Income inequality and party (de)polarisation

References

• Abramowitz, Alan I. (2006). ‘Disconnected, or Joined at the Hip?’, in Pietro S. Nivola and David W. Brady (eds.), Red and Blue Nation? Characteristics and Causes of America’s Polarized Politics. Baltimore, MD: Brookings Institution Press, 72–111.
   Google Scholar
• Abramowitz, Alan I. (2010). The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, James (2001). ‘A Theory of Spatial Competition with Biased Voters: Party Policies Viewed Temporally and Comparatively’, British Journal of Political Science, 31:1, 121–58.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Michael Clark, Lawrence Ezrow, and Garrett Glasgow (2006). ‘Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties’ Policy Shifts, 1976–1998’, American Journal of Political Science, 50:3, 513–29.10.1111/ajps.2006.50.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alesina, Alberto, and Edward Glaeser (2005). Fighting Poverty in the U.S. and Europe: A World of Difference. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J., and Pablo Beramendi (2008). ‘Income, Inequality, and Electoral Participation’, in Pablo Beramendi and Christian J. Anderson (eds.), Democracy, Inequality, and Representation: A Comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 278–311.
   Google Scholar
• Armingeon, Klaus, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner, and Sarah Engler (2014). Comparative Political Data Set I 1960–2012. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, Erling, Henning Finseraas, and Karl O. Moene (2015). ‘Political Reinforcement: How Rising Inequality Curbs Manifested Welfare Generosity’, American Journal of Political Science, 59:3, 565–77.10.1111/ajps.2015.59.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumer, Donald C., and Howard J. Gold (2009). Parties, Polarization, and Democracy in the United States. Herndon, VA: Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bechtel, Michael M., Dominik Hangartner, and Lukas Schmid (2015). ‘Does Compulsory Voting Increase Support for Leftist Policy?’, American Journal of Political Science, 60:3, 752–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bénabou, Roland (2000). ‘Unequal Societies: Income Distribution and the Social Contract’, American Economic Review, 90:1, 96–129.10.1257/aer.90.1.96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, André (2000). To Vote or Not to Vote? The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.10.2307/j.ctt5hjrrf
   Google Scholar
• Blais, André, and Kenneth R. Carty (1990). ‘Does Proportional Representation Foster Voter Turnout?’, European Journal of Political Research, 18:2, 167–81.10.1111/ejpr.1990.18.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonica, Adam, Nolan McCarty, Keith T. Poole, and Howard Rosenthal (2013). ‘Why Hasn’t Democracy Slowed Rising Inequality?’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27:3, 103–24.10.1257/jep.27.3.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian (1994). ‘A New Spatial Theory of Party Competition: Uncertainty, Ideology, and Policy Equilibria Viewed Comparatively and Temporarily’, British Journal of Political Science, 24:4, 443–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, Tak Wing, and John H. Goldthorpe (2007). ‘Class and Status: The Conceptual Distinction and Its Empirical Relevance’, American Sociological Review, 72, 512–32.10.1177/000312240707200402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, Alberto, and Mauricio Olivera (2008). ‘Does Compulsory Voting Help Equalize Incomes?’, Economics and Politics, 20:3, 391–415.10.1111/ecpo.2008.20.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Citrin, Jack, Eric Schickler, and John Sides (2003). ‘What If Everyone Voted? Simulating the Impact of Increased Turnout in Senate Elections’, American Journal of Political Science, 47:1, 75–90.10.1111/ajps.2003.47.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W. (1990). ‘Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems’, American Journal of Political Science, 34:4, 903–35.10.2307/2111465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J. (2008). ‘The Quantity and Quality of Party Systems: Party System Polarization, Its Measurement, and Its Consequences’, Comparative Political Studies, 41:7, 899–920.10.1177/0010414008315860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorussen, Han, and Kyriaki Nanou (2006). ‘European Integration, Intergovernmental Bargaining, and Convergence of Party Programmes’, European Union Politics, 7:2, 235–56.10.1177/1465116506063709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, Jay K. (2001). ‘A Comparative Spatial Analysis of Majoritarian and Proportional Elections’, Electoral Studies, 20:1, 109–25.10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00041-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, Jay K. (2011). ‘Party-System Extremism in Majoritarian and Proportional Electoral Systems’, British Journal of Political Science, 41:2, 341–61.10.1017/S0007123410000360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Drukker, David M. (2003). ‘Testing for Serial Correlation in Linear Panel-Data Models’, The Stata Journal, 3:2, 168–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elff, Martin (2007). ‘Behavior in Comparative Perspective: The Decline of Social Cleavages in Western Europe Revisited’, Perspectives on Politics, 5:2, 277–94.
   Google Scholar
• Elff, Martin (2009). ‘Social Divisions, Party Positions, and Electoral Behaviour’, Electoral Studies, 28:2, 297–308.10.1016/j.electstud.2009.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enelow, James M., and Melvin J. Hinich (1984). The Spatial Theory of Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Geoffrey (2000). ‘The Continued Significance of Class Voting’, Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 401–17.10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence (2007). ‘The Variance Matters: How Party Systems Represent the Preferences of Voters’, Journal of Politics, 69:1, 182–92.10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00503.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence (2008). ‘Parties’ Policy Programmes and the Dog That Didn’t Bark: No Evidence That Proportional Systems Promote Extreme Party Positioning’, British Journal of Political Science, 38:3, 479–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence, and Georgios Xezonakis (2011). ‘Citizen Satisfaction with Democracy and Parties’ Policy Offerings’, Comparative Political Studies, 44:9, 1152–78.10.1177/0010414011405461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorina, Morris P., Samuel A. Abrams, and Jeremy C. Pope (2005). Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York, NY: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, Anthony (2013). ‘Electoral and Policy Consequences of Voter Turnout: Evidence from Compulsory Voting in Australia’, The Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 8, 159–82.10.1561/100.00012055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, James K., and Travis J. Hale (2008). ‘State Income Inequality and Presidential Election Turnout and Outcomes’, Social Science Quarterly, 89:4, 887–901.10.1111/ssqu.2008.89.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, James K. and Hyunsub Kum (2004). ‘Estimating the Inequality of Household Incomes: A Statistical Approach to the Creation of a Dense and Consistent Global Data Set’, UTIP Working Papers, 22. Austin: The University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, James K., Béatrice Halbach, Aleksandra Malinowska, Amin Shams, and Wenjie Zhang (2014). ‘The UTIP Global Inequality Data Sets 1963-2008: Updates, Revisions and Quality Checks’, UTIP Working Papers, 68. Austin: The University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Golder, Matt (2003). ‘Explaining Variation in the Success of Extreme Right Parties in Western Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, 36:4, 432–66.10.1177/0010414003251176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Sung Min (2015). ‘Income Inequality, Electoral Systems and Party Polarization’, European Journal of Political Research, 54:3, 582–600.10.1111/ejpr.2015.54.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansford, Thomas G., and Brad T. Gomez (2010). ‘Estimating the Electoral Effects of Voter Turnout’, American Political Science Review, 104:2, 268–88.10.1017/S0003055410000109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbs, Douglas A. (1973). Mass Political Violence. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hug, Simon, and Danielle Martin (2012). ‘How Electoral Systems Affect MPs’ Positions’, Electoral Studies, 31:1, 192–200.10.1016/j.electstud.2011.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, Torben, and David Soskice (2016). ‘Information, Inequality, and Mass Polarization: Ideology in Advanced Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 48:13, 1781–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, Kathleen H., and Erika Falk (2000). ‘Continuity and Change in Civility in the House’, in Jon R. Bond and Richard Fleisher (eds.), Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era. Washington: CQ Press, 96–108.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, David R. (2001). ‘Party Polarization and Legislative Gridlock’, Political Research Quarterly, 54, 125–41.10.1177/106591290105400107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasara, Kimuli, and Pavithra Suryanarayan (2015). ‘When Do the Rich Vote Less than the Poor and Why? Explaining Turnout Inequality across the World’, American Journal of Political Science, 59:3, 613–27.10.1111/ajps.2015.59.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter, Edgar Grande, Romain Lachat, Martin Dolezal, Simon Bornschier, and Timotheos Frey (2006). ‘Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared’, European Journal of Political Research, 45:6, 921–56.10.1111/ejpr.2006.45.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachat, Romain (2008). ‘The Impact of Party Polarization on Ideological Voting’, Electoral Studies, 27:4, 687–98.10.1016/j.electstud.2008.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layman, Geoffrey C., and Thomas M. Carsey (2002). ‘Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electorate’, American Journal of Political Science, 46:4, 786–802.10.2307/3088434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layman, Geoffrey C., Thomas M. Carsey, and Juliana Menasce Horowitz (2006). ‘Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences’, Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 83–110.10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.070204.105138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend (1997). ‘Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma’, American Political Science Review, 91:1, 1–14.10.2307/2952255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Tse-Min, James M. Enelow, and Han Dorussen (1999). ‘Equilibrium in Multicandidate Probabilistic Spatial Voting’, Public Choice, 98:1/2, 59–82.10.1023/A:1018391410733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupu, Noam (2015). ‘Party Polarization and Mass Partisanship: A Comparative Perspective’, Political Behavior, 37, 331–56.10.1007/s11109-014-9279-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahler, Vincent A. (2008). ‘Electoral Turnout and Income Redistribution by the State: A Cross-National Analysis of the Developed Democracies’, European Journal of Political Research, 47:2, 161–83.10.1111/ejpr.2008.47.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maoz, Zeev, and Zeynep Somer-Topcu (2010). ‘Political Polarization and Cabinet Stability in Multiparty Systems: A Social Networks Analysis of European Parliaments, 1945–98’, British Journal of Political Science, 40:4, 805–33.10.1017/S0007123410000220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, Gregory B. (1988). ‘The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on the Presidential Vote: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Analysis’, American Journal of Political Science, 32:1, 137–54.10.2307/2111314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarty, Nolan, Keith T. Poole, and Howard Rosenthal (2006). Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meguid, Bonnie M. (2005). ‘Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success’, American Political Science Review, 99:3, 347–59.10.1017/S0003055405051701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, Maurits J. (2017). ‘Contagious Euroscepticism: The Impact of Eurosceptic Support on Mainstream Party Positions on European Integration’, Party Politics, 23:4, 413–23.10.1177/1354068815601787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer, Allan H., and Scott F. Richard (1981). ‘A Rational Theory of the Size of Government’, The Journal of Political Economy, 89:5, 914–27.10.1086/261013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moene, Karl O., and Michael Wallerstein (2001). ‘Inequality, Social Insurance, and Redistribution’, American Political Science Review, 95:4, 859–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, Dennis C., and Thomas Stratman (2003). ‘The Economic Effects of Democratic Participation’, Journal of Public Economics, 87:9-10, 2129–55.10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00046-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevitte, Neil, André Blais, Elisabeth Gidengril, and Richard Nadeau (2009). ‘Socioeconomic Status and Nonvoting: A Cross-National Comparative Analysis’, in H.-D. Klingemann and I. MacAllister (eds.), The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 85–108.
   Google Scholar
• Perotti, Roberto (1996). ‘Growth, Income Distribution, and Democracy: What the Data Say’, Journal of Economic Growth, 1:2, 149–87.10.1007/BF00138861
   Google Scholar
• Plümper, Thomas, Vera E. Troeger, and Philip Manow (2005). ‘Panel Data Analysis in Comparative Politics: Linking Method to Theory’, European Journal of Political Research, 44:2, 327–54.10.1111/ejpr.2005.44.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontusson, Jonas, and David Rueda (2008). ‘Inequality as a Source of Political Polarization: A Comparative Analysis of Twelve OECD Countries’, in Pablo Beramendi and Christopher J. Anderson (eds.), Democracy, Inequality, and Representation: A Comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 312–53.
   Google Scholar
• Pontusson, Jonas, and David Rueda (2010). ‘The Politics of Inequality: Voter Mobilization and Left Parties in Advanced Industrial States’, Comparative Political Studies, 43:6, 675–705.10.1177/0010414009358672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, Bingham G. (1982). Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability, and Violence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell Jr, Bingham G., and Guy D. Whitten (1993). ‘A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context’, American Journal of Political Science, 37:2, 391–414.10.2307/2111378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, Michael (2006). ‘Is Democracy Good for the Poor?’, American Journal of Political Science, 50:4, 860–74.10.1111/ajps.2006.50.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solt, Frederick (2008). ‘Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement’, American Journal of Political Science, 52:1, 48–60.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00298.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solt, Frederick (2010). ‘Does Economic Inequality Depress Electoral Participation? Testing the Schattschneider Hypothesis’, Political Behavior, 32:2, 285–301.10.1007/s11109-010-9106-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solt, Frederick (2016). ‘The Standardized World Income Inequality Database’, Social Science Quarterly, 97:5, 1267–81.10.1111/ssqu.2016.97.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavits, Margit, and Joshua D. Potter (2015). ‘The Effect of Inequality and Social Identity on Party Strategies’, American Journal of Political Science, 59:3, 744–58.10.1111/ajps.2015.59.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmons, Jeffrey F. (2010). ‘Does Democracy Reduce Economic Inequality?’, British Journal of Political Science, 40:4, 741–57.10.1017/S0007123410000165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Brug, Wouter, Meindert Fennema, and Jean Tillie (2005). ‘Why Some Anti-Immigrant Parties Fail and Others Succeed: A Two-Step Model of Aggregate Electoral Support’, Comparative Political Studies, 38:5, 537–73.10.1177/0010414004273928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Spanje, Joost (2010). ‘Contagious Parties: Anti-Immigration Parties and Their Impact on Other Parties’ Immigration Stances in Contemporary Western Europe’, Party Politics, 16:5, 563–86.10.1177/1354068809346002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry Brady (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Volkens, Andrea, Pola Lehmann, Nicolas Merz, Sven Regel, Annika Werner, with Onawa Promise Lacewell, and Henrike Schultze (2014). The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR), Version 2014b. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Ching-Hsing (2014). ‘The Effects of Party Fractionalization and Party Polarization on Democracy’, Party Politics, 20:5, 687–99.10.1177/1354068812448691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, Hugh, Lawrence Ezrow, and Han Dorussen (2011). ‘Globalization, Party Positions, and the Median Voter’, World Politics, 63:3, 509–47.10.1017/S004388711100013X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xezonakis, Georgios (2012). ‘Party System Polarization and Quality of Government: On the Political Correlates of QoG’, Working Paper Series, 14. Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute, University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar