Slope analysis of Auditory Brainstem Responses in children at risk of central auditory processing disorders

References

• Ainslie PJ, Boston JP. Comparison of brain stem auditory evoked potentials for monaural and binaural Stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980; 49:291–302.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arkebauer HJ, Mencher GT, McCall C. Modification of speech discrimination in patients with binaural asym-metrical hearing loss. J Speech Hear Disord 1971;36: 208–12.
   Google Scholar
• Boettcher FA, Mills 111, Norton BL. Age-related changes in auditory evoked potentials of gerbils. 1. Response amplitudes. Hear Res 1993;71: 137–45.
   Google Scholar
• Debruyne F. Binaural interaction in early, middle and late auditory evoked responses. Scand Audiol 1984; 13:293–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirks D, Wilson R. Binaural hearing for aided and unaided conditions. J Speech Hear Res 1969;12:650–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gopal KV, Pierel K. Binaural interaction component in children at risk for central auditory processing dis-orders. Scand Audiol 1999;28:77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard M, Hall J. Forms of binaural summation and the implications of individual variability for binaural hearing aids. Scand Audiol 1982;5 (Suppl):47–63.
   Google Scholar
• Hall JVV Handbook of auditory evoked responses. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Harris J. Monaural and binaural speech intelligibility and stereophonic effects based upon temporal cues. Laryngoscope 1965;75:428–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood J, Prasher D. Effect of simulated bilateral Scandinavian Anthology • Vol 28 • No 2 • 1999 cochlear distortion on speech discrimination in normal subjects. Scand Audiol 1990;19:37–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson JT, Hall JVV. Newborn and infant auditory brainstem response applications. In: Jacobson KT, editor. Principles and applications in auditory evoked potentials. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J, Silman S, Lew HL, Chmiel R. Case studies in binaural interference: converging evidence from beha-vioral and electrophysiologic measures. J Amer Acad Audiol 1993;4:122–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jewett DL, Williston JS. Auditory evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of humans. Brain 1971;94: 681–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang ZD, Tierney TS. Binaural interaction in human neonatal auditory brainstem. Pediatr Res 1996a;39: 708–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang ZD, Tierney TS. Long-term effect of perinatal and postnatal asphyxia on developing human auditory brainstem responses: brainstem impairment. Pediatr Oto Rhino Laryngol 1996b;34:111–27.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan H, Pickett J. Effects of dichotic/diotic versus monotic presentation on speech understanding in noise in elderly hearing-impaired listeners. Ear Hear 1981; 2:202–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith RW SCAN: a screening test for auditory processing disorders. San Antonio: The Psychology Corporation, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly-Ballweber D, Dobie RA. Binaural interaction measured behaviorally and electro-physiologically in young and old adult. Audiology 1984;23:181–94.
   Google Scholar
• Martin TH. Cortical neurons, the EEG, and the mech-anisms of epilepsy. In: Kandal ER, Schwartz HI, editors. Principles of neural science. II Ed. New York: Elsevier, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson DL, Tures C, Starr A. Binaural interaction of the auditory brain-stem potentials and middle latency auditory evoked potentials in infants and adults. Electroencephalogr Chin Neurophysiol 1989;74:124–30.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson DL, Starr A. Binaural interaction in auditory evoked potentials: Brainstem, middle- and long-latency components. Hear Res 1993;66:91–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson DL, Starr A. Auditory time-intensity cues in the binaural interaction component of the auditory evoked potentials. Hear Res 1995;89:162–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabelek A, Robinson P. Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages. J Acoust Soc Am 1982;71:1242–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz DM, Morris MD, Jacobson JT. The normal auditory brainstem response and its variants. In: Jacobson JT, ed. Principles and applications in auditory evoked potentials. Boston Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Silman S. Binaural interference in multiple sclerosis: Case study. J Amer Acad Audiol 1995;6:93–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Speaks CE. Dichotic listening. A clinical or research tool? In: Sullivan MD, editor. Proceedings of a symposium on central auditory processing disorders. Omaha Nebraska: University of Nebraska Medical Center, 1975.
   Google Scholar