The Politics of Network Governance in Europe: The Case of Energy Regulation

References

• Bache, I., M.V. Flinders, and M. Flinders (2005). Multi-level Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boje, D.M., and D.A. Whetten (1981). ‘Effects of Organizational Strategies and Contextual Constraints on Centrality and Attributions of Influence in Interorganizational Networks’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26:3, 378–95.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S.P. (2005). ‘Centrality and Network Flow’, Social Networks, 27:1, 55–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S.P., and M.G. Everett (2006). ‘A Graph-theoretic Perspective on Centrality’, Social Networks, 28:4, 466–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, Steve P., Martin G. Everett, and Linton C. Freeman (2002). ‘Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis’. Harward: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Carrington, P.J., J. Scott, and S. Wasserman (2005). Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T., and S. Piattoni (2003). Informal Governance in the European Union. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D., and M. Thatcher (2005). ‘The New Governance of Markets and Non-Majoritarian Regulators’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy Administration, and Institutions, 18:3, 329–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen, D., and M. Thatcher (2008a). ‘Network Governance and Multi-level Delegation: European Networks of Regulatory Agencies’, Journal of Public Policy, 28:1, 49–71.
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D., and M. Thatcher (2008b). ‘The Emergence of Networks of European Regulators’, Journal of Public Policy, 27:1.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, K.S. (1977). ‘Exchange and Power in Networks of Interorganizational Relations’, The Sociological Quarterly, 18:1, 62–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diani, M., and D. McAdam (2003). Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Djelic, M.L., and S. Quack (2010). Transnational Communities: Shaping Global Economic Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Djelic, M.L., and K. Sahlin-Andersson (2006). Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eberlein, B., and E. Grande (2005). ‘Beyond Delegation: Transnational Regulatory Regimes and the EU Regulatory State’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12:1, 89–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberlein, B., and A.L. Newman (2008). ‘Escaping the International Governance Dilemma? Incorporated Transgovernmental Networks in the European Union’, Governance, 21:1, 25–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, M.G., and S.P. Borgatti (2005). ‘Extending Centrality’, in Peter J. Carrington, John Scott and Stanley Wasserman (eds.), Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57–76.
   Google Scholar
• Faust, K. (1997). ‘Centrality in Affiliation Networks’, Social Networks, 19:2, 157–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finger, M., and F. Varone (2009). ‘Regulatory Practices and the Role of Technology in Network Industries: The Case of Europe’, in The Governance of Network Industries: Institutions, Technology and Policy in Reregulated Infrastructures. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, 87–101.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, John (2007). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilardi, Fabrizio (2008). Delegation in the Regulatory State: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Glachant, J.M., and F. Lévêque (2009). Electricity Reform in Europe: Towards a Single Energy Market. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P.M. (1992). ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, International Organization, 46:1, 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanneman, R.A., and M. Riddle (2011). ‘A Brief Introduction to Analyzing Social Network Data’, in J. Scott and P.J. Carrington (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, A. (2003). ‘New Modes of Governance in Europe: Increasing Political Capacity and Policy Effectiveness’, The State of the European Union, 6, 105–126.
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, Adrienne, and Sandra Eckert (2008). ‘New Modes of Governance in the Shadow of Hierarchy: Self-regulation by Industry in Europe’, Journal of Public Policy, 28:1, 113–138.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S. (1998). ‘The Study of the European Union II: The “New Governance” Agenda and its Rival’, Journal of European Public Policy, 5:1, 38–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A.N., T.M. Stearns, and C.B. Shrader (1990). ‘Structure, Context, and Centrality in Interorganizational Networks’, Journal of Business Research, 20:4, 333–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks (2001). Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks (2003). ‘Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance’, American Political Science Review, 97:2, 233–43.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J.C. (1983). ‘Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements’, Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 527–53.
   Google Scholar
• Kenis, P., and K.G. Provan (2009). ‘Towards an Exogenous Theory of Public Network Performance’, Public Administration, 87:3, 440–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.H., and J.F.M. Koppenjan (2000). ‘Politicians and Interactive Decision Making: Institutional Spoilsports or Playmakers’, Public Administration, 78:2, 365–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.H., J. Koppenjan, and K. Termeer (1995). ‘Managing Networks in the Public Sector: A Theoretical Study of Management Strategies in Policy Networks’, Public Administration, 73:3, 437–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoke, D., and S. Yang (2008). Social Network Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Künneke, R.W. (2009). ‘Convergence of Gas and Electricity Markets: Economic and Technological Drivers’, in A. Bausch and B. Schwenker (eds.), Handbook Utility Management. Dordrecht: Springer, 263–78.
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, David (2011). ‘Regulatory Networks and Regulatory Agencification: Towards a Single European Regulatory Space’, Journal of European Public Policy, 18:6, 810–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggetti, Martino (2007). ‘De Facto Independence After Delegation: A Fuzzy-Set Analysis’, Regulation and Governance, 1:4, 271–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggetti, Martino, and Fabrizio Gilardi (2011). ‘The Policy-making Structure of European Regulatory Networks and the Domestic Adoption of Standards’, Journal of European Public Policy, 18:6, 830–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, Giandomenico (1994). ‘The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe’, West European Politics, 17:3, 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, Giandomenico (1996). Regulating Europe. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, Giandomenico (1999). ‘The Regulatory State and Its Legitimacy Problems’, West European Politics, 22:1, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G., F.W. Scharpf, P.C. Schmitter, and W. Streeck (1996). Governance in the European Union. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Marwell, G., P.E. Oliver, and R. Prahl (1988). ‘Social Networks and Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. III’, American Journal of Sociology, 94:3, 502–34.
   Google Scholar
• Mattli, W., and T. Büthe (2003). ‘Setting International Standards: Technological Rationality or Primacy of Power?’, World Politics, 56:1, 1–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J.D., and M.N. Zald (1977). ‘Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory’, American Journal of Sociology, 82:6, 1212–41.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, Michael (2002). ‘Review Article: Understanding the Regulatory State’, British Journal of Political Science, 32, 391–413.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Y. (2007). ‘Problems of Democratic Accountability in Network and Multilevel Governance’, European Law Journal, 13:4, 469–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Yannis, and Arthur Benz (2006). Governance and Democracy: Comparing National, European and International Experiences. Abingdon, Oxfordshire and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Piattoni, S. (2010). The Theory of Multi-level Governance: Conceptual, Empirical, and Normative Challenges. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K.G., and P. Kenis (2008). ‘Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18:2, 229–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R.A.W. (1996). ‘The New Governance: Governing without Government’, Political Studies, 44, 652–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P.A. (1988). ‘An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-oriented Learning Therein’, Policy Sciences, 21:2, 129–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabel, C.F., and J. Zeitlin (2010). Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: towards a New Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, John (2000). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London and Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Seawright, J., and J. Gerring (2008). ‘Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options’, Political Research Quarterly, 61:2, 294–307.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, A.M. (2004). A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, M., and D. Coen (2008). ‘Reshaping European Regulatory Space: An Evolutionary Analysis’, West European Politics, 31, 806–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Boetzelaer, K., and S. Princen (2012). ‘The Quest for Co-ordination in European Regulatory Networks’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies., 50, 819–36.
   Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, J. (2005). ‘Towards the Internal Energy Market: How to Bridge a Regulatory Gap and Build a Regulatory Framework’, European Review of Energy Markets, 1:1, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Wonka, A., and B. Rittberger (2010). ‘Credibility, Complexity and Uncertainty: Explaining the Institutional Independence of 29 EU Agencies’, West European Politics, 33:4, 730–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesilkagit, K. (2011). ‘‘Institutional Compliance’, European Networks of Regulation and the Bureaucratic Autonomy of National Regulatory Authorities’, Journal of European Public Policy, 18:7, 962–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. (2000). ‘Democratic Governance beyond the Nation-state’, European Journal of International Relations, 6:2, 183–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar