The Media as Political Agenda-Setters: Journalists’ Perceptions of Media Power in Eight West European Countries

References

• Bachrach, Peter, and Moron Baratz (1962). ‘Two Faces of Power’, American Political Science Review, 56:4, 941–952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bardi, Luciano, and Peter Mair (2008). ‘The Parameters of Party Systems’, Party Politics, 14:2, 147–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, Kenneth, and Nina Wiesehomeier (2009). ‘Expert Judgments’, in Susanne Pickel, Gert Pickel, Hans-Joachim Lauth, and Detlef Jahn (eds.), Methoden der vergleichenden Politik- und Socialwissenschaft. Neue Entwicklungen und Anwendungen [Methods of Comparative Political and Social Science. New Developments and Applications]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 497–516.
   Google Scholar
• Blumler, Jay G., and Michael Gurevitch (1995). The Crisis of Public Communication. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brandenburg, Heinz (2002). ‘Who Follows Whom? The Impact of Parties on Media Agenda Formation in the 1997 British General Elections Campaign’, Harvard Journal of Press/Politics, 7:4, 34–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, Larry M. (1996). Politicians and the Press: Who Leads, Who Follows?. San Francisco: APSA.
   Google Scholar
• Brants, Kees, and Philip van Praag (2006). ‘Signs of Media Logic; Half A Century of Political Communication in The Netherlands’, Javnost/The Public, 13:1, 25–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Jonathan, Yariv Tsfati, and Tamir Sheafer (2008). ‘The Influence of Presumed Media Influence in Politics. Do Politicians’ Perceptions of Media Power Matter?’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 72:2, 331–44.
   Google Scholar
• Comparative European Politics. 3rd edition Colomer Josep M. Routledge London 2008
   Google Scholar
• Curran, James (2012). Media and Democracy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert (1957). ‘The Concept of Power’, Behavioural Sciences, 2:3, 201–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, Aeron (2007). ‘Investigating journalists’ influences on political issue agendas at Westminster’, Political Communication, 24:2, 181–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearing, James W., and Everett M. Rogers (1996). Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denham, Bryan E. (2010). ‘Towards Conceptual Consistency in Studies of Agenda-building Processes: A Scholarly Review’, Review of Communication, 10:4, 306–323.
   Google Scholar
• Deschouwer, Kris (2009). The Politics of Belgium. Governing a Divided Society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Donsbach, Wolfgang, and Thomas E. Patterson (2004). ‘Political News Journalists; Partisanship, Professionalism, and Political Roles in Five Countries’, in Frank Esser and Barbara Pfetsch (eds.), Comparing Political Communication; Theories, Cases, and Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 251–270.
   Google Scholar
• Esser, Frank (2008). ‘Dimensions of Political News Culture: Sound Bite and Image Bite News in France, Germany, Great Britain, and the United Kingdom’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13:4, 401–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges Esser Frank Pfetsch Barbara Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2004
   Google Scholar
• European Social Survey Round 5 Data (2010). Data File Edition 1.0. Norwegian social science data services, Norway – Data archive and distributor of ESS data.
   Google Scholar
• Feldstein, Mark (2007). ‘Dummies and Ventriloquists: Models of How Sources Set the Investigative Agenda’, Journalism, 8:5, 543–553.
   Google Scholar
• Freedom House (2009). Freedom of the Press 2008 Survey Release, available at http://www.freedomhouse.org (accessed December 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, and Rune Stubager (2010). ‘The Political Conditionality of Mass Media Influence. When Do Parties Follow Mass Media Attention’, British Journal of Political Science, 40:3, 663–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallin, Daniel, and Paolo Mancini (1984). ‘Speaking of the President: Political Structure and Representational Form in U.S. and Italian TV News’, Theory and Society, 13, 829–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallin, Daniel, and Paolo Mancini (2004). Comparing Media Systems. Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanitzsch, Thomas (2009). ‘Comparative Journalism Studies’, in Karin Wahl-Jorgensen and Thomas Hanitzsch (eds.), The Handbook of Journalism Studies. London: Routledge, 413–427.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkin, Jonathan (2005). ‘Spain: Proportional Representation with Majoritarian Outcomes’, in Michael Gallagher and Paul Mitchell (eds.), The Politics of Electoral Systems. New York: Oxford University Press, 375–394.
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, David N., Christian Elmelund-Praestekaer, Erik Albaek, and Claes H. de Vreese (2009). ‘The Public or Parties in the Media? A Study of Public, Party and Media Issue Agendas in five Danish Election Campaigns’, Javnost/The Public, 16:3, 71–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, Bengt (2004). ‘Mass Media, Interpersonal Communication or Personal Experience? Perceptions of Media Effects among Swedish Politicians’, Nordicom-Review, 25:1–2, 259–276.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, Mary, Gianpietro Mazzoleni, and Denis McQuail (2004). The Media in Europe; the Euromedia Handbook, 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• King, Anthony (1994). ‘Chief Executives in Western Europe’, in Developing Democracy (ed.), Ian Budge and David McKay. London: Sage, 150–163.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, John W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael, and W. Bent Hunt (1992). Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Light, Paul C. (1982). The President’s Agenda: Domestic Policy Choice from Kennedy to Carter (With Notes on Ronald Reagan). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend (1999). Patterns of Democracy; Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, Peter (2011). ‘Explaining Perceived Media Influence in Politics. An Analysis of the Interplay of Context and Attitudes in Four European Democracies’, Publizistik, 56, 27–50.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, Gianpietro (1987). ‘Media Logic and Party Logic in Campaign Coverage: The Italian General Election of 1983’, European Journal of Communication, 2:1, 81–103.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, Frands (2004). ‘Denmark’, in Mary Kelly, Gianpietro Mazzoleni and Denis McQuail (eds.), The Media in Europe; The Euromedia Handbook., 3rd ed. London: Sage, 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Pfetsch, Barbara, and Eva Mayerhöffer (2011)., Vordergründige Nähe – Zur Kommunikations-kultur von Politik- und Medieneliten in Deutschland‘ [Superficial Closeness – On the Communication Culture of Political and Media Elite in Germany], Medien und Kommunikations Wisschenschaft, 59:1, 40–59.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, Leonard (1999). ‘Measuring Party Orientations towards European Integration: Results from an Expert Survey’, European Journal of Political Research, 36:2, 283–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese, Stephen D. (1991). ‘Setting the Media’s Agenda: A Power Balance Perspective’, Communication Yearbook, 14, 309–340.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Everett M., and James W. Dearing (1988). ‘Agenda-Setting Research: Where Has It Been, Where Is It Going?’, Communication Yearbook, 11, 555–594.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, Giovanni (1976). Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Manfred G. (2008). ‘Germany: The Grand Coalition State’, in Josep M. Colomer (ed.), Comparative European Politics. (3rd edition). London: Routledge, 58–93.
   Google Scholar
• Semetko, Holli, Jay G. Blumler, Michael Gurevitch, and David Weaver (1991). The Formation of Campaign Agendas: A Comparative Analysis of Party and Media Roles in Recent American and British Elections. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, Pamela J., Martin Eichholz, Eunyi Kim, and Brenda Wrigley (2001). ‘Individual and Routine Forces in Gatekeeping’, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78:2, 233–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siaroff, Alan (2003). ‘Two-and-a-Half-Party Systems and the Comparative Role of the “Half”’, Party Politics, 9:3, 267–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strom, Kaare (1997). ‘Democracy, Accountability, and Coalition Bargaining’, European Journal of Political Research, 31, 47–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, Jesper (2011). ‘Mediatization and Perceptions of the Media’s Political Influence’, Journalism Studies, 12:4, 423–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, Jesper, and Lars W. Nord (2006). ‘Do Politicians Lead the Tango? A Study of the Relationship between Swedish Journalists and their Political Sources in the Context of Election Campaigns’, European Journal of Communication, 21:2, 147–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbo, Craig (1995). ‘Longitudinal Modelling of Public Issues: An Application of the Agenda-setting Process to the Issue of Global Warming’, Journalism and Mass Communication Monographs, 152, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Yariv, and Oren Livio (2008). ‘Exploring Journalists’ Perceptions of Media Impact’, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 85:1, 113–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunstall, Jeremy (2004). ‘The United Kingdom’, in Mary Kelly, Gianpietro Mazzoleni and Denis McQuail (eds.), The Media in Europe; The Euromedia Handbook. London: Sage, 262–274.
   Google Scholar
• Van, Aelst, Peter Kees Brants, Philip van Praag, Claes de Vreese, Michiel Nuytemans, and Arjen van Dalen (2008). ‘The Fourth Estate as Superpower? An Empirical Study on Perceptions of Media Power in Belgium and the Netherlands’, Journalism Studies, 9:4, 494–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van, Aelst, Peter Adam Shehata, and Arjen van Dalen (2010). ‘Members of Parliament, Equal Competitors for Media Attention? An Analysis of Personal Contacts between MPs and Political Journalists in Five European Countries’, Political Communication, 27:3, 310–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, Peter, and Stefaan Walgrave (2011). ‘Minimal or Massive? The Political Agenda-setting Power of the Mass Media according to Different Methods’, International Journal of Press Politics, 16:3, 295–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Noije, Lonneke (2007). The Democratic Deficit Closer to Home. Agenda-building Relations between Parliament and the Press, and the Impact of European Integration, in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and France. Amsterdam: Free University.
   Google Scholar
• Van Noije, Lonneke, Jan Kleinnijenhuis, and Dirk Oegema (2008). ‘Loss of Parliamentary Control Due to Mediatization and Europeanization: A Longitudinal and Cross-sectional Analysis of Agenda Building in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands’, British Journal of Political Science, 38:3, 455–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, Rens, and Stefaan Walgrave (2011). ‘Content Matters. The Dynamic of Parliamentary Questioning in Belgium and Denmark’, Comparative Political Studies, 44:8, 1031–1059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, Stefaan (2008). ‘Again, the Almighty Mass Media? The Media’s Political Agenda-setting Power according to Politicians and Journalists in Belgium’, Political Communication, 25:4, 445–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, Stefaan, Stuart Soroka, and Michiel Nuytemans (2008). ‘The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-setting Power. A Longitudinal Analysis of Media, Parliament, and Government in Belgium (1993–2000)’, Comparative Political Studies, 41:6, 814–36.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesehomeier, Nina, and Kenneth Benoit (2007). ‘Presidents, Parties and Policy Competition’, Journal of Politics, 71:4, 1435–1447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanovitzky, Itzhak (2002). ‘Effects of News Coverage on Policy Attention and Actions’, Communication Research, 29:4, 422–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar