Publish or Perish: How Are Research and Reputation Related?

Notes

• J. F. Volkwein, and K. V. Sweitzer, , “Institutional prestige and reputation among research universities and liberal arts colleges,” Research in Higher Education 47, (2) (2006): 129–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. A. Kirk, H. J. Kil, and K. Corcoran, , “Picky, picky, picky: ranking graduate schools of social work by student selectivity,” Journal of Social Work Education 45, (1) (2009): 65–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Auspurg, T. Hinz, and J. Güdler, , “Emergence of an academic elite? The impact of universities’ size and reputation on research funding,” Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 60, (4) (2008): 653–685.
   Google Scholar
• M.-H. Huang, H.-W. Chang, and D.-Z. Chen, , “Research evaluation of research-oriented universities in Taiwan from 1993 to 2003,” Scientometrics 67, (3) (2006): 419–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. N. Bastedo, and N. Bowman, , “U.S. News and World Report college rankings: modeling institutional effects on organizational reputation,” American Journal of Education 116, (2) (2010): 163–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Boulton, , “University rankings: diversity, excellence and the European initiative,” Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences 13 (2011): 74–82.
   Google Scholar
• N. A. Bowman, and M. N. Bastedo, , “Anchoring effects in world university rankings: exploring biases in reputation scores,” Higher Education 61, 4 (2011): 431–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Safón, , “Measuring the reputation of top US business schools: a MIMIC modeling approach,” Corporate Reputation Review 12, (3) (2009): 204–228.
   Google Scholar
• V. Safón, , “Factors that influence recruiters’ choice of b-schools and their MBA graduates: evidence and implications for b-schools,” The Academy of Management Learning and Education 6, (2) (2007): 217–233.
   Google Scholar
• N. A. Bowman, and M. N. Bastedo, , “Getting on the front page: organizational reputation, status signals, and the impact of U.S. news and world report on student decisions,” Research in Higher Education 50, (5) (2009): 415–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Brennan, , R. Brodnick, and D. Pinckley, , “De-Mystifying the U.S. news rankings: how to understand what matters, what doesn’t and what you can actually do about it,” Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 17, (2) (2007): 169–188.
   Google Scholar
• P. Cyrenne, and H. Grant, , “University decision making and prestige: an empirical study,” Economics of Education Review 28, (2) (2009): 237–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anon, , “Publish or perish,” Nature 193, (4817) (1962): 709.
   Google Scholar
• R. J. Good, , “Publish or perish — some solutions,” Chemical and Engineering News 42, (36) (1964): 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• A. Mackay, , “Publish or perish,” Nature 250, (5469) (1974): 698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Lofthouse, , “Thoughts on “publish or perish,” Higher Education 3, (1) (1974): 59–80.
   Google Scholar
• A. S. Relman, , “Publish or perish—or both,” The New England Journal of Medicine 297, (13) (1977): 724–725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. F. Nash, and D. C. Walsh, , “Research plans for current basic surgical trainees: still publish or perish?,” Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 82, (10 Suppl) (2000): 336–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Y. Rhee, , “Carpe diem. Retooling the “publish or perish” model into the “share and survive” model,” Plant Physiology 134, (2) (2004): 543–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Clapham, , “Publish or perish,” BioScience 55, (5) (2005): 390–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. K. Schachman, , “From “publish or perish” to “patent and prosper”,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 281, (11) (2006): 6889–6903.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• M. De Rond, and A. N. Miller, , “Publish or perish: bane or boon of academic life?,” Journal of Management Inquiry 14, (4) (2005): 321–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Angell, , “Publish or perish: a proposal,” Annals of Internal Medicine 104, (2) (1986): 261–262.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• B. A. Solagberu, , “Literature search in medical publications,” West African Journal of Medicine 21, (4) (2002): 329–331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D. Yimin, , “Chinese academy of sciences: in China, publish or perish is becoming the new reality,” Science 291, (5508) (2001): 1477–1479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Qiu, , “Publish or perish in China,” Nature 463, (7278) (2010): 142–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. de Meis, A. Velloso, D. Lannes, M. S. Carmo, and C. de Meis, , “The growing competition in Brazilian science: rites of passage, stress and burnout,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 36, (9) (2003): 1135–1141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Plümper, and C. M. Radaelli, , “Publish or perish? Publications and citations of Italian political scientists in international political science journals, 1990–2002,” Journal of European Public Policy 11, (6) (2004): 1112–1127.
   Google Scholar
• M. M. De Villiers, S. F. Malan, , “Publish or perish: how is pharmacy research coping in a changing South Africa?,” South African Journal of Science 93, (8) (1997): 355–358.
   Google Scholar
• A. P. Smith, , “Publish or perish: the write thing for nursing,” Nursing Economics 22, (6) (2004): 342–343.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• G. Parchomovsky, , “Publish or perish,” Michigan Law Review 98, (4) (2000): 926–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. B. Mitchell, and M. Reichel, , “Publish or perish: a dilemma for academic librarians?,” College and Research Libraries 60, (3) (1999): 232–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. A. Frost, N. D. Phillips, and T. R. Clear, , “Productivity of criminal justice scholars across the career,” Journal of Criminal Justice Education 18, 3 (2007): 428–443.
   Google Scholar
• B. McKercher, , “A citation analysis of tourism scholars,” Tourism Management 29, (6) (2008): 1226–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Bunz, , “Publish or perish: a limited author analysis of ICA and NCA journals,” Journal of Communication 55, (4) (2005): 703–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. F. Noè, & D. J. Batten, , “Ȝ‘Publish or perish’: the pitfalls of duplicate publication,” Palaeontology 49, (6) (2006): 1365–1367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.-Y. Wang, Z.-X. Zhou, H.-L. Fang, and X.-L. Liu, , “The bibliometric characteristics of Chinese Medical Core Journals,” Serials Review 37, (1) (2011): 9–13 10.1016/j.serrev.2010.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Sadée, , “Publish or perish, and the journal glut,” Pharmaceutical Research 7, (4) (1990): 433–434.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• E. C. Halperin, , “Publish or perish — and bankrupt the medical library while we’re at it,” Academic Medicine 74, (5) (1999): 470–472.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• M. Gad-El-Hak, , “Publish or perish — an ailing enterprise?,” Physics Today 57, (3) (2004): 61–62.
   Google Scholar
• D. M. Chiu, and T.Z.J. Fu, , ““Publish or perish” in the internet age — a study of publication statistics in computer networking research,” Computer Communication Review 40, (1) (2010): 34–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Shaban, , “Multiple authorship trends in prestigious journals from 1950 to 2005,” Saudi Medical Journal 28, (6) (2007): 927–932.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• T. D. Englebrecht, S. A. Hanke, and Kuang, Y., “An assessment of patterns of co-authorship for academic accountants within premier journals: evidence from 1979–2004,” Advances in Accounting 24, (2) (2008): 172–181.
   Google Scholar
• F. P. de Villiers, , “Publish or perish—the growing trend towards multiple authorship,” South African Medical Journal 66, (23) (1984): 882–883.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• G. Holden, G. Rosenberg, K. Barker, and P. Onghena, , “An assessment of the predictive validity of impact factor scores: implications for academic employment decisions in social work,” Research on Social Work Practice 16, (6) (2006): 613–624.
   Google Scholar
• li, Xue-L.Fang, Hong-lingMei-ying, and Wang, Serials Review, 37 (3) (2011): 157–161.
   Google Scholar
• Anon., , “E-publish or perish,” Economist 395, 8676 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• P. őleszyński, , “The position of Polish geographical journals and series as seen in the Google Scholar databases,” Przeglad Geograficzny 81, (4) (2009): 551–578.
   Google Scholar
• P. Jacsó, , “Calculating the h-index and other bibliometric and scientometric indicators from Google Scholar with the Publish or Perish software,” Online Information Review 33, (6) (2009): 1189–1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Dazey, and B. Parks, , “Thoughts on Open Access: an interview with Diane Graves,” Serials Review 36, (2) (2010): 112–115.
   Google Scholar
• B. N. Lizotte, , “Publish or perish: the electronic availability of summary judgments by eight district courts,” Wisconsin Law Review, (1) (2007): 107–149.
   Google Scholar
• J. Cohen, , “Publish or perish—is open access the only way forward?,” International Journal of Infectious Diseases 10, (6) (2006): 417–418.
   Google Scholar
• H. Chanson, , “Research quality, publications, and impact in civil engineering into the 21st century. Publish or perish, commercial versus open access, internet versus libraries?,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 34, (8) (2007): 946–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Vinkler, , “The π-index: a new indicator for assessing scientific impact,” Journal of Information Science 35, (5) (2009): 602–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Eisenberg, M. T. Wells, , “Ranking and explaining the scholarly impact of law schools,” The Journal of Legal Studies 27 (1998): 3732 PART I.
   Google Scholar
• G. Franco, , “Publish or perish: the scientific productivity of academics in the field of Occupational Medicine,” Medicina del Lavoro 100, (3) (2009): 163–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• H. M. Ortner, , “The impact factor and other performance measures — much used with little knowledge about,” International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials 28, (5) (2010): 559–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Pautasso, and H. Schäfer, , “Peer review delay and selectivity in ecology journals,” Scientometrics 84, (2) (2010): 307–315.
   Google Scholar
• V. A. Cartwright, and C.N.J. McGhee, , “Ophthalmology and vision science research. Part 1: understanding and using journal impact factors and citation indices,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 31, (10) (2005): 1999–2007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Bontis, and A. Serenko, , “A follow-up ranking of academic journals,” Journal of Knowledge Management 13, (1) (2009): 16–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouimet, M.Bédard, P.-O. and Gélineau, F. “Are the h-index and some of its alternatives discriminatory of epistemological beliefs and methodological preferences of faculty members? The case of social scientists in Quebec,” Scientometrics, 88 (1) (2011): 91–106.
   Google Scholar
• D. Truex, M. Cuellar, and H. Takeda, , “Assessing scholarly influence: using the Hirsch indices to reframe the discourse,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10, (7) (2009): 560–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. L. Sellers, S. G. Mathiesen, R. Perry, and T. Smith, , “Evaluation of social work journal quality: citation versus reputation approaches,” Journal of Social Work Education 40, (1) (2004): 143–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Schläpfer, , “How much does journal reputation tell us about the academic interest and relevance of economic research?,” Gaia 19, (2) (2010): 140–145.
   Google Scholar
• A. Parameswaran, and R. Sebastian, , “The value of South and Southeast Asian Studies Journal Rankings,” Serials Review 32, (3) (2006): 154–163.
   Google Scholar
• L. V. Ellis, and G. C. Durden, , “Why economists rank their journals the way they do,” Journal of Economics and Business 43, (3) (1991): 265–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.-W.K. Harzing, and R. van der Wal, , “Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis,” Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8, (1) (2008): 61–73.
   Google Scholar
• H. Long, L. N. Boggess, and W. G. Jennings, , “Re-assessing publication productivity among academic “stars” in criminology and criminal justice,” Journal of Criminal Justice Education 22, (1) (2011): 102–117.
   Google Scholar
• D. R. Euben, , “Publish or perish: the ever-higher publications hurdle for tenure,” Academe 88, (4) (2002): 78.
   Google Scholar
• M. Heesacker, and T. R. Elliott, , “My dog’s better than your dog: publication counts and quality of clinical psychology PhD training,” Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 14, (2) (2007): 175–178.
   Google Scholar
• R. Plomp, , “The highly cited papers of professors as an indicator of a research group’s scientific performance,” Scientometrics 29, (3) (1974): 377–393.
   Google Scholar
• Macleans, , “Canadian University Rankings,” http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/rankings/. accessed August 23, 2011
   Google Scholar
• DAAD, , “German University Rankings,” http://www.daad.de/deutschland/hochschulen/hochschulranking/06543.en.html.accessed August 23, 2011
   Google Scholar
• Guardian, , “UK University Rankings,” http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/table/2011/may/17/university-league-table-2012. accessed August 23, 2011
   Google Scholar
• ARWU, , “Academic Ranking of World Universities,” http://www.arwu.org/index.jsp. accessed August 23, 2011
   Google Scholar
• QS, , “Quacquarelli Symonds Limited Ranking of World Universities,” http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings. accessed August 23, 2011
   Google Scholar
• WR, , “Webometrics Ranking of World Universities,” http://www.webometrics.info/. accessed August 23, 2011
   Google Scholar
• HEEACT, , “Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan,” http://www.heeact.edu.tw/mp.asp?mp=4. accessed August 23, 2011
   Google Scholar
• J. Billaut, D. Bouyssou, and P. Vinke, , “Should we believe the Shanghai ranking? An MCDM view,” Scientometrics 84, (1) (2010): 237–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Marginson, M. van der Wende, , “To rank or to be ranked: the impact of global rankings on higher education,” Journal of Studies in International Education 11, (3/4) (2007): 306–329.
   Google Scholar
• Răzvan V. Florian, , “Irreproducibility of the results of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities,” Scientometrics 72, (1) (2007): 25–32 10.1007/s11192-007-1712-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. C. Liu, and Y. Cheng, , “The Academic Ranking of World Universities — methodologies and problems,” Higher Education in Europe 30, (2) (2005): 127–136.
   Google Scholar
• N. C. Liu, and Y. Cheng, , “Examining major rankings according to the Berlin principles,” Higher Education in Europe 33, (2/3) (2008): 201–208.
   Google Scholar
• A.F.J. van Raan, , “Fatal attraction — conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods,” Scientometrics 62, (1) (2005): 133–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isidro F. Aguillo, Judit Bar-Ilan, Mark Levene, and Jose Luis Ortega, , “Comparing university rankings,” Scientometrics 85 (2010): 243–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. F. Aguillo, B. Granadino, J. L. Ortega, and M. Fernandez, , “Webometric ranking of world universities: introduction, methodology, and future developments,” Higher Education in Europe 33, (2/3) (2008): 234–244.
   Google Scholar
• Andrejs Rauhvargers, , Global University Rankings and Their Impact, (Brussels: European University Association, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• H. Andersen, , “Influence and reputation in the social sciences — how much do researchers agree?,” Journal of Documentation 56, (6) (2000): 674–692.
   Google Scholar
• B. L. Andersen, S. J. Beck, R. A. Bornstein, C. F. Emery, M. A. Fristad, J. K. Kiecolt-Glaser, D. R. Strunk, J. F. Thayer, M. W. Vasey, K. O. Yeates, , “Problematic methods in the assessment of scholarly productivity in clinical PhD programs,” Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 15, (1) (2008): 102–104.
   Google Scholar
• T. J. Gaeta, , “Authorship: ‘law’ and order,” Academic Emergency Medicine 6, (4) (1999): 297–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. F. Nash, , “Equilibrium points in N-person games,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science on the United States of America 36, (1) (1950): 48–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. F. Nash, , “The bargaining problem,” Econometrica 18, (4) (1950): 155–161.
   Google Scholar