589
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original articles

Exploring linkage of message frames with personality traits for political advertising effectiveness

, &
Pages 247-263 | Received 21 Sep 2016, Accepted 08 Oct 2017, Published online: 26 Oct 2017

References

  • Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. Y. (2001). “I” seek pleasures and “we” avoid pains: The role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 33–49. doi: 10.1086/321946
  • Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. Y. (2006). Understanding regulatory fit. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 15–19. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.43.1.15
  • Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2006). How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(February), 1–10. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.43.1.1
  • Calonge, D. S. (2015). South Korean education ranks high, but it’s the kids who pay. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/south-korean-education-ranks-high-but-its-the-kids-who-pay-34430
  • Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 388–404. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.388
  • Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117–132. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1996.2675
  • Detweiler, J. B., Bedell, B. T., Salovey, P., Pronin, E., & Rothman, A. J. (1999). Message framing and sunscreen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health Psychology, 18, 189–196. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.18.2.189
  • Dijkstra, A. (2008). The psychology of tailoring-ingredients in computer-tailored persuasion. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 765–784. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00081.x
  • Fowler, E. F., Franz, M. M., & Ridout, T. N. (2016). Political advertising in the United States. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
  • Higgins, E. T. (2000a). Does personality provide unique explanations for behavior? Personality as cross-person variability in general principles. European Journal of Personality, 14(January), 391–407. doi: 10.1002/1099-0984(200009/10)14:5<391::AID-PER394>3.0.CO;2-6
  • Higgins, E. T. (2000b). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217–1230. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1217
  • Higgins, E. T. (2005). Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 209–213. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00366.x
  • Higgins, E. T., Chen Idson, L., Freitas, A. L., Spiegel, S., & Molden, D. C. (2003). Transfer of value from fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1140–1153. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1140
  • Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Chen Idson, L., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3–23. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.27
  • Higgins, E. T., & Silberman, I. (1998). Development of regulatory focus: Promotion and prevention as ways of living. In J. Heckhausen & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulation across the life span (pp. 78–113). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hirsh, J. B., Kang, S., & Bodenhausen, G. (2012). Personalized persuasion: Tailoring persuasive appeals to recipients’ personality traits. Psychological Science, 23(6), 578–581. doi: 10.1177/0956797611436349
  • Huffman, C., Ratneshwar, S., & Mick, D. G. (2000). Consumer goal structures and goal determination processes: An integrative framework. In S. Ratneshwar, D. G. Mick, & C. Huffman (Eds.), Why of consumption: Contemporary perspectives on consumer motives, goals and desire (pp. 9–35). London: Routledge.
  • Kaid, L. L. (2004). Handbook of political communication research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Kaid, L. L., & Johnston, A. (2001). Videostyles in presidential campaigns: Style and content of televised political advertising. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Kaye, K. (2017). Data-driven targeting creates huge 2016 political ad shift: Broadcast TV down 20%, cable and digital way up. AdAge. Retrieved from http://adage.com/article/media/2016-political-broadcast-tv-spend-20-cable-52/307346/
  • Kim, N. (2013). The influence of message framing and issue involvement on promoting abandoned animals adoption behaviors. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 338–341.
  • Kim, S. K., & Yang, Y. (1995). The effects of self-monitoring, usage situations and perceived risk on consumer behavior. Advertising Research, Winter, 103–125.
  • Krosnick, J. A. (1988). The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: A study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluations, and voting behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 196–210. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.196
  • Lee, A., & Aaker, J. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 205–218. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205
  • Lee, S., Khang, H., & Kim, Y. (2016). A cross-cultural perspective on televised political advertising during the presidential election between the US and South Korea: 1992–2012. Asian Journal of Communication, 26(2), 133–152. doi: 10.1080/01292986.2015.1110605
  • Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149–188. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2804
  • Lin, H., & Shen, F. (2012). Regulatory focus and attribute framing: Evidence of compatibility effects in advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 31(1), 169–188. doi: 10.2501/IJA-31-1-169-188
  • Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 854–864. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.854
  • Lowery, S. A., & DeFleur, M. L. (1995). Milestones in mass communication research: Media effects (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
  • Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 361–367. doi: 10.2307/3172593
  • Mannetti, L., Brizi, A., Giacomantonio, M., & Higgins, E. T. (2013). Framing political messages to fit the audience’s regulatory orientation: How to improve the efficacy of the same message content. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e77040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077040
  • Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 500–510. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.500
  • Millar, M. G., & Millar, K. U. (2000). Promoting safe driving behaviors: The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(4), 853–866. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02827.x
  • Perloff, R. M. (2014). The dynamics of political communication: Media and politics in a digital age. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1915–1926. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1915
  • Reese, S. D. (2001). Prologue. In S. Reese, O. Gandy, & A. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 7–31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 3–19. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3
  • Roy, R., & Phau, I. (2014). Examining regulatory focus in the information processing of imagery and analytical advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 43(4), 371–381. doi: 10.1080/00913367.2014.888323
  • Shah, J., Higgins, E. T., & Friedman, R. S. (1998). Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 285–293. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.285
  • Skumanich, S. A., & Kintsfather, D. P. (1996). Promoting the organ donor card: A causal model of persuasion effects. Social Science & Medicine, 43(3), 401–408. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00404-1
  • Tak, J., Kaid, L., & Khang, H. (2007). The reflection of cultural parameters on videostyles of televised political spots in the US and Korea. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(1), 58–77. doi: 10.1080/01292980601114570
  • Turow, J., Delli Carpini, M. X., Draper, N. A., & Howard-Williams, R. (2012). Americans roundly reject tailored political advertising. Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/ 398
  • Zaichkowsky, J. L., (1994). The personal involvement inventory: Reduction, revision, and application to advertising. Journal of Advertising, 23(4), 59–70. doi: 10.1080/00913367.1943.10673459

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.