Second order secrecy and Europe’s legality mosaics

References

• Abazi, Vigjilenca (2015). ‘Secrecy and Oversight in the European Union. the Law and Practice of Classified Information’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht, Jan Philipp (2016). ‘How the GDPR Will Change the World’, European Data Protection Law Review, 2:3, 287–289.10.21552/EDPL/2016/3/4
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, Richard, and Daniela Richterova (2018). ‘Ambient Accountability: Intelligence Services in Europe and the Decline of State Secrecy’, West European Politics, doi: 10.1080/01402382.2017.1415780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoore, Louise (2011). ‘Data Derivatives. on the Emergence of a Security Risk Calculus for Our times’, Theory, Culture and Society, 28:6, 24–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoore, Louise (2013). The Politics of Possibility. Durham and London: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822377269
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, David (2015). A Question of Trust: Report of the Investigatory Powers Review. London: The Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation, available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-question-of-trust-report-of-the-investigatory-powers-review (accessed 20 February 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Argomaniz, Javier (2009). ‘When the EU is the ‘Norm-Taker’: The Passenger Name Records Agreement and the EU’s Internalization of US Border Security Norms’, Journal of European Integration, 31:1, 119–136.10.1080/07036330802503981
   Google Scholar
• Ballaschk, Julia (2015). 'Interoperability of Intelligence Networks in the European Union: An Analysis of the Policy of Interoperability in the EU's Area of Freedom, Security and Justice and Its Compatibility with the Right to Data Protection’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Birchall, Clare (2011). ‘“There’s Been Too Much Secrecy in This City”: the False Choice between Secrecy and Transparency in US Politics’, Cultural Politics, 7:1, 133–156.10.2752/175174311X12861940861905
   Google Scholar
• Boehm, Franziska (2012). Information Sharing and Data Protection in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, towards Harmonized Data Protection Principles for Information Exchange at EU-Level. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bok, Sissela (1989). Secrets: On the Ethics of Concealment and Revelation. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, Mark, and Stavros Zouridis (2002). ‘From Street-Level to System-Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional Control’, Public Administrative Review, 62:2, 174–184.10.1111/puar.2002.62.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito Bastos, Filipe (2018). ‘Beyond Executive Federalism. The Judicial Crafting of the Law of Composite Administrative Decision-Making’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, European University Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Broeders, Dennis (2016). ‘The Secret in the Information Society’, Philos. Technol., 29:3, 293–305.10.1007/s13347-016-0217-3
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, Evelien (2011). ‘Legality and Data Protection Law: The Forgotten Purpose of Purpose Limitation’, in Leonard Besselink, Frans Pennings and Sacha Prechal (eds.), The Eclipse of the Legality Principle in the European Union. Kluwer: Alphen aan den Rijn, 273–294.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, Andreas (2013). ‘The Regulation of Transborder Data Traffic: Disputes across the Atlantic’, Security and Human Rights, 23:4, 313–330.10.1163/18750230-99900035
   Google Scholar
• Busch, Heiner, and Matthias Monroy. (2017), Counter-Terrorism and the Inflation of Databases, http://statewatch.org/analyses/no-316-ct-and-inflation-eu-databases.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Colonna, Liane (2016). Legal Implications of Data Mining: Assessing the European Union’s Data Protection Principles in Light of the United States Government’s National Intelligence Data Mining Practices. Visby: Ragulka förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, Deirdre (2014). ‘Overseeing Secrets in the EU: A Democratic Perspective’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52:3, 684–700.10.1111/jcms.2014.52.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin, Deirdre (2016). ‘Executive Power’, in D. Patterson and A. Södersten (eds.), A Companion to European Law and International Law. Oxford: Blackwell, 109–118.
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, Deirdre, and Christina Eckes (2017). Secrecy inside and outside: EU External Relations in Focus. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, available at http://www.sieps.se/sites/default/files/Sieps%202016_13%20web.pdf (accessed 21 February 2017).
   Google Scholar
• De Witte, Bruno (2016). ‘Member State Competences – Is There Such a Thing?’ European Legal Studies Conference, College of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Eckes, Christina (2009). EU Counter-Terrorist Policies and Fundamental Rights: The Case of Individual Sanctions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573769.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Eckes, Christina (2014). ‘EU Restrictive Measures against Natural and Legal Persons: From Counterterrorist to Third Country Sanctions’, Common Market Law Review, 51:4, 869–905.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2016). ‘High Level Expert Group on Information Systems and Interoperability: Scoping Paper’, Activity Report ( 20 June 2016), available at http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/index.cfm?do=groupDetail.groupDetail&groupID=3435 (accessed 20 February 2017), 6.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council (2001). Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of 30 May 2001 regarding Public Access to European Parliament, Council and Commission Documents. OJ 2001 L 145/43.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council (2004). Directive (EC) No 2004/38 of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council (2006). Directive 2006/24/EC of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC. OJ L 105/54.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council (2016a). Regulation 2016/679 of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). OJ 2016 L 119/1.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council (2016b). Directive 2016/681 of 27 April 2016 on the use of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime. OJ 2016 L 119/132.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council (2016c). Regulation 2016/794 of 11 May 2016 on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and replacing and repealing Council Decisions 2009/371/JHA, 2009/934/JHA, 2009/935/JHA, 2009/936/JHA and 2009/968/JHA. OJ 2016 L 135/53.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (2012). Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of passenger name records to the United States Department of Homeland Security. OJ L 204/16.
   Google Scholar
• Fenster, Mark (2017). The Transparency Fix: Secrets, Leaks, and Uncontrollable Government Information. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fundamental Rights Agency (2017). ‘Fundamental Rights Interoperability’, available at http://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2017/fundamental-rights-interoperability.
   Google Scholar
• Galli, Francesca (2016). ‘Digital Rights Ireland as an Opportunity to Foster a Desirable Approximation of Data Retention Provisions’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 23:3, 460–477.
   Google Scholar
• General Court (2015). ‘Rules of Procedure’, Rules of Procedure of the General Court. OJ L 105/1.
   Google Scholar
• de Goede, Marieke (2012). Speculative Security: The Politics of Pursuing Terrorist Monies. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/minnesota/9780816675890.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• de Goede, Marieke, and Gavin Sullivan (2016). ‘The Politics of Security Lists’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34:1, 67–88.10.1177/0263775815599309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Goede, Marieke, Anna Leander, and Gavin Sullivan (2016). ‘Introduction: The Politics of the List’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34:1, 3–13.10.1177/0263775815624561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• High-Level Expert Group on Information Systems and Interoperability (2017). Final Report, Ref.Ares(2017)2412067 – 11/05/17, available at http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/index.cfm?do=groupDetail.groupDetailDoc&id=32600&no=1 (accessed 9 November 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Horn, Eva (2011). ‘Logics of Political Secrecy’, Theory, Culture & Society, 28:7-8, 103–122.10.1177/0263276411424583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila (2016). The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• King, Julian (2017). ‘Commissioner King’s Remarks on Interoperability’, Presentation of the final HLEG report for the LIBE Committee at the European Parliament, Brussels, 29 May 2017, available at https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/king/announcements/commissioner-kings-remarks-interoperability-presentation-final-hleg-report-libe-committee-european_en (accessed 20 June 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Koivisto, Ida (2016). ‘The Anatomy of Transparency: The Concept and Its Multifarious Implications’, EUI Working Paper MWP 2016/09.
   Google Scholar
• Kuner, Christopher (2017). ‘Data Protection, Data Transfers and International Agreements: The CJEU’s Opinion 1/15’, available at http://verfassungsblog.de/data-protection-data-transfers-and-international-agreements-the-cjeus-opinion-115/.
   Google Scholar
• Lynskey, Orla (2016). The Foundations of EU Data Protection Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, David (2015). Surveillance after Snowden. Cambridge: Polity Press, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, Albert (2015). ‘Transparency’, in M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, and Th. Schillemans (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 508–521.
   Google Scholar
• Mitsilegas, Valsamis (2009). ‘The Borders Paradox: The Surveillance of Movement in a Union without Internal Frontiers’, in Hans Lindahl (ed.), A Right to Inclusion and Exclusion? Normative Fault Lines of the EU's Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Portland, ME: Hart Publishing, 33–64.
   Google Scholar
• Mitsilegas, Valsamis (2015). ‘The Transformation of Privacy in an Era of Pre-Emptive Surveillance’, Tilburg Law Review, 20:1, 35–57.10.1163/22112596-02001006
   Google Scholar
• Mitsilegas, Valsamis (2016). ‘Surveillance and Digital Privacy in the Transatlantic “War on Terror”: The Case for a Global Privacy Regime’, Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 47:3, 1–77.
   Google Scholar
• Mitsilegas, Valsamis, and N. Vavoula (2017). ‘The Normalisation of Surveillance of Movement in an Era of Reinforcing Privacy Standards’, in P. Bourbeau (ed.), Handbook on Migration and Security. London: Edward Elgar, 232–252.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquale, Frank (2015). The Black Box Society. The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674736061
   Google Scholar
• Peters, Anne (2013). ‘Towards Transparency as a Global Norm’, in A. Peters and A. Bianchi (eds), Transparency in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 534.10.1017/CBO9781139108843
   Google Scholar
• Pozen, David (2005). ‘The Mosaics Theory, National Security, and the Freedom of Information Act’, Yale Law Journal, 115:3, 628–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozen, David (2010). ‘Deep Secrecy’, Stanford Law Review, 62:2, 257–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prins, C., D. Broeders, H. Griffioen, A.-G. Keizer, and E. Keymolen (2011). iGovernment. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheingold, Stuart A. (1974). The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheppele, Kim Lane (2011). ‘Global Security Law and the Challenge to Constitutionalism after 9/11’, Public Law, 2011:2, 353–377.
   Google Scholar
• Scheppele, Kim Lane (2012). ‘Judges as Architects’, Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 24:1, 345–396.
   Google Scholar
• Scheppele, Kim Lane (2013). From a War on Terrorism to Global Security Law. Institute for Advanced Study, available at https://www.ias.edu/ideas/2013/scheppele-terrorism (accessed 21 February 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, Gabriel (2010). Necessary Secrets: National Security, the Media, and the Rule of Law. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Schrijvers, Erik, Bart Van der Sloot, and Dennis Broeders (eds.) (2016). Exploring the Boundaries of Big Data. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Setty, Sudha (2017). National Security Secrecy: Comparative Effects on Democracy and the Rule of Law. Cambride: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staeheli, Urs (2012). ‘Listing the Global: Dis/Connectivity beyond Representation?’, Distinktion: Scandanvian Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 13:3, 233–246.10.1080/1600910X.2012.724646
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Gavin (2014). ‘Transnational Legal Assemblages and Global Security Law: Topologies and Temporalities of the List’, Transnational Legal Theory, 5:1, 81–127.10.5235/20414005.5.1.81
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Gavin (2017). ‘The Law of the List: UN Counterterrorism Sanctions and the Politics of Global Security Law’, unpublished Ph.D. manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Dennis (1999). ‘Democratic Secrecy’, Political Science Quarterly, 114:2, 181–193.10.2307/2657736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuori, Kaarlo (2015). European Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316091883
   Google Scholar
• Vavoula, Niovi (2016). ‘Immigration and Privacy in the Law of the EU: The Case of Databases’, PhD thesis (unpublished), Queen Mary University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Vervaele, John (2013). ‘Surveillance and Criminal Investigation : Blurring of Thresholds and Boundaries in the Criminal Justice System ?’, in S. Gutwirth and P. De Hert (eds.), Reloading Data Protection: Multidisciplinary Insights and Contemporary Challenges. Heidelberg: Springer, 115–128.
   Google Scholar
• Vismann, Cornelia (2008). Files: Law and Media Technology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Bogdandy, Armin, and Philipp Dann (2008). ‘International Composite Administration: Conceptualizing Multi-Level and Network Aspects in the Exercise of International Public Authority’, German Law Journal, 9:11, 2013–2039.
   Google Scholar