A critical review on the techno-economic analysis of membrane gas absorption for CO₂ capture

References

• Abdulhameed MA, Othman MHD, Ismail AF, Matsuura T, Harun Z, Rahman MA, Puteh MH, Jaafar J, Rezaei M, Hubadillah SK. 2017. Carbon dioxide capture using a superhydrophobic ceramic hollow fibre membrane for gas-liquid contacting process. J Clean Prod. 140:1731–1738. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Zahra MRM, Niederer JPM, Feron PHM, Versteeg GF. 2007. CO2 capture from power plants: Part II. A parametric study of the economical performance based on mono-ethanolamine. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 1(2):135–142. doi:10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00032-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad AL, Mohammed HN, Ooi BS, Leo CP. 2013. Deposition of a polymeric porous superhydrophobic thin layer on the surface of poly(vinylidenefluoride) hollow fiber membrane. Pol J Chem Technol. 15(3):1–6. doi:10.2478/pjct-2013-0036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad NA, Mohd Noh AN, Leo CP, Ahmad AL. 2017. CO2 removal using membrane gas absorption with PVDF membrane incorporated with POSS and SAPO-34 zeolite. Chem Eng Res Des. 118:238–247. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2016.12.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias AM, Mussati MC, Mores PL, Scenna NJ, Caballero JA, Mussati SF. 2016. Optimization of multi-stage membrane systems for CO2 capture from flue gas. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 53:371–390. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonalumi D, Lillia S, Valenti G. 2019. Rate-based simulation and techno-economic analysis of coal-fired power plants with aqueous ammonia carbon capture. Energy Convers Manag. 199:111966. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Muñoz R, Fíla V, Dung CT. 2017. Mixed Matrix Membranes Based on PIMs for Gas Permeation: Principles, Synthesis, and Current Status. Chem Eng Commun. 204(3):295–309. doi:10.1080/00986445.2016.1273832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakradhar RPS, Prasad G, Bera P, Anandan C. 2014. Stable superhydrophobic coatings using PVDF–MWCNT nanocomposite. Appl Surf Sci. 301:208–215. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.02.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Shen Q, Gong H, Du M. 2020. Preparation of a novel dual-layer polyvinylidene fluoride hollow fiber composite membrane with hydrophobic inner layer for carbon dioxide absorption in a membrane contactor. Sep Purif Technol. 248:117045. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dastbaz A, Karimi-Sabet J, Ahadi H, Amini Y. 2017. Preparation and characterization of novel modified PVDF-HFP/GO/ODS composite hollow fiber membrane for Caspian Sea water desalination. Desalination. 424:62–73. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2017.09.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fashandi H, Ghodsi A, Saghafi R, Zarrebini M. 2016. CO2 absorption using gas-liquid membrane contactors made of highly porous poly(vinyl chloride) hollow fiber membranes. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 52:13–23. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueroa JR, Cuenca HE. 2017. Membrane Gas Absorption Processes: Applications, Design and Perspectives. In: Du H, Thompson A, Wang X, editors. Osmotically Driven Membrane Processes Approach, Development and Current Status. London (RBKC): IntechOpen. p. 254–272.
   Google Scholar
• Ghobadi J, Ramirez D, Khoramfar S, Jerman R, Crane M, Hobbs K. 2018. Simultaneous absorption of carbon dioxide and nitrogen dioxide from simulated flue gas stream using gas-liquid membrane contacting system. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 77:37–45. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.07.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilassi S, Taghavi SM, Rodrigue D, Kaliaguine S. 2020. Techno-economic evaluation of membrane and enzymatic-absorption processes for CO2 capture from flue-gas. Sep Purif Technol. 248:116941. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano L, Roizard D, Bounaceur R, Favre E. 2017. Evaluating the effects of CO2 capture benchmarks on efficiency and costs of membrane systems for post-combustion capture: A parametric simulation study. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 63:449–461. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond GP, Spargo J. 2014. The prospects for coal-fired power plants with carbon capture and storage: A UK perspective. Energy Convers Manag. 86:476–489. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanak DP, Manovic V. 2018. Techno-economic feasibility assessment of CO2 capture from coal-fired power plants using molecularly imprinted polymer. Fuel. 214:512–520. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Hägg M-B. 2014. Energy Efficient Process for CO2 Capture from Flue gas with Novel Fixed-site-carrier Membranes. Energy Procedia. 63:174–185. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.018
   Google Scholar
• Ho MT, Allinson GW, Wiley DE. 2011. Comparison of MEA capture cost for low CO2 emissions sources in Australia. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 5(1):49–60. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Merkel TC, Baker RW. 2014. Pressure ratio and its impact on membrane gas separation processes. J Membr Sci. 463:33–40. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang K, Li K, Yu H, Chen Z, Wardhaugh L, Feron P. 2017. Advancement of ammonia based post-combustion CO2 capture using the advanced flash stripper process. Appl Energy. 202:496–506. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang K, Yu H, Chen L, Fang M, Azzi M, Cottrell A, Li K. 2020. An advanced, ammonia-based combined NOx/SOx/CO2 emission control process towards a low-cost, clean coal technology. Appl Energy. 260:114316. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung J, Jeong YS, Lim Y, Lee CS, Han C. 2013. Advanced CO2 capture process using MEA scrubbing: Configuration of a split flow and phase separation heat exchanger. Energy Procedia. 37:1778–1784. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.054
   Google Scholar
• Kaldis SP, Skodras G, Grammelis P, Sakellaropoulos GP. 2007. Application of polymer membrane technology in coal combustion processes. Chem Eng Commun. 194(3):322–333. doi:10.1080/15397730600830021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball E, Al-Azki A, Gomez A, Goetheer E, Booth N, Adams D, Ferre D. 2014. Hollow fiber membrane contactors for CO2 capture: modeling and up-scaling to CO2 capture for an 800 MWe coal power station. Oil Gas Sci Technol Rev Ifp Energies Nouvelles. 69(6):1047–1058. doi:10.2516/ogst/2013165
   Google Scholar
• Kujawa J, Rozicka A, Cerneaux S, Kujawski W. 2014. The influence of surface modification on the physicochemical properties of ceramic membranes. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 443:567–575. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.10.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo C-Y, Lin H-N, Tsai H-A, Wang D-M, Lai J-Y. 2008. Fabrication of a high hydrophobic PVDF membrane via nonsolvent induced phase separation. Desalination. 233(1-3):40–47. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.09.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee E-J, An AK, He T, Woo YC, Shon HK. 2016. Electrospun nanofiber membranes incorporating fluorosilane-coated TiO2 nanocomposite for direct contact membrane distillation. J Membr Sci. 520:145–154. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2016.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J-Y, Keener TC, Yang YJ. 2009. Potential flue gas impurities in carbon dioxide streams separated from coal-fired power plants. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 59(6):725–732. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.59.6.725
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li K, Cousins A, Yu H, Feron P, Tade M, Luo W, Chen J. 2016. Systematic study of aqueous monoethanolamine-based CO2 capture process: model development and process improvement. Energy Sci Eng. 4(1):23–39. doi:10.1002/ese3.101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li K, Leigh W, Feron P, Yu H, Tade M. 2016. Systematic study of aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA)-based CO2 capture process: Techno-economic assessment of the MEA process and its improvements. Appl Energy. 165:648–659. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.12.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Wang L, Hu X, Jin P, Song X. 2018. Surface modification to produce superhydrophobic hollow fiber membrane contactor to avoid membrane wetting for biogas purification under pressurized conditions. Sep Purif Technol. 194:222–230. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2017.11.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li K, Yu H, Yan S, Feron P, Wardhaugh L, Tade M. 2016. Technoeconomic assessment of an advanced aqueous ammonia-based postcombustion capture process integrated with a 650-MW coal-fired power station. Environ Sci Technol. 50(19):10746–10755. doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b02737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin J, Lin F, Liu R, Li P, Fang S, Ye W, Zhao S. 2020. Scalable fabrication of robust superhydrophobic membranes by one-step spray-coating for gravitational water-in-oil emulsion separation. Sep Purif Technol. 231:115898. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2019.115898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S-H, Tung K-L, Chen W-J, Chang H-W. 2009. Absorption of carbon dioxide by mixed piperazine–alkanolamine absorbent in a plasma-modified polypropylene hollow fiber contactor. J Membr Sci. 333(1-2):30–37. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.01.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y, Xu Y, Loh CH, Wang R. 2018. Development of robust fluorinated TiO2/PVDF composite hollow fiber membrane for CO2 capture in gas-liquid membrane contactor. Appl Surf Sci. 436:670–681. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzolini G, Sanchez Fernandez E, Rezvani S, Macchi E, Goetheer ELV, Vlugt TJH. 2015. Economic assessment of novel amine based CO2 capture technologies integrated in power plants based on European Benchmarking Task Force methodology. Appl Energy. 138:546–558. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mat NC, Lipscomb GG. 2017. Membrane process optimization for carbon capture. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 62:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu P, Bolland O. 2013. Comparison of Costs for Natural gas Power Generation with CO2 Capture. Energy Procedia. 37:2406–2419. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.122
   Google Scholar
• Merkel TC, Lin H, Wei X, Baker R. 2010. Power plant post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: An opportunity for membranes. J Membr Sci. 359(1-2):126–139. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merlet RB, Pizzoccaro-Zilamy M-A, Nijmeijer A, Winnubst L. 2020. Hybrid ceramic membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration: State-of-the-art and challenges. J Membr Sci. 599:117839. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2020.117839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moioli S, Pellegrini LA, Ho MT, Wiley DE. 2019. A comparison between amino acid based solvent and traditional amine solvent processes for CO2 removal. Chem Eng Res Des. 146:509–517. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2019.04.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo JQ, Lee ST, Jawad ZA, Ahmad AL, Lee RJ, Yeap SP, Sum JY. 2020. The influence of cellulose acetate butyrate membrane structure on the improvement of CO2/N2 separation. Chem Eng Commun. 207(12):1707–1718. doi:10.1080/00986445.2019.1680365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimmanterdwong P, Chalermsinsuwan B, Piumsomboon P. 2017. Emergy analysis of three alternative carbon dioxide capture processes. Energy. 128:101–108. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obek CA, Ayittey FK, Saptoro A. 2019. Improved process modifications of aqueous ammonia-based CO2 capture system. MATEC Web Conf. 268:02004. doi:10.1051/matecconf/201926802004
   Google Scholar
• Pagliero M, Bottino A, Comite A, Costa C. 2020. Novel hydrophobic PVDF membranes prepared by nonsolvent induced phase separation for membrane distillation. J Membr Sci. 596:117575. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panja P, Pack TX, Deo M. 2021. Operational optimization of absorption column in capturing CO2 from flue gas in coal-fired power plant. Chem Eng Commun. 208(9):1344–1357. doi:10.1080/00986445.2020.1774375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puppolo MM, Hughey JR, Weber B, Dillon T, Storey D, Cerkez E, Jansen-Varnum S. 2017. Plasma modification of microporous polymer membranes for application in biomimetic dissolution studies. AAPS Open. 3(1):9. doi:10.1186/s41120-017-0019-4
   Google Scholar
• Ren L-X, Chang F-L, Kang D-Y, Chen C-L. 2020. Hybrid membrane process for post-combustion CO2 capture from coal-fired power plant. J Membr Sci. 603:118001. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik KP, Yeh JT, Pennline HW. 2004. Aqua ammonia process for simultaneous removal of CO2, SO2 and NOx. IJETM. 4(1/2):89–104. doi:10.1504/IJETM.2004.004634
   Google Scholar
• Rinprasertmeechai S, Chavadej S, Rangsunvigit P, Kulprathipanja S. 2012. Carbon Dioxide Removal from Flue Gas Using Amine-Based Hybrid Solvent Absorption. Int J Chem Molecular Eng. 6(4):284–288. 10.5281/zenodo.1332828.
   Google Scholar
• Rosli A, Ahmad AL, Lim JK, Low SC. 2017. Advances in Liquid Absorbents for CO2 Capture: A Review. JPS. 28(Suppl. 1):121–144. doi:10.21315/jps2017.28.s1.8
   Google Scholar
• Rosli A, Ahmad AL, Low SC. 2019. Anti-wetting polyvinylidene fluoride membrane incorporated with hydrophobic polyethylene-functionalized-silica to improve CO2 removal in membrane gas absorption. Sep Purif Technol. 221:275–285. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2019.03.094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosli A, Ahmad AL, Low SC. 2020a. Functionalization of silica nanoparticles to reduce membrane swelling in CO2 absorption process. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 95(4):1073–1084. doi:10.1002/jctb.6289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosli A, Ahmad AL, Low SC. 2020b. Enhancing membrane hydrophobicity using silica end-capped with organosilicon for CO2 absorption in membrane contactor. Sep Purif Technol. 251:117429. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosli A, Paul SAS, Low SC. 2021. Computational analysis of atomic binding energy for organosilicon-low-density polyethylene-coated silica embedded in polyvinylidene fluoride composite membrane for membrane gas absorption. Int J Energy Res. 45(10):15372–15388. doi:10.1002/er.6810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussanaly S. 2019. Calculating CO2 avoidance costs of Carbon Capture and Storage from industry. Carbon Manag. 10(1):105–112. doi:10.1080/17583004.2018.1553435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussanaly S, Anantharaman R, Lindqvist K, Hagen B. 2018. A new approach to the identification of high-potential materials for cost-efficient membrane-based post-combustion CO2 capture. Sustainable Energy Fuels. 2(6):1225–1243. doi:10.1039/C8SE00039E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussanaly S, Anantharaman R, Lindqvist K, Zhai H, Rubin E. 2016. Membrane properties required for post-combustion CO2 capture at coal-fired power plants. J Membr Sci. 511:250–264. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2016.03.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussanaly S, Lindqvist K, Anantharaman R, Jakobsen J. 2014. A Systematic Method for Membrane CO2 Capture Modeling and Analysis. Energy Procedia. 63:217–224. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.023
   Google Scholar
• Shimada K, Seekkuarachchi IN, Kumazawa H. 2006. Absorption of CO2 into Aqueous Solutions of Sterically Hindered Methyl Aminoethanol Using a Hydrophobic Microporous Hollow Fiber Contained Contactor. Chem Eng Commun. 193(1):38–54. doi:10.1080/009864490923484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song QQ, Jiang QZ, Song ZZ, Yuan B, Song WJ. 2013. Economic Evaluation of CO2 Separation Technologies in Chinese Refineries. AMR. 864-867:1725–1731. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.864-867.1725
   Google Scholar
• Tang H, Zhang Y, Wang F, Zhang H, Guo Y. 2016. Long-Term Stability of Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Hollow Fiber Membranes for CO2 Capture. Energy Fuels. 30(1):492–503. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b01789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teoh GH, Chin JY, Ooi BS, Jawad ZA, Leow HTL, Low SC. 2020. Superhydrophobic membrane with hierarchically 3D-microtexture to treat saline water by deploying membrane distillation. J Water Process Eng. 37:101528. doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turi DM, Ho M, Ferrari MC, Chiesa P, Wiley DE, Romano MC. 2017. CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycles by CO2 selective membranes. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 61:168–183. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.03.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valencia-Marquez D, Flores-Tlacuahuac A, Ricardez-Sandoval L. 2015. Technoeconomic and Dynamical Analysis of a CO2 Capture Pilot-Scale Plant Using Ionic Liquids. Ind Eng Chem Res. 54(45):11360–11370. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Spek M, Sanchez Fernandez E, Eldrup NH, Skagestad R, Ramirez A, Faaij A. 2017. Unravelling uncertainty and variability in early stage techno-economic assessments of carbon capture technologies. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 56:221–236. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.11.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Liu Z, Wang E, Yuan R, Gao D, Zhang X, Zhu Y. 2015. A robust superhydrophobic PVDF composite coating with wear/corrosion-resistance properties. Appl Surf Sci. 332:518–524. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei X, Zhao B, Li X-M, Wang Z, He B-Q, He T, Jiang B. 2012. CF4 plasma surface modification of asymmetric hydrophilic polyethersulfone membranes for direct contact membrane distillation. J Membr Sci. 407-408:164–175. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2012.03.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Więcław-Solny L, Tatarczuk A, Stec M, Krótki A. 2014. Advanced CO2 Capture Pilot Plant at Tauron’s coal-fired Power Plant: Initial Results and Further Opportunities. Energy Procedia. 63:6318–6322. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.664
   Google Scholar
• Wu X, Zhao B, Wang L, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Zhao X, Guo X. 2016. Hydrophobic PVDF/graphene hybrid membrane for CO2 absorption in membrane contactor. J Membr Sci. 520:120–129. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2016.07.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu G, Wu Y, Yang Y, Zhang K, Song X. 2013. A novel integrated system with power generation, CO2 capture, and heat supply. Appl Therm Eng. 61(2):110–120. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan S, Fang M, Wang Z, Xue J, Luo Z. 2011. Economic analysis of CO2 separation from coal-fired flue gas by chemical absorption and membrane absorption technologies in China. Energy Procedia. 4:1878–1885. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.066
   Google Scholar
• Yan S, Fang M, Zhang W, Zhong W, Luo Z, Cen K. 2008. Comparative analysis of CO2 separation from flue gas by membrane gas absorption technology and chemical absorption technology in China. Energy Convers Manag. 49(11):3188–3197. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2008.05.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Li X-M, Gilron J, Kong D, Yin Y, Oren Y, Linder C, He T. 2014. CF4 plasma-modified superhydrophobic PVDF membranes for direct contact membrane distillation. J Membr Sci. 456:155–161. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2014.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu X, An L, Yang J, Tu S-T, Yan J. 2015. CO2 capture using a superhydrophobic ceramic membrane contactor. J Membr Sci. 496:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2015.08.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun S, Oh S-Y, Kim J-K. 2020. Techno-economic assessment of absorption-based CO2 capture process based on novel solvent for coal-fired power plant. Appl Energy. 268:114933. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zha D, Mei S, Wang Z, Li H, Shi Z, Jin Z. 2011. Superhydrophobic polyvinylidene fluoride/graphene porous materials. Carbon. 49(15):5166–5172. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2011.07.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai H, Rubin ES. 2013. Techno-Economic Assessment of Polymer Membrane Systems for Postcombustion Carbon Capture at Coal-Fired Power Plants. Environ Sci Technol. 47(6):3006–3014. doi:10.1021/es3050604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, He X, Gundersen T. 2013. Post-combustion Carbon Capture with a Gas Separation Membrane: Parametric Study, Capture Cost, and Exergy Analysis. Energy Fuels. 27(8):4137–4149. doi:10.1021/ef3021798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Qu R, Sha Y, Wang X, Yang L. 2015. Membrane gas absorption for CO2 capture from flue gas containing fine particles and gaseous contaminants. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 33:10–17. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao F, Ma Z, Xiao K, Xiang C, Wang H, Huang X, Liang S. 2018. Hierarchically textured superhydrophobic polyvinylidene fluoride membrane fabricated via nanocasting for enhanced membrane distillation performance. Desalination. 443:228–236. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2018.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar