Universal newborn screening: a dream realized or a nightmare in the making?

References

• Altman MM, Shenhav R. Methods for early detectionc of hearing loss in infants. J Laryngol Otol 1971;85:35–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Altman MM, Shenhav R, Schaudinischky L. Semiobjective method for auditory mass screening of neonates. In: Mencher GT, ed. Early Identi. cation of Hearing Loss. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), American Academy of Audiology & Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf. A model universal newborn/infant hearing screening, tracking, and intervention Bill. Maryland: ASHA, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Bamford J, Battersby C, Beresford D, et al. Assessing service quality in paediatric audiology and early deaf education. Nottingham: Institute of Hearing Research
   Google Scholar
• Bennett MJ. The auditory response cradle: a device for the objective assessment of auditory state in the
   Google Scholar
• Bennett MJ. Trials with the auditory response cradle I. Neonatal responses to auditory stimuli. Br J Audiol
   Google Scholar
• Bess FH. Personal communication, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bess FH, Paradise JL. Universal screening for infant hearing impairment: not simple, not risk-free, not necessarily bene. cial, and not presently justied. Pediatrics 1994a;93:330– 4.
   Google Scholar
• Bess FH, Paradise JL. Universal screening for infant hearing impairment [Reply]. Pediatrics 1994b;94:959–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bio-logic Systems Corporation. Advertisment (p. 1).
   Google Scholar
• Dalzell L, Orlando M, MacDonald M, et al. The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: ages of hearing loss identifica-tion, hearing aid fitting, and enrollment in early intervention. Ear Hear 2000;21:118–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis A, Fortnam H, Bamford J. Epidemiological issues associated with newborn hearing screening. In Bess F, ed. Children with hearing impairment – contemporary trends. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Downs MP. The expanding imperatives of early identi. cation. In: Bess F, ed: Childhood deafness: causation, assessment and management. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Downs MP, Hemenway WG. Report on the hearing screening of 17,000 neonates. Audiology 1969;8:72– 6.
   Google Scholar
• Downs MP, Sterritt GM. Identification audiometry for neonates: a preliminary report. J Auditory Res 1964;4: 69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Downs MP, Sterritt GM. A guide to newborn and infant hearing screening programmes. Arch Otolaryngol 1967; 85:15–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Consensus Statement on Universal Newborn Hearing Screening. Milan, Italy, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing IR, Ewing AWG. The ascertainment of deafness in infancy and early childhood. J Laryngol Otol 1944; S ept: 309–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing IR, Ewing AWG. Opportunities and the deaf child. London: University of London Press, 1947.
   Google Scholar
• Feinmesser M, Tell L, Levi H. Follow-up of 40,000 infants screened for hearing defect. Audiology 1982;21: 197–203.
   Google Scholar
• Gravel J, Berg A, Bradley M, et al. New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: effects of screening protocol on inpatient outcome measures. Ear Hear 2000;21:131-40. Hardy JB. Viral infections in pregnancy: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1965;93: 1052–65.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy JB. Viral infections in pregnancy: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1965;93:1052– 65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy JB. Fetal consequences of maternal viral infections in pregnancy. Arch Otolaryngol 1973;98: 218–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy WG, Bordley J. Special techniques in testing the hearing of children. J Speech Hear Dis 1951;16:122–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hecox K, Galambos R. Brainstem auditory evoked responses in human infants and adults. Arch Otolar-yngol 1974;99:30–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepsen 0. Intratympanic muscle reflexes in psycho-genic deafness. Acta Oto-Laryngol 1953;109(Suppl): 61–9.
   Google Scholar
• Jepsen 0. Middle-ear muscle reflexes in man. In: Jerger J, ed. Modern developments in audiology, Chapter 6. New York: Academic Press, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Jewett DL, Willison JS. Auditory evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of humans. Brain 1971;94: 681–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on Infant Screening. 1972 supplemen-tary statement. In: Mencher G, ed. Early identification of hearing loss, vol 4. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1976. Joint Committee. 1970 statement on neonatal screening for hearing impairment. In: Mencher G, ed. Early identification of hearing loss, vol 5. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Position statement. ASHA 1982;24:1017–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Position statement. ASHA 1990;33:3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Position statement. ASHA 1994;36:38–41.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Position statement. Maryland: American Speech-Language-Hearing Asso-ciation, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, D. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoustical Soc Am 1978;64:1386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuyper P. Audiometry and the newborn. Audiology 1981;20:530–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch BJ, Stick SL, Mencher GT. The University of Nebraska neonatal hearing project - one year later. 1 43–55. In: Mencher G, ed. (1974) Early identification of hearing loss. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1976; 143–55.
   Google Scholar
• National Deaf Children's Society (NDCS). Quality standards in paediatric audiology. Vol I: guidelines for the early identification of hearing impairment. London:
   Google Scholar
• National Deaf Children's Society, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• National Deaf Children's Society (NDCS). Quality standards in paediatric audiology. Vol II: The audio-logical management of the child with permanent hearing loss. London: National Deaf Children's So-ciety, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health (NIH). Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. NIH Consensus Statement, 1993;11:1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Prieve BA, Dalzell L, Berg A, et al. The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstra-tion project: outpatient outcome measures. Ear Hear 2000;21:104— 18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieve BA, Stevens F. The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: introduction and overview. Ear Hear 2000;21:85–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs R. Beobachtungen uber das physiologische verhalten des gehorogans neugeborener. Arch Ohren Nasen 1893;35:28–38.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons FB, Russ FN. Automated newborn hearing screening, the Crib-o-gram. Archives of Otolaryngol-ogy 1974;100:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohmer H, Feinmesser M. Cochlear action potentials recorded from the external ear in man. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1967;76:427–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivak L, Dalzell L, Berg A, et al. New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: inpatient outcome measures. Ear Hear 2000;21: 92–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkin P. The worth of universal newborn hearing screening: ten years on. Presented at Silver Jubilee Symposium on New Developments in Audiology. England: Manchester, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Wedenberg E. Auditory tests on newborn infants. Aca Otolaryngol 956;45:446–61.
   Google Scholar
• Wedenberg E. Objective auditory tests on non-co-operative children. Acta Otolaryngol 1963;Suppl 175.
   Google Scholar