Children's amplification needs - same or different from adults?

References

• Bentler R, Niebuhr D. Verification: issues and im-plementation. Trends Amplification 1999;4:90–102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Byrne D. Word familiarity in speech perception testing of children. Aust J Audiol 1983;5:77– 80.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne D, Cotton S. Preferred listening levels of sensorineurally hearing-impaired listeners. Aust J Audiol 1987;9:7-14. 22. frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear 1986;7: 257–65.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne D, Parkinson A, Newall P. Modified hearing aid selection procedures for severe/profound hearing losses. In: Studebaker G, Bess F, Beck L, eds. The Vanderbilt Hearing Aid Report 11 1991. Parkton, MD: York Press, 1991: 295–300.
   Google Scholar
• Ching TYC, Dillon H, Byrne D. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;103:1128–40.
   Google Scholar
• Ching TYC, Hill M, Birtles G, Beecham L. Clinical use of paired comparisons to evaluate hearing aid fitting of severely/profoundly hearing impaired children. Aust New Zeal J Audiol 1999;21:51–63.
   Google Scholar
• Ching TYC, Hill M, Psarros C. Strategies for optimis-ing hearing aid fitting of hearing-impaired children. Paper presented at the IHCON 2000 Conference, August 23–27, Lake Tahoe, California, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Ching TYC, Newall P, Wigney D. Frequency response and gain requirements of severely and profoundly hearing impaired children. Aust J Audiol 1996;18: 99–101.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H. Fitting a wide dynamic range of speech into a narrow dynamic range of hearing. In: Seewald RC, ed. A Sound Foundation through Early Amplification. Phonak AG, 2000: 65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H. Hearing aids. Sydney: Boomerang Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. Apparent auditory deprivation effects of late onset: the role of presentation level. J Acoust Soc Am 1989;86:2103–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravel JS. Audiologic assessment for the fitting of hearing instruments: big challenges from tiny ears. In: Seewald RC, ed. A Sound Foundation through Early Amplification. Phonak AG, 2000: 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan CA, Turner CW. High frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;104:432–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenstad LM, Seewald RC, Cornelisse LE, Shantz J. Comparison of linear gain and wide dynamic range compression hearing aid circuits: aided speech percep-tion measures. Ear Hear 1999;20:117–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawell KE, Kopun JG, Stelmachowicz PG. Loudness discomfort levels in children. Ear Hear 1988;9:133-7. Lewis DE. Selecting and pre-selecting amplification for children: where do we begin? Trends Amplification 1999;4: 72–89.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis DE, Eiten LR. One size does not fit all: rationale and procedures for FM system fitting. In: Seewald RC, ed. A Sound Foundation through Early Amplification. Phonak AG, 2000: 87–108.
   Google Scholar
• Macrae J. A review of research into safety limits for amplification by hearing aids. Aust J Audiol 1994;16: 67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Moodie KS, Sinclair ST, Fisk T, Seewald RC. Individualising hearing instrument fitting for infants: a case study. In: Seewald RC, ed. A Sound Foundation through Early Amplification. Phonak AG, 2000: 213–18.
   Google Scholar
• Nozza RJ. Thresholds are not enough: understanding how infants process speech has a role in how we manage hearing loss. In: Seewald RC, ed. A Sound Foundation through Early Amplification. Phonak AG, 2000: 47–55.
   Google Scholar
• Nozza RJ, Rossman RNF, Bond LC. Infant-adult differences in unmasked thresholds for the discrimina-tion of CV syllable pairs. Audiol 1991;30:102-12. Nozza RJ, Rossman RNF, Bond LC, Miller SL. Infant
   Google Scholar
• speech—sound discrimination in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;87: 339–50.
   Google Scholar
• Seewald RC. The desired sensation level (DSL) method for hearing aid fitting in infants and children. Phonak Focus 1995;20.
   Google Scholar
• Seewald RC, Ramji KY, Sinclair ST, Moodie KS, Jamieson DG. A computer-assisted implementations of the desired sensation level method for electroacoustic selection and fitting in children. User's manual. University of Western Ontario, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Seewald RC, Scollie SD. Infants are not average adults: implications for audiometric testing. Hear J 1998;52: 64–72.
   Google Scholar
• Seewald RC, Moodie KS, Sinclair ST, Scollie SD. Predictive validity of a procedure for paediatric hearing instrument fitting. Am J Audiol 1999;8:143–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snik AFM, Hombergen GCHJ. Hearing aid fitting of preschool and primary school children. Scand Audiol 1993;22:245–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snik AFM, Stollman MHP. Fitting preschool and primary school children with hearing instruments: an evaluation of hearing aid prescription rules. In: Seewald RC, ed. A Sound Foundation through Early Amplifica-tion. Phonak AG, 2000: 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Snik AFM, van den Borne S, Brokx JPL, Hoekstra C. Hearing aid fitting in profoundly hearing-impaired children: comparison of prescription rules. Scand Audiol 1995;24:225–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz PG, Mace AL, Kopun JG, Carney E. Long-term and short-term characteristics of speech: implications for hearing aid selection for young children. J Speech Hear Res 1993;36:609–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar