Ideological congruence between party rhetoric and policy-making

References

• Adams, James (2012). ‘Causes and Electoral Consequences of Party Policy Shifts in Multiparty Elections: Theoretical Results and Empirical Evidence’, Annual Review of Political Science, 15:1, 401–419.10.1146/annurev-polisci-031710-101450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Aelst, Peter, Bart Maddens, Jo Noppe, and Stefaan Fiers (2008). ‘Politicians in the News: Media or Party Logic?’, European Journal of Communication, 23:2, 193–210.10.1177/0267323108089222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artés, Joaquín (2013). ‘Do Spanish Politicians Keep Their Promises?’, Party Politics, 19:1, 143–158.10.1177/1354068811407581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, Nathaniel (2011). ‘Is OLS with a Binary Dependent Variable Really OK?: Estimating (Mostly) TSCS Models with Binary Dependent Variables and Fixed Effects’, Unpublished Working Paper, NYU, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Nathaniel (2015). ‘Estimating Grouped Data Models with a Binary Dependent Variable and Fixed Effects: What Are the Issues ?’, Anuual Meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, 1–20. Unpublished Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, Shaun, Peter John, and Will Jennings (2011). ‘Keeping Party Programmes on Track: The Transmission of the Policy Agendas of Executive Speeches to Legislative Outputs in the United Kingdom’, European Political Science Review, 3:3, 395–417.10.1017/S1755773910000433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianco, William T. (1994). Trust - Representatives and Constituents. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.14057
   Google Scholar
• Brace, Paul, and Barbara Hinckley (1993). ‘Presidential Activities from Truman through Reagan: Timing and Impact’, Journal of Politics, 55:2, 382–398.10.2307/2132271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, and Richard I. Hofferbert (1990). ‘Mandates and Policy Outputs: U.S. Party Platforms and Federal Expenditures’, American Political Science Review, 84:1, 111–131.10.2307/1963632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, and Eric Tanenbaum (2001). Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Jeffrey E. (1995). ‘Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda’, American Journal of Political Science, 39:1, 87–107.10.2307/2111759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Jeffrey E. (1999). Presidential Responsiveness and Public Policy-Making: The Public and the Policies That Presidents Choose. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, NY: Harper; Row.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, James N., and Justin W. Holmes (2004). ‘Does Presidential Rhetoric Matter? Priming and Presidential Approval’, Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34:4, 755–778.10.1111/psq.2004.34.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Efron, Bradley, and Gail Gong (1983). ‘A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and Cross-Validation,’ American Statistician, 37:1, 36–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon, James D. (1997). ‘Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands versus Sinking Costs’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41:1, 68–90.10.1177/0022002797041001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, and Peter B. Mortensen (2010). ‘Who Sets the Agenda and Who Responds to It in the Danish Parliament? A New Model of Issue Competition and Agenda-Setting’, European Journal of Political Research, 49:2, 257–281.10.1111/ejpr.2010.49.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbling, Marc, and Anke Tresch (2011). ‘Measuring Party Positions and Issue Salience from Media Coverage: Discussing and Cross-Validating New Indicators’, Electoral Studies, 30:1, 174–183: Elsevier Ltd.10.1016/j.electstud.2010.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbling, Marc, Dominic Hoeglinger, and Bruno Wüest (2010). ‘How Political Parties Frame European Integration’, European Journal of Political Research, 49:4, 495–521.10.1111/ejpr.2010.49.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinckley, Barbara (1990). The Symbolic Presidency: How Presidents Portray Themselves. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hofferbert, Richard I., and Ian Budge (1992). ‘The Party Mandate and the Westminster Model: Election Programmes and Government Spending in Britain, 1948-85’, British Journal of Political Science, 22:02, 151–182.10.1017/S0007123400006323
   Google Scholar
• Holian, David B. (2004). ‘He’s Stealing My Issues! Clinton’s Crime Rhetoric and the Dynamics of Issue Ownership’, Political Behavior, 26:2, 95–124.10.1023/B:POBE.0000035959.35567.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, D.N., R. Vliegenthart, C.H. De Vreese, and E. Albæk (2010). ‘Effects of Election News Coverage: How Visibility and Tone Influence Party Choice’, Political Communication, 27:4, 389–405.10.1080/10584609.2010.516798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahn, Detlef, and Sebastian Korolczuk (2012). ‘German Exceptionalism: The End of Nuclear Energy in Germany!’, Environmental Politics, 21:1, 159–164.10.1080/09644016.2011.643374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, Will, and Peter John (2009). ‘The Dynamics of Political Attention: Public Opinion and the Queen’s Speech in the United Kingdom’, American Journal of Political Science, 53:4, 838–854.10.1111/ajps.2009.53.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalogeropoulou, Efthalia (1989). ‘Election Promises and Government Performance in Greece: PASOK's Fulfilment of Its 1981 Election Pledges’, European Journal of Political Research, 17:3, 289–311.10.1111/ejpr.1989.17.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keman, Hans (2007). ‘Experts and Manifestos: Different Sources – Same Results for Comparative Research?’, Electoral Studies, 26:1, 76–89.10.1016/j.electstud.2006.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Gary, Michael Laver, Richard I. Hofferbert, Ian Budge, and Michael D. McDonald (1993). ‘Party Platforms, Mandates, and Government Spending’, American Political Science Review, 87:03, 744–750.10.2307/2938748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, Heike, and Iñaki Sagarzazu (2015). ‘Setting the Agenda or Responding to Voters? Political Parties, Voters and Issue Attention’, West European Politics, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, Ruud, and Paul Statham (1999). ‘Political Claims Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Approaches’, Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 4:1998, 203–221.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter, Edgar Grande, Romain Lachat, Martin Dolezal, Simon Bornschier, and Timotheos Frey (2008). West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511790720
   Google Scholar
• Lax, Jeffrey R., and Justin H. Phillips (2009). ‘Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness’, American Political Science Review, 103:03, 367.10.1017/S0003055409990050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lax, Jeffrey R., and Justin H. Phillips (2012). ‘The Democratic Deficit in the States’, American Journal of Political Science, 56:1, 148–166.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00537.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, Will, Kenneth Benoit, Slava Mikhaylov, and Michael Laver (2011). ‘Scaling Policy Preferences from Coded Political Texts’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36:1, 123–155.10.1111/j.1939-9162.2010.00006.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manin, Bernard (1997). The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511659935
   Google Scholar
• Mansergh, Lucy, and Robert Thomson (2007). ‘Election Pledges, Party Competition, and Policymaking’, Comparative Politics, 39:3, 311–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGraw, Kathleen M., Samuel Best, and Richard Timpone (1995). ‘‘What They Say or What They Do?’ the Impact of Elite Explanation and Policy Outcomes on Public Opinion’, American Journal of Political Science, 39:1, 53–74.10.2307/2111757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naurin, Elin (2014). ‘Is a Promise a Promise? Election Pledge Fulfilment in Comparative Perspective Using Sweden as an Example’, West European Politics, 37:5, 1046–1064: Routledge.10.1080/01402382.2013.863518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocik, John R. (1996). ‘Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study’, American Journal of Political Science, 40:3, 825–850.10.2307/2111797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pétry, François, and Benoît Collette (2009). ‘Measuring How Political Parties Keep Their Promises: A Positive Perspective from Political Science’, in Louis M. Imbeau (ed.), Do They Walk like They Talk?. New York, NY: Springer, 65–80.10.1007/978-0-387-89672-4
   Google Scholar
• Ragsdale, Lyn (1984). ‘The Politics of Presidential Speechmaking, 1949-1980’, American Political Science Review, 78:04, 971–984.10.2307/1955802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schermann, Katrin, and Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik (2013). ‘Coalition Policy-Making under Constraints: Examining the Role of Preferences and Institutions’, West European Politics, 37:3, 564–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, Stuart N. (2002a). Agenda-Setting Dynamics in Canada. Vancouver, CA: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soroka, Stuart N. (2002b). ‘Issue Attributes and Agenda-Setting by Media, the Public, and Policymakers in Canada’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14:3, 265–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare (1990). ‘A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties’, American Journal of Political Science, 34:2, 565–598.10.2307/2111461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, Robert (2001). ‘The Programme to Policy Linkage: The Fulfilment of Election Pledges on Socio-Economic Policy in the Netherlands, 1986-1998’, European Journal of Political Research, 40:2, 171–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, R., T. Royed, E. Naurin, Joaquín Artés, Mark Ferguson, Petia Kostadinova, Catherine Moury, and François Pétry (2017). ‘Explaining the Fulfillment of Election Pledges: A Comparative Study on the Impact of Government Institutions’, American Journal of Political Science, 61:3, 527–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulis, Jeffery (1987). The Rhetorical Presidency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, Rens, Stefaan Walgrave, and Corine Meppelink (2011). ‘Inter-Party Agenda-Setting in the Belgian Parliament: The Role of Party Characteristics and Competition’, Political Studies, 59:2, 368–388.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00867.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorholz, Fritz (2015). ‘Ein Erkenntnisgewinn, der Milliarden kostet’, Die Zeit, available at Http://www.zeit.de/wirtschaft/2015-03/atomausstieg-Kernkraftwerk-Atomenergie (accessed 12 March 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Walgrave, Stefaan, Stuart N. Soroka, and Michiel Nuytemans (2007). ‘The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power: A Longitudinal Analysis of Media, Parliament, and Government in Belgium (1993 to 2000)’, Comparative Political Studies, 41:6, 814–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, Stefaan, Jonas Lefevere, and Michiel Nuytemans (2009). ‘Issue Ownership Stability and Change: How Political Parties Claim and Maintain Issues through Media Appearances’, Political Communication, 26:2, 153–172.10.1080/10584600902850718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C.F.J. (1986). ‘Jackknife, Bootstrap and Other Resampling Methods in Regression Analysis’, The Annals of Statistics, 14:4, 1261–1295.10.1214/aos/1176350142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar