The EU’s collective securitisation of climate change

References

• Bäckstrand, Karin, and Ole Elgström (2013). ‘The EU’s Role in Climate Change Negotiations: From Leader to “Leadiator”', Journal of European Public Policy, 20:10, 1369–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boasson, Elin Lerum, and Claire Dupont (2015). ‘Buildings: Good Intentions Unfulfilled', in Claire Dupont and Sebastian Oberthür (eds.), Decarbonization in the European Union: Internal Policies and External Strategies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 137–58.
   Google Scholar
• Bretherton, Charlotte, and John Vogler (2006). The European Union as a Global Actor. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, Harriet, and Peter Newell (2010). Governing Climate Change. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry, Ole Waever, and Jaap de Wilde (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cañete, Miguel Arias (2018). ‘Opening Remarks at the Second Ministerial on Climate Action (MoCA) by the EU, China and Canada', Brussels, 20 June, available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-18-4236_en.htm (accessed 30 June 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Corry, Olaf (2012). ‘Securitisation and “Riskification”: Second-Order Security and the Politics of Climate Change', Millenium - Journal of International Studies, 40:2, 235–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union (1995). Community Strategy on Climate Change: Council Conclusions, 12841/95 (December).
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union (1999). Community Strategy on Climate Change: Council Conclusions, 11654/99 (October).
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union (2001). Community Strategy on Climate Change: Council Conclusions, 9116/01 (June).
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union (2002). Conclusions, 13276/02 (October).
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union (2004). Conclusions, 16298/04 (December).
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union (2006). Conclusions, 16941/06 (December).
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union (2007). Conclusions, 14632/07 (November).
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union (2009). Conclusions, 14790/09 (October).
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union (2010). Conclusions, 7562/10 (March).
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union (2018). Conclusions, 6125/18 (February).
   Google Scholar
• Detraz, Nicole, and Michele M. Betsill (2009). ‘Climate Change and Environmental Security: For Whom the Discourse Shifts', International Studies Perspectives, 10:3, 303–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diez, Thomas, Franziskus von Lucke, and Zehra Wellmann (2016). The Securitization of Climate Change: Actors, Processes and Consequences. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrov, Radoslav S. (2010). ‘Inside Copenhagen: The State of Climate Governance', Global Environmental Politics, 10:2, 18–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dröge, Susanne (2016). SWP Research Paper The Paris Agreement 2015: Turning Point for the International Climate Regime. Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Dubash, Navroz K, and Lavanya Rajamani (2010). ‘Beyond Copenhagen: Next Steps', Climate Policy, 10: 593–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupont, Claire (2016). Climate Policy Integration into EU Energy Policy: Progress and Prospects. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dupont, Claire, and Sebastian Oberthür (2015). ‘The European Union', in Eva Lövbrand and Karin Bäckstrand (eds.), Research Handbook on Climate Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 224–36.
   Google Scholar
• Dupont, Claire, and Sebastian Oberthür (2017). ‘The Council and the European Council: Stuck on the Road to Transformational Leadership', in Rüdiger K. W. Wurzel, James Connelly, and Duncan Liefferink (eds.), The European Union in International Climate Change Politics: Still Taking a Lead? Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 66–79.
   Google Scholar
• EEA (2016). Trends and Projections in Europe 2016 - Tracking Progress towards Europe’s Climate and Energy Targets. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer (2008). Europeans’ Attitudes towards Climate Change. Special Eurobarometer 300. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer (2011). Climate Change. Special Eurobarometer 372. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer (2015). Climate Change. Special Eurobarometer 435. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2001). Communication from the Commission: Withdrawal of Commission Proposals Which Are No Longer Topical, COM(2001) 763/2.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2008a). 20 20 by 2020: Europe’s Climate Change Opportunity, COM(2008) 30.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2008b). Climate Change and International Security: Paper from the High Representative and the European Commission to the European Council.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011). Communication from the Commission. A Roadmap for Moving to a Competitive Low Carbon Economy in 2050, COM(2011) 112.
   Google Scholar
• European Council (1997). Conclusions: Amsterdam European Council (June).
   Google Scholar
• European Council (1998). Conclusions: Vienna European Council (December).
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2001). Conclusions: European Council Declaration on Climate Change (March).
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2006). Conclusions (December).
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2007a). Conclusions (March).
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2007b). Conclusions (June).
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2009). Conclusions (October).
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2014). Conclusions, EUCO169/14 (October).
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2017a). Conclusions, EUCO8/17 (June).
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2017b). Conclusions EUCO19/17 (December).
   Google Scholar
• European Union (2003). A Secure Europe in a Better World: European Security Strategy. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Union, External Action Service (2018). ‘Climate Diplomacy Week: EU Steps up International Cooperation on Climate Change' available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/46988/climate-diplomacy-week-eu-steps-international-cooperation-climate-change_en (accessed 30 June 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, Gerda (2016). ‘The EU’s Problem-Solving Capacity and Legitimacy in a Crisis Context: A Virtuous or Vicious Circle?', West European Politics, 39:5, 953–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner, Robert, Hannes Stephan, and John Vogler (2010). ‘International Climate Policy after Copenhagen: Towards a “Building Blocks” Approach', Global Policy, 1:3, 252–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, Rita (2008). ‘The Environmental Security Debate and Its Significance for Climate Change', The International Spectator, 43:3, 51–65.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, Rita (2011). ‘Can Securitization Theory be Used in Normative Analysis? Towards a Just Securitization Theory’, Security Dialogue, 42:4-5, 427–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, Rita (2016). ‘Extraordinary or Ordinary Emergency Measures: What, and Who, Defines the “Success” of Securitisation?', Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29:2, 677–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groen, Lisanne, Arne Niemann, and Sebastian Oberthür (2012). ‘The EU as a Global Leader? The Copenhagen and Cancun UN Climate Change Negotiations', Journal of Contemporary European Research, 8:2, 173–91.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, Joyeeta, and Michael Grubb (eds.) (2000). Climate Change and European Leadership. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, Garett (1968). ‘The Tragedy of the Commons', Science 162: 1243–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermwille, Lukas, Wolfgang Obergassel, Hermann E Ott, and Christiane Beuermann (2015). ‘UNFCCC before and after Paris – What’s Necessary for an Effective Climate Regime?', Climate Policy, 17:2, 150–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hey, Christian (2010). ‘The German Paradox: Climate Leader and Green Car Laggard', in Sebastian Oberthür and Marc Pallemaerts (eds.), The New Climate Policies of the European Union: Internal Legislation and Climate Diplomacy. Brussels, Belgium: VUB Press, 211–30.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC (2007). Climate Change 2007. Fourth Assessment Report: Synthesis Report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC (2013). ‘Summary for Policymakers', in T.F. Stoker et al. (eds.), Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O. (2014). ‘The Global Politics of Climate Change: Challenge for Political Science', PS: Political Science & Politics, 48:1, 19–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampinen, Risto, and Petri Uusikylä (1998). ‘Implementation Deficit - Why Member States Do Not Comply with EU Directives', Scandinavian Political Studies, 21:3, 231–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landler, Mark (2014). ‘US and China Reach Climate Accord After Months of Talks', New York Times, 11 November 2014, http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/12/world/asia/china-us-xi-obama-apec.html (accessed 11 November 2014).
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, Matt (2008). ‘The Copenhagen School and the Construction of Security', European Journal of International Relations, 14:4, 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, Matt (2012). ‘The Failed Securitization of Climate Change in Australia', Australian Journal of Political Science, 47:4, 579–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogherini, Federica (2018). ‘Speech at the High-Level Event “Climate, Peace and Security: Time for Action”' (22 June), available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/47168/mogherini-high-level-event-climate-peace-and-security-time-action_en (accessed 30 June 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Niemann, Arne, and Charlotte Bretherton (2013). ‘EU External Policy at the Crossroads: The Challenge of Actorness and Effectiveness', International Relations 27:3, 261–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberthür, Sebastian (1999). The Kyoto Protocol. International Climate Policy for the 21st Century. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Oberthür, Sebastian (2016). ‘Where to Go from Paris? The European Union in Climate Geopolitics', Global Affairs, 2:2, 119–30.
   Google Scholar
• Oberthür, Sebastian, and Claire Dupont (2011). ‘The Council, the European Council and International Climate Policy: From Symbolic Leadership to Leadership by Example', in Rüdiger K. W. Wurzel and James Connelly (eds.), The European Union as a Leader in International Climate Change Politics, Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 74–91.
   Google Scholar
• Oberthür, Sebastian, and Claire Roche Kelly (2008). ‘EU Leadership in International Climate Policy: Achievements and Challenges', The International Spectator, 43:3, 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Oels, Angela (2012). ‘From “Securitization” of Climate Change to “Climatization” of the Security Field: Comparing Three Theoretical Perspectives', in Jürgen Scheffran et al. (eds.), Climate Change, Human Security and Violent Conflict. London: Springer, 185–206.
   Google Scholar
• Skjaerseth, Jon Birger, and Jørgen Wettestad (2010). ‘Making the EU Emissions Trading System: The European Commission as an Entrepreneurial Epistemic Leader', Global Environmental Change, 20:2, 314–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skovgaard, Jakob (2014). ‘EU Climate Policy after the Crisis', Environmental Politics, 23:1, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperling, James and Mark Webber (2018). ‘The European Union: Security Governance and Collective Securitization', West European Politics. doi:10.1080/01402382.2018.1510193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, Nicholas (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terhalle, Maximilian, and Joanna Depledge (2013). ‘Great-Power Politics, Order Transition, and Climate Governance: Insights from International Relations Theory', Climate Policy, 13:5, 572–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trombetta, Maria Julia (2010). ‘Rethinking the Securitization of the Environment: Old Beliefs, New Insights', in Thierry Balzacq (ed.), Understanding Securitisation Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 135–49.
   Google Scholar
• van Schaik, Louise (2010). ‘The Sustainability of the EU’s Model for Climate Diplomacy', in Sebastian Oberthür and Marc Pallemaerts (eds.), The New Climate Policies of the European Union: Internal Legislation and Climate Diplomacy. Brussels: VUB Press, 251–80.
   Google Scholar
• Vogler, John (2017). ‘Global Climate Politics: Can the EU Be an Actor?', in Rüdiger K. W. Wurzel, James Connelly, and Duncan Liefferink (eds.), The European Union in International Climate Change Politics: Still Taking a Lead?, Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 20–33.
   Google Scholar
• Waever, Ole (2011). ‘Politics, Security, Theory', Security Dialogue 42:4–5, 465–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WBGU (2007). Climate Change as a Security Risk. London: German Advisory Council on Global Change, Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Weidner, Helmut and Lutz Mez (2008). ‘German Climate Change Policy: A Success Story with Some Flaws', Journal of Environment and Development, 17:4, 356–78.
   Google Scholar
• Wettestad, Jørgen, Per Ove Eikeland, and Måns Nilsson (2012). ‘EU Climate and Energy Policy: A Hesitant Supranational Turn?', Global Environmental Politics, 12:2, 67–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Michael C (2003). ‘Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics', European Journal of International Relations, 47:4, 511–31.
   Google Scholar
• Yamin, Farhana, and Joanna Depledge (2004). The International Climate Change Regime. A Guide to Rules, Institutions and Procedures, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar