Apparent change of masking functions with compression-type digital hearing aid

References

• Asano F, Suzuki Y, Sone T, Kakehata S, Satake M, Ohyama K, et al. A digital hearing aid that compensates loudness for sensorineural impaired listeners. Proceed-ings of the International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 1991a;3625–8.
   Google Scholar
• Asano F, Suzuki Y, Sone T, Kakehata S, Satake M, Ohyama K, et al. A digital hearing aid system that compensates loudness for lack of loudness. Proceedings of ISSHS, 1991b;122–33.
   Google Scholar
• Asano F, Suzuki Y, Sone T, Hayashi T, Satake M, Ohyama K, et al. A method of designing and realizing a digital hearing aid that compensates loudness for impaired listeners (in Japanese). J Acoust Soc Jpn (in Japanese) 199 1c;47 :373–9.
   Google Scholar
• Farassopoulos AM. Evaluation of a new multichannel hearing aid for speech enhancement of hearing impaired listeners. Proceedings of 13th International Congress on Acoustics (ICA) 1989;457–61.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler EP. A method for the early detection of otosclerosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1936;24:731–41.
   Google Scholar
• Halpin C, Thornton A, Hasso M. Low-frequency sensor-ineural hearing loss: clinical evaluation and implications for hearing aid fitting. Ear Hear 1994;15:71–81.
   Google Scholar
• Heller O. Horfeldaudiometrie mit dem Verfahren der Kategorienunterteilung (KU). Psychologische Beitrage 1985;478–93.
   Google Scholar
• Hellbruck J. Loudness scaling: ratio scales, intersubject variability and some other problems. In Schick A, Hellbruck J, Weber, eds. Contributions to psychological acoustics. Results of the Fifth Oldenburg Symposium on Psychological A. BIS Universitat Oldenburg 1991;119–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hidaka H, Takahashi S, Hirano K, Kawase T, Ikeda K, Kobayashi T, et al. A portable digital hearing aid with narrow-band loudness compensation and its clinical evaluation. Proc Assoc Res Otolaryngol (ARO) 1996;41.
   Google Scholar
• Hidaka H, Kawase T, Takahashi S, Hirano K, Ueda N, Sasaki N, et al. The clinical evaluation of a portable digital hearing aid with narrow-band loudness compen-sation (second report). Proc Assoc Res Otolaryngol (ARO) 1997;29.
   Google Scholar
• Hidaka H, Kawase T, Takahashi S, Suzuki Y, Ozawa K, Sakamoto S, et al. Clinical evaluation of portable digital hearing aid with narrow-band loudness compensation. Scand Audiol 1998;27:225–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiessling J, Schubert M, Archut A. Adaptive fitting of hearing instruments by category loudness scaling (Scal Adapt). Scand Audiol 1996;25:153–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmeier B. Simulation of digital hearing aids based on loudness scaling and modulation discrimination, in Contributions to psychological acoustics. BIS Universi-tat Oldenburg 1991;171–86.
   Google Scholar
• Liberman MC, Dodds LW. Single neuron labeling and chronic cochlea pathology III. Stereocilia damage and alterations in threshold tuning curves. Hearing Res 1984;16:54–74.
   Google Scholar
• Liberman MC, Dodds LW, Learson DA. Structure-function correlation in noise-damaged ears: A light and electron-microscopic study. In Salvi RL, Henderson D, Hamemik RP, Colletti V eds. Basic and applied aspects of noise-induced hearing loss. New York: Plenum, 1986;163–76.
   Google Scholar
• Lyberger S Method of fitting hearing aid. US Patient Applications SN 1944;543:278, July 3.
   Google Scholar
• Moore BCJ An introduction to the psychology of hearing. 3rd edn. London: Academic Press, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Moore BCJ. How much do we gain by gain control in hearing aids? Acta Otolaryngol 1990;Suppl 469:250–6.
   Google Scholar
• Moore BCJ. Characterization and simulation of impaired hearing: Implications for Hearing Aid Design. Ear Hear 1991;Suppl 12:154S–61S.
   Google Scholar
• Moore BCJ. Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids. Ear Hear 1996;17:133–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR. A comparison of two-channel and single-channel compression hearing aids. Audiology 1986;25:210–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR, Stone MA. Optimization of a slow-acting automatic gain control system for use in hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1991;25:171–82.
   Google Scholar
• Moore BCJ, Laurence RF, Wright D. Improvements in speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise produced by two-channel compression hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1985;19:175–87.
   Google Scholar
• Moore BCJ, Johnson JS, Clark TM, Pluvinage V. Evalua-tion of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 1992;13:349–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim AAV, Schafer RW Digital signal processimg, Prentice Hall 1975;160–3.
   Google Scholar
• Plomp R. The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. J Acoust Soc Am 1988;83:2322–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. Noise, amplification and compression: considera-tions of three main issues in hearing aid design. Ear and Hearing 1994;15:2–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuknecht HF Pathology of the EAR. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Sone T, Suzuki Y, Asano F, Takasaka T, Ohashi M, Yamaguchi K. A portable digital hearing aid with narrow-band loudness compensation and the fitting system for it. Proceedings of 15th International Congress on Acoustics (ICA) 1955;1:265–8.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg JC, Gardner MB. The dependency of hearing impairment on sound intensity. J Acoust Soc Am 1937;9: 11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki Y, Sone T. Frequency characteristics of loudness perception: principles and applications. In: Schick A, eds. Contributions to psychological acoustics. Results of the Sixth Oldenburg Symposium on Psychological Acoustics BIS Universitat Oldenburg, 1993;193–221.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki Y, Ise T, Asano F, Sone T, Ohyama K, Takasaka T. Measurement of loudness functions with the subdivision rating scale method and the conventional rating scale method (in Japanese with English abstract). Audiol Jpn 1995;38:803–16.
   Google Scholar
• Takasaka T, Ohyama K, Hozawa K, Sunose H, Sato R, Yulian Z. Age-related changes in the Mongolian gerbil cochlea. The auditory system (Proceedings of the Satellite Symposium of the Second Extraordinay Inter-national Symposium on Recent Advances in Otitis Media) 1993;1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Van Tasell DJ. Hearing loss, speech and hearing aids (review). J Speech Hear Res 1993;36:228–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verschuure J, Benning FJ, Van Cappellen M, Dreschler WA, Boeremans PP. Speech intelligibility in noise with fast compression hearing aids. Audiology 1998;37:127–50.
   Google Scholar
• Villchur E. Signal processing to improve speech intelligi-bility in perceptive deafness. J Acoust Soc Am 1973; 53:1646–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yund EW, Simon HJ, Efron R. Speech discrimination with an 8-channel compression hearing aid and conventional aids in background of speech-band noise. J Rehabil Res Dev 1987;24: 161–80.
   Google Scholar
• Walden BE, Demorest ME, Hepler EL. Self-report approach to assessing benefit derived from amplification. J Speech Hear Res 1984;27:49–56.
   Google Scholar