Policy Congruence and Style of Representation: Party Voters and Political Parties

References

• Achen, Christopher H. (1977). ‘Measuring Representation: Perils of the Correlation Coefficient’, American Journal of Political Science, 21:4, 805–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, John H. (1995). Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• American Political Science Association (APSA) (1950). ‘Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System: A Report of the Committee on Political Parties’, American Political Science Review, 44:3, Part 2, Supplement.
   Google Scholar
• Andeweg, Rudy B. (2011). ‘Approaching Perfect Policy Congruence: Measurement, Development and Relevance for Political Representation’, in Martin Rosema, Bas Denters and Kees Aarts (eds.), How Democracy Works: Political Representation and Policy Congruence in Modern Societies. Amsterdam: Pallas Publication, 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Andeweg, Rudy B. (2012). ‘Consequences of Representatives’ Role Orientations: Attitudes, Behaviour, Perceptions’, in Magnus Blomgren and Olivier Rozenberg (eds.), Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 66–84.
   Google Scholar
• Andeweg, Rudy B., and Jacques J.A. Thomassen (2005). ‘Modes of Political Representation: Toward a New Typology’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 4, 507–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belchior, Ana M. (2011). ‘Explaining Left–Right Party Congruence across European Party Systems: A Test of Micro, Meso and Macro Level Models’. 1st European Conference on Comparative Electoral Research, University of National and World Economy, Sofia.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, Åsa, and Hanna Wass (2011). ‘The Representatives Roles of MPs: A Citizen Perspective’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 34:2, 143–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comparative Candidates Survey (CCS) (n.d.). Available at http://www.comparativecandidates.org/ (accessed 28 April 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) (n.d.). Available at http://www.cses.org/plancom/plancom.htm (accessed 23 March 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Converse, Philip E., and Roy Pierce (1986). Political Representation in France. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, Stefan (2009). ‘Political Parties and Perceptual Agreement: The Influence of Party Related Factors on Voters’ Perceptions in Proportional Electoral Systems’, Electoral Studies, 28:2, 270–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J. (1985). ‘Political Parties and Political Representation: Party Supporters and Party Elites in Nine Nations’, Comparative Political Studies, 18:3, 267–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J. (2008). ‘The Quantity and Quality of Party Systems: Party Systems Polarization, its Measurement, and its Consequences’, Comparative Political Studies, 41:7, 899–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond, Andrew J. (2010). ‘Assimilation, Contrast and Voter Projections of Parties in Left–Right Space: Does the Electoral System Matter?’, Party Politics, 17:6, 711–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esaiasson, Peter, and Sören Holmberg (1996). Representation From Above: Members of Parliament and Representative Democracy in Sweden. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Eulau, Heinz, and Paul D. Karps (1977). ‘The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying the Components of Responsiveness’, Comparative Legislative Research Center, 2:3, 233–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eulau, Heinz, John C. Wahlke, William Buchanan, and Leroy C. Ferguson (1959). ‘The Role of the Representative: Some Empirical Observations on the Theory of Edmund Burke’, American Political Science Review, 53:3, 742–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Election Study (EES) (n.d.). Available at http://www.ees-homepage.net/ (accessed 15 March 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence (2010). Linking Citizens and Parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Justin, and Kenneth W. Shotts (2009). ‘Delegates or Trustees? A Theory of Political Accountability’, The Journal of Politics, 71:4, 1225–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, Matt, and Jacek Stramski (2010). ‘Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions’, American Journal of Political Science, 54:1, 90–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, Jane (2007). ‘When Voters and Parties Agree: Valence Issues and Party Competition’, Political Studies, 55, 629–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellwig, Timothy (2008). ‘Explaining the Salience of Left–Right Ideology in Post Industrial Democracies: The Role of Structural Economic Change’, European Journal of Political Research, 47, 687–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, Sören (1997). ‘Dynamic Opinion Representation’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 20:3, 265–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, Sören (2011). ‘Dynamic Representation from Above’, in Martin Rosema, Bas Denters and Kees Aarts (eds.), How Democracy Works: Political Representation and Policy Congruence in Modern Societies. Amsterdam: Pallas Publications, 53–76.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchheimer, Otto (1990). ‘The Catch-All Party’, in Peter Mair (ed.), The West European Party System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 50–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kristinsson, Gunnar Helgi (2011). ‘Party Cohesion in the Icelandic Althingi’, Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla, 7:2, 229–51.
   Google Scholar
• Leimgruber, Philipp, Dominik Hangartner, and Lucas Leeman (2010). ‘Comparing Candidates and Citizens in the Ideological Space’, Swiss Political Science Review, 16:3, 499–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Warren E., and Donald E. Stokes (1963). ‘Constituency Influence in Congress’, American Political Science Review, 57:1, 45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parliament and Government Composition Database (2011). Available at http://www.parlgov.org (accessed 1 March 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Patrikios, Stratos, and Georgios Karyotis (2008). ‘The Greek Parliamentary Election of 2007’, Electoral Studies, 27:2, 356–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilet, Jean-Benoit, and Emilie van Haute (2008). ‘The Federal Elections in Belgium, June 2007’, Electoral Studies, 27:3, 547–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell Jr, G.Bingham (2009). ‘The Ideological Congruence Controversy: The Impact of Alternative Measures, Data, and Time Periods on the Effects of Election Rules’, Comparative Political Studies, 42:12, 1475–1497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrschneider, Robert, and Stephen Whitefield (2012). The Strain of Representation: How Parties Represent Diverse Voters in Western and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosema, Martin, Kees Aarts, and Bas Denters (2011). ‘How Democracy Works: An Introduction’, in Martin Rosema, Bas Denters and Kees Aarts (eds.), How Democracy Works: Political Representation and Policy Congruence in Modern Societies. Amsterdam: Pallas Publications, 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Hermann (2010). ‘Better Than it Used to Be? New Evidence on the Congruence of Voters and Their National MPs Regarding the Issue of European Integration’. The 106th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, the Omni Shoreham and the Hilton Washington, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Hermann, and Jacques J.A. Thomassen (2000). ‘Dynamic Representation: The Case of European Integration’, European Union Politics, 1, 318–39.
   Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare (2012). ‘Roles as Strategies: Towards a Logic of Legislative Behaviour’, in Magnus Blomgren and Olivier Rozenberg (eds.), Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 85–100.
   Google Scholar
• Valen, Henry, and Hanne Marthe Narud (2007). ‘The Conditional Party Mandate: A Model for the Study of Mass and Elite Opinion Patterns’, European Journal of Political Research, 46, 296–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Eijk, Cees (2001). ‘Measuring Agreement in Ordered Rating Scales’, Quality and Quantity, 35, 325–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Eijk, Cees, and Hermann Schmitt (2010). ‘Party Manifestos as a Basis of Citizens’ Left–Right Perceptions’. The 106th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, the Omni Shoreham and the Hilton Washington, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Eijk, Cees, Hermann Schmitt, and Tanja Binder (2005). ‘Left–Right Orientation and Party Choice’, in Jacques J.A. Thomassen (ed.), The European Voter: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 167–91.
   Google Scholar
• Wessels, Bernhard, and Heiko Giebler (2011). ‘Choosing a Style of Representation: The Role of Institutional and Organizational Incentives’. The 6th ECPR General, Reykjavik.
   Google Scholar
• Wessels, Bernhard, and Hermann Schmitt (2008). ‘Meaningful Choices, Political Supply and Institutional Effectiveness’, Electoral Studies, 27, 19–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar