https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1559-8335
References
- Biggerstaff, D., & Thompson, A. R. (2008). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): A qualitative methodology of choice in healthcare research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5(3), 214–224.
- Bion, W. R. (1967). Second thoughts. Selected papers on psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
- Butler-Kisber, L. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry. Thematic, Narrative and Arts-Based Perpsectives. McGill University, Canada: Sage.
- Chamberlain, K., Cain, T., Sheridan, J., & Dupuis, A. (2011). Pluralisms in qualitative research: From multiple methods to integrated methods. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 8, 151–169.
- Chamberlain, K., McGuigan, K., Anstiss, D., & Marshall, K. (2018). A change of view: Arts-based research and psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 15(2–3), 131–139.
- Fangen, K. (2011). Analyse og organisering av et stort livshistorisk materiale: Komparativt kvalitativt prosjekt [Analysis and organisation of a large material on life history: Comaparative qualitative project]. In K. Fangen (Ed.), Mange ulike metoder (pp. 251–266). Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
- Freud, S. (1912). Recommendations to physicians practising psycho-analysis. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. XII, pp. 109–120). London: Hogarth.
- Freud, S. (1926). The question of lay analysis the standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, volume XX (1925–1926) (Vol. XX, pp. 177–258). London: Hoghart.
- Freud, S. (1926/1971). Die Frage der Laienanalyse. Unterredungen mit einem Unparteiischen ( Sigmund Freud Studienausgabe, Ergänzungsband ed., pp. 271–349). Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag.
- Frommer, J. (2007). Psychoanalytische und qualitative Sozialforschung in Konvergenz: Gibt es Möglichkeiten, voneeinander zu lernen? Psyche, 61, 781–803.
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
- Gullestad, S., & Killingmo, B. (2013). Underteksten. Psykoanalytisk terapi i praksis [The subtext. Psychoanalytic therapy in practice]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
- Killingmo, B. (1999). A psychoanalytic listening-perspective in a time of pluralism. The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 22(2), 151–171.
- Killingmo, B. (2007). Relational-oriented character analysis: A position in contemporary psychoanalysis. The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 30, 76–83.
- Killingmo, B., Varvin, S., & Strømme, H. (2014). What can we expect from beginning therapists? A study of acquisition competence in dynamic psychotherapy training. Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 37(1), 24–35.
- Kvale, S. (1999). The psychoanalytic interview as qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(1), 87–113.
- Leuzinger-Bohleber, M. (2015). Finding the body in the mind. Embodied memories, trauma and depression. London: Karnac Books.
- Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., Rüger, B., Stuhr, U., & Beutel, M. (2002). “Forschung und Heilen” in der Psychoanalyse. Ergebnisse und Berichte aus Forschung und Praxis. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
- Lopate, P. (1994). The art of the personal essay. New York: Anchor Books.
- Migdley, N. (2006). Psychoanalysis and qualitative psychology: Complementary or contradictory paradigms? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 213–231.
- Montaigne,M. D. (1958). The complete essays of Montaigne. (Donald M. Framet, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Nielsen, H. B. (1995). Seductive texts with serious intentions. Educational Researcher, 24(1), 4–12.
- Sandler, J., & Sandler, A. M. (1998). Internal objects revisited. London: Karnac Books.
- Smith, J. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. London: Sage.
- State, G. (2000). A new defence of Gadamer’s hermenuetics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LX(1), 45–65.
- Stiles, W. (2015). Theory-building, enriching, and fact-gathering: Alternative purposes of psychotherapy research. In O. Gelo, A. Pritz, & B. Rieken (Eds.), Psychotherapy research: Foundations, process, and outcome (pp. 159–179). New York: Springer-Verlag.
- Tuckett, D. (2005). Does anything go? Towards a framework for the more transparent assessment of psychoanalytic competence. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86, 31–49.
- UCL. (2019). Competence frameworks psychoanalytic/psychodynamic therapy University College of London Psychology and Language Sciences. Retrieved November 17, 2019 from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/pals/research/clinical-educational-and-health-psychology/research-groups/core/competence-frameworks-6.
- Varvin, S. (2011). Phenomena or data? Qualitative and quantitative research strategies in psychoanalysis. Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 34, 117–123.