To adapt or to disregard? Parties’ reactions to external shocks

References

• Bakker, Ryan, Erica Edwards, Liesbet Hooghe, Seth Jolly, Jelle Koedam, Filip Kostelka, Gary Marks, et al. (2015). 1999–2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File. Version 1.1. Available on chesdata.eu. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Abou-Chadi, Tarik (2016). ‘Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Policy Shifts – How Green and Radical Right Parties Differ in their Impact’, British Journal of Political Science, 46:2, 417–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, James Robinson, and Yunyong Thaicharoen (2003). ‘Institutional Causes, Macroeconomic Symptoms: Volatility, Crises and Growth’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 50:1, 49–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James (2012). ‘Causes and Electoral Consequences of Party Policy Shifts in Multiparty Elections: Theoretical Results and Empirical Evidence’, Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 401–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Michael Clark, Lawrence Ezrow, and Garett Glasgow (2004). ‘Understanding Change and Stability in Party Ideologies: Do Parties Respond to Public Opinion or to Past Election Results’, British Journal of Political Science, 34:4, 589–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Michael Clark, Lawrence Ezrow, and Garrett Glasgow (2006). ‘Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties’ Policy Shifts, 1976–1998’, American Journal of Political Science, 50:3, 513–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Lawrence Ezrow, and Zeynep Somer-Topcu (2011). ‘Is Anybody Listening? Evidence That Voters Do Not Respond to European Parties' Policy Statements During Elections’, American Journal of Political Science, 55:2, 370–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Lawrence Ezrow, and Zeynep Somer-Topcu (2014). ‘Do Voters Respond to Party Manifestos or to a Wider Information Environment? An Analysis of Mass-Elite Linkages on European Integration’, American Journal of Political Science, 58:4, 967–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Andrea B. Haupt, and Heather Stoll (2009). ‘What Moves Parties? The Role of Public Opinion and Global Economic Conditions in Western Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, 42:5, 611–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, and Samuel Merrill III (2009). ‘Policy-Seeking Parties in a Parliamentary Democracy with Proportional Representation: A Valence-Uncertainty Model’, British Journal of Political Science, 39:3, 539–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, and Zeynep Somer-Topcu (2009). ‘Policy Adjustment by Parties in Response to Rival Parties’ Policy Shifts: Spatial Theory and the Dynamics of Party Competition in Twenty-Five Post-War Democracies’, British Journal of Political Science, 39:4, 825–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, Shaghil (2003). ‘Sources of Economic Fluctuations in Latin America and Implications for Choice of Exchange Rate Regime’, Journal of Development Economics, 72:1, 181–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albala-Bertrand, Jose-Miguel (1993). Political Economy of Large Natural Disasters: With Special Reference to Developing Countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armingeon, Klaus, and Besir Ceka (2014). ‘The Loss of Trust in the European Union During the Great Recession Since 2007: The Role of Heuristics from the National Political System’, European Union Politics, 15:1, 82–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawn, Kathleen, and Zeynep Somer-Topcu (2012). ‘Government versus Opposition at the Polls: How Governing Status Affects the Impact of Policy Positions’, American Journal of Political Science, 56:2, 433–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischof, Daniel (2017a). ‘Towards a Renewal of the Niche Party Concept: Parties, Market Shares and Condensed Offers’, Party Politics, 23:3, 220–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischof, Daniel (2017b). ‘New Graphic Schemes for Stata: Plotplain and Plottig’, The Stata Journal, 17:3, 748–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Daniela, and Markus Tausendpfund (2014). ‘The Impact of the Euro Crisis on Citizens’ Support for the European Union’, Journal of European Integration, 36:3, 231–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremer, Björn (2018). ‘The Missing Left? Economic Crisis and the Programmatic Response of Social Democratic Parties in Europe’, Party Politics, 24:1, 23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, Eric C., John P. Frendreis, and Dennis W. Gleiber (1984). ‘An ‘Events’ Approach to the Problem of Cabinet Stability’, Comparative Political Studies, 17:2, 167–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian (1994). ‘A New Spatial Theory of Party Competition: Uncertainty, Ideology and Policy Equilibria Viewed Comparatively and Temporally’, British Journal of Political Science, 24:0 , 443–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, and Eric Tanenbaum, eds. (2001). Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, Lawrence Ezrow, and Michael D. McDonald (2010). ‘Ideology, Party Factionalism and Policy Change: An Integrated Dynamic Theory’, British Journal of Political Science, 40:4, 781–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, Charlotte, and Paul Tobin (2016). ‘The Impact of the Economic Crisis on European Union Environmental Policy’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 54:6, 1485–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, Michael R., Peter D. Little, Tewoday Mogues, and Workneh Negatu (2007). ‘Poverty Traps and Natural Disasters in Ethiopia and Honduras’, World Development, 35:5, 835–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessens, Stijn, Giovanni Dell’Arriccia, Deniz Igan, and Luc Laeven (2010). ‘Cross-country Experiences and Policy Implications from the Global Financial Crisis’, Economic Policy, 25:4, 267–93.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, Paul, and Gunning, J. W. (1999). ‘Explaining African Economic Performance’, Journal of Economic Literature, 37:1, 64–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti, Nicolò, Swen Hutter, and Kyriaki Nanou (2018). ‘Party Competition and Political Representation in Crisis: An Introductory Note’, Party Politics, 24:1, 3–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Richard J. (2016). ‘Stability and Change in Party Issue Positions: The 2009 and 2014 European Elections’, Electoral Studies, 44, 525–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Richard J., and Ian McAllister (2015). ‘Random Walk or Planned Excursion? Continuity and Change in the Left–right Positions of Political Parties’, Comparative Political Studies, 48:6, 759–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dassonneville, Ruth, and Michael S. Lewis-Beck (2014). ‘Macroeconomics, Economic Crisis and Electoral Outcomes: A National European Pool’, Acta Politica, 49:4, 372–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaton, Angus, and Ron Miller (1996). ‘International Commodity Prices, Macroeconomic Performance and Politics in Sub-Saharan Africa’, Journal of African Economies, 5:3, 99–191.
   Google Scholar
• Dehn, Jan (2000). The Effects on Growth of Commodity Price Uncertainty and Shocks. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Döring, Holger, and Philipp Manow (2016). Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies. Development Version.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, Frances (2007). ‘“Lately, Things Just Don’t Seem the Same”: External shocks, Party Change and the Adaptation of the Dutch Christian Democrats during “Purple Hague” 1994–8’, Party Politics, 13:1, 69–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterly, William, Michael Kremer, Lant Pritchett, and Lawrence H. Summers (1993). ‘Good Policy or Good Luck? Country Growth Performance and Temporary Shocks’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 32:3, 459–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, Robert S., Michael B. MacKuen, and James A. Stimson (2002). The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence, Catherine C. de Vries, Marco R. Steenbergen, and Erica Edwards (2010). ‘Mean Voter Representation and Partisan Constituency Representation: Do Parties Respond to the Mean Voter Position or to their Supporters?’, Party Politics, 17:3, 275–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence, and Timothy Hellwig (2014). ‘Responding to Voters or Responding to Markets? Political Parties and Public Opinion in an Era of Globalization’, International Studies Quarterly, 58:4, 816–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerholm, Anders (2016). ‘Why Do Political Parties Change their Policy Positions? A Review’, Political Studies Review, 14:4, 501–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherstone, Kevin (2011). ‘The JCMS Annual Lecture: The Greek Sovereign Debt Crisis and EMU: A Failing State in a Skewed Regime’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49:2, 193–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frick, Bernd, and Rob Simmons (2017). ‘The Impact of Exogenous Shocks on Exits from the Catholic and Protestant Churches in Germany, 1953–2015’, Applied Economics Letters, 24:20, 1476–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frieden, Jeffry, and Stefanie Walter (2017). ‘Understanding the Political Economy of the Eurozone Crisis’, Annual Review of Political Science, 20, 371–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goerres, Achim, and Stefanie Walter (2016). ‘The Political Consequences of National Crisis Management: Micro-Level Evidence from German Voters During the 2008/09 Global Economic Crisis’, German Politics, 25:1, 131–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürkaynak, Refet S., Brian Sack, and Eric Swanson (2005). ‘The Sensitivity of Long-Term Interest Rates to Economic News: Evidence and Implications for Macroeconomic Models’, The American Economic Review, 95:1, 425–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmel, Robert, and Kenneth Janda (1994). ‘An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6:3, 259–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, Tim (2014). ‘Money, Margins and the Motors of Politics: The EU and the Development of Party Politics in Central and Eastern Europe’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 52:1, 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haupt, Andrea B. (2010). ‘Parties’ Responses to Economic Globalization. What is Left for the Left and Right for the Right?’, Party Politics, 16:1, 5–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellwig, Timothy (2012). ‘Constructing Accountability: Party Position Taking and Economic Voting’, Comparative Political Studies, 45:1, 91–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández, Enrique, and Hanspeter Kriesi (2016). ‘The Electoral Consequences of the Financial and Economic Crisis in Europe’, European Journal of Political Research, 55:2, 203–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara B., and James Tilley (2016). ‘Fleeing the Centre: The Rise of Challenger Parties in the Aftermath of the Euro Crisis’, West European Politics, 39:5, 971–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, Dermot, and Lucia Quaglia (2009). ‘European Perspectives on the Global Financial Crisis: Introduction’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 47:5, 939–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, Ryan Bakker, Anna Brigevich, Catherine De Vries, Erica Edwards, Gary Marks, Jan Rovny, et al. (2010). ‘Reliability and Validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill Expert Surveys on Party Positioning’, European Journal of Political Research, 49:5, 687–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jann, Ben (2014). ‘Plotting Regression Coefficients and Other Estimates’, The Stata Journal 14:4, 708–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kraay, and Massimo Mastruzzi (2010). ‘The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues.’ World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430.
   Google Scholar
• Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, Ian Budge, and Michael D. McDonald, eds. (2006). Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD, 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, Sebastian, and Thomas König (2015). ‘Fiscal Governance in the Eurozone: How Effectively Does the Stability and Growth Pact Limit Governmental Debt in the Euro Countries?’, Political Science Research and Methods, 3:2, 329–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter (2014). ‘The Political Consequences of the Economic Crisis in Europe: Electoral Punishment and Popular Protest’, in Nancy Bermeo and Larry M. Bartels (eds.), Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes and Protest in the Great Recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 297–333.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Theresa, and Florian Stoeckel (2014). ‘When European Integration Becomes Costly: The Euro Crisis and Public Support for European Economic Governance’, Journal of European Public Policy, 21:4, 624–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacewell, Onawa P. (2017). ‘Beyond Policy Positions: How Party Type Conditions Programmatic Responses to Globalization Pressures’, Party Politics, 23:4, 448–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael (2005). ‘Policy and the Dynamics of Political Competition’, American Political Science Review, 99:2, 263–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael, and Kenneth A. Shepsle (1996). Making and Breaking Governments. Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LeDuc, Lawrence, and Jon H. Pammett (2013). ‘The Fate of Governing Parties in Times of Economic Crisis’, Electoral Studies, 32:3, 494–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Mary Stegmaier (2000). ‘Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes’, Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 183–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Gallardo, Cecilia (2014). ‘Designing Cabinets: Presidential Politics and Ministerial Instability’, Journal of Politics in Latin America, 6:2, 3–38.
   Google Scholar
• Meguid, Bonnie M. (2005). ‘Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success’, American Political Science Review, 99:3, 347–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, Nicolas (2015). ‘Wie haben die Parteien auf die Wirtschafts- und Finanzkrise reagiert? Eine Untersuchung der Thematisierungsstrategien europäischer Parteien unter besonderer Berücksichtigung Deutschlands’, in Heiko Giebler and Aiko Wagner (eds.), Wirtschaft, Krise und Wahlverhalten. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 301–30.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, Thomas M., and Bernhard Miller (2015). ‘The Niche Party Concept and Its Measurement’, Party Politics, 21:2, 259–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, Marco, and Harald Schoen (2017). ‘Avoiding Vote Loss by Changing Policy Positions: the Fukushima Disaster, Party Responses, and the German Electorate’, Party Politics, 23:4, 424–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, Thomas M., and Markus Wagner (2013). ‘Mainstream or Niche? Vote-Seeking Incentives and the Programmatic Strategies of Political Parties’, Comparative Political Studies, 46:10, 1246–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morlino, Leonardo, and Mario Quaranta (2016). ‘What Is the Impact of the Economic Crisis on Democracy? Evidence from Europe’, International Political Science Review, 37:5, 618–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Wolfgang C., and Paul W. Thurner, eds. (2017). The Politics of Nuclear Energy in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nannestad, Peter, and Martin Paldam (2002). ‘The Cost of Ruling: A Foundation Stone for Two Theories’, in Han Dorussen and Michael Taylor (eds.), Economic Voting. London: Routledge, 17–44.
   Google Scholar
• Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro (1992). The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peersman, Gert (2002). ‘Monetary Policy and Long Term Interest Rates in Germany’, Economics Letters, 77:2, 271–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham (2004). ‘The Chain of Responsiveness’, Journal of Democracy, 15:4, 91–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham, and Guy D. Whitten (1993). ‘A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context’, American Journal of Political Science, 37:2, 391–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raddatz, Claudio (2007). ‘Are External Shocks Responsible for the Instability of Output in Low-Income Countries?’, Journal of Development Economics, 84:1, 155–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (1999). ‘Where Did All the Growth Go? External Shocks, Societal Conflict, and Growth Collapses’, Journal of Economic Growth, 4:4, 385–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrschneider, Robert, and Stephen Whitefield (2016). ‘Responding to Growing European Union-Skepticism? The Stances of Political Parties Toward European Integration in Western and Eastern Europe Following the Financial Crisis’, European Union Politics, 17:1, 138–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield, Norman, and Itai Sened (2006). Multiparty Democracy: Elections and Legislative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, Gijs, Catherine E. de Vries, and Barbara Vis (2013). ‘Why Do Parties Change Position? Party Organization and Environmental Incentives’, Journal of Politics, 75:2, 464–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, Gijs, Marc van de Wardt, Barbara Vis, and Michael Baggesen Klitgaard (2015). ‘How Aspiration to Office Conditions the Impact of Government Participation on Party Platform Change’, American Journal of Political Science, 59:49, 1040–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skidmore, Mark, and Hideki Toya (2002). ‘Do Natural Disasters Promote Long-run Growth?’, Economic Inquiry, 40:4, 664–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, Donald E. (1992). ‘Valence Politics’ in Dennis Kavanagh (ed.), Electoral Politics. Oxford: Clarendon, 141–64.
   Google Scholar
• Somer-Topcu, Zeynep (2009). ‘Timely Decisions: The Effects of Past National Elections on Party Policy Change’, Journal of Politics, 71:1, 238–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoon, Jae-Jae, and Heike Klüver (2015). ‘Voter Polarisation and Party Responsiveness: Why Parties Emphasise Divided Issues, but Remain Silent on Unified Issues’, European Journal of Political Research, 54:2, 343–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stimson, James A., Michael B. MacKuen, and Robert S. Erikson (1995). ‘Dynamic Representation’, American Political Science Review, 89:3, 543–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare, and Wolfgang C. Müller (1999). ‘Political Parties and Hard Choices’, in Wolfgang C. Müller and Kaare Strøm (eds.), Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, Jaques (2012). ‘The Blind Corner of Political Representation’, Representation, 48:1, 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Traber, Denise, Nathalie Giger, and Silja Häusermann (2018). ‘How Economic Crises Affect Political Representation: Declining Party–Voter Congruence in Times of Constrained Government’, West European Politics, 41:5, 1100–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, George (1995). ‘Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism’, British Journal of Political Science, 25:3, 289–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, Markus (2012a). ‘Defining and Measuring Niche Parties’, Party Politics, 18:6, 845–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, Markus (2012b). ‘When do Parties Emphasise Extreme Positions? How Strategic Incentives for Policy Differentiation Influence Issue Importance’, European Journal of Political Research, 51:1, 64–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, Hugh, Lawrence Ezrow, and Han Dorussen (2011). ‘Globalization, Party Positions, and the Median Voter’, World Politics, 63:3, 509–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Laron K., Katsunori Seki, and Guy D. Whitten (2016). ‘You’ve Got Some Explaining to Do: The Influence of Economic Conditions and Spatial Competition on Party Strategy’, Political Science Research and Methods, 4:1, 47–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Christopher, and Jae-Jae Spoon (2015). ‘Differentiated Party Response: The Effect of Euroskeptic Public Opinion on Party Positions’, European Union Politics, 16:2, 176–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar