Pre-parliamentary party career and political representation

References

• Abbott, Andrew, and Alexandra Hrycak (1990). ‘Measuring Resemblance in Sequence Data: An Optimal Matching Analysis of Musicians’ Careers’, American Journal of Sociology, 96:1, 144–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott, Andrew, and Angela Tsay (2000). ‘Sequence Analysis and Optimal Matching Methods in Sociology’, Sociological Methods & Research, 29:1, 3–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• André, Audrey, and Sam Depauw (2013). ‘District Magnitude and Home Styles of Representation in European Democracies’, West European Politics, 36:5, 986–1006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• André, Audrey, Sam Depauw, and Shane Martin (2015). ‘Electoral Systems and Legislators’ Constituency Effort: The Mediating Effect of Electoral Vulnerability’, Comparative Political Studies, 48:4, 464–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APSA (1950). ‘Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System: A Report of the Committee on Political Parties of the American Political Science Association’, American Political Science Association, 44:3, 1–99.
   Google Scholar
• Bafumi, Joseph, and Andrew Gelman (2006). ‘Fitting Multilevel Models When Predictors and Group Effects Correlate’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Bailer, Stefanie, Peter Maissner, Tamaki Ohmura, and Peter Selb (2013). Seiteneinsteiget im Deutschen Bundestag - eine Analyse über Karrierewege und ihre Auswirkungen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Bille, Lars (2001). ‘Democratizing a Democratic Procedure: Myth or Reality? Candidate Selection in Western European Parties, 1960–1990’, Party Politics, 7:3, 363–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bøggild, Troels, and Helene Helboe Pedersen (2018). ‘Campaigning on Behalf of the Party? Party Constraints on Candidate Campaign Personalisation’, European Journal of Political Research, 57:4, 883–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, Bruce E., John A. Ferejohn, and Morris P. Fiorina (1987). The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, Paul (2007). ‘The Professionalisation of MPs: Refining the ‘Politics-Facilitating’ Explanation’, Parliamentary Affairs, 60:2, 212–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, John M., and Matthew Soberg Shugart (1995). ‘Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas’, Electoral Studies, 14:4, 417–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen, David, and Matia Vannoni (2016). ‘Sliding Doors in Brussels: A Career Path Analysis of EU Affairs Managers’, European Journal of Political Research, 55:4, 811–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Converse, Philip E., and Roy Pierce (1986). Political Representation in France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cotta, Maurizio, and Heinrich Best (2007). ‘Parliamentary Representatives from Early Democratization to the Age of Consolidated Democracy: National Variations and International Convergence in a Long-Term Perspective’, in Maurizio Cotta and Heinrich Best (eds.), Democratic Representation in Europe: Diversity, Change, and Convergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 136–59.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins (1993). Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enns, Peter K., and Julianna Koch. (2013). ‘Public Opinion in the U.S. States 1956 to 2010’, State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 13:3, 349–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiers, Stefaan, and Ineke Secker (2007). ‘A Career through the Party: The Recruitment of Party Politicians in Parliament’, in Maurizio Cotta and Heinrich Best (eds.), Democratic Representation in Europe: Diversity, Change, and Convergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 136–59.
   Google Scholar
• Gabadinho, Alexis, Gilbert Ritschard, Müller Nicolas, and Matthias Studer (2011). ‘Analyzing and Visualizing State Sequences in R with TraMineR’, Journal of Statistical Software, 4:40, 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier, Jacques-Antoine, Felix, Bühlmann, and Philippe Blanchard (2014). ‘Introduction: Sequence Analysis in 2014’, in Philippe Blanchard, Felix Bühlmann, and Jacques-Antoine Gauthier (eds.), Advances in Sequence Analysis: Theory, Method, Applications. Life Course Research and Social Policies. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, Andrew, and Thomas C. Little (1997). ‘Poststratification into Many Categories Using Hierarchical Logistic Regression’, Survey Methodology, 23:2, 127–35.
   Google Scholar
• Harden, Jeffrey J. (2013). ‘Multidimensional Responsiveness: The Determinants of Legislators’ Representational Priorities’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 38:2, 155–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazan, Reuven Y., and Gideon Rahat (2010). Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heitshusen, Valerie, Garry Young, and David M. Wood (2005). ‘Electoral Context and MP Constituency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom’, American Journal of Political Science, 49:1, 32–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam, Christopher J. (2009). Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, Richard S., and Peter Mair (1995). ‘Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party’, Party Politics, 1:1, 5–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keena, Alex, and Misty Knight-Finley (2018). ‘Governed by Experience: Political Careers and Party Loyalty in the Senate’, Congress & the Presidency, 45:1, 20–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchheimer, O. (1966). ‘The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems’, in Joseph LaPalombara and Myron Weiner (eds.), Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 177–200.
   Google Scholar
• Kornberg, Allan (1967). Canadian Legislative Behavior: A Study of the 25th Parliament. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Lax, Jeffrey R., and Justin H. Phillips. (2009). ‘Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness’, American Political Science Review, 103:3, 367–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesnard, Laurent (2014). ‘Using Optimal Matching Analysis in Sociology: Cost Setting and Sociology of Time’, in Philippe Blanchard, Felix Bühlmann, and Jacques-Antoine Gauthier (eds.) Advances in Sequence Analysis: Theory, Method, Applications. Life Course Research and Social Policies. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 39–50.
   Google Scholar
• Macindoe, Heather, and Andrew Abbott (2004). ‘Sequence Analysis and Optimal Matching Techniques for Social Science Data’, in Melissa Hardy and Alan Bryman (eds.), Handbook of Data Analysis. London: SAGE Publications, 386–406.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane (2011). ‘Clarifying the Concept of Representation’, American Political Science Review, 105:3, 621–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew, David (1974). Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Warren E., and Donald E. Stokes (1963). ‘Constituency Influence in Congress’, American Political Science Review, 57:1, 45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narud, Hanne M., and Henry Valen (2008). ‘The Norwegian Storting: “People’s Parliament” or Coop for “Political Broilers”?’, World Political Science, 4:2, 2363–4782.
   Google Scholar
• O’Grady, Tom (2018). ‘Careerists versus Coal-Miners: Welfare Reforms and the Substantive Representation of Social Groups in the British Labour Party’, Comparative Political Studies, 52:4, 544–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohmura, Tamaki, Stefanie Bailer, Peter Meiβner, and Peter Selb (2018). ‘Party Animals, Career Changers and Other Pathways into Parliament’, West European Politics, 41:1, 169–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacheco, Julianna (2011). ‘Using National Surveys to Measure Dynamic U.S. State Public Opinion a Guideline for Scholars and an Application’, State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 11:4, 415–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selb, Peter, and Georg Lutz (2015). ‘Lone Fighters: Intraparty Competition, Interparty Competition, and Candidates’ Vote Seeking Efforts in Open-Ballot PR Elections’, Electoral Studies, 39, 329–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratmann, Thomas, and Martin Baur (2002). ‘Plurality Rule, Proportional Representation, and the German Bundestag: How Incentives to Pork-Barrel Differ across Electoral Systems’, American Journal of Political Science, 46:3, 506–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studer, Matthias, and Gilbert Ritschard (2016). ‘What Matters in Differences between Life Tratejctories: A Comparative Review of Sequences Dissimilarity Measures’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 179:2, 481–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studer, Matthias. (2013). ‘WeightedCluster Library Manual: A Practical Guide to Creating Typologies of Trajectories in the Social Sciences with R’, LIVES Working Papers, 24, 34.
   Google Scholar
• Tavits, Margit (2009). ‘The Making of Mavericks: Local Loyalties and Party Defection’, Comparative Political Studies, 42:6, 793–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tromborg, Mathias (2018). ‘Issue Salience and Candidate Position Taking in Parliamentary Parties’, Political Studies, 67:2, 307–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tromborg, Mathias, and Leslie Schwindt-Bayer 2019. ‘Constituent Demand and District-Focused Legislative Representation’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 44:1, 35–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Biezen, Ingrid, and Petr Kopecký (2014). ‘The Cartel Party and the State: Party–State Linkages in European Democracies’, Party Politics, 20:2, 170–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlke, John C. (1962). The Legislative System: Explorations in Legislative Behavior. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, Joe H. (1963). ‘Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58:301, 236–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willumsen, David M., and Klaus H. Goetz (2017). ‘Set Free? Impending Retirement and Legislative Behaviour in the UK’, Parliamentary Affairs, 70:2, 254–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willumsen, David M., and Patrik Öhberg (2017). ‘Toe the Line, Break the Whip: Explaining Floor Dissent in Parliamentary Democracies’, West European Politics, 40:4, 688–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar