Courts and the politics of secrecy: national security, human rights and the importance of supranational oversight

References

• Ackerman, Bruce (2006). Before the Next Attack. Preserving Civil Liberties in an Age of Terrorism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, Richard, and Richterova, Daniela (2017). ‘The End of Secrecy?’, West European Politics, on file with author.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, Ryan (2017). Permanent State of Emergency. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, Karen (2001). Establishing the Supremacy of EU Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carozza, Paolo (2003). ‘Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law’, American Journal of International Law, 97, 38.10.2307/3087103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoffersen, Jonas, and Michael Madsen (eds.) (2011). The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, David, Federico Fabbrini, and Arianna Vedaschi, eds. (2013). Secrecy, National Security and the Vindication of Constitutional Law. Cheltenham: Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• De Schutter, Olivier (2011). International Human Rights Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donohue, Laura (2010). ‘The Shadow of the State Secret’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 159, 77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dothan, Shai (2014). Reputation and Judicial Tactics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139381260
   Google Scholar
• Fabbrini, Federico (2010). ‘The Role of the Judiciary in times of Emergence’, Yearbook of European Law, 28, 664.
   Google Scholar
• Fabbrini, Federico (2011). ‘Extraordinary Renditions and the State Secret Privilege: Italy and the United States Compared’, Italian Journal of Public Law, 2, 255.
   Google Scholar
• Fabbrini, Federico (2014a). ‘The European Court of Human Rights, Extraordinary Renditions and the Right to the Truth’, Human Rights Law Review, 14, 75.
   Google Scholar
• Fabbrini, Federico (2014b). Fundamental Rights in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702047.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Fabbrini, Federico and Vedaschi, Arianna (2017). ‘Secrecy and Accountability for Extraordinary Renditions to Torture: Italy, the European Court of Human Rights and the Abu Omar Case’, Journal Européen De Droits De L’Homme 6, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Giupponi, Tommaso, and Federico Fabbrini (2010). ‘Intelligence Agencies and the State Secret Privilege: The Italian Experience’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 4, 443.
   Google Scholar
• Greer, Steven, and Luzius Wildhaber (2012). ‘Revisiting the Debate about “Constitutionalizing” the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 12, 655.10.1093/hrlr/ngs034
   Google Scholar
• Keller, Hellen, and Alec Stone Sweet, eds. (2009). A Europe of Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Messineo, Francesco (2009). ‘“Extraordinary Renditions” and State Obligations to Criminalize and Prosecute Torture in the Light of the Abu Omar Case in Italy’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 7, 1023.10.1093/jicj/mqp075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milanovic, Marco (2011). The Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199696208.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, Andrew (2000). ‘The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe’, International Organizations, 54, 217.10.1162/002081800551163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naqvi, Yasmin (2006). ‘The Right to the Truth in International Law: Fact or Fiction?’, International Review of the Red Cross, 88, 245.10.1017/S1816383106000518
   Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite, Margaret (2006). ‘‘Rendered Meaningless: Extraordinary Rendition and the Rule of Law’, George Washington Law Review, 75, 1333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setty, Sudha (2009). ‘Litigating Secrets: Comparative Perspective on the State Secret Privilege’, Brooklyn Law Review, 75, 201.
   Google Scholar
• Setty, Sudha (2017). National Security Secrecy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316440674
   Google Scholar
• Stone Sweet, Alec (2004). The Judicial Construction of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019927553X.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Vedaschi, Arianna (2014). ‘Globalization of Human Rights and Mutual Influence between Courts: The Innovative Reverse Path of the Right to the Truth’, in Shimon Shetreet (ed.), The Culture of Judicial Independence: Rule of Law and World Peace. Brill: Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Vedaschi, Arianna (2017). ‘State Secret Privilege versus Human Rights: Lessons from the European Court of Human Rights Ruling on the Abu Omar Case’, European Constitutional Law Review, 13, 166.10.1017/S1574019616000456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, Robert, and William Pallito (2005). Presidential Secrecy and the Law. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weissbrodt, David, and Amy Bergquist (2006). ‘Extraordinary Renditions: A Human Rights Analysis’, Harvard Human Rights Journal, 19, 123.
   Google Scholar