Determination of acute noise effects using distortion product otoacoustic emissions

References

• Bonfils P. Avan P, Elbez M, Deys S, Erminy M, Francois M. Auditory threshold evaluation by distor-tion-product oto-acoustic emissions using decision support system. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1994;114: 360–5.
   Google Scholar
• Brown AM, Gaskill SA. Measurement of acoustic distortion reveals underlying similarities between hu-man and rodent mechanical responses. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;88:840–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang KW, Norton SJ. The effects of continuous versus interrupted noise exposures on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs. Hear Res 1996; 96:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark WW, Bohne BA. Animal model of the 4-kHz tonal dip in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1978;87 (Suppl):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Dallos P, Harris D. Properties of auditory nerve responses in absence of outer hair cells. J Neurophysiol 1978;41:365–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H. An active process in cochlear mechanics. Hear Res 1983;9:79–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis RI, Hamemik RP, Ahroon WA. Frequency selectivity in noise-damaged cochleas. Audiology 1993;32:110–31.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan TG, Abbas PJ. Short-term effects of sound exposure on the 2fl-12 acoustic emission. J Acoust Soc Am 1985;77:1614–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eicken Cv. Experimentelle akustische Schädigung des Labyrinths bei normaler und defekter Gehörlmöchel-chenkette. Verh Dtsch Otol Gesellsch 1909;144.
   Google Scholar
• Engdahl B, Kemp DT. The effect of noise exposure on the details of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;99:1573–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold T. Hearing II: The physical basis of the action of the cochlea. Proc R Soc Lond 1948;135:492–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley JA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: the state of the art. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 1989;29:307–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris FP, Lonsbury Martin BL, Stagner BB, Coats AC, Martin GK. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/fl ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 1989;85:220–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison RV, Evans EF. The effects of hair cell loss (restricted to outer hair cells) on the threshold and tuning properties of cochlear fibres in the guinea pig. In: Portmann M, Aran JM, eds. Inner ear biology. Paris: INSERM 1977;105–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser R, Probst R. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1991;89:280–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotz MA, Probst R, Harris FP, Hauser R. Monitoring the effects of noise exposure using transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1993;113:478–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ising H. Soziakusis. In: Dieroff H-G, ed. Lärmschwer-hörigkeit. 3. Auflage ed. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1994;198–208.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone BM, Patuzzi R, Yates GK. Basilar membrane measurements and the travelling wave. Hear Res 1986;22 :147–53.
   Google Scholar
• Kim DO, Paparello J, Jung MD, Smurzynski J, Sun X. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test of sensor-ineural hearing loss: performance regarding sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristics. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996;116:3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kvaemer KJ, Engdahl B, Amesen AR, Mair IW. Temporary threshold shift and otoacoustic emissions after industrial noise exposure. Scand Audiol 1995;24:137–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liebel J, Delb W, Andes C, Koch A. Die Erfassung von Lärmschaden bei Besuchem einer Diskothek mit Hilfe der TEOAE und DPOAE. Laryngorhinootologie 1996; 75 :259–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978;8:283–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen LH, Popelka GR, Rasmussen AN, Osterham-mel PA. Clinical significance of probe-tone frequency ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol 1993;22:159–64.
   Google Scholar
• Norton SJ, Mott JB, Champlin CA. Behavior of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions following intense ipsilateral acoustic stimulation. Hear Res 1989;38:243–58.
   Google Scholar
• Schmiedt RA. Acoustic distortion in the ear canal. I. Cubic difference tones: effects of acute noise injury. J Acoust Soc Am 1986;79:1481–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel 111, Kim DO, Molnar CE. Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2-fl and 2f1-f2. J Neurophysiol 1982;47: 303–28.
   Google Scholar
• Skellett RA, Crist JR, Fallon M, Bobbin RP. Chronic low-level noise exposure alters distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1996;98:68–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stover L, Gorga MP, Neely ST. Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emis-sions measurements. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;100:956–67.
   Google Scholar
• Subramaniam M, Henselman LW, Spongr V, Hender-son D, Powers NL. Effect of high-frequency interrupted noise exposures on evoked-potential thresholds, distor-tion-product otoacoustic emissions, and outer hair cell loss. Ear Hear 1995;16:372–81.
   Google Scholar
• Suckfäll M, Schneeweiss S, Dreher A, Schorn K. Evaluation of TEOAE and DPOAE measurements for the assessment of auditory thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996;116:528–33.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton LA, Lonsbury Martin BL, Martin GK, White-head ML. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2. Hear Res 1994;75: 161–74.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead ML, McCoy MJ, Lonsbury Martin BL, Martin GK. Dependence of distortion-product otoa-coustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below Li. J Acoust Soc Am 1995;97:2346–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead ML, Stagner BB, McCoy MJ, Lonsbury Martin BL, Martin GK. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. II. Asymmetry in Li, L2 space. J Acoust Soc Am 1995;97: 2359–77.
   Google Scholar
• Wittmaack K. Ober Schädigung des Gehärs durch Schalleinwirkung. Eine experimentelle Studie. Z Oh-renheilk 1907;54:37–80.
   Google Scholar
• Zurek PM, Clark WW, Kim DO. The behavior of acoustic distortion products in the ear canals of chinchillas with normal or damaged ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1982;72:774–80.
   Google Scholar