The role of high-frequency hearing in age-related speech understanding deficits

References

• Abel SM, Najafee R. The benefit of contextual cues for the perception of temporally degraded speech. Canad Acous 1998;26:25–8.
   Google Scholar
• ANSI S3.1–1991 Maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms. New York: American National Standards Institute, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• ANSI S3.6–1996 Specification for audiometers. New York: American National Standards Institute, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman M, Blumenfeld VG, Cascardo D, Dash B, Levitt H, Margulies MK. Age-related decrement in hearing for speech. J Gerontol 1976;31:533–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brant LJ, Fozard IL. Age changes in pure-tone hearing thresholds in a longitudinal study of normal human aging. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;88:813–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel WW Biostatistics: A foundation for analysis in the health sciences, 3rd edn. New York: Wiley, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Dubno JR, Dirks DD, Morgan DE. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1984;76:87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Dubno JR, Schaefer AB. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1992;91:2110–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster JR, Haggard MP. FAAF -An efficient analytical test of speech perception. In: Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics. Nottingham, UK: MRC Institute of Hearing Research, 1979;9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Giguère C, Abel SM. A multi-purpose facility for research on hearing protection. Appl Acous 1990;31: 295–311.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein BA, Newman CW. Clinical masking: A decision-making process. In: Katz J, editor. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilk-ins, 1985;170–201.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant S. Consonant recognition and confusion patterns among elderly hearing-impaired listeners. Ear Hear 1987;8:270–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes LE, Roberts L. Speech-recognition difficulties of the hearing-impaired elderly: the contributions of audibility. J Sp Hear Res 1990;33:726–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humes LE, Watson BU, Christensen LA, Cokely CG, Halling DC, Lee L. Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly. J Sp Hear Res 1994;37:465–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerger J. Can age-related decline in speech under-standing be explained by peripheral hearing loss? J Am Acad Audiol 1992;3:33–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kryter KD, Williams C, Green DM. Auditory acuity and the perception of speech. J Acoust Soc Am 1962; 34:1217–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall L. Auditory processing in aging listeners. J Sp Hear Res 1981;8:226–40.
   Google Scholar
• Matsche RG. Frequency selectivity and psychoacoustic tuning curves in old age. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1991;Suppl 476:114–9.
   Google Scholar
• Morrell CH, Gordon-Salant S, Pearson JD, Brant LJ, Fozard IL. Age- and gender-specific reference ranges for hearing level and longitudinal changes in hearing level. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;100:1949–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papsin BC, Abel SM, Nedzelski JM. Frequency selectivity in patients with acoustic neuroma. Laryngo-scope 1994;104:1092–98.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson RD, Nimmo-Smith I, Weber DL, Milroy R. The deterioration of hearing with age: Frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 1982;72:1788–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekkarinen E, Salmivalli A, Suonpää J. Effect of noise on word discrimination by subjects with impaired hearing, compared with those with normal hearing. Scand Audiol 1990;19:31–6.
   Google Scholar
• Pelausa EO, Abel SM, Simard J, Dempsey I. The prevention of noise-induced hearing loss in the Canadian military. J Otolaryngol 1995;24:271–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pickett JM, Bergman M, Levitt H. Aging and speech understanding. In: Ordy JM, Brizzee K, editors. Aging: sensory systems and communication in the elderly, Vol. 10. New York: Raven, 1979;167–86.
   Google Scholar
• Preminger J, Wiley TL. Frequency selectivity and consonant intelligibility in sensorineural hearing loss. J Sp Hear Res 1985;28:197–206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prosser S, Turrini M, Arslan E. Effects of different noises on speech discrimination by the elderly. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1991\(Suppl 476):136–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders DA. Hearing aid orientation and counseling. In: Pollack MC, editor. Amplification for the hearing impaired, 2nd edn. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1980;343–91.
   Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg GF. Speech reception in quiet and noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiograms. J Acoust Soc Am 1992;91:421–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz PG, Jesteadt W, Gorga MP, Mott J. Speech perception ability and psychophysical tuning curves in hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1985;77:620–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Working Group on Speech Understanding and Aging. Speech understanding and aging. J Acoust Soc Am 1988;83:859–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield A. Cognitive factors in auditory perfor-mance: Context, speed of processing, and constraints of memory. J Am Acad Audiol 1996;7:175–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yantis PA. Puretone air-conduction testing. In: Katz J, editor. Handbook of clinical audiology, 3rd edn. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1985;153–69.
   Google Scholar
• Yates GK. Frequency selectivity in the auditory periphery. In: Moore BCJ, editor. Frequency selectivity in hearing. London: Academic, 1986;1–50.
   Google Scholar
• Zwislocki H. Central masking and auditory frequency selectivity. In: Plomp R, Smoorenburg GF, eds. Frequency analysis and periodicity detection in hearing. Leiden: Sijthoff, 1970;444–54.
   Google Scholar
• Zwislocki JJ, Damianopoulos EN, Buining E, Glantz J. Central masking: some steady-state and transient effects. Percept & Psychophys 1967;2:59–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar