On mainstream parties’ professionalized use of populist communication on social networking sites: an analysis of party Facebook contents in Taiwan’s 2020 national election

References

• Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Reinemann, C., Stromback, J., & de Vreese, C. (2017). Populist political communication in Europe. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, T., de Lange, S. L., & Rooduijn, M. (2016). Inclusion and mainstreaming? Radical right-wing populist parties in the new millennium. In T. Akkerman, S. L. de Lange, & M. Rooduijn (Eds.), Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: Into the mainstream? (pp. 1–28). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aslanidis, P. (2016). Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies, 64(1_suppl), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batto, N. (2021). The impact of Han Kuo-yu’s populist rhetoric in the 2018 Kaohsiung mayoral election. Journal of Election Studies, 28(2), 47–94.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institution. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blassing, S., Udris, L., Staender, A., & Vogler, D. (2021). Popularity on Facebook during election campaigns: An analysis of issues and emotions in parties’ online communication. International Journal of Communication, 15, 4399–4419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, E., & Negrine, R. (2017). The populist communication style: Toward a critical framework. International Journal of Communication, 11, 178–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumler, J. G., & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication, 16(3), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossetta, M. (2017). Fighting fire with fire: Mainstream adoption of the populist political style in the 2014 Europe debates between Nick Clegg and Nigel Farage. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(4), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117715646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracciale, R., & Martella, A. (2017). Define the populist political communication style: The case of Italian political leaders on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1310–1329. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, M. (2011). Populist communication and publicity: An empirical study of contextual differences in Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review, 17(3), 286–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02019.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vreese, C., Esser, F., Aalberg, T., Reinemann, C., & Stanyer, J. (2018). Populism as an expression of political communication content and style: A new perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(4), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218790035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., Riefler, P., & Roth, K. (2008). Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1203–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Happer & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engesser, S., Fawzi, N., & Larsson, A. O. (2017). Populist online communication: Introduction to the special issue. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1279–1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, N., Blassnig, S., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., & Esser, F. (2019). Populists prefer social media over talk shows: An analysis of populist messages and stylistic elements across six countries. Social Media + Society, 5(1), 205630511882335. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118823358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, N., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Blassnig, S., & Esser, F. (2017). Extreme parties and populism: An analysis of Facebook and Twitter across six countries. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1347–1364. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1329333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, R., & Römmele, A. (2009). Measuring the professionalization of political campaigning. Party Politics, 15(3), 265–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068809102245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haim, M., Kümpel, A. S., & Brosius, H.-B. (2018). Popularity cues in online media: A review of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and general effects. SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 7(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-58
   Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., Schmuck, D., Bos, L., & Ecklebe, S. (2021). Interacting with the ordinary people: How populist messages and styles communicated by politicians trigger users’ behaviour on social media in a comparative context. European Journal of Communication, 36(3), 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120978723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., Schmuck, D., Schulz, A., Wirz, D., Matthes, J., Bos, L., Corbu, N., & Andreadis, I. (2021). The effects of populist identity framing on populist attitudes across Europe: Evidence from a 15-country comparative experiment. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33(3), 491–510. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edaa018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. A., Carlin, R., Littvay, L., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2019). The ideational approach to populism: Concept, theory, and analysis. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heinisch, R. (2003). Success in opposition – failure in government: Explaining the performance of right-wing populist parties in public office. West European Politics, 26(3), 91–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380312331280608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiss, R., Schmuck, D., & Matthes, J. (2019). What drives interaction in political actors’ Facebook posts? Profile and content predictors of user engagement and political actors’ reactions. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1497–1513. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1445273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heydarian, R. J. (2018). The rise of duterte: A populist revolt against elite democracy. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Holtz-Bacha, C. (2002). Professionalization of political communication. Journal of Political Marketing, 1(4), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1300/J199v01n04_02
   Google Scholar
• Hu, C.-K., & Chiang, S.-H. (2020). Populism in Taiwan: Han Kuo-yu and his supporters. Taiwan International Studies Quarterly, 16(3), 155–183.
   Google Scholar
• Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, P., & Holmes, R. (2020). A new penal populism? Rodrigo duterte, public opinion, and the war on drugs in the Philippines. Journal of East Asian Studies, 20(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2020.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2005). Populism: What’s in a name? In Populism and the mirror of democracy (pp. 32–49). Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lams, L. (2018). Issues salience and framing in the Taiwanese 2016 presidential election campaign: An analysis of the KMT and DPP campaign discourses. International Journal of Taiwan Studies, 1(2), 301–330. https://doi.org/10.1163/24688800-00102004
   Google Scholar
• Liao, D., Lin, J.-C., Liu, D., & Yang, Y. (2020). She cyun mei ti shih bian chuei jheng dang de syuan jyu dong yuan li ci?—Tai wan guo huei da syuan wu jheng dang lian shu shih yong jhih bi jiao” [Is social media a weapon for political mobilization by fringe parties? A comparison of Facebook uses of five parliamentary parties in the 2020 national election]. In T.-P. Liang (Ed.), Smart electronic commerce III (pp. 332–353). Intelligent Electronic Commerce Research Center, NSYSU.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, J., d’Haenens, L., & Liao, D. (2020). Does the left-right ideological distinction help differentiate ‘populist’ communicative patterns on social media? An analysis of the Facebook posts of two ‘populist’ candidates in the 2017 German federal election. Taiwanese Journal of Political Science, (86), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.6166/TJPS.202012_(86).0001
   Google Scholar
• Magin, M., Podschuweit, N., Haßler, J., & Russmann, U. (2017). Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication. A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society, 20(11), 1698–1719. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1254269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maly, I. (2018). Populism as a mediatized communicative relation: The birth of algorithmic populism. Tilburg papers in culture studies rapid social and cultural transformation: Online & offline, tilburg.
   Google Scholar
• Manucci, L., & Weber, E. (2017). Why the big picture matters: Political and media populism in Western Europe since the 1970s. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marien, S., Goovaerts, I., & Elstub, S. (2020). Deliberative qualities in televised election debates: The influence of the electoral system and populism. West European Politics, 43(6), 1262–1284. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1651139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, G. (2014). Mediatization and political populism. In F. Esser & J. Strömbäck (Eds.), Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of western democracies (pp. 42–56). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, G., & Bracciale, R. (2018). Socially mediated populism: The communicative strategies of political leaders on Facebook. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0104-x
   Google Scholar
• Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. (2002). The constitutive ambiguity of populism. In Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 1–21). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negrine, R., & Lilleker, D. G. (2002). The professionalization of political communication: Continuities and change in media practices. European Journal of Communication, 17(3), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323102017003688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmann, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., & Nielsen, R. (2020). Reuters institute digital news report 2019. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panao, R. A. L., & Pernia, R. A. (2022). Fear and loathing or strategic priming? Unveiling the audience in duterte’s crime rhetoric. Journal of East Asian Studies, 22(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2022.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papathanassopoulos, S., & Negrine, R. (2019). Political communication, digital inequality and populism. In Digital media inequalities: Policies against divides, distrust and discrimination (pp. 79–94). Nordicom.
   Google Scholar
• Porten-Cheé, P., Haßler, J., Jost, P., Eilders, C., & Maurer, M. (2018). Popularity cues in online media: Theoretical and methodological perspectives. SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 7(2), 208–230. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2018-2-80
   Google Scholar
• Reinemann, C., Stanyer, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., & de Vreese, C. (2019). Communicating populism: Comparing actor perceptions, media coverage, and effects on citizens in Europe. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, B. (2004). The emotional deficit in political communication. Political Communication, 21, 339–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roemmele, A., & Gibson, R. (2020). Scientific and subversive: The two faces of the fourth era of political campaigning. New Media & Society, 22(4), 595–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M. (2014). The nucleus of populism: In search of the lowest common denominator. Government and Opposition, 49(4), 573–599. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2013.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmuck, D., & Hameleers, M. (2020). Closer to the people: A comparative content analysis of populist communication on social networking sites in pre- and post-Election periods. Information, Communication & Society, 23(10), 1531–1548. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1588909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwörer, J. (2021). The growth of populism in the political mainstream: The contagion effect of populist messages on mainstream parties’ communication. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, N. (2023). Populism and social media use: Comparing the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s strategic use of Twitter during the 2014 and the 2019 election campaigns. Media Asia, 50(2), 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2022.2135269
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, S. (2017). Fragile hegemony: Modi, social media, and competitive electoral populism in India. International Journal of Communication, 11, 4158–4180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanyer, J., Salgado, S., & Strömbäck, J. (2017). Populist actors as communication or political actors as communication: Cross-national findings and perspectives. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Stromback, & C. de Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 353–364). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J. (2007). Political marketing and professionalized campaigning. Journal of Political Marketing, 6(2–3), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1300/J199v06n02_04
   Google Scholar
• Tan, A., & Ho, K. (2017). Cross-strait relations and the Taiwan voter. In The Taiwan voter (pp. 158–168). University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, A., & Curato, N. (2019). Populism in the Philippines. In D. Stockemer (Ed.), Populism around the world: A comparative perspective (pp. 49–65). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/422412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth, W., Esser, F., Wettstein, M., Engesser, S., Wirz, D., Schulz, A., Ernst, N., Büchel, F., Caramani, D., Manucci, L., Steenbergen, M., Bernhard, L., Weber, E., Hänggli, R., Dalmus, C., Schemer, C., & Müller, P. (2016). The appeal of populist ideas, strategies and styles: A theoretical model and research design for analyzing populist political communication. National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century.
   Google Scholar
• Wirz, D. (2023). Emotions and populist communication. In L. Manucci (Ed). The populism interviews (pp. 91–94). Routledge.
   Google Scholar