Modified atmosphere packaging as a method to extend postharvest life of tulip flowers

References

• Ali A, Rehman S, Hussain R, Raza S, Sarwar M, Bashir A, Khan MA. 2014. Enhancing the vase life of tulip (Tulipa gesneriana L.) using various pulsing solutions of humic acid and NPK. International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences 4(2):193–200.
   Google Scholar
• Asrar AW. 2012. Effects of some preservative solutions on vase life and keeping quality of snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus L.) cut flowers. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences 11:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2011.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Baolian D, Wei S, Yiwei T, Yimin S. 1999. Studies on senescence physiology of tulip flowers during vase life. Journal of Shanghai Agricultural College 17(4):281–289.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop CFH, Gash AJ, Mathas E, Finlayson I. 2007. Use of modified packaging with cut flowers. Acta Horticulturae 755:515–518. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.755.71
   Google Scholar
• Bunya-atichart K, Ketsa S, van Doorn WG. 2004. Postharvest physiology of Curcuma alismatifolia flowers. Postharvest Biology and Technology 34:219–226. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantín CM, Crisosto CH, Day KR. 2008. Evaluation of the effect of different modified atmosphere packaging box liners on the quality and shelf life of ‘friar’ plums. HortTechnology 18(2):261–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çelikel FG, Reid MS. 2002. Storage temperature affects the quality of cut flowers from the Asteraceae. HortScience 37(1):148–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çelikel FG, Dodge LL, Reid MS. 2002. Efficacy of 1-MCP (1-methylcyclopropene) and Promalin for extending the post-harvest life of Oriental lilies (Lilium x ‘Mona Lisa’ and ‘Stargazer’). Scientia Horticulturae 93(2):149–155. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4238(01)00331-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier D. 1997. Changes in respiration, protein and carbohydrates of tulip tepals and alstroemeria petals during development. Journal of Plant Physiology 150:446–451. doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(97)80096-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa C, Lucera A, Conte A, Mastromatteo M, Speranza B, Antonacci A, Del Nobile MA. 2011. Effects of passive and active modified atmosphere packaging conditions on ready-to-eat table grape. Journal of Food Engineering 102:115–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Pascale S, Maturi T, Nicolais V. 2005. Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) for preserving Gerbera, Lilium and Rosa cut flowers. Acta Horticulturae 682:1145–1152. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.682.151
   Google Scholar
• Del-Valle V, Almenar E, Lagaron JM, Catala R, Gavara R. 2003. Modelling permeation through porous polymeric films for modified atmosphere packaging. Food Additives & Contaminants 20:170–179. doi: 10.1080/0265203021000042869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Doorn W, Abadie P, Belde P. 2002. Alkylethoxylate surfactants for rehydration of roses and Bouvardia flowers. Postharvest Biology and Technology 24:327–333.
   Google Scholar
• van Doorn W, Han SS. 2011. Postharvest quality of cut lily flowers. Postharvest Biology and Technology 62:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Doorn W, Perik RRJ, Abadie P, Harkema H. 2011. A treatment to improve the vase life of cut tulips: effects on tepal senescence, tepal abscission, leaf yellowing and stem elongation. Postharvest Biology and Technology 61(1):56–63. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eason JR. 2002. Sandersonia aurantiaca: an evaluation of postharvest pulsing solutions to maximise cut flower quality. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 30(4):273–279. doi: 10.1080/01140671.2002.9514224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eason JR, Morgan ER, Mullan AC and Burge GK. 2004. Display life of Gentiana flowers is cultivar specific and influenced by sucrose, gibberellin, fluoride, and postharvest storage. New Zealand journal of crop and horticultural science, 32(2):217–226. doi: 10.1080/01140671.2004.9514299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalona VH, Aguayo E and Artés F. 2007. Modified atmosphere packaging improved quality of kohlrabi stems. LWT-Food Science and Technology 40(3):397–403. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2006.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrante A, Tognoni F, Mensuali-Sodi A, Serra G. 2003. Treatment with thidiazuron for preventing leaf yellowing in cut tulips and chrysanthemum. Acta Horticulturae 624:357–363. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.624.49
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca SC, Oliveira FAR, Brecht JK. 2002. Modelling respiration rate of fresh fruits and vegetables for modified atmosphere packages: a review. Journal of Food Engineering 52:99–119. doi: 10.1016/S0260-8774(01)00106-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han SS. 2003. Role of sugar in the vase solution on postharvest flower and leaf quality of oriental lily ‘Stargazer’. HortScience 38(3):412–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han SS, Miller JA. 2003. Role of ethylene in postharvest quality of cut Oriental lily ‘Stargazer’. Plant Growth Regulation 40:213–222. doi: 10.1023/A:1025023904151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwaya-Inoue M, Takata M. 2001. Trehalose plus chloramphenicol prolong the vase life of tulip flowers. HortScience 36:946–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwaya-Inoue M, Nonami H. 2003. Effects of trehalose on flower senescence from the view point of physical states of water. Environment Control in Biology 41:3–15. doi: 10.2525/ecb1963.41.3
   Google Scholar
• Jones R, McConchie R. 1995. Characteristics of petal senescence in a non-climacteric cut flower. Acta Horticulturae 405:216–223. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1995.405.28
   Google Scholar
• Kader A. 2007. Tecnología Postcosecha de Cultivos Hortofrutícolas. 3rd ed. California, CA: UCANR Publications. 571 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Knee M. 2000. Selection of biocides for use in floral preservatives. Postharvest Biology and Technology 18:227–234. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5214(99)00074-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lara I, Belge B, Goulao L. 2014. The fruit cuticle as a modulator of postharvest quality. Postharvest Biology and Technology 87:103–112. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SY, Baek SY. 2008. Effect of chemical sanitizer combined with modified atmosphere packaging on inhibiting Escherichia coli O157:H7 in commercial spinach. Food Microbiology 25:582–587. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2008.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnish A, Leonard R, Nell T. 2008. Treatment with chlorine dioxide extends the vase life of selected cut flowers. Postharvest Biology and Technology 50:197–207. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Madrid M, Fernández P, Serrano M, Romojaro F. 1998. Factores que determinan la vida útil comercial del clavel. Plantflor 3:25–78.
   Google Scholar
• Montanez JC, Rodríguez FA, Mahajan PV, Frías JM. 2010. Modelling the effect of gas composition on the gas exchange rate in perforation-mediated modified atmosphere packaging. Journal of Food Engineering 96:348–355. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redman P, Dole JM, Maness N, Anderson A. 2002. Postharvest handling of nine specialty cut flower species. Scientia Horticulturae 92:293–303. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4238(01)00294-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid M. 2001. Advances in shipping and handling of ornamentals. Acta Horticulturae 543:277–284. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.543.33
   Google Scholar
• Reid M, Jiang C. 2012. Postharvest biology and technology of cut flowers and potted plants. 1st ed. California, CA: University of California. Horticultural Reviews, Volume 40.
   Google Scholar
• Rennie TJ, Tavoularis S. 2009. Perforation-mediated modified atmosphere packaging. Postharvest Biology and Technology 51:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandhya S. 2010. Modified atmosphere packaging of fresh produce: current status and future needs. LWT – Food Science and Technology 43:381–392. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2009.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serek M, Woltering EJ, Sisler EC, Frello S, Sriskandarajah S. 2006. Controlling ethylene responses in flowers at the receptor level. Biotechnology Advances 24(4):368–381. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano M, Martinez-Romero D, Guillén F, Castillo S, Valero D. 2006. Maintenance of broccoli quality and functional properties during cold storage as affected by modified atmosphere packaging. Postharvest Biology and Technology 39(1):61–68. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2005.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrzypek E, Miyamoto K, Saniewski M, Ueda J. 2005. Jasmonates are essential factors inducing gummosis in tulips: mode of action of jasmonates focusing on sugar metabolism. Journal of plant physiology 162:495–505. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2004.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JP, Ramaswamy HS, Ranganna B, Raghavan GSV. 2003. Packaging of fruits and vegetables. In: Chakraverty A, Mujumdar AS, Raghavan GSV, Ramaswamy HS, editors. Handbook of postharvest technology: cereals, fruits, vegetables, tea, and spices. New York (NY): Marcel Dekker, Inc; p. 539–554.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira J. 2003. The cut flower: postharvest considerations. Journal of Biological Sciences 4:406–442.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins CB. 2000. Responses of horticultural commodities to high carbon dioxide as related to modified atmosphere packaging. HortTechnology 10(3):501–506.
   Google Scholar
• Wu XW, Suh JK, Wang LH. 2013. Effects of modified atmosphere packaging and storage conditions on freshness maintenance of cut flowers of oriental lily ‘Activa’. Acta Horticulturae. 1002:381–387. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.1002.51
   Google Scholar
• Zeltzer S, Meir S, Mayak S. 2001. Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) for long-term shipment of cut flowers. Acta Horticulturae 553:631–634. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.553.152
   Google Scholar