Scholarly Communications Training: Professional Development for the Next Generation of Scholars

References

• Antelman, K. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries, 65(5), 372–382. https://doi-org.libproxy.uncg.edu/10.5860/crl.65.5.372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, J., Peacemaker, B., & Miller, H. (2019). Same question, different world: Replicating an open access research impact study. College & Research Libraries, 80(3), 303–318. https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/16949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazeley, J. W., Waller, J., & Resnis, E. (2014). Engaging faculty in scholarly communication change: A learning community approach. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2(3), 1129–1113. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1129.
   Google Scholar
• Cantrell, M., & Johnson, A. (2018). Engaged citizenship through campus-level democratic processes: A librarian and graduate student collaboration on open access policy adoption. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 6(2), 2229–2217. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2229.
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, M. J., Johnson, M., Schwieder, D., & Craig, C. L. (2013). Innovation in the academy: Creating an online information literacy course. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 7(3), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2013.805663
   Google Scholar
• Coble, Z., Potvin, S., & Shirazi, R. (2014). Process as product: Scholarly communication experiments in the digital humanities. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2(3), 1137. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1137.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, R., & Chawner, B. (2011). Institutional repositories, open access, and scholarly communication: A study of conflicting paradigms. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(6), 460–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy, M. A., & Solomon, D. (2017). Leveraging librarian liaison expertise in a new consultancy role. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong, B. L. (2019). Boot camps for graduate student success: A collaborative initiative. Journal of Library Administration, 59(4), 373–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2019.1593710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, B. M. (2014). Online tutorials and effective information literacy instruction for distance learners. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(1–2), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2014.898011.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. (2018). Reshaping academic librarianship in the context of twenty-first century scholarly communications and information fluency: A case study of the scholarly communications management team at imperial college london library services. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 24(3–4), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2018.1519490.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, R., Burns, D., & Thoms, B. (2019). Altruism or self-interest? Exploring the motivations of open access authors. College & Research Libraries, 80(4), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.4.485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laughtin-Dunker, K. (2014). Assessing the scholarly communication attitudes and practices of faculty: Lessons from a “failed” survey. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2(3), 1164. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1164.
   Google Scholar
• MoChridhe, R. (2019). Linguistic equity as open access: Internationalizing the language of scholarly communication. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(4), 423–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, E. (2019, March). Beyond citation-counting: Metrics and altmetrics for demonstrating scholarly impact [Webcast]. Association of College & Research Libraries University Libraries Section (ULS) Professional Development Section webcast series. https://www.acrl.ala.org/ULS/beyond-citation-counting/
   Google Scholar
• Paulson, E., & Laverty, C. (2018). Leveraging learning outcomes to build an online information literacy tool. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 12(1–2), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2017.1415242.
   Google Scholar
• Radom, R., Feltner-Reichert, M., Stringer-Stanback, K. (2012). Organization of scholarly communication services: Spec kit 332. https://publications.arl.org/Organization-of-Scholarly-Communication-Services-SPEC-Kit-332/
   Google Scholar
• Reinsfelder, T. L., & Anderson, J. A. (2013). Observations and perceptions of academic administrator influence on open access initiatives. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(6), 481–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.08.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios, D. M. (2019). An optometry librarian’s vision: Improved student scholarly communication. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 38(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2019.1588038.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodriguez, J. E. (2014). Awareness and attitudes about open access publishing: A glance at generational differences. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(6), 604–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte, J., Tiffen, B., Edwards, J., Abbott, S., & Luca, E. (2018). Shaping the future of academic libraries: Authentic learning for the next generation. College & Research Libraries, 79(5), 685–696. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.5.685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senseney, M., Koehl, E. D., & Nay, L. (2019). Collaboration, consultation, or transaction: Modes of team research in humanities scholarship and strategies for library engagement. College & Research Libraries, 80(6), 787–804. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.6.787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southall, J., & Scutt, C. (2017). Training for research data management at the Bodleian Libraries: National contexts and local implementation for researchers and librarians. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 23(2–3), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2017.1318766.
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, L. B., & Clark, J. A. (2017). Citations as data: Harvesting the scholarly record of your university to enrich institutional knowledge and support research. College & Research Libraries, 78(7), 952–963. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.7.952
   Google Scholar
• Swoger, B. J. M., Brainard, S. A., & Hoffman, K. D. (2015). Foundations for a scholarly communications program: Interviewing faculty at a small public liberal arts college. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3(1), 1219. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1219.
   Google Scholar
• Tenopir, C., Dalton, E. D., Christian, L., Jones, M. K., McCabe, M., Smith, M., & Fish, A. (2017). Imagining a gold open access future: Attitudes, behaviors, and funding scenarios among authors of academic scholarship. College & Research Libraries, 78(6), 824–843. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.6.824
   Google Scholar
• UNCG Office of Institutional Research. (2018). Online enrollment. University of North Carolina Greensboro (UNCG). Retrieved from https://ire.uncg.edu/factbook/dashboards/online-enrollment.php.
   Google Scholar
• Zakharov, W., & Maybee, C. (2019). Bridging the gap: Information literacy and learning in online undergraduate courses. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 13(1–2), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2018.1499256.
   Google Scholar