Do Politics in Europe Benefit from Politicising Corruption?

References

• Bågenholm, Andreas (2009). ‘Politicizing Corruption. the Electoral Impact of Anti–Corruption Discourse in Europe 1983–2007’, QoG Working Paper Series 2009:10. Quality of Government Institute, University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Bågenholm, Andreas (2013a). ‘The Electoral Fate and Policy Impact of ‘Anti-Corruption Parties’ in Central and Eastern Europe’, Human Affairs, 23:2, 74–195.
   Google Scholar
• Bågenholm, Andreas (2013b). ‘Throwing the Rascals out? the Electoral Effects of Corruption Allegations and Corruption Scandals in Europe 1981–2011’, Crime, Law and Social Change, 60:5, 595–609.10.1007/s10611-013-9482-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bågenholm, Andreas, and Andreas Johansson Heinö (2010). ‘A New Road to Electoral Success. Incentive Structures, Elite Strategies and the Emergence of New Political Parties in the Baltic States’. Paper presented at the ISA conference in New Orleans. February 16–21, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Barberá, Pablo, Raúl Gómez, Juan Antonio Mayoral, José Ramón Montero, and Pedro Riera (2012). ‘The Electoral Consequences of Political Scandals in Spain’, XXII World Congress of Political Science, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan Katz (1995). ‘What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time Series Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics’, American Political Science Review, 89:3, 634–47.10.2307/2082979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, Thorsten, George Clarke, Alberto Groff, Philip Keefer, and Patrick Walsh (2001). ‘New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions’, World Bank Economic Review, 15:1, 165–76.10.1093/wber/15.1.165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Eric C., Miriam Golden, and Seth Hill (2010). ‘Legislative Malfeasance and Political Accountability’, World Politics, 62:2, 177–210.10.1017/S0043887110000031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, Nicholas (2011). ‘Exploring the Impact of Foreign Aid on Corruption: Has the ‘Anti-Corruption Movement’ Been Effective?’, The Developing Economies, 49:1, 66–88.10.1111/deve.2011.49.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, Nicholas (2013). ‘European Perceptions of Quality of Government: A Survey of 24 Countries’, in Alina Mungiu-Pippidi (ed.), Controlling Corruption in Europe. Budrich-Verlag publishing, available at: http://anticorrp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/European-perception_Charron.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Charron, Nicholas, and Victor Lapuente (2010). ‘Does Democracy Produce Quality of Government?’, European Journal of Political Research, 49:4, 443–70.10.1111/ejpr.2010.49.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, Nicholas, Lewis Dijkstra, and Victor Lapuente (2013). ‘Regional Governance Matters: Quality of Government within European Union Member States’, Regional Studies, doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.770141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sousa, Luis (2001). ‘Political Parties and Corruption in Portugal’, West European Politics, 24:1, 157–80.10.1080/01402380108425422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Porta, Donatella, and Alberto Vannucci (2007). ‘Corruption and Anti-Corruption: The Political Defeat of ‘Clean Hands’ in Italy’, West European Politics, 30:4, 830–53.10.1080/01402380701500322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, Sanjeev, Hamid Davoodi, and Rosa Alonso-Terme (2002). ‘Does Corruption Affect Income Inequality and Poverty?’, Economics of Governance, 3:1, 23–45.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, Sören, and Bo Rothstein, eds. (2012). Good Government: The Relevance of Political Science. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Huberts, Leo (1995). ‘Western Europe and public corruption’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 3:2, 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hug, Simon (2001). Altering Party Systems. Strategic Behavior and the Emergence of New Political Parties in Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, Richard, and Peter Mair (1995). ‘Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party’, Party Politics, 1:1, 5–28.10.1177/1354068895001001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefer, Philip (2007). ‘Clientelism, Credibility, and the Policy Choices of Young Democracies’, American Journal of Political Science, 51:4, 804–21.10.1111/ajps.2007.51.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, Jan-Erik, and Svante Ersson (2007). ‘Party System Instability in Europe: Persistent Differences in Volatility between West and East?’, Democratization, 14:1, 92–110.10.1080/13510340601024322
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Mary Stegmaier (2000). ‘Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes’, Annual Reviews of Political Science, 3:1, 183–219.10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, Peter, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Fritz Plasser (2004). ‘Introduction: Electoral Challenges and Party Responses’, in Peter Mair, Wolfgang C. Müller and Fritz Plasser (eds.), Political Parties and Electoral Change: Party Responses to Electoral Markets. London: Sage, 1–19.10.4135/9781446216224
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Monty, and Keith Jaggers (2002). ‘Polity IV Project: Political Regime. Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–1999’, Integrated Network for Societal Conflict Research Program, University of Maryland, College Park.
   Google Scholar
• Mauro, Paolo (2004). ‘Institutions and the External Capital Structure of Countries’, IMF Working Papers, 1–18.10.5089/9781451875713.001
   Google Scholar
• Medina-Ariza (2006). ‘Politics of Crime in Spain, 1978–2004’, Punishment & Society, 8:2, 183–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguid, Bonnie (2005). ‘Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success’, American Political Science Review, 99:3, 347–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Bernhard & Thomas Meyer (2011). ‘To the Core of the Niche Party: Conceptual Clarity and Valid Measurement for a Much Employed Concept’. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Pennings, Paul (1998). ‘Party Responsiveness and Socio-Economic Problem-Solving in Western Democracies’, Party Politics, 4:3, 393–404.10.1177/1354068898004003007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings, Paul, and Jan-Erik Lane, eds. (1998). Comparing Party System Change. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, John, and Susan Welch (1980). ‘The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections’, American Political Science Review, 74:3, 697–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, Steven (1999). ‘Punishing Corruption: The Response of the Japanese Electorate to Scandals’, in Ofer Feldman (ed.), Political Psychology in Japan: behind the Nails Which Sometimes Stick out (and Get Hammered down). Commack, NY: Nova Science, 131–48.
   Google Scholar
• Sikk, Allan (2012). ‘Newness as a Winning Formula for New Political Parties’, Party Politics, 18:4, 465–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Special Eurobarometer (2012). 374 Corruption, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_374_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Spendzharova, Aneta, and Milada Anna Vachudova (2012). ‘Catching up? Consolidating Liberal Democracy in Bulgaria and Romania after EU accession’, West European Politics, 35:1, 39–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavits, Margit (2008). ‘Party Systems in the Making: The Emergence and Success of New Parties in New Democracies’, British Journal of Political Science, 38:1, 113–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transparency International (2011). CPI Ranking 2011, available at: http://www.transparency.org/cpi2011/in_detail
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, Markus (2012). ‘Defining and Measuring Niche Parties’, Party Politics, 18:6, 845–64.10.1177/1354068810393267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, Susan, and John Hibbing (1997). ‘The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections, 1982–1990’, Journal of Politics, 59:1, 226–39.10.2307/2998224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsch, Heinz (2004). ‘Corruption, Growth, and the Environment: A Cross–Country Analysis’, Environment and Development Economics, 9:5, 663–93.10.1017/S1355770X04001500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar