The Role of Articles in Science–Technology Relationship: A Topic Analysis of Non-patent Literature (NPL) References

References

• Akhtar, N., Javed, H., & Ahmad, T. (2019). Hierarchical summarization of text documents using topic modeling and formal concept analysis. In Data management, analytics and innovation (pp. 21–33). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1274-8_2
   Google Scholar
• Alcácer, J., Gittelman, M., & Sampat, B. (2009). Applicant and examiner citations in U.S. patents: An overview and analysis. Research Policy, 38(2), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayda, S., Adeel, M., Tuccinardi, T., Cordani, M., & Rizzolio, F. (2019). The history of nanoscience and nanotechnology: From chemical-physical applications to nanomedicine. Molecules, 25(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25010112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittermann, A., & Fischer, A. (2018). How to identify hot topics in psychology using topic modeling. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 226(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(1), 993–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-411519-4.00006-9
   Google Scholar
• Braun, T., Schubert, A., & Zsindely, S. (1997). Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Scientometrics, 38(2), 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2007). The scientific productivity of academic inventors: New evidence from Italian data. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590600982830
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, H. (1994). The relationship between science and technology. Research Policy, 23(5), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)01001-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaert, J., Van Looy, B., Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., & Thijs, B. (2006). Traces of prior art: An analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents. Scientometrics, 69(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0135-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
   Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R., & Zuniga, P. (2008). In search of performance effects of (in)direct industry science links. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(4), 611–646. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtn023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y. W., Yang, H. W., & Huang, M. H. (2017). Interaction between science and technology in the field of fuel cells based on patent paper analysis. The Electronic Library, 35(1), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-10-2015-0195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, D. Z., Lin, W. Y. C., & Huang, M. H. (2007). Using Essential Patent Index and Essential Technological Strength to evaluate industrial technological innovation competitiveness. Scientometrics, 71(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1655-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, T. S., & Shih, H. Y. (2011). Patent citation network analysis of core and emerging technologies in Taiwan: 1997-2008. Scientometrics, 89(3), 795–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0457-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Solla Price, D. J. (1965). Is technology historically independent of science? A study in statistical historiography. Technology and Culture, 6(4), 553. https://doi.org/10.2307/3101749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, J., Li, P., Guo, Q., & Tang, X. (2019). Measuring the knowledge translation and convergence in pharmaceutical innovation by funding-science-technology-innovation linkages analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durack, K. T. (2004). Tacit knowledge in patent applications: Observations on the value of models to early US Patent Office practice and potential implications for the 21st century. World Patent Information, 26(2), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2003.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2007). University-industry-government: The triple helix model of innovation [Proceedings of 51-St EOQ Congress]. European Organization of Quality. http://triplehelix.stanford.edu/etzkowitz_pubs
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frascati Manual 2002. (2007). Frascati manual 2002. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789955682684-lt
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero-Bote, V. P., Sánchez-Jiménez, R., & De-Moya-Anegón, F. (2019). The citation from patents to scientific output revisited: A new approach to Patstat/Scopus matching. El Profesional de la Información, 28(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.jul.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, F., & Magee, C. L. (2018). Testing the science/technology relationship by analysis of patent citations of scientific papers after decomposition of both science and technology. Scientometrics, 116(2), 767–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2774-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32(8), 1343–1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00124-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hullmann, A., & Meyer, M. (2003). Publications and patents in nanotechnology: An overview of previous studies and the state of the art. Scientometrics, 58(3), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000006877.45467.a7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Fogarty, M. S. (2000). Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors. American Economic Review, 90(2), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.2.215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, O. A., Jaffe, A., Ashton, D., Warren, B., Koellhofer, D., Dulleck, U., Ballagh, A., Moe, J., Dicuccio, M., Ward, K., Bilder, G., Dolby, K., & Jefferson, R. A. (2018). Mapping the global influence of published research on industry and innovation. Nature Biotechnology, 36(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karki, M. M. S. (1997). Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Patent Information, 19(4), 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0172-2190(97)00033-1
   Google Scholar
• Ke, Q. (2018). Comparing scientific and technological impact of biomedical research. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 706–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Lee, J., Kim, G., Park, S., & Jang, D. (2016). A hybrid method of analyzing patents for sustainable technology management in humanoid robot industry. Sustainability, 8(5), 474–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosinski, M., Wang, Y., Lakkaraju, H., & Leskovec, J. (2016). Mining big data to extract patterns and predict real-life outcomes. Psychological Methods, 21(4), 493–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari, R., Jeong, J. Y., Lee, B. H., Choi, K. N., & Choi, K. (2021). Topic modelling and social network analysis of publications and patents in humanoid robot technology. Journal of Information Science, 47(5), 658–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551519887878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Kang, B., & Shin, J. (2015). Novelty-focused patent mapping for technology opportunity analysis. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 90(PB), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Lee, H. J., & Yoon, B. (2012). Modeling and analyzing technology innovation in the energy sector: Patent-based HMM approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 63(3), 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. (2004). The university-industry knowledge relationship: Analyzing patents and the science base of technologies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(11), 991–1001. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The triple helix, quadruple helix, …, and an n-tuple of helices: Explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4
   Google Scholar
• Li, R., Chambers, T., Ding, Y., Zhang, G., & Meng, L. (2014). Patent citation analysis: Calculating science linkage based on citing motivation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(5), 1007–1017. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. Y., & Yang, C. H. (2020). Heterogeneity in industry–university r&d collaboration and firm innovative performance. Scientometrics, 124(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03436-2
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., Xiong, X., Zhang, W., Liu, J., & Zhao, R. (2020). Research on classification and similarity of patent citation based on deep learning. Scientometrics, 123(2), 813–839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03385-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, D., Waldherr, A., Miltner, P., Wiedemann, G., Niekler, A., Keinert, A., Pfetsch, B., Heyer, G., Reber, U., Häussler, T., Schmid-Petri, H., & Adam, S. (2018). Applying LDA topic modeling in communication research: Toward a valid and reliable methodology. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(2-3), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1430754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. (2000). Patent citations in a novel field of technology - What can they tell about interactions between emerging communities of science and technology? Scientometrics, 48(2), 151–178. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005692621105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, J., & Bettels, B. (2001). Patent citation analysis: A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports. Scientometrics, 51(1), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010577030871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa, K., Takata, M., Kato, K., Matsuyuki, T., & Matsuhashi, T. (2017). A university–industry collaborative entrepreneurship education program as a trading zone: The case of Osaka University. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(6), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview1083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narin, F. (2000). Tech-line background paper. CHI Research. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/Eurostat. (1995). Measurement of scientific and technological activities: Manual on the measurement of human resources devoted to S&T - Canberra manual. In The measurement of scientific and technological activities. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264065581-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD/Eurostat. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. In The measurement of scientific and technological activities (3rd ed.). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264013100-en
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, S. D. A., & Quoniam, L. (2017). Intellectual property and patent prospecting as a basis for knowledge and innovation – A study on mobile information technologies and virtual processes of communication and management. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 14(4), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rai.2017.07.006
   Google Scholar
• Ponweiser, M. (2012, May). Latent Dirichlet allocation in R (pp. 2–21). http://epub.wu.ac.at/3558/
   Google Scholar
• Qu, Z., & Zhang, S. (2020). References to literature from the business sector in patent documents: A case study of charging technologies for electric vehicles. Scientometrics, 124(2), 867–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03518-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A. (1992). Science and technology as dancing partners. In P. Kroes & M. Bakker (Eds.), Technological development and science in the industrial age. Boston studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 144, pp. 231–270). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8010-6_10
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. (2014). A citation-based patent evaluation framework to reveal hidden value and enable strategic business decisions. Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(6), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview799
   Google Scholar
• Smojver, V., Štorga, M., & Zovak, G. (2020). Exploring knowledge flow within a technology domain by conducting a dynamic analysis of a patent co-citation network. Journal of Knowledge Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-01-2020-0079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, X., & Ding, K. (2018). Identifying and tracking scientific and technological knowledge memes from citation networks of publications and patents. Scientometrics, 116(3), 1735–1748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2836-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suominen, A., Toivanen, H., & Seppänen, M. (2017). Firms’ knowledge profiles: Mapping patent data with unsupervised learning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tijssen, R. J. W. (2001). Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows. Research Policy, 30(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00080-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzun, A. (2006). Science and technology policy in Turkey. National strategies for innovation and change during the 1983-2003 period and beyond. Scientometrics, 66(3), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0040-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Luwel, M., Andries, P., Zimmermann, E., & Deleus, F. (2002). Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes. Scientometrics, 54(3), 399–420. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016034516731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe, C., Tsuji, Y. S., & Griffy-Brown, C. (2001). Patent statistics: Deciphering a “real” versus a “pseudo” proxy of innovation. Technovation, 21(12), 783–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00025-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, H., Winnink, J., Yue, Z., Liu, Z., & Yuan, G. (2020). Topic-linked innovation paths in science and technology. Journal of Informetrics, 14(2), 101014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101014
   Google Scholar
• Xu, H. Y., Yue, Z. H., Wang, C., Dong, K., Pang, H. S., & Han, Z. (2017). Multi-source data fusion study in scientometrics. Scientometrics, 111(2), 773–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2290-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, S., Zhai, D., Wang, F., An, X., Pang, H., & Sun, Y. (2019). A novel method for topic linkages between scientific publications and patents. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(9), 1026–1042. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yau, C. K., Porter, A., Newman, N., & Suominen, A. (2014). Clustering scientific documents with topic modeling. Scientometrics, 100(3), 767–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1321-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar