References
- Anderson, K. (2016, February 1). 96 things publishers do—2016 edition [Web log post]. The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2016/02/01/guest-post-kent-anderson-updated-96-things-publishers-do-2016-edition/.
- Anderson, K. (2017, September 7). A confusion of journals: What is PubMed now? [Web log post]. The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/09/07/confusion-journals-pubmed-now/.
- Anderson, R. (2017, February 21). The forbidden forecast: Thinking about open access and library subscriptions [Web log post]. The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/02/21/forbidden-forecast-thinking-open-access-library-subscriptions/.
- Barok, D., Berry, J., Balázs, B., Dockray, S., Goldsmith, K., Iles, A., … Snelting, F. (2015, November 30). In solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-Hub [letter]. Custodians Online. Retrieved from http://custodians.online/.
- Beall, J. (2008). Potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers. Retrieved from http://beallslist.weebly.com/.
- Björk, B. (2011). A study of innovative features in scholarly open access journals. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4), e115. Retrieved from https://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e115/. doi:10.2196/jmir.1802.
- Bohannon, J. (2016, April 28). Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone. Science. Retrieved from http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/whos-downloading-pirated-papers-everyone.
- Bond, S. (2017, January 23). Dear scholars, delete your account at academia.edu. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/drsarahbond/2017/01/23/dear-scholars-delete-your-account-at-academia-edu/#710ddd182d62.
- Borghi, J. (2014, March 3). Skirting around paywalls: How scientists quickly get the articles they need [Web log post]. The Incubator: Hatching Conversations About Science. Retrieved from http://incubator.rockefeller.edu/skirting-around-paywalls-how-scientists-quickly-get-the-articles-they-need/.
- Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2012, September 12). Ten years on from the Budapest Open Access Initiative: Setting the default to open. Retrieved from http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai-10-recommendations.
- Buranyi, S. (2017, June 27). Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science.
- Carroll, D., & McArthur, J. (2013, September 2). The Open Access Button: It's time we capture individual moments of paywall injustice and turn them into positive change [Web log post]. LSE Impact Blog. Retrieved from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2013/09/02/the-open-access-button-carroll-mcarthur/.
- Charlesworth, A. (2017, September 8). #icanhazpdf is probably the second age of academic piracy after the cumbersome ‘email the author’ and before the smooth yet illegal sci-hub [Tweet]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/Miko_Charleswor/status/906202633098203136.
- Chen, L., Cuplinskas, D., Eisen, M., Friend, F., Genova, Y., Guédon, J. C., … Velterop, J. (2002, February 14). Read the Budapest Open Access Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read.
- Chopin, A. (2016, May). Five truths about science publishing or why all science should be free [Web log post]. Bitesize Bio: Science, Communication and Ethics. Retrieved from http://bitesizebio.com/28276/five-truths-science-publishing-science-free/.
- Clarke, M. (2013, December 11). The end of an era for Academia.edu and other academic networks? [Web log post]. The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/12/11/has-elsevi-er-signaled-a-new-era-for-academia-edu-and-other-prof-essional-networks/.
- Coalition for Responsible Sharing. (2017, October 5). Coalition statement: Publishers and societies take action against ResearchGate's copyright infringements. Retrieved from http://www.responsiblesharing.org/coalition-statement/.
- Collins, E., & Milloy, C. (2016). OAPEN-UK final report. Retrieved from http://oapen-uk.jiscebooks.org/files/2016/01/OAPEN-UK-final-report.pdf.
- Corker, K. (2017, August 18). Bye bye, academia.edu and ResearchGate—hello PsyArXiv! [Web log post]. Science of Psych. Retrieved from https://scienceofpsych.wordpress.com/2017/08/18/bye-bye-academia-edu-and-researchgate-hello-psyarxiv/.
- Crossick, G. (2015). Monographs and open access: A report to HEFCE. Retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rereports/year/2015/monographs/.
- Curry, S. (2015, April 29). Can we amend the laws of scholarly publication? [ Web log post]. Reciprocal Space. Retrieved from http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2015/04/29/amend-laws-scholarly-publication/.
- Curry, S. (2017, May 25). It's time for academics to take back control of research journals. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2017/may/25/its-time-for-academics-to-take-back-control-of-research-journals.
- Deegan, M. (2017, July 27). Open access monograph dash could lead us off a cliff. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/opinion/open-access-monograph-dash-could-lead-us-off-a-cliff.
- Else, H. (2017, August 15). “Almost half” of research papers now open access. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/almost-half-recent-research-papers-now-open-access.
- Fahmy, S. (2017, October 12). JISC Open Access Button project: Our findings [Web log post]. JISC Scholarly Communications. Retrieved from https://scholarlycommunications.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2017/10/12/jisc-open-access-button-project-our-findings/.
- Finch, J. (2012). Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: How to expand access to research publications: Report of the Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings [“The Finch Report”]. Retrieved from https://www.acu.ac.uk/research-information-network/finch-report.
- Fitzpatrick, K. (2015, October 26). Academia, not edu [Web log post]. Planned Obsolescence. Retrieved from http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/academia-not-edu/.
- Fletcher, R. (2017, January 19). U of C axes hundreds of journal subscriptions as “big 5” publishers jack up prices. CBC News. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/university-calgary-cancels-journal-subscriptions-2017-1.3942774.
- Fyfe, A., Coate, K., Curry, S., Lawson, S., Moxham, N., & Røstvik, C. M. (2017, May 25). Untangling academic publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research. Retrieved from doi:10.5281/zenodo.546100
- Gardner, C. C., & Gardner, G. J. (2017, February 2). Open access “pirates”: Sci-Hub and #icanhazpdf as resource sharing. ALA CopyTalk Webinars. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/advocacy/pp/pub/copytalk.
- Gargouri, Y., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., & Harnad, S. (2012). Green and gold open access percentages and growth, by discipline. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1206/1206.3664.pdf.
- Genovese, T. R. (2017, October 21). As long as the CEO of Wiley is making $4,017,769/year off of academics work, I'll be posting anything I publish wherever the hell I please [Tweet]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/trgenovese/status/921931681912668160.
- Hagemann, M. (2012, February 14). Ten years on, researchers embrace open access [Web log post]. Open Society Foundations. Retrieved from https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/ten-years-on-researchers-embrace-open-access.
- Harington, R. (2017, February 7). The value of copyright: A publisher's perspective [Web log post]. The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/02/07/the-value-of-copyright-a-publishers-perspective/.
- Henderson, E. (2016, February 15). Pirate website offering millions of academic papers for free refuses to close despite lawsuit. The Independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/pirate-webs-ite-offering-millions-of-academic-papers-for-free-refuses-to-close-despite-law-suit-a6875001.html.
- Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). (2014, March 28). Policy for open access in the post-2014 Research Excellence Framework. Retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2014/201407/.
- Himmelstein, D. S. (2017). Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature. PeerJ Preprints, 6, e3100v3. Retrieved from https://peerj.com/preprints/3100/.
- Holcombe, A. (2015, May 21). Scholarly publisher profit update [Web log post]. Alex Holcombe's blog. Retrieved from https://alexholcombe.wordpress.com/2015/05/21/scholarly-publisher-profit-update/.
- Ingram, M. (2013, April 9). The Empire acquires the rebel alliance: Mendeley users revolt against Elsevier takeover [Web log post]. GIGAOM. Retrieved from https://gigaom.com/2013/04/09/the-empire-acquires-the-rebel-alliance-mendeley-users-revolt-against-elsevier-takeover/.
- Johnson, J. (2016, February 11). Response to independent advice on open access research: Letter from Jo Johnson MP to Professor Adam Tickell. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/open-access-to-research-independent-advice-response.
- Jump, P. (2014, July 30). Open access papers “gain more traffic and citations.” Times Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/home/open-access-papers-gain-more-traffic-and-citations/2014850.article.
- Kamen, M. (2015, May 27). UK ISPs must block ebook pirate sites. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.co.uk/article/high-court-blocks-pirate-ebook-sites.
- Kelly, J. (2013, January 27). Green, gold, and diamond?: A short primer on open access [Web log post]. Digital Humanities. Retrieved from http://www.jasonmkelly.com/2013/01/27/green-gold-and-diamond-a-short-primer-on-open-access/.
- Kendzior, S. (2012, October 2). Academic paywalls mean publish and perish. Al Jazeera. Retrieved from http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/10/20121017558785551.html.
- Khomami, N. (2016, May 28). All scientific papers to be free by 2020 under EU proposals. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/may/28/eu-ministers-2020-target-free-access-scientific-papers.
- Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015, June 10). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PloS One. Retrieved from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0127502. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127502.
- Lessig, L. (2004). Free culture: The nature and future of creativity. New York, NY: Penguin.
- Martin-Martin, A., Orduna-Malea, E., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2016, March 4). The role of ego in academic profile services: Comparing Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Mendeley, and ResearcherID [Web log post]. LSE Impact Blog. Retrieved from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/imp-actofsocialsciences/2016/03/04/academic-profile-services-many-mirrors-and-faces-for-a-single-ego/.
- McKenzie, L. (2017, July 27). Sci-Hub's cache of pirated papers is so big, subscription journals are doomed, data analyst suggests. Science. Retrieved from http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/07/sci-hub-s-cache-pirated-papers-so-big-subscription-journals-are-doomed-data-analyst doi:10.1126/science.aan7164.
- Modern Language Association (MLA), Ad Hoc Committee on the Future of Scholarly Publishing. (2002). The future of scholarly publishing. Profession. Retrieved from https://apps.mla.org/pdf/schlrlypblshng.pdf.
- Mohdin, A. (2015, October 21). Academics have found a way to access insanely expensive research papers—for free [Web log post]. Quartz. Retrieved from https://qz.com/528526/academics-have-found-a-way-to-access-insanely-expensive-research-papers-for-free/.
- Monaghan, J. (2016, October 25). European open access strategies [Web log post]. BMC Research in Progress. Retrieved from https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2016/10/25/european-open-access-strategies/.
- Mphahlele, M. (2017, August 11). Thread: Learn things for free [Tweet]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/Mary_JaneSA/status/895983310886674432.
- Newton, C. (2015, December 9). Over 1 billion works now licensed with Creative Commons [Web log post]. Open Learning. Retrieved from https://openlearning.mit.edu/news-events/blog/over-1-bil-lion-works-now-licensed-creative-commons.
- Open Access Button. (n.d.). Terms of service. Retrieved from https://openaccessbutton.org/terms.
- OpenDOAR. (n.d.). Directory of open access repositories. Retrieved from http://www.opendoar.org/find.php.
- Oxenham, S. (2016, February). Meet the Robin Hood of science [Web log post]. Big Think. Retrieved from http://bigthink.com/neurobonkers/a-pirate-bay-for-science.
- Peet, L. (2016, August 25). Sci-Hub controversy triggers publishers' critique of librarian. Library Journal. Retrieved from http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2016/08/copyright/sci-hub-controversy-triggers-publishers-critique-of-librarian/#_.
- Peters, J. (2016, April 5). Why is it so expensive to read academic research? Slate. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2016/04/the_lawsuit_against_Sci-Hub_begs_the_question_why_are_academic_journals.html.
- Pinfield, S. (2016, October 13). Mega-journals: The future, a stepping stone to it or a leap into the abyss? [Web log post]. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/mega-journals-future-stepp-ing-stone-it-or-leap-abyss.
- Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L, Norlander, B., … Haustein, S. (2017, August 2). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ Preprints, 5, e3119v1. Retrieved from https://peerj.com/preprints/3119/.
- Pooley, J. (2017 August 15). Scholarly communications shouldn't be just open, but non-profit too [Web log post]. LSE Impact Blog. Retrieved from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/08/15/scholarly-communications-shouldnt-just-be-open-but-non-profit-too/.
- Poynder, R. (2015). Open access and the Research Excellence Framework: Strange bedfellows yoked together by HEFCE. Retrieved from https://www.richardpoynder.co.uk/REF_and_OA.pdf.
- Publishers' Association. (2016). The role of hybrid journals in supporting open access. Retrieved from https://www.publishers.org.uk/EasySiteWeb/GatewayLink.aspx?alId=20877.
- Regier, R. (2017, August 18). Bronze and delayed open access: What can we do about these? [Web log post]. A Way of Happening: A Research Library Blog. Retrieved from https://awayofhappening.wordpress.com/2017/08/18/bronze-and-delayed-open-access-what-can-we-do-about-these/.
- Research Councils UK. (2015). Review of the implementation of the RCUK policy on open access. Retrieved from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/openaccessreport-pdf/.
- Ruff, C. (2016, February 18). Librarians find themselves caught between journal pirates and publishers. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com/article/Librarians-Find-Themselves/235353.
- Russell, C., & Sánchez, E. (2016). Sci-Hub unmasked: Piracy, information policy, and your library. College & Research Libraries News, 77(3). Retrieved from http://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/9457/10701 doi:10.5860/crln.77.3.9457.
- Russon, M. (2017, June 23). Sci-Hub: “Pirate Bay for scientists” ordered to pay Elsevier $15m in damages. International Business Times. Retrieved from http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/sci-hub-pirate-bay-scientists-ordered-pay-elsevier-15m-damages-1627569.
- Science Direct. (2017). Sharing publications (journal articles and book chapters). Retrieved from http://help.sciencedirect.com/Content/sharing_pubs.htm.
- Sci-Hub. (n.d.a). Homepage. Retrieved from https://scihub22266oqcxt.onion.link/.
- Sci-Hub. (n.d.b). Twitter account profile. Retrieved from http://twitter.com/sci_hub?lang=en.
- Scollo Lavizar, C. (2017, September 15). STM proposal—RG platform to become consistent with usage and access rights for article sharing [letter from Lenz Caemmerer Attorneys and Notaries to the CEO and CTO of ResearchGate GmbH]. Retrieved from https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/509068/STM_letter_ResearchGate.20170916.pdf.
- Schwarz, W. (2015, April 2). Please, don't put your papers on academia.edu [Web log post]. Wo's weblog. Retrieved from https://www.umsu.de/wo/2015/628.
- Tickell, A. (2016). Open access to research publications: Independent advice. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/open-access-to-research-indepe-ndent-advice.
- Titcomb, J. (2016, July 5). Internet piracy falls to record lows amid rise of Spotify and Netflix. The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/07/04/internet-piracy-falls-to-record-lows-amid-rise-of-spotify-and-ne/.
- University of Tennessee Team and CIBER Research Team. (2013). Trust and authority in scholarly communications in the light of the digital transition: Final report. Retrieved from http://ciber-research.eu/download/20140115-Trust_Final_Report.pdf.
- Wendling, M. (2015, October 21). The scientists encouraging online piracy with a secret codeword [Web log post]. BBC Trending. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-34572462.
- Wexler, E. (2015, November 9). What open-access publishing actually costs. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com/article/What-Open-Access-Publishing/234108.
- Woodhead, J. (2014, May 13). Digitisation after Google Books—Is fair use fair dealing? Retrieved from https://www.simkins.com/digitisation-google-books-fair-use-fair-dealing/.
- Xalabarder, R. (2014). Google books and fair use: A tale of two copyrights? JIPITEC, 5(1). Retrieved from https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-5-1-2014/3908.