Policy Advocacy in Hard Times: The Impact of Economic Performance on Gendering Executive Attention

References

• Annesley, C., and F. Gains (2013). ‘Investigating the Economic Determinants of the UK Gender Equality Policy Agenda’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 15:1, 125–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armingeon, K., D. Weisstanner, S. Engler, P. Potolidis, and M. Gerber (2012). Comparative Political Data Set I 1960–2010. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.
   Google Scholar
• Bara, Judith (2006). ‘Do Parties Reflect Public Concerns?’ in J. Bara and Weale (ed.), Democratic Politics and Party Competition. London and New York: Routledge, 104–124.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F., C. Green-Pedersen and B. Jones (2008). Comparative Studies of Policy Agendas. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, B.D., and F.R. Jones (1993). The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, Frank R., Christian Breunig, Christoffer Green-Pedersen, Bryan D. Jones, Peter B. Mortensen, Michiel Neytemans, and Stefaan Walgrave (2009). ‘Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective’, American Journal of Political Science, 53:3, 602–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F., B. Jones, and J. Wilkerson (2011). ‘Comparative Studies of Policy Dynamics’, Comparative Political Studies, 44:8, 947–972.10.1177/0010414011405160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, N., and J. Katz (1995). ‘What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series-Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics’, American Political Science Review, 89:03, 634–47.10.2307/2082979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, N., J. Katz, and R. Tucker (1998). ‘Taking Time Seriously: Time Series Cross Sectional Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable’, American Journal of Political Science, 42:4, 1260–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, Shaun, Peter John, and Will Jennings (2011). ‘Keeping Party Programmes on Track: The Transmission of the Policy Agendas of the Speech from the Throne to Acts of the UK Parliament’, European Political Science Review, 3:03, 395–417.10.1017/S1755773910000433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G., and F. Reber (2010). ‘The Political Economy of Child Care in OECD Countries: Explaining Cross-National Variation in Spending and Coverage Rates’, Comparative Political Studies, 49, 97–118.
   Google Scholar
• Bratton, K. (2005). ‘Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislature’, Gender and Politics, 1:1, 97–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breeman, G., D. Lowery, C. Poppelaars, S. Resodihardjo, A. Timmermans, and J. De Vries (2009). ‘Political Attention in a Coalition System: Analysing Queen’s Speeches in the Netherlands 1945–2007’, Acta Politica, 44:1, 1–27.10.1057/ap.2008.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, G., and C. Annesley (2007). ‘Women and Nordic Labour Parties’, in C. Annesley, F. Gains and K. Rummery (eds.), Women and New Labour: Engendering Politics and Policy? Bristol: Policy Press, 43–61.
   Google Scholar
• Burrell, B. (1994). A Woman’s Place is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, S.J. (2001). ‘Representing Women. Women State Legislators as Agents of Policy-Related Change’, in Susan Carroll (ed.), The Impact of Women in Public Office. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, D.B., and C.S. Signorino (2010). ‘Back to the Future: Modelling Time Dependence in Binary Data’, Political Analysis, 18:3, 271–292.10.1093/pan/mpq013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celis, K. (2008). ‘Studying Women’s Substantive Representation in Legislatures’, Representation, 44:2, 111–123.10.1080/00344890802079516
   Google Scholar
• Childs, S. (2004). New Labour’s Women: Women Representing Women. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B., and R.J. Tibshirani (1994). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Engeli, I. (2009). ‘The Challenges of Abortion and Assisted Reproductive Technologies Policies in Europe’, Comparative European Politics, 7:1, 56–74.10.1057/cep.2008.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeli, Isabelle (2012). ‘Policy Struggle on Reproduction: Doctors, Women, and Christians’, Political Research Quarterly, 65:2, 330–345.10.1177/1065912910395323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschet, S., and J. Piscopo (2008). ‘Gender Quotas and Women’s Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina’, Politics and Gender, 4:3, 393–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, C., and J. Krogstrup (2008). ‘Immigration as a Political Issue in Denmark and Sweden’, European Journal of Political Research, 47:5, 610–34.10.1111/ejpr.2008.47.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, and Peter B. Mortensen (2010). ‘Who Sets the Agenda and Who Responds to It in the Danish Parliament? A New Model of Issue Competition and Agenda-Setting’, European Journal of Political Research, 49:2, 257–281.10.1111/ejpr.2010.49.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, C., and J. Wilkerson (2006). ‘How Agenda-Setting Attributes Shape Politics’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13:7, 1039–52.10.1080/13501760600924092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara B., and Robert Klemmensen (2008). ‘Government Responsiveness and Political Competition in Comparative Perspective’, Comparative Political Studies, 41:3, 309–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Htun, M., and S.L. Weldon (2010). ‘When Do Governments Promote Women’s Rights? A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Sex Equality Policy’, Perspectives on Politics, 8:1, 207–216.10.1017/S1537592709992787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Htun, M., and S.L. Weldon (2012). ‘The Civic Origins of Progressive Policy Change: Combating Violence against Women in Global Perspective, 1975–2005’, American Political Science Review, 106:3, 548–569.10.1017/S0003055412000226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, E., and J.D. Stephens (2000). ‘Partisan Governance, Women’s Employment, and the Social Democratic Service State’, American Sociological Review, 65:3, 323–342.10.2307/2657460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, W., S. Bevan, and P. John (2010). ‘The British Government’s Political Agenda: The Speech from the Throne, 1911–2008’, Political Studies, 59:1, 74–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, Will, Shaun Bevan, Arco Timmermans, Gerard Breeman, Sylvain Brouard, Laura Chaques, Christoffer Green-Pedersen, Peter John, Peter B. Mortensen, and Anna Palau (2011). ‘Effects of the Core Functions of Government on the Diversity of Executive Agendas’, Comparative Political Studies, 44:8, 1001–1030.10.1177/0010414011405165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, S. (2003). ‘Where is Gender in Agenda Setting?’ Women and Politics, 25:12, 179–207.
   Google Scholar
• King, G., and L. Zeng (2001). ‘Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data’, Political Analysis, 9:2, 137–63.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J.W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd ed. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Kittel, B., and H. Winner (2005). ‘How Reliable is Pooled Analysis in Political Economy? the Globalization-Welfare State Nexus Revisited’, European Journal of Political Research, 44:2, 269–293.10.1111/ejpr.2005.44.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittilson, M.C. (2008). ‘Representing Women: The Adoption of Family Leave in Comparative Perspective’, The Journal of Politics, 79:2, 323–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krook, M. (2009). Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195375671.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lovenduski, J. (2005). Feminising Politics. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Lovenduski, J., and M. Guadagnini (2010). ‘Political Representation’, in D. McBride and A.G. Mazur (eds.), The Politics of State Feminism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 164–192.
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, F. (2010). ‘Gendering Constitutional Change and Policy Outcomes: Substantive Representation and Domestic Violence Policy in Scotland’, Policy and Politics, 38:3, 369–88.10.1332/030557310X521062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazur, Amy G. (1995). Gender Bias and the State: Symbolic Reform at Work in Fifth Republic France. Pittsburg: Pittsburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, Amy G., ed. (2001). State Feminism, Women’s Movement, and Job Training: Making Democracies Work in the Global Economy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, Amy G. (2002). Theorizing Feminist Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199246726.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, Amy G. (2009). ‘Comparative Gender and Policy Projects in Europe: Current Trends in Theory, Method and Research’, Comparative European Politics, 7, 12–36.10.1057/cep.2008.39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBeth, M.K., E.A. Shanahan, R.J. Arnell, and P.L. Hathaway (2007). ‘The Intersection of Narrative Policy Analysis and Policy Change Theory’, Policy Studies Journal, 35:1, 87–108.10.1111/psj.2007.35.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBride, D., and A.G. Mazur (2010). The Politics of State Feminism: Innovation in Comparative Research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McBride Stetson, Dorothy, eds. (2001). Abortion Politics, Women’s Movements, and the Democratic State. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McBride Stetson, D., and A. Mazur, eds. (1995). Comparative State Feminism. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K.J. (2009). ‘Caring Time Policies in Western Europe: Trends and Implications’, Comparative European Politics, 7:1, 37–55.10.1057/cep.2008.40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen, Peter B., Christoffer Green-Pedersen, Gerard Breeman, Laura Chaques, Will Jennings, Peter John, Anna Palau, and Arco Timmermans (2011). ‘Comparing Government Agendas: Executive Speeches in the Netherlands, United Kingdom and Denmark’, Comparative Political Studies, 44:8, 973–1000.10.1177/0010414011405162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Outshoorn, J., ed. (2004). The Politics of Prostitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philips, A. (1995). The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poggione, S. (2004). ‘Exploring Gender Differences in State Legislators’ Policy Preferences’, Political Research Quarterly, 57:2, 305–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reingold, B. (2000). Representing Women: Sex, Gender and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwindt-Bayer, L.A. (2006). ‘Still Supermadres? Gender and Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators’, American Journal of Political Science, 50:3, 570–85.10.1111/ajps.2006.50.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, Stuart, and Christopher Wlezien (2010). Degrees of Democracy: Politics. Public Opinion and Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swers, M.L. (2005). ‘Connecting Descriptive and Substantive Representation: An Analysis of Sex Differences in Cosponsorship Activity’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30:3, 407–33.10.3162/036298005X201617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor-Robinson, M.M., and R.M. Heath (2003). ‘Do Women Legislators Have Different Policy Priorities than Their Male Colleagues? a Critical Test’, Women and Politics, 24:2, 77–100.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. (1994). How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tresch, Anke, Sciarini Pascal, and Frédéric Varone (2013). ‘The Relationship between Media and Political Agendas: Variations across Decision-Making Phases’, West European Politics, 36:5, 897–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varone, Frédéric, Isabelle Engeli, Pascal Sciarini and Roy Gava (2014). ‘Agenda-Setting and Direct Democracy: The Rise of the Swiss People’s Party’, in Stefaan Walgrave and Christoffer Green-Pedersen (eds.), Agenda Setting, Policies, and Political Systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waylen, G. (2007). Engendering Transitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248032.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Weldon, S.L. (2002). Protest, Policy and the Problem of Violence against Women: A Cross-National Comparison. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar