How party‒issue linkages vary between election manifestos and media debates

References

• Banda, Kevin K. (2016). ‘Issue Ownership, Issue Positions, and Candidate Assessment’, Political Communication, 33:4, 651–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bélanger, Éric, and Bonnie M. Meguid (2008). ‘Issue Salience, Issue Ownership, and Issue-based Vote Choice’, Electoral Studies, 27:3, 477–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischof, Daniel (2017a). ‘New Graphic Schemes for Stata: Plotplain and Plottig’, The Stata Journal, 17:3, 748–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischof, Daniel (2017b). ‘Towards a Renewal of the Niche Party Concept: Parties, Market Shares and Condensed Offers’, Party Politics, 23:3, 220–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian (2015). ‘Issue Emphases, Saliency Theory and Issue Ownership: A Historical and Conceptual Analysis’, West European Politics, 38:4, 761–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, and Dennis Farlie (1983). Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Damore, David F. (2004). ‘The Dynamics of Issue Ownership in Presidential Campaigns’, Political Research Quarterly, 57:3, 391–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sio, Lorenzo, Andrea De Angelis, and Vincenzo Emanuele (2018). ‘Issue Yield and Party Strategy in Multiparty Competition’, Comparative Political Studies, 51:9, 1208–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolezal, Martin (2008). ‘The Design of the Study: The Distinguishing Characteristics of Our Approach’, in Hanspeter Kriesi, Edgar Grande, Romain Lachat, Martin Dolezal, Simon Bornschier, and Timotheos Frey (eds.), West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 53–74.
   Google Scholar
• Dolezal, Martin, Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Anna Katharina Winkler (2016). ‘Analyzing Manifestos in their Electoral Context: A New Approach Applied to Austria, 2002–2008’, Political Science Research and Methods, 4:3, 641–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolezal, Martin, Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Anna Katharina Winkler (2014). ‘How Parties Compete for Votes: A Test of Saliency Theory’, European Journal of Political Research, 53:1, 57–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, Patrick J. (2013). Partisan Priorities: How Issue Ownership Drives and Distorts American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, Christoffer (2007). ‘The Growing Importance of Issue Competition: The Changing Nature of Party Competition in Western Europe’, Political Studies, 55:3, 607–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, and Peter B. Mortensen (2010). ‘Who Sets the Agenda and Who Responds to It in the Danish Parliament? A New Model of Issue Competition and Agenda‐Setting’, European Journal of Political Research, 49:2, 257–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, and Peter B. Mortensen (2015). ‘Avoidance and Engagement: Issue Competition in Multiparty Systems’, Political Studies, 63:4, 747–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, Peter B. Mortensen, and Gunnar Thesen (2015). ‘The Incumbency Bonus Revisited: Causes and Consequences of Media Dominance’, British Journal of Political Science, 47:1, 131–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, and Rune Stubager (2010). ‘The Political Conditionality of Mass Media Influence: When Do Parties Follow Mass Media Attention?’ British Journal of Political Science, 40:3, 663–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselmayer, Martin, Thomas M. Meyer, and Markus Wagner (2019). ‘Fighting for Attention: Media Coverage of Negative Campaign Messages’, Party Politics, 25:3, 412–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselmayer, Martin, Markus Wagner, and Thomas M. Meyer (2017). ‘Partisan Bias in Message Selection: Media Gatekeeping of Party Press Releases’, Political Communication, 34:3, 367–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, Danny (2008). ‘Party Reputations, Journalistic Expectations: How Issue Ownership Influences Election News’, Political Communication, 25:4, 377–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfer, Luzia, and Peter Van Aelst (2016). ‘What Makes Party Messages Fit for Reporting? An Experimental Study of Journalistic News Selection’, Political Communication, 33:1, 59–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeglinger, Dominic (2015). ‘The Politicisation of European Integration in Domestic Election Campaigns’, West European Politics, 39:1, 44–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, David N., Christian Elmelund-Praestekaer, Rens Vliegenthart, and Claes H. de Vreese (2012). ‘Party Media Agenda-Setting: How Parties Influence Election News Coverage’, Party Politics, 18:2, 173–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, Swen, and Hanspeter Kriesi, eds. (2019). European Party Politics in Times of Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, Swen, Edgar Grande, and Hanspeter Kriesi, eds. (2016). Politicising Europe: Integration and Mass Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Noah, David K. Park, and Travis N. Ridout (2006). ‘Dialogue in American Political Campaigns? An Examination of Issue Convergence in Candidate Television Advertising’, American Journal of Political Science, 50:3, 724–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinnijenhuis, Jan, and Paul Pennings (2001). ‘Measurement of Party Positions on the Basis of Party Programmes, Media Coverage and Voter Perceptions’, in Michael Laver (ed.), Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors. London: Routledge, 162–82.
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, Heike, and Iñaki Sagarzazu (2016). ‘Setting the Agenda or Responding to Voters? Political Parties, Voters and Issue Attention’, West European Politics, 39:2, 380–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter (2012). ‘Personalization of National Election Campaigns’, Party Politics, 18:6, 825–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter, Edgar Grande, Martin Dolezal, Marc Helbling, Dominic Höglinger, Swen Hutter, and Bruno Wüest (2012). Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter, Edgar Grande, Romain Lachat, Martin Dolezal, Simon Bornschier, and Timotheos Frey (2008). West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefevere, Jonas, Stefaan Walgrave, Rune Stubager, and Anke Tresch (2017). ‘Measuring Issue Ownership: A Comparative Question Wording Experiment’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 40:1, 120–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, Nicolas (2017). ‘Gaining Voice in the Mass Media: The Effect of Parties’ Strategies on Party-Issue Linkages in Election News Coverage’, Acta Politica, 52:4, 436–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, Thomas M., Martin Haselmayer, and Markus Wagner (2017). ‘Who Gets into the Papers? Party Campaign Messages and the Media’, British Journal of Political Science. doi: 10.1017/S0007123417000400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, Thomas M., and Markus Wagner (2016). ‘Issue Engagement in Election Campaigns the Impact of Electoral Incentives and Organizational Constraints’, Political Science Research and Methods, 4:3, 555–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minozzi, William (2014). ‘Conditions for Dialogue and Dominance in Political Campaigns’, Political Communication, 31:1, 73–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocik, John R. (1996). ‘Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study’, American Journal of Political Science, 40:3, 825–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocik, John R., William L. Benoit, and Glenn J. Hansen (2003). ‘Issue Ownership and Presidential Campaigning, 1952–2000’, Political Science Quarterly, 118:4, 599–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauh, Christian (2015). ‘Communicating Supranational Governance? The Salience of EU Affairs in the German Bundestag, 1991–2013’, European Union Politics, 16:1, 116–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, Elmer E. (1975 [1960]). The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shang, Shengwu, Erik Nesson, and Maoyong Fan (2018). ‘Interaction Terms in Poisson and Log Linear Regression Models’, Bulletin of Economic Research, 70:1, E89–E96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sides, John (2006). ‘The Origins of Campaign Agendas’, British Journal of Politic Science, 36, 407–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigelman, Lee, and Emmett H. Buell (2004). ‘Avoidance or Engagement? Issue Convergence in U.S. Presidential Campaigns, 1960–2000’, American Journal of Political Science, 48:4, 650–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Jason Matthew (2010). ‘Does Crime Pay? Issue Ownership, Political Opportunity, and the Populist Right in Western Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, 43:11, 1471–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, Stuart N. (2014). Negativity in Democratic Politics: Causes and Consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spoon, Jae-Jae (2012). ‘How Salient is Europe? An Analysis of European Election Manifestos, 1979–2004’, European Union Politics, 13:4, 558–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoon, Jae-Jae, Sara B. Hobolt, and Catherine E. de Vries (2014). ‘Going Green: Explaining Issue Competition on the Environment’, European Journal of Political Research, 53:2, 363–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staab, Joachim Friedrich (1990). ‘The Role of News Factors in News Selection: A Theoretical Reconsideration’, European Journal of Communication, 5:4, 423–43.
   Google Scholar
• Steenbergen, Marco R., and David J. Scott (2004). ‘Contesting Europe? The Salience of European Integration as a Party Issue’, in Gary Marks, and Marco R. Steenbergen (eds.), European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 165–92.
   Google Scholar
• Stubager, Rune (2018). ‘What Is Issue Ownership and How Should We Measure It?’ Political Behavior, 40:2, 345–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thesen, Gunnar, Christoffer Green-Pedersen, and Peter B. Mortensen (2017). ‘Priming, Issue Ownership, and Party Support: The Electoral Gains of an Issue-Friendly Media Agenda’, Political Communication, 34:2, 282–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tresch, Anke (2009). ‘Politicians in the Media: Determinants of Legislators’ Presence and Prominence in Swiss Newspapers’, International Journal of Press/Politics, 14:1, 67–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tresch, Anke, Jonas Lefevere, and Stefaan Walgrave (2018). ‘How Parties’ Issue Emphasis Strategies Vary Across Communication Channels: The 2009 Regional Election Campaign in Belgium’, Acta Politica, 53:1, 25–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, Peter, and Stefaan Walgrave (2016). ‘Information and Arena: The Dual Function of the News Media for Political Elites’, Journal of Communication, 66:3, 496–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Camp, Kirsten (2018). ‘Issue Ownership as a Determinant of Political Parties’ Media Coverage’, Communications, 43:1, 25.
   Google Scholar
• Volkens, Andrea, Pola Lehmann, Theres Matthieß, Nicolas Merz, Sven Regel, and Annika Werner (2015). The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2015a. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum für Sozialforschung (WZB).
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, Markus, and Thomas M. Meyer (2014). ‘Which Issues Do Parties Emphasise? Salience Strategies and Party Organisation in Multiparty Systems’, West European Politics, 37:5, 1019–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, Stefaan, Jonas Lefevere, and Anke Tresch (2012). ‘The Associative Dimension of Issue Ownership’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 76:4, 771–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, Stefaan, and Rens Vliegenthart (2010). ‘Why Are Policy Agendas Punctuated? Friction and Cascading in Parliament and Mass Media in Belgium’, Journal of European Public Policy, 17:8, 1147–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar