Interacting with the State via Information and Communication Technologies

References

• Ahuja, M., & Singh, A. P. (2005b). Computerisation of Land Records: Inter-state variations. In: Habibullah, W. & Ahuja, M. (eds.) Land Reforms in India. Volume 10: Computerisation of Land Records. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ahuja, M., & Singh, A. P. (2006). “Evaluation of Computerisation of Land Records in Karnataka: A Study from Gulbarga District”. Economic and Political Weekly. Vol. 41 (01): 69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (2000). Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: a practical handbook. London, SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, S. (2000). Governance, Economic Settings and Poverty in Bangalore. Environment & Urbanisation 12(1): 35–56.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin S., Bhuvaneswari R., Rajan P., & Manjunath, B., (2005) Bhoomi: ‘E-Governance’, Or An Anti-Politics Machine Necessary to Globalise Bangalore? Bangalore: International Institute of Information Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar, S., & Chawla, R. (2005). Bhoomi: Online Delivery of Record of Right Tenancy. In: Habibullah, W. & Ahuja, M. (eds.) Land Reforms in India. Volume 10: Computerisation of Land Records. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. (1995). Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W., & Law, J. (1992). Shaping Technology/ Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge MA, London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., & Zouridis, S. (2002) From street-level to system-level bureaucracies: How information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control. Public Administration Review, 62, 174–184.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P. (2002). The Politics of the Governed. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla, R., & Bhatnagar, S. 2004. Online Delivery of Land Titles to Rural Farmers in Karnataka, India. Scaling up Poverty Reduction: A Global Learning Process and Conference. Shanghai: International Bank for Development and Reconstruction / The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Los Angeles, SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Corbridge, S., et al. (2005). Seeing the State: Governance and Governmentality in India, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De, R. (2005). E-Government systems in developing countries: Stakeholders and conflict. In Wimmer, M. A., Traunmiller, R., Grounlund, A., and Anderson, K. V. (Eds.), EGOV. Heildelberg. Springer, 26–37.
   Google Scholar
• De, R. (2009). Caste Structures and E-Governance in a Developing Country. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. Bogota, Columbia. ACM International Conference Proceedings Series.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). ‘Introduction: The Discipline and Practices of Qualitative Research’. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds). Handbook of Qualitative Research London, Sage: 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, C. J., & Hariss, J. (2001). For an anthropology of Indian State. In: Fuller, C. J. & Veronique, B. (eds.) The Everyday State and Society in Modern India. London: Hurst & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gatty, N. (2009). Information Technology for Governance Reforms: Land Records Computerisation in an Indian State. United Kingdom: Institute of Development Studies, Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Gil-Garcia, R. J., & Martinez-Moyano, I. J. (2007). Understanding the evolution of e-government: The influence of systems of rules on public sector dynamics. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 266–290.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. (1995) Blurred boundaries: The discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state. American Ethnologist, 22, 375–402.
   Google Scholar
• Haila, A. 2002. The Market as the New Emperor. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31, 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of individuals in public services. New York, Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Madon, S. (2006) IT-based government-reform initiatives in the Indian state of Gujarat. Journal of International Development, 18, 877–888.
   Google Scholar
• Meena S. D., Thakur V., Shukla D. R., & Sisodia, O. P. (2005). ‘Computerisation of Land Records: National Perspective’. In: Habibullh W. & Ahuja M. (Eds.) Land Reforms in India Volume 10: Computerisation of Land Records. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J., & Bovens, M. (2005). Public Accountability in the Information age: E Government as Technological and Institutional Innovation in Public Administration. In V. Bekkers and & V. Homburg (Eds.) The Information Ecology of E-Government. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Miles, M. B. & A. M. Huberman (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, Calif, Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J.(2003). Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rossel, P., & Finger, M. (2007). Conceptualising e-Governance. Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governance held in Macao, China: ACM International Conference Proceedings Series.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, V., & Gururaj, J. (2009). Nemmadi Telecentre Project. In: Bagga, P. K. & Gupta, P. (eds.) Transforming Government – e-Government Initiatives in India. ICFAI University Press. Pp. 311–326.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. R. (ed). (1985). Military Enterprise and Technological Change. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, R. (2009). Diversity: A Challenge to Urban Governance. Toronto: APSA Toronto Meeting Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• von Haldenwang, C. (2002). Electronic Government (E-Government) and Development: Does the Digital Divide Contribute to the Governance Divide? A paper presented at EA DI-conference in Ljubljana.
   Google Scholar
• William, R, & Edge, D (1996). The Social Shaping of Technology. Research Policy (25):856–899
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (2001). World Development Report 2002: Building Institutions for Markets. New York: Oxford University Press, The World Bank
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (2006). Reforming public services in India. Drawing lessons from success. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (2007). Land Administration Reform: Indicators of Success and Future Challenges. Washington, DC: IBRD/World Bank.
   Google Scholar