Growth and nutrient status of French marigold (Tagetes patula L.) under biostimulant application

References

• Abbott LK, Macdonald LM, Wong MTF, Webb MJ, Jenkins SN, Farrell M. 2018. Potential roles of biological amendments for profitable grain production – A review. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 256:34–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartwal A, Mall R, Lohani P, Guru SK, Arora S. 2013. Role of secondary metabolites and brassinosteroids in plant defense against environmental stresses. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 32:216–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremmer JM. 1965. Total nitrogen. In: Black C.A, editor. Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Madison, Wisconsin, USA: American Soc.Agric.Inc.; p. 1149–1178.
   Google Scholar
• Bulgari R, Cocetta G, Trivellini A, Vernieri P, Ferrante A. 2015. Biostimulants and crop responses: A review. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture. 31:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulgari R, Franzoni G, Ferrante A. 2019. Biostimulants application in horticultural crops under abiotic stress conditions. Agronomy. 9(306):1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo P, Nelson L, Kloepper JW. 2014. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant and Soil. 383:3–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canellas LP, Olivares FL. 2014. Physiological responses to humic substances as plant growth promoter. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture. 1:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Close DC, Beadle CL, Brown PH. 2005. The physiological basis of containerized tree seedling ‘transplant shock’: A review. Australian Forestry. 68(2):112–120.
   Google Scholar
• Colla G, Nardi S, Cardarelli M, Ertani A, Lucini L, Canaguier R, Rouphael Y. 2015. Protein hydrolysates as biostimulants in horticulture. Scientia Horticulturae. 196:28–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudaš S, Šola I, Sladonja B, Erhatić R, Ban D, Poljuha D. 2016. The effect of biostimulants and fertilizer on ‘low input’ lettuce production. Acta Botanica Croatica. 75:253–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Jardin P. 2015. Plant biostimulants: definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Scientia Horticulturae. 196:3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Nemr MA, El-Desuki M, El-Bassiony AM, Fawzy ZF. 2012. Response of growth and yield of cucumber plants (Cucumis sativus L.) to different foliar applications of humic acid and bio-stimulators. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 6(3):630–637.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrante A, Trivellini A, Vernieri P, Piaggesi A. 2013. Application of Actiwave® for improving the rooting of camellia cuttings. Acta Horticulturae. 1009:213–218.
   Google Scholar
• González-González MF, Ocampo-Alvarez H, Santacruz-Ruvalcaba F, Sánchez-Hernández CV, Casarrubias-Castillo K, Becerril-Espinosa A, Castañeda-Nava JJ, Hernández-Herrera RM. 2020. Physiological, ecological and biochemical implications in tomato plants of two plant biostimulants: arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and seaweed extract. Frontiers in Plant Science. 11:999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jindo K, Canellas L, Albacete A, Figueiredo dos Santos L, Frinhani Rocha R, Carvalho Baia D, Oliveira Aguiar Canellas N, Goron T, Olivares F. 2020. Interaction between humic substances and plant hormones for phosphorous acquisition. Agronomy. 10(5):640.
   Google Scholar
• Khaled H, Fawy HA. 2011. Effect of different levels of humic acids on the nutrient content, plant growth, and soil properties under conditions of salinity. Soil and Water Research. 6:21–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAFF/ADAS. 1986. The analysis of agricultural materials. Reference Book No. 427, third ed. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Monder MJ, Niedzielski M, Woliński K. 2014. Effect of rooting preparations on protein, chlorophyll and carotenoid content in leaves of rosa gallica “duchesse d`angouleme” cuttings. Dendrobiology. 72:29–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikbakht A, Kafi M, Babalar M, Ping Xia Y, Luo A, Etemadi N. 2008. Effect of humic acid on plant growth, nutrient uptake, and postharvest life of gerbera. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 31(12):2155–2167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parađiković N, Teklić T, Zeljković S, Lisjak M, Špoljarević M. 2019. Biostimulants research in some horticultural plant species - A review. Food and Energy Security. 8(2):1–17, e00162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parađiković N, Vinković T, Vinković Vrček I, Tkalec M. 2013. Natural biostimulants reduce the incidence of BER in sweet yellow pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.). Agricultural and Food Science. 22:307–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parađiković N, Zeljković S, Tkalec M, Vinković T, Maksimović I, Haramija J. 2017. Influence of biostimulant application on growth, nutrient status and proline concentration of begonia transplants. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture. 33:89–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira C, Dias MI, Petropoulos SA, Plexida S, Chrysargyris A, Tzortzakis N, Calhelha RC, Ivanov M, Stojković D, Soković M, et al. 2019. The effects of biostimulants, biofertilizers and water-stress on nutritional value and chemical composition of two spinach genotypes (Spinacia oleracea L.). Molecules. 24(4494):1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos AC, Dobbss LB, Santos LA, Fernandes MS, Olivares FL, Aguiar NO, Canellas LP. 2015. Humic matter elicits proton and calcium fluxes and signaling dependent on Ca2+- dependent protein kinase (CDPK) at early stages of lateral plant root development. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture. 2(3):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Shah ZH, Rehman HM, Akhtar T, Alsamadany H, Hamooh BT, Mujtaba T, Daur I, Zahrani YA, Alzahrani HAS, Ali S, et al. 2018. Humic substances: determining potential molecular regulatory processes in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 9:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva TS, Silva APS, de Almeida Santos A, Ribeiro KG, de Souza DC, Bueno PAA, Marques MMM, de Almeida PM, Peron AP. 2020. Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, and toxicity of plant biostimulants produced in Brazil: subsidies for determining environmental risk to non-target species. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 231:233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Špoljarević M, Štolfa I, Lisjak M, Stanisavljević A, Vinković T, Agić D, Parađiković N, Teklić T, Engler M, Klešić K. 2010. Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch) leaf antioxidative response to biostimulators and reduced fertilization with N and K. Agriculture. 16:50–56.
   Google Scholar
• Tkalec M, Parađiković N, Zeljković S, Vinković T. 2012. Influence of medium on growth and development of wild rose in vitro. Conference Proceedings of the International Conference on BioScience: Biotechnology and Biodiversity – Step in the Future – The Forth Joint UNS – PSU Conference. 104–108.
   Google Scholar
• Tkalec M, Vinković T, Baličević R, Parađiković N. 2010. Influence of biostimulants on growth and development of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Acta Agriculturae Serbica. 15:83–88.
   Google Scholar
• Vernieri P, Ferrante A, Borghesi E, Magnani G. 2005. Quality bedding plants using biostimulants. Inf Agrar. 61:57–60.
   Google Scholar
• Vinković T, Parađiković N, Tkalec M, Teklić T, Lončarić Z. 2012. Effect of biostimulants on nutrient content in some organs and tomato plant. Book of abstract of 47th Croatian and 7th International Symposium on Agriculture. 114–115.
   Google Scholar
• Zeljković S, Parađiković N, Babić T, Đurić G, Oljača R, Vinković T, Tkalec M. 2010. Influence of biostimulant and substrate volume on root growth and development of scarlet sage (Salvia splendens L.) transplants. Journal of Agricultural Science. 55(1):29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Zeljković S, Parađiković N, Šušak U, Tkalec M. 2014. Growth and development of basil transplants (Ocimum basilicum L.) under biostimulants application. Agro-knowledge Journal. 15(4):415–424.
   Google Scholar
• Zeljković S, Parađiković N, Vinković T, Tkalec M. 2011. Biostimulant application in the production of seedlings of seasonal flowers. Agro-knowledge Journal. 12(2):175–181.
   Google Scholar
• Zeljković S, Parađiković N, Vinković T, Tkalec M, Maksimović I, Haramija J. 2013. Nutrient status, growth and proline concentration of French marigold (Tagetes patula L.) as affected by biostimulant treatment. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment. 11(3 &4):2324–2327.
   Google Scholar