553
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original articles

Does site architecture matter? The political implications of public- versus private-oriented social network sites in China

, &
Pages 134-153 | Received 10 Jan 2016, Accepted 23 Aug 2016, Published online: 22 Sep 2016

References

  • Baumgartner, J. C., & Morris, J. S. (2009). Myfacetube politics: Social networking websites and political engagement of young adults. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 24–44. doi: 10.1177/0894439309334325
  • Bennett, W. L. (2008). Changing citizenship in the digital age. In W. L. Bennett (Eds.), Civic life online (pp. 1–24). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • boyd, d. (2007). Social network sites: Public, private, or what. Knowledge Tree, 13(1), 1–7.
  • boyd, d., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
  • Carlisle, J. E., & Patton, R. C. (2013). Is social media changing how we understand political engagement? An analysis of Facebook and the 2008 presidential election. Political Research Quarterly, 66(4), 883–895. doi: 10.1177/1065912913482758
  • Chen, H. T., Chan, J. M., & Lee, F. L. F. (in press). Social media use and democratic engagement: A comparative study of Hong Kong, Taiwan, and China. Chinese Journal of Communication.
  • CNNIC. (2014, August 22). Research report on social media user behaviour in China, 2014. Retrieved from http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/ (in Chinese).
  • Creemers, R. (2015). The pivot in Chinese cybergovernance: Integrating internet control in Xi Jinping’s China. China Perspectives, 4, 5–13. Retrieved from http://chinaperspectives.revues.org/6835.
  • Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S., & Passerini, K. (2007, August). Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: A comparison of Facebook and MySpace. Paper presented at the proceedings of AMCIS 2007, Keystone, CO. Retrieved from https://csis.pace.edu/dwyer/research/DwyerAMCIS2007.pdf
  • Effing, R., van Hillegersberg, J., & Huibers, T. (2011). Social media and political participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube democratizing our political systems? In E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh, & H. de Bruijn (Eds.), Electronic participation (Vol. 6847, pp. 25–35). Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Ellison, N. B., & Vitak, J. (2015). Social network site affordances and their relationship to social capital processes. In S. S. Sundar (Eds.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 205–227). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Feezell, J. T., Conroy, M., & Guerrero, M. (2012). Facebook and political engagement: A study of online political group membership and offline political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1535–1546. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.012
  • Gan, C., & Wang, W. (2014). Weibo or Weixin? Gratifications for using different social media. In H. X. Li, M. Mäntymäki, & X. F. Zhang (Eds.), Digital services and information intelligence (pp. 14–22). Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
  • Halpern, D., & Gibbs, J. (2013). Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1159–1168. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.008
  • Hawn, C. (2009). Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: How Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care. Health Affairs, 28(2), 361–368. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.361
  • Hodgkinson, T. (2008, January 14). With friends like these. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2008/jan/14/facebook.
  • Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456. doi: 10.1177/S0038038501000219
  • Johnson, I. (2014, July 4). An online shift in China muffles an open forum. New York Times, p. A5.
  • Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (2010). Data analysis. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 115–139). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Kim, J., Wyatt, R. O., & Katz, E. (1999). News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication, 16(4), 361–385. doi: 10.1080/105846099198541
  • Kushin, M. J., & Kitchener, K. (2009). Getting political on social network sites: Exploring online political discourse on Facebook. First Monday, 14(11), Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/2645/2350. doi: 10.5210/fm.v14i11.2645
  • Kushin, M. J., & Yamamoto, M. (2010). Did social media really matter? College students’ use of online media and political decision making in the 2008 election. Mass Communication and Society, 13(5), 608–630. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2010.516863
  • Lee, F. L. F. (2009). The impact of political discussion in a democratizing society: The moderating role of disagreement and support for democracy. Communication Research, 36(3), 379–399. doi: 10.1177/0093650209333027
  • Lee, F. L. F., & Chan, J. M. (2016). Digital media activities and mode of participation in a protest campaign: The case of the umbrella movement. Information, Communication & Society, 19(1), 4–22. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1093530
  • Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M., Wimmer, A., & Christakis, N. (2008). Tastes, ties, and time: A new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Social Networks, 30(4), 330–342. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2008.07.002
  • MacKinnon, R. (2013). Consent of the networked. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Mansbridge, J. (1999). Everyday talk in the deliberative system. In S. Macedo (Ed.), Deliberative politics (pp. 211–250). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Martin, R. L., & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(2), 28–39.
  • Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063. doi: 10.1177/0093650212466406
  • Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350–361. doi: 10.1177/0270467610380009
  • Rapoza, K. (2011, May 17). China’s Weibos vs US’s Twitter: and the winner is. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2011/05/17/chinas-weibos-vs-uss-twitter-and-the-winner-is/#2c979c66646f.
  • Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32(5), 531–565. doi: 10.1177/0093650205279209
  • Smith, A. N., Fischer, E., & Yongjian, C. (2012). How does brand-related user-generated content differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 102–113. doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.002
  • Stutzman, F. (2007, April 11). The 12-minute definitive guide to Twitter. AOL Developer Network. Retrieved from http://dev.aol.com/article/2007/04/definitive-guide-to-twitter.
  • Štětka, V., & Mazák, J. (2014). Whither slacktivism? Political engagement and social media use in the 2013 Czech parliamentary elections. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8(3), article 1.
  • Tang, G., & Lee, F. L. F. (2013). Facebook use and political participation: The impact of exposure to shared political information, connections with public political actors, and network structural heterogeneity. Social Science Computer Review, 31(6), 763–773. doi: 10.1177/0894439313490625
  • Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Communication Yearbook, 36, 143–189.
  • Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir square. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 363–379. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x
  • Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875–901. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x
  • Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. Cyber-Psychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(3), 107–114. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0226
  • Walsh, K. C. (2004). Talking about politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wei, L. (2013). Social media and political participation in China. In L. Willnat, & A. Aw (Eds.), Social media, culture and politics in Asia (pp. 33–62). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
  • Zhang, W., & Chia, S. C. (2006). The effects of mass media use and social capital on civic and political participation. Communication Studies, 57(3), 277–297. doi: 10.1080/10510970600666974
  • Zhang, W., & Wang, R. (2010). Interest-oriented versus relationship-oriented social network sites in China. First Monday, 15(8), Retrieved from http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2836/2582. doi: 10.5210/fm.v15i8.2836

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.