The Ties that Bind? Intra-party Information Exchanges of German MPs in EU Multi-level Politics

References

• Auel, Katrin, and Arthur Benz (2005). ‘The Politics of Adaptation: The Europeanisation of National Parliamentary Systems’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 11:3/4, 372–393.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, David J. (2008). ‘Misperceiving Matters: Elite Ideas and the Failure of the European Constitution’, Comparative European Politics, 6, 33–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolini, Stefano (2005). Restructuring Europe. Centre Formation, System Building and Political Structuring between the Nation-state and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bäck, Hanna, Marc Debus, Jochen Müller, and Henry Bäck (2013). ‘Regional Government Formation in Varying Multilevel Contexts: A Comparison of Eight European Countries’, Regional Studies, 47:3, 368–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, Torbjörn (1997). ‘National Parliaments and EU Affairs Committees: Notes on Empirical Variation and Competing Explanations’, Journal of European Public Policy, 4:3, 373–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, Torbjörn (2000). ‘The European Union as the Next Step of Delegation and Accountability’, European Journal of Political Research, 37, 415–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, Torbjörn, Wolfgang C. Müller, Kaare Strøm, and Magnus Blomgren (2003). ‘Democratic Delegation and Accountability: Cross-national Patterns’, in Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller and Torbjörn Bergman (eds.), Delegation and Accountability Parliamentary Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 109–220.
   Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, Nicole (2012). ‘New Party Organization in Western Europe: Of Party Hierarchies Stratarchies and Federations’, Party Politics, 18:3, 315–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinegar, Adam P., Seth K. Jolly, and Herbert Kitschelt (2004). ‘Varieties of Capitalism and Political Divides over European Integration’, in Gary Marks and Marco R. Steenbergen (eds.), European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 62–89.
   Google Scholar
• Caramani, Daniele (2012). ‘The Europeanization of Electoral Politics: An Analysis of Converging Voting Distributions in 30 European Party Systems, 1970–2008’, Party Politics, 18:6, 803–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conference of Community and European Affairs Committees of Parliaments of the European Union (COSAC) (2007). Eighth bi-annual Report: Development in European Union Procedures and Practices Relevant to Parliamentary Scrutiny. Brussels: COSAC Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Deschouwer, Kris (2003). ‘Political Parties in Multi-Layered Systems’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 10:3, 213–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finke, Daniel, and Tanja Dannwolf (2013). ‘Whistle Blowing and Opposition Control: Parliamentary Scrutiny in the European Union’, European Journal of Political Research.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, John (2007). Case Study Research. Principles and Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, Klaus H., and Jan-Hinkrik Meyer-Sahling (2008). ‘The Europeanisation of National Political Systems: Parliaments and Executives’, Living Reviews in European Governance 3 (2), available at http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2008-2 (accessed 26 April 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Hancké, Bob (2009). Intelligent Research Design: A Guide for Beginning Researchers in the Social Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, Simon, Abdul Noury, and Gerard Roland (2007). Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holzhacker, Ronald (2002). ‘National Parliamentary Scrutiny over EU Issues. Comparing the Goals and Methods of Governing and Opposition Parties’, European Union Politics, 3:4, 459–479.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks, and Carole J. Wilson (2002). ‘Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration’, Comparative Political Studies, 35:8, 965–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlas, Jan (2011). ‘Parliamentary Control of EU Affairs in Central and Eastern Europe: Explaining the Variation’, Journal of European Public Policy, 18:2, 258–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, Thomas, and Lars Mäder (2008). ‘Das Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates und der Mythos einer 80-Prozent–Europäisierung in Deutschland’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 49:3, 438–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, Scott J., and Jeremy Freese (2001). Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, Gary, and Carole Wilson (2000). ‘The Past in the Present: A Cleavage Theory of Party Response to European Integration’, British Journal of Political Science, 30:3, 433–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Wolfgang C. (2000). ‘Political Parties in Parliamentary Democracies: Making Delegation and Accountability Work’, European Journal of Political Research, 37, 309–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brennan, John, and Tapio Raunio (2007). ‘Introduction. Deparliamentarization and European integration’, in John O’Brennan and Tapio Raunio (eds.), National Parliaments within the Enlarged European Union. From ‘Victims’ of Integration to Competitive Actors?. London: Routledge, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Jonathan B. Slapin (2010). ‘Parliamentary Questions and Oversight in the European Union’, European Journal of Political Research, 50:1, 53–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raunio, Tapio (2005). ‘Holding Governments Accountable in European Affairs: Explaining Cross-National Variation’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 11:3/4, 319–342.
   Google Scholar
• Raunio, Tapio (2009). ‘National Parliaments and European Integration: What We Know and Agenda for Future Research’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 15:4, 317–334.
   Google Scholar
• Raunio, Tapio, and Simon Hix (2000). ‘Backbenchers Learn to Fight Back: European Integration and Parliamentary Government’, West European Politics, 23:4, 142–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, Thomas (2005). ‘Deliberate Delegation or Abdication? Government Backbenchers, Ministers and European Union Legislation’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 11:3, 343–371.
   Google Scholar
• Stine, Robert (1989). ‘An Introduction to Bootstrap Methods. Examples and Ideas’, Sociological Methods Research, 18:2–3, 243–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Töller, Annette Elisabeth (2008). ‘Mythen und Methoden. Zur Messung der Europäisierung der Gesetzgebung des Deutschen Bundestages jenseits des 80-Prozent-Mythos’, Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 1, 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Van Houten, Pieter (2009). ‘Multi-level Relations in Political Parties. A Delegation Approach’, Party Politics, 15:2, 137–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winzen, Thomas (2012). ‘National Parliamentary Control of European Union Affairs: A Cross-national and Longitudinal Comparison’, West European Politics, 35:3, 657–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar