. Membr Sci. 526:60–72. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar