Voter–Representative Congruence in Europe: A Loss of Institutional Influence?

References

• Andeweg, Rudy (2011). ‘Approaching Perfect Policy Congruence: Measurement, Development, and Relevance for Political Representation’, in Martin Rosema, Bas Denters and Kees Aarts (eds.), How Democracy Works. Political Representation and Policy Congruence in Modern Societies. Amsterdam: Pallas Publications, 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Armingeon, Klaus, Romana Careja, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner, Sarah Engler, Panajotis Potolidis, and Marléne Gerber (2013). Comparative Political Data Set III 1990–2011. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, Christine, and Mark N. Franklin (2012). ‘Introduction: Issue Congruence and Political Responsiveness’, West European Politics, 35:6, 1217–1225.10.1080/01402382.2012.713741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, Ryan, Seth Jolly, and Jonathan Polk (2012). ‘Complexity in the European Party Space: Exploring Dimensionality with Experts’, European Union Politics, 13:2, 219–245.10.1177/1465116512436995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belchior, Ana Maria (2010). ‘Ideological Congruence among European Political Parties’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 16:1, 121–142.10.1080/13572330903542191
   Google Scholar
• Belchior, Ana Maria (2012). ‘Explaining Left-Right Party Congruence across European Party Systems: A Test of Micro-, Meso-, and Macro-Level Models’, Comparative Political Studies, 46:3, 352–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, Asa, and Hanna Wass (2012). ‘Congruence between MPs’, Non-elected Candidates’ and Citizens’ Preferences for Representational Roles’. APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2108227 (accessed 3 February 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Bernhagen, Patrick, and Michael Marsh (2010). ‘Missing Voters, Missing Data: Using Multiple Imputation to Estimate the Effects of Low Turnout’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 20:4, 447–472.10.1080/17457289.2010.512840
   Google Scholar
• Blais, André, and Marc André Bodet (2006). ‘Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence between Citizens and Policy Makers?’, Comparative Political Studies, 39:10, 1243–1262.10.1177/0010414005284374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohrer, Robert E., Alexander C. Pacek, and Benjamin Radcliff (2000). ‘Electoral Participation, Ideology, and Party Politics in Post-Communist Europe’, The Journal of Politics, 62:4, 1161–1172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonen, Joris, Eva Falk Pedersen, and Marc Hooghe (2014). ‘The Influence of Political Sophistication and Party Identification on Party-Voter Congruence: A Comparative Analysis of 37 Countries.’ Paper Presented at the 13th Belgian Dutch Political Science Conference Maastricht, 12–13 June 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bormann, Nils-Christian, and Matt Golder (2013). Democratic Electoral Systems around the World, 1946–2011, available at https://files.nyu.edu/mrg217/public/elections.html (accessed 20 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Brady, Henry E., Sidney Verba, and Kay Lehman Schlozman (1995). ‘Beyond Ses: A Resource Model of Political Participation’, American Political Science Review, 89:2, 271–294.10.2307/2082425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citrin, Jack, Eric Schickler, and John Sides (2003). ‘What If Everyone Voted? Simulating the Impact of Increased Turnout in Senate Elections’, American Journal of Political Science, 47:1, 75–90.10.1111/ajps.2003.47.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, W.J. (1980). Practical Nonparametric Statistics. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, Rory, Jaques Thomassen, and Martin Rosema (2012). ‘European Parliament Elections and Political Representation: Policy Congruence between Voters and Parties’, West European Politics, 35:6, 1226–1248.10.1080/01402382.2012.713744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotta, Maurizio, Pierangelo Isernia, and Paolo Bellucci (2009). IntUne Mass Survey Wave 2. ICPSR34272-v2. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2013-04-22. doi:10.3886/ICPSR34272.v2
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W. (1997). Making Votes Count. Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174954
   Google Scholar
• Dageförde, Mirjam (2013). ‘On the Effects of Congruence: Does the Many-to-Many-Relationship Affect Perceived Responsiveness?’ Paper pesented at the ECPR General Conference, Bordeaux, 4–7 September 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert (1971). Polyarchy. Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell (2008). ‘The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems: Party System Polarization, Its Measurement, and Its Consequences’, Comparative Political Studies, 41:7, 899–920.10.1177/0010414008315860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditmars, Mathilde M., and Sarah L. de Lange (2014). ‘Bridging the Gap? Representation by Mainstream and Niche Parties in Dutch Local Politics’. ECPR General Conference, University of Glasgow, 3–6 September 2014, available at http://www.ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/4488742c-4ff9-4008-81fb-4523e9d3d9fa.pdf (accessed 3 February 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Döring, Holger, and Philip Manow (2012). Parliament and Government Composition Database (ParlGov): an Infrastructure for Empirical Information on Parties, Elections and Governments in Modern Democracies. Version 12/10 – 15 October 2012, available at http://www.parlgov.org/static/static-2014/stable/download.html (accessed 20 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Eulau, Heinz, and Paul D. Karps (1977). ‘The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 2:3, 233–254.10.2307/439340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Jocelyn (2004). Voters & Voting. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence (2007). ‘The Variance Matters: How Party Systems Represent the Preferences of Voters’, The Journal of Politics, 69:1, 182–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, André, and Ana Belchior (2013). ‘Ideological Representation in Portugal: MPs’–Electors’ Linkages in Terms of Left-Right Placement and Substantive Meaning’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 19:1, 1–21.10.1080/13572334.2013.736784
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Michael (1991). ‘Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems’, Electoral Studies, 10:1, 33–51.10.1016/0261-3794(91)90004-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, Matt, and Gabriella Lloyd (2014). ‘Re-Evaluating the Relationship between Electoral Rules and Ideological Congruence’, European Journal of Political Research, 53:1, 200–212.10.1111/1475-6765.12031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, Matt, and Jacek Stramski (2010). ‘Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions’, American Journal of Political Science, 54:1, 90–106.10.1111/ajps.2010.54.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, John D., and Brian Newman (2005). ‘Are Voters Better Represented?’, The Journal of Politics, 67:4, 1206–1227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grofman, Benard, Guillermo Owen, and Christian Collet (1999). ‘Rethinking the Partisan Effects of Higher Turnout: So What’s the Question?’, Public Choice, 99:3–4, 357–376.10.1023/A:1018397327176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks, and Carole J. Wilson (2002). ‘Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?’, Comparative Political Studies, 35:8, 956–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, John D., and G. Bingham Powell (1994). ‘Congruence between Citizens and Policy Makers in Two Visions of Liberal Democracy’, World Politics, 46:3, 291–326.10.2307/2950684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurley, Patricia, and Kim Quaile Hill (2003). ‘Beyond the Demand-Input Model: A Theory of Representational Linkages’, The Journal of Politics, 65:2, 304–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karyotis, Georgios, Wolfgang Rüdig, and David Judge (2014). ‘Representation and Austerity Politics: Attitudes of Greek Voters and Elites Compared’, South European Society and Politics, 19:4, 435–456.10.1080/13608746.2014.977478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, HeeMin, G. Bingham Powell, and Richard C. Fording (2010). ‘Electoral Systems, Party Systems, and Ideological Representation. An Analysis of Distortion in Western Democracies’, Comparative Politics, 42:2, 167–185.10.5129/001041510X12911363509477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert (1994). The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511622014
   Google Scholar
• Kohler, Ulrich, and Richard Rose (2010). ‘Under What Circumstances Could Maximizing Turnout Alter an Election Result?’, Representation, 46:2, 119–138.10.1080/00344893.2010.485507
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, Markku, and Rein Taagepera (1979). ‘“Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, 12:1, 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachat, Romain, André Blais, and Ignacio Lago (2015). ‘Assessing the Mechanical and Psychological Effects of District Magnitude’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, Published online 28 January 2015, available at https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2014.1002791 ( accessed 29 May 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Lax, Jeffrey R., and Justin H. Phillips (2012). ‘The Democratic Deficit in the States’, American Journal of Political Science, 56:1, 148–166.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00537.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengyel, György, and Stefan Jahr (2012). ‘Surveying Elites: Information on the Study Design and Field Report of the IntUne Elite Survey’, in Heinrich Best, György Lengyel and Luca Verzichelli (eds.), The Europe of Elites: A Study into the Europeanness of Europe’s Political and Economic Elites. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 242–268.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602315.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, Georg, Kathrin Kissau, and Jan Rosset (2014). ‘The Political Preferences of Political Elites, Voters and Non-Voters in Europe’. ECPR General Conference, University of Glasgow, 3–6 September 2014, available at http://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/762c1a64-8ec5-432e-af92-80ae4e69d3e9.pdf (accessed 3 February 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane (2003). ‘Rethinking Representation’, American Political Science Review, 97:4, 515–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, Gary, Liesbet Hooghe, Moira Nelson, and Erica Edwards (2006). ‘Party Competition and European Integration in East and West. Different Structure, Same Causality’, Comparative Political Studies, 39:2, 155–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, Gary, and Marco Steenbergen (2002). ‘Understanding Political Contestation in the European Union’, Comparative Political Studies, 35:8, 879–892.10.1177/001041402236297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila, Mikko, and Tapio Raunio (2006). ‘Cautious Voters-Supportive Parties. Opinion Congruence between Voters and Parties on the EU Dimension’, European Union Politics, 7:4, 427–449.10.1177/1465116506069434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila, Mikko, and Tapio Raunio (2012). ‘Drifting Further Apart: National Parties and Their Electorates on the EU Dimension’, West European Politics, 35:3, 589–606.10.1080/01402382.2012.665742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, Michael, and Ian Budge (2008). Election, Parties, Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McEvoy, Caroline (2012). ‘Unequal Representation in the EU: A Multi-Level Analysis of Voter-Party Congruence in EP Elections’, Representation, 48:1, 83–99.10.1080/00344893.2012.653243
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Warren E., and Donald E. Stokes (1963). ‘Constituency Influence in Congress’, American Political Science Review, 57:1, 45–56.10.2307/1952717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa (2002). Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610073
   Google Scholar
• Önnudóttir, Eva H. (2014). ‘Policy Congruence and Style of Representation: Party Voters and Political Parties’, West European Politics, 37:3, 538–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacek, Alexander, and Benjamin Radcliff (1995). ‘Turnout and the Vote for Left-of-Centre Parties: A Cross-National Analysis’, British Journal of Political Science, 25:1, 137–143.10.1017/S0007123400007109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, Benjamin. (2002). ‘The Semi-Sovereign Public’, in Jeff Manza, Fay Lomax Cook, and Benjamin Page (eds.), Navigating Public Opinion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 325–344.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersen, Per Arnt, and Lawrence Rose (2007). ‘The Dog That Didn’t Bark: Would Increased Electoral Turnout Make a Difference?’, Electoral Studies, 26:3, 574–588.10.1016/j.electstud.2006.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, Roy (1999). ‘Mass-Elite Issue Linkages and the Responsible Party Model Representation’, in Warren E. Miller, Roy Pierce, Jacques Thomassen, Richard Herrera, Sören Holmberg, Peter Esaiasson, and Bernhard Wessels (eds.), Policy Representation in Western Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 9–32.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham (2000). Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham (2004). ‘Political Representation in Comparative Politics’, Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 273–296.10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham (2009). ‘The Ideological Congruence Controversy. The Impact of Alternative Measures, Data, and Time Periods on the Effect of Election Rules’, Comparative Political Studies, 42:12, 1475–1497.10.1177/0010414009332147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham (2011). ‘Party Polarization and the Ideological Congruence of Governments’, in Russell Dalton and Christopher Anderson (eds.), Citizens, Context and Choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 197–213.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham (2013). ‘Electoral Responsiveness, Party Government, and the Imperfect Performance of Democratic Elections’, in Wolfgang C. Müller and Hanne Marthe Narud (eds.), Party Governance and Party Democracy. New York, NY: Springer, 81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham (2014). ‘Congruence with Whom; Responsiveness to What?’ Prepared for presentation at the 2014 Annual Meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, 3 April 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham, and Georg S. Vanberg (2000). ‘Election Laws, Disproportionality and Median Correspondence: Implications for Two Visions of Democracy’, British Journal of Political Science, 30:3, 383–411.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliff, Benjamin (1994). ‘Turnout and Democratic Vote’, American Politics Research, 22:3, 259–276.10.1177/1532673X9402200301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehfeld, Andrew (2009). ‘Representation Rethought: On Trustees, Delegates, and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy’, American Political Science Review, 103, 214–230.10.1017/S0003055409090261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrschneider, Robert, and Stephen Whitefield (2012a). ‘Institutional Context and Representational Strain in Party-Voter Agreement in Wester and Eastern Europe’, West European Politics, 35:6, 1320–1340.10.1080/01402382.2012.713748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrschneider, Robert, and Stephen Whitefield (2012b). The Strain of Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199652785.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Rosema, Martin (2007). ‘Low Turnout: Threat to Democracy or Blessing in Disguise? Consequences of Citizens’ Varying Tendencies to Vote’, Electoral Studies, 26:3, 612–623.10.1016/j.electstud.2006.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosema, Martin, Kees Aarts, and Bas Denters (2011). ‘How Democracy Works: An Introduction’, in Martin RosemaBas Denters and Kees Aarts (eds.), How Democracy Works. Political Representation and Policy Congruence in Modern Societies. Amsterdam: Pallas Publications, 9–20.10.5117/9789085550365
   Google Scholar
• Rosema, Martin, and Catherine E. de Vries (2011). ‘Assesing the Quality of European Democracy: Are Voters Voting Correctly?’, in Martin Rosema Bas Denters and Kees Aarts (eds.), How Democracy Works. Political Representation and Policy Congruence in Modern Societies. Amsterdam: Pallas Publications, 199–219.10.5117/9789085550365
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Hermann, and Jacques Thomassen (2000). ‘Dynamic Representation. The Case of European Integration’, European Union Politics, 1:3, 318–339.10.1177/1465116500001003003
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, H., and J. Thomassen (2009). ‘The European Party System after Enlargement’, in Jacques Thomassen (ed.), The Legitimacy of the European Union after Enlargement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 23–43.
   Google Scholar
• Taagepera, Rein, and Bernard Grofman (2003). ‘Mapping the Indices of Seats–Votes Disproportionality and Inter-election Volatility’, Party Politics, 9:6, 659–677.10.1177/13540688030096001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomassen, Jacques (1999). ‘Empirical Research into Political Representation: Failing Democracy or failing Models?’, in Warren E. Miller, Roy Pierce, Jacques Thomassen, Richard Herrera, Sören Holmberg, Peter Esaiasson, and Bernhard Wessels (eds.), Policy Representation in Western Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 33–58.
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, Jacques (2012). ‘The Blind Corner of Political Representation’, Representation, 48:1, 13–27.10.1080/00344893.2012.653229
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, Jacques, and Caroline van Ham (2014). ‘Failing Political Representation or a Change in Kind? Models of Representation and Empirical Trends in Europe’, West European Politics, 37:2, 400–419.10.1080/01402382.2014.887881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Eijk, Cees, Hermann Schmitt, and Tanja Binder (2005). ‘Left-Right Orientations and Party Choice’, in Jacques Thomassen (ed.), The European Voter. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 167–191
   Google Scholar
• van der Eijk, Cees, and Marcel van Egmond (2007). ‘Political Effects of Low Turnout in National and European Elections’, Electoral Studies, 26:3, 561–573.10.1016/j.electstud.2006.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Eijk, Cees, and Mark Franklin (1996). Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Eijk, Cees, Mark Franklin, and Wouter van der Brug (1999). ‘Policy Preferences and Party Choice’, in Jacques Thomassen and Hermann Schmitt (eds.), Political Representation, and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 161–181.10.1093/0198296614.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Walczak, Agnieszka, and Wouter van der Brug (2011). ‘The Quality of Representation in European Elections’ paper prepared for the Elections, Public Opinion and Parties Conference at the University of Exeter, 9–11 September 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Walczak, Agnieszka, and Wouter van der Brug (2013). ‘Repreresentation in the European Parliament: Factors Affecting the Attitude Congruence of Voters and Candidates in the EP Elections’, European Union Politics, 14:1, 3–22.10.1177/1465116512456089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, Stefaan, and Jonas Lefevere (2013). ‘Ideology, Salience, and Complexity: Determinants of Policy Issue Incongruence between Voters and Parties’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 23:4, 456–483.10.1080/17457289.2013.810630
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, John E. (1962). Handbook of Nonparametric Statistics. New York, NY: D.V. Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• Wessels, Bernhard (1999). ‘System Characteristics Matter: Empirical Evidence from Ten Representation Studies’, in Warren E. Miller, Roy Pierce, Jacques Thomassen, Richard Herrera, Sören Holmberg, Peter Esaiasson, and Bernhard Wessels (eds.), Policy Representation in Western Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 137–161.
   Google Scholar
• Wlezien, Christopher, and Stuart Soroka (2007). ‘The Relationship between Public Opinion and Public Policy’, in Russel Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 799–817.
   Google Scholar