Actual and perceived polarization on independence-unification views in Taiwan

References

• Ahler, D. J., & Sood, G. (2018). The parties in our heads: Misperceptions about party composition and their consequences. The Journal of Politics, 80(3), 964–981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J. R., Hatemi, P. K., Hibbing, J. R., Martin, N. G., & Eaves, L. J. (2011). The politics of mate choice. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 362–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin-Düzgit, S. (2019). The islamist-secularist divide and Turkey’s descent into severe polarization. In T. Carothers & A. O’Donohue (Eds.), Democracies divided: The global challenge of political polarization (pp. 17–37). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Best, R. E., & McDonald, M. D. (2011). The role of party policy position in the operation of democracy. In R. J. Dalton & C. J. Anderson (Eds.), Citizens, context, and choice: How context shapes citizens’ electoral choices (pp. 79–102). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, B. P. (2020). Polarizing the middle: Internet exposure and public opinion. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(1/2), 99–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carothers, T. (2019). The long path of polarization in the United States. In T. Carothers & A. O’Donohue (Eds.), Democracies divided: The global challenge of political polarization (pp. 65–92). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, T., & O’Donohue, A. (2019). Introduction. In T. Carothers & A. O’Donohue (Eds.), Democracies divided: The global challenge of political polarization (pp. 1–14). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Y.-b. (2019). 世代之間的正義與分配：年齡與經濟世代對薪資公平正義認知 [Justice and redistribution among cohorts: Perceptions of just earnings among age and economic cohorts]. Taiwanese Political Science Review, 23(1), 103–158.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L.-h., Keng, S., & Wang, T. Y. (2009). 兩岸關係與2008年台灣總統大選：認同、利益、威脅與選民投票取向 [Taiwan’s 2008 presidential election and its implications on cross-strait relations: The effects of Taiwanese identity, trade interests and military threats]. Journal of Electoral Studies, 16(2), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Corrales, J. (2005). In search of a theory of polarization: Lessons from Venezuela, 1999–2005. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 79, 105–118.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., & Levendusky, M. S. (2019). What do we measure when we measure affective polarization? Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(1), 114–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, A. M., & Armaly, M. T. (2019). The differential effects of actual and perceived polarization. Political Behavior, 41, 815–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, A. M., & Lupton, R. N. (2020). Value extremity contributes to affective polarization in the US. Political Science Research and Methods, doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2020.27
   Google Scholar
• Feldmann, A. E. (2019). Colombia’s polarizing peace efforts. In T. Carothers & A. O’Donohue (Eds.), Democracies divided: The global challenge of political polarization (pp. 153–176). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Heltzel, G., & Laurin, K. (2020). Polarization in America: Two possible futures. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 179–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, N. (2019). Winner takes all: Elite power struggles and polarization in Bangladesh. In T. Carothers & A. O’Donohue (Eds.), Democracies divided: The global challenge of political polarization (pp. 177–198). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, Y.-c. (2014). 從政黨情感溫度計解析台灣民眾的政治極化 [Political polarization in Taiwan: An analysis on mass feeling thermometer toward political parties]. Journal of Electoral Studies, 21(2), 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, Y.-c. (2019). 台灣民衆的黨性極化及其對民主態度的影響 [The people's partisan polarization and its influence on the attitudes toward democracy in Taiwan]. Taiwanese Political Science Review, 23(2), 41–85.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, Y.-c., & Cheng, S.-f. (2014). 台灣民眾對左右意識型態的認知：以統獨議題取代左右意識型態檢測台灣的政黨極化 [citizens’ perceptions of the left-right ideology in Taiwan: Replacing left-right ideology with the unification-independence issue to measure Taiwan's party polarization]. Taiwanese Political Science Review, 18(2), 79–138.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, Y.-c., & Lin, T.-j. (2013). 台灣政治極化之初探：測量與分析 [Exploration of political polarization in Taiwan: Measurement and analysis]. In C. Huang (Ed.), 國族認同的問卷設計與測量：TEDS與TSCS之比較 [Taiwan’s election and democratization study (TEDS): It’s methodology in retrospect and prospect] (pp. 89–133). Taipei: Wunan.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C. (2019). Generation effects? Evolution of independence-unification views in Taiwan, 1996–2016. Electoral Studies, 58, 103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C., & Chang, C. C. (2020). 台灣政經傳播研究：2019年民眾定群追蹤面訪調查 [Taiwan Institute for Governance and Communication Research (TIGCR), 2019: Political Polarization Survey (TIGCR-PPS 2019)]. https://tigcr.nccu.edu.tw/. doi:https://doi.org/10.6923/TW-TIGCR-PPS2019
   Google Scholar
• Hui, V. T.-b. (2020). Beijing’s hard and soft repression in Hong Kong. Orbis, 64(2), 289–311.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 763(3), 405–431.
   Google Scholar
• Kuan, H.-c. (2018). 台灣青年世代統獨與兩岸經貿交流態度之探索 [Exploring the attitudes of Taiwan’s young generation towards unification-independence and cross-strait economic exchanges]. Prospect Quarterly, 19(2), 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Levendusky, M. S., & Malhotra, N. (2016). (Mis)perceptions of partisan polarization in the American public. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 378–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, T.-j. (2007). 政治支持與民主鞏固 [Political support and democratic consolidation]. Political Science Review, 34, 71–104.
   Google Scholar
• Lupu, N. (2015). Party polarization and mass partisanship: A comparative perspective. Political Behavior, 37(2), 331–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignozzetti, U., & Spektor, M. (2019). Brazil: When political oligarchies limit polarization but fuel populism. In T. Carothers & A. O’Donohue (Eds.), Democracies divided: The global challenge of political polarization (pp. 228–254). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, S.-y. (2017). 台灣民眾對於左右派辨識能力之初探 [A preliminary investigation of citizens’ capability of identifying the ideology in Taiwan]. International and Public Affairs, 7, 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Sahoo, N. (2019). Hindu nationalism and political polarization in India. In T. Carothers & A. O’Donohue (Eds.), Democracies divided: The global challenge of political polarization (pp. 93–125). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Sheng, S.-y. (2002). 統獨議題與台灣選民的投票行為：1990年代的分析 [The issue Taiwan independence vs. unification with the mainland and voting behavior in Taiwan: An analysis in the 1990s]. Journal of Electoral Studies, 9(1), 41–80.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C.-h., & Chen, L.-h. (2015). 「中國因素」或是「公民不服從」？從定群追蹤樣本探討太陽花學運之民意 [China factor or civic disobedience? Explaining support for the sunflower movement with panel data]. Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy, 27(4), 573–603.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C.-h., Wang, D.-m., & Tossutti, L. S. (2008). Between independence and unification: An ordered probit analysis of panel survey data on Taiwan’s constitutional future. Issues & Studies, 44(4), 71–98.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, A. H.-e. (2019). The myth of polarization among Taiwanese voters: The missing middle. Journal of East Asian Studies, 19(3), 275–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S.-j., Chen, C.-m., & Hung, Y.-c. (2014). 民眾對於同性戀的認知與接受程度之探討 [Discussion on the public’s cognition and acceptance of homosexuality]. Journal of Engineering Technology and Education, 11(1), 30–42.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, J. R. (2010). Carlos Mesa, Evo Morales, and a divided Bolivia (2003–2005). Latin American Perspectives, 37(3), 51–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westfall, J., Van Boven, L., Chambers, J. R., & Judd, C. M. (2015). Perceiving political polarization in the United States: Party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 145–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C.-e., & Lin, Y.-t. (2013). 兩岸經貿開放、認同與投票選擇：2008年與2012年總統選舉的分析 [Cross-strait economic openness, identity, and vote choice: An analysis of the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections]. Journal of Electoral Studies, 20(2), 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, N.-t. (2002). 認同衝突和政治信任：現階段台灣族群政治的核心難題 [Identity conflict and political trust: Ethnic politics in contemporary Taiwan]. Taiwanese Sociology, 4, 75–118.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, E. C.-h., & Lim, K.-y. (2013). 解析台灣民眾統獨偏好：一個兩難又不確定的選擇 [Analyzing Taiwanese public opinion toward future cross-strait relations: Choice under ambiguity and uncertainty]. Taiwanese Political Science Review, 17(2), 165–230.
   Google Scholar
• Zellner, A. (1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regression equations and tests of aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57, 500–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar