Effects of sample size on the noise floor and distortion product otoacoustic emissions

References

• American National Standards Institute American na-tional standard specification for audiometers (ANSI 53.6-1989). New York: ANSI, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Arlinger S. Technical aspects on stimulation, recording and signal processing. Scand Audiol 1981; Suppl 13: 41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Baer JE, Hall JW. Effects of nonpathologic factors on otoacoustic emissions. Hear J 1992; 45: 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie RC, Jones RL. Effects of relative levels of the primary tones on distortion product otoacoustic emis- sions in normal-hearing subjects. Audiology 1998; 37: 187–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beattie RC, Zipp JA, Schaffer CA, Silzel KL. Effects of sample size on the latency and amplitude of the auditory evoked response. Am J Otolaryngol 1992; 13: 55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown AM. Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: a comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs, and gerbils. Hear Res 1987; 31: 25–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown AM, Kemp DT. Suppressibility of 2F1-F2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear Res 1984; 13: 29–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruning JL, Kintz BL Computational handbook of statistics, 3rd edn. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman & Co., 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Coats AC. Instrumentation. In: Moore EJ, ed. Basis of auditory brainstem evoked responses. New York: Grum & Stratton, 1983; 197–220.
   Google Scholar
• Durrant JD. Distortion-product OAE analysis: is it ready for broad clinical use? Hear J 1992; 45: 42–5.
   Google Scholar
• Elberling C, Don M. Quality estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 187–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberling C, Don M. Threshold characteristics of the human auditory brain stem response. J Acoust Soc Amer 1987; 81: 115–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasscock ME, Jackson CG, Josey AF The ABR handbook: auditory brainstem response, 2nd edn. New York: Theme Medical Publishers, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Grason-Stadler Grason-Stadler GSI 60 DPOAE - Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions System User Manual. Milford, NH: GSI Grason-Stadler, 1996; 15.
   Google Scholar
• Hall JW Handbook of auditory evoked responses. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Harris FP, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Stagner BB, Coats AC, Martin GK. Acoustic distortion products in humans: Systematic changes in amplitude as a function of f2/f1 ratio. J Acoust Soc Amer 1989; 85: 220–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood LJ, Berlin CI Auditory evoked potentials. Austin: Pro-ed Inc., 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson JT. An overview of the auditory brainstem response. In: Jacobson JT, ed. The auditory brainstem response. San Diego: College Hill Press, 1985; 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson JT, Hyde ML. An introduction to auditory evoked potentials. In: Katz J, ed. Handbook of clinical audiology. 3rd edn. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1985; 496–533.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions from the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64: 1386–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp DT. Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea. Arch Otolaryngol 1979; 224: 37–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp DT. Otoacoustic emissions, travelling waves and cochlear mechanics. Hear Res 1986; 22: 95–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp DT, Bray P, Alexander L, Brown AM. Acoustic emission cochleography - practical aspects. Scand Audiol 1986; Suppl 15: 71–96.
   Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin BL, Harris FP, Stagner BB, Hawkins MD, Martin GK. Distortion product emissions in humans I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99: 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 144–54.
   Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B, McCoy M, Whitehead M, Martin G. Clinical testing of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 11–22.
   Google Scholar
• Martin GK, Ohlms LA, Franklin DJ, Harris FP, Lonsbury-Martin BL. Distortion product emissions in humans III. Influence of sensorineural hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99: 30–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrens WA, Lehmann Ii Measurement and evalua-tion in education and psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Musiek FE, Baran JA. Comparison of standard and abbreviated distortion product otoacoustic emissions procedures. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7: 370–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nielsen LH, Popelka GR, Rasmussen AN, Osterham-mel PA. Clinical significance of probe tone frequency ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol 1993; 22: 159–64.
   Google Scholar
• Norton Si, Stover Si. Otoacoustic emissions: an emerging clinical tool. In: Katz J, ed. Handbook of clinical audiology, 4th edn. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1994; 448–62.
   Google Scholar
• Picton TW, Linden RD, Hamel G, Maru JT. Aspects of averaging. Semin Hear 1983; 4: 327–40.
   Google Scholar
• Picton TW, Smith AD. The practice of evoked potential audiometry. Otolaryngol Clin N Amer 1978; 11: 263–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton TW, Stapells DR, Campbell KB. Auditory evoked potentials from the human cochlea and brainstem. J Otolaryngol 1981; 9: 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Popelka GR, Karzon RK, Clary RA. Identification of noise sources that influence distortion product oto- acoustic emission measurements in human neonates. Ear Hear 1998; 19: 319–28.
   Google Scholar
• Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin B, Martin G. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Amer 1991; 89: 2053–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X, Kim DO, Jung MD, Randolph KJ. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test of sensorineural hearing loss in humans: comparison of unequal- and equal-level stimuli. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996; 105: 982–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead ML, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. Relevance of animal models to the clinical application of otoacoustic emissions. Semin Hear 1992; 13: 81–101.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead ML, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. The influence of noise on the measured amplitudes of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36: 1097–102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitehead ML, McCoy MJ, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. Dependence of distortion-product oto-acoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below Li. J Acoust Soc Amer 1995; 97: 2346–58.
   Google Scholar
• Wong PK, Bickford RG. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials: the use of noise estimate. Electroencephal Clin Neurophysiol 1980; 50: 25–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar