Partisan selective following on twitter over time: polarization or depolarization?

References

• Adamic, L., & Glance, N. (2005, August). The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. Election: Divided they blog. Paper presented at proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on link discovery, Chicago, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Agresti, A. (2007). An introduction to categorical data analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, D. J., Steele, F., Galbraith, J., & Moustaki, I. (2008). Analysis of multivariate social science data. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Presss.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brundidge, J. (2010). Encountering “difference” in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 680–700. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01509.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, N., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S. (2000). What If politics weren’ta man’s game? Gender, citizen participation, and the lessons of politics. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, M, Sang, Y, & Park, H. W. (2014). Exploring political discussions by Korean Twitter users: A look at opinion leadership and homophily phenomenon. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(6), 582–602. doi: 10.1108/AJIM-11-2012-0089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in twitter using big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 317–332. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damásiom, M. J., & Poupa, C. (2008). Understanding online audiences: New research approaches. Media Psychology Review, 1(1), Retrieved from http://mprcenter.org/review/damasio-online-audiences/?print=print
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996). Have Americans social attitudes become more polarized? American Journal of Sociology, 102, 690–755. doi: 10.1086/230995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of facebook “friends”: social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2005). Culture wars? The myth of polarized america. New York, NY: Pearson Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, J. (2000). Generalized linear models: A unified approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, K. S., Ryu, S., & Park, S. (2015). Fragmentation in the twitter following of news outlets: The representation of South Korean users’ ideological and generational cleavage. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(1), 56–76. doi: 10.1177/1077699014559499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlow, S., & Harp, D. (2012). Collective action on the Web: A cross-cultural study of social networking sites and online and offline activism in the United States and latin america. Information, Communication & Society, 15(2), 196–216. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.591411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausdorf, B., & Hennig, C. (2003). Biotic element analysis in biogeography. Systematic Biology, 52(5), 717–723. doi: 10.1080/10635150390235584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, A. D., Prałat, P., & Zhang, C. Q. (2011). Emergence of segregation in evolving social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(21), 8605–8610. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014486108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S., & Kim, S. H. (2016). Political polarization on twitter: Implications for the use of social media in digital governments. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 777–782. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubalek, Z. (1982). Coefficients of association and similarity, based on binary (presence-absence) data: an evaluation. Biological Reviews, 57(4), 669–689. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1982.tb00376.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. (1990). The accessibility bias in politics: Television news and public opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/2.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media and blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, D. J. (2011). Korean politics on twitter: Networks of politicians and voters. Journal of Communication Research, 48(2), 80–107. Retrieved from http://s-space.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/75545/1/3.pdf doi: 10.22174/jcr.2011.48.2.80
   Google Scholar
• Jang, D. J., & Ghim, D. H. (2011). The structure and dynamics of the Korean twitter network. Journal of Communication Research, 48(1), 59–86. Retrieved from http://s-space.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/75537/1/3_EC9EA5EB8D95ECA784_EAB980EAB8B0ED9B88.pdf doi: 10.22174/jcr.2011.48.1.59
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, M. K., & Zeitner, V. (2003). Internet use and civic engagement: A longitudinal analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(3), 311–334. doi: 10.1086/376947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. J., Bichard, S. L., & Zhang, W. (2009). Communication communities or “cyber ghettos?” A path analysis model examining factors that explain selective exposure to blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(1), 60–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01492.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. J., Kaye, B. K., Bichard, S. L., & Wong, W. J. (2007). Every blog has its day: Politically-interested internet users’ perceptions of blog credibility. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 100–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00388.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joy, L. A., Kimball, M. M., & Zabrack, M. L. (1986). Television and children’s aggressive behavior. In T.M. Williams (Ed.), The impact of television: A natural experiment in three communities (pp. 303–360). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, W. T. (2003). Election politics in South Korea: Ideology, region, generation and the media. Seoul: Purengil.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., Choi, J. Y., & Cho, J. (2008). Changing cleavage structure in new democracies: An empirical analysis of political cleavages in korea. Electoral Studies, 27(1), 136–150. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2007.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korea Information Society Development Institute. (2016). Report of Korean SNS use trend. Retrieved from https://www.kisdi.re.kr/kisdi/common/premium?file=1%7C13868
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, H. W., Lee, C. H., Park, H. S., & Moon, S. (2010, April). What is twitter, a social network or a news media?Paper presented at the 19th international conference on world wide Web, Raleigh, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, E., Sides, J., & Farrell, H. (2010). Self-segregation or deliberation? Blog readership, participation, and polarization in American politics. Perspectives on Politics, 8(1), 141–157. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1151490 doi: 10.1017/S1537592709992714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up His mind in a presidential campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M. Berger (Ed.), Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 18–66). New York, NY: Van Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. M. (2015). Another Look at partisan polarization in the South Korean mass public: Ideological or affective polarization? Korea Observer, 46(2), 211–232. Retrieved from http://kiss.kstudy.com/journal/thesis_name.asp?tname=kiss2002&key=3332439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D., Hahn, K. S., Yook, S. H., & Park, J. (2015). Quantifying discrepancies in opinion spectra from online and offline networks. PloS one, 10(4), e0124722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73(1), 13–22. doi: 10.1093/biomet/73.1.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, J. (2001). Race, school integration, and friendship segregation in america. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 679–716. doi: 10.1086/338954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mummolo, J. (2016). News from the other Side: How topic relevance limits the prevalence of partisan selective exposure. The Journal of Politics, 78(3), 763–773. doi: 10.1086/685584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 838–855. doi: 10.2307/3088437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napoli, P. M. (2011). Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. R. (1986). The paradox of mass politics: Knowledge and opinion in the American electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, G. S. (2011). Rethinking generational conflict in contemporary korea: The search for economic dimensions. Korean Society, 12(1), 3–25. Retrieved from http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/ArticleDetail/NODE01656299
   Google Scholar
• Perlmutter, D. D. (2008). Blogwars. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Pew Research Center for the People. (2008). The internet gains in politics. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2008/01/11/the-internet-gains-in-politics
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Houston, J. B., & Semmler, S. M. (2007). Mediating the vote: The changing Media landscape in U.S. Presidential campaigns. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. L. (2011). Ideology and congress. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. A., Mucha, P. J., Newman, M. E., & Warmbrand, C. M. (2005). A network analysis of committees in the US house of representatives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(20), 7057–7062. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500191102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, V., & Zaller, J. (1993). Who gets the news? Alternative measures of news reception and their implications for research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(2), 133–164. doi: 10.1086/269363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2012). Who watches presidential debates? Measurement problems in campaign effects research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(2), 350–363. doi:10.1086/269363 doi: 10.1093/poq/nfs019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. C. (1969). Models of segregation. The American Economic Review, 59, 488–493. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1823701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., & Nisbet, E. C. (2004). Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation. Political Communication, 21(3), 315–338. doi: 10.1080/10584600490481389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffman, S. S., Reynolds, M. L., Young, F. W., & Carroll, J. D. (1981). Introduction to multidimensional scaling: Theory, methods, and applications. New York, NY: Academic press.
   Google Scholar
• Schramm, W., & Carter, R. F. (1959). The effectiveness of a political telethon. Public Opinion Quarterly, 23, 121–127. doi: 10.1086/266853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O., & Freedman, J. L. (1967). Selective exposure to information: A critical review. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31, 194–213. doi: 10.1086/267513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semaan, B. C., Robertson, S. P., Douglas, S., & Maruyama, M. (2014, February). Social media supporting political deliberation across multiple public spheres: Towards depolarization.Paper presented at the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing, Baltimore, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. (2009). The social media revolution. International Journal of Market Research, 51(4), 559–561. doi: 10.2501/S1470785309200773
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Korea. (2011). Korea social trends 2011. Seoul: Statistics Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trammell, K. D., Tarkowski, A., Hofmokl, J., & Sapp, A. M. (2006). Rzeczpospolita blogów [republic of blog]: examining polish bloggers through content analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), 702–722. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00032.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M. E., & Mutz, D. C. (2009). Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement? Journal of Communication, 59, 40–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorn, C. J. (2001). Generalized estimating equation models for correlated data: A review with applications. American Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 470–490. doi: 10.2307/2669353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar