‘It’s the economy, stupid’: when new politics parties take on old politics issues

References

• Abou-Chadi, Tarik (2016). ‘Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Shifts: How Green and Radical Right Parties Differ in Their Impact’, British Journal of Political Science, 46:2, 417–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou-Chadi, Tarik, and Werner Krause (2018). ‘The Causal Effect of Radical Right Success on Mainstream Parties’ Policy Positions: A Regression Discontinuity Approach’, British Journal of Political Science. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélanger, Éric, and Bonnie M. Meguid (2008). ‘Issue Salience, Issue Ownership, and Issue-Based Vote Choice’, Electoral Studies, 27:3, 477–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bomberg, Elizabeth (2002). ‘The Europeanisation of Green Parties: Exploring the EU’s Impact’, West European Politics, 25:3, 29–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bomberg, Elizabeth, and Neil Carter (2006). ‘Greens in Brussels: Shaping or Shaped?’, European Journal of Political Research, 45:s1, S99–S125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bormann, Nils-Christian, and Matt Golder (2013). ‘Democratic Electoral Systems around the World, 1946–2011’, Electoral Studies, 32:2, 360–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambor, Thomas, William Roberts Clark, and Matt Golder (2006). ‘Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empricial Analyses.’ Political Analysis, 14:1, 63–82.
   Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, and Dennis J. Farlie (1983). Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies. London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, Jon (2002). The Evolution of Green Politics: Development and Change within European Green Parties. New York: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Chiaramonte, Alessandro, and Vincente Emanuele (2017). ‘Party System Volatility, Regeneration and De-Institutionalization in Western Europe’, Party Politics, 23:4, 376–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W. (1990). ‘Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems’, American Journal of Political Science, 34:4, 903–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W. (1997). Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Sio, Lorenzo, and Till Weber (2014). ‘Issue Yield: A Model of Party Strategy in Multidimensional Space’, American Political Science Review, 108:4, 870–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Duverger, Maurice (1954). Political Parties. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• European Green Party (2019). European Green Party Manifesto: Time to Renew the Promise of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat (2019). ‘Unemployment by Sex and Age’, http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=une_rt_a&lang=en (accessed 10 May 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence, and Timothy Hellwig (2014). ‘Responding to Voters or Responding to Markets? Political Parties and Public Opinion in an Era of Globalization’, International Studies Quarterly, 58:4, 816–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorina, Morris P. (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golder, Sona (2006). The Logic of Pre-Electoral Coalition Formation. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, Zack P., and James Tilley (2019). ‘Fertile Soil: Explaining Variation in the Success of Green Parties’, West European Politics, 42:3, 495–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Zachary D. (2016). ‘Competing on the Issues: How Experience in Government and Economic Conditions Influence the Scope of Parties’ Policy Messages’, Party Politics, 22:6, 809–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Kyung Joon (2015). ‘The Impact of Radical Right-Wing Parties on the Positions of Mainstream Parties regarding Multiculturalism’, West European Politics, 38:3, 557–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henceroth, Nathan, and Christian B. Jensen (2018). ‘Confrontation and Competition: The Electoral Benefits of Regionalist Parties’ Positions in Parliamentary Democracies’, Party Politics, 24:6, 629–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara B., and Catherine E. de Vries (2015). ‘Issue Entrepreneurship and Multiparty Competition’, Comparative Political Studies, 48:9, 1159–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, Ronald (1997). Modernization and Post-Modernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchheimer, Otto (1990). ‘The Catch-all Party’, in Peter Mair (ed.), The West European Party System. New York: Oxford University Press, 50–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert (1988). ‘Left-Libertarian Parties: Explaining Innovation in Party Systems’, World Politics, 40:2, 194–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert (1994). The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert (1995). The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klingemann, Hans Dieter, Andrea Volkens, Michael D. McDonald, Ian Budge, and Judith Bara (2006). Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD 1990–2003. Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, Heike, and Igñazi Sagarzazu (2016). ‘Setting the Agenda or Responding to Voters? Political Parties, Voters and Issue Attention’, West European Politics, 39:2, 380–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, Heike, and Jae-Jae Spoon (2016). ‘Who Responds? Voters, Parties and Issue Attention’, British Journal of Political Science, 46:3, 633–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, Luke, and Charlotte Rommerskirchen (2015). ‘Out of Left Field? Explaining the Variable Electoral Success of European Radical Left Parties’, Party Politics, 21:1, 40–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguid, Bonnie M. (2005). ‘Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success’, American Political Science Review, 99:3, 347–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, Maurits (2017). ‘Contagious Euroscepticism: The Impact of Eurosceptic Support on Mainstream Party Positions on European Integration’, Party Politics, 23:4, 413–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, Maurits, and Christopher J. Williams (2019). ‘When Shifting Backfires: The Electoral Consequences of Responding to Niche Party Positions’, Journal of European Public Policy, 1–20. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1668044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2019). ‘Unemployment Rate’, https://data.oecd.org/unemp/unemployment-rate.htm. (accessed 13 May 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Petrocik, John (1996). ‘Issue Ownership in Presidential Election with a 1980 Case Study’, American Journal of Political Science, 40:3, 825–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam, and John Sprague (1986). Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shull, Tad (1999). Redefining Red and Green: Ideology and Strategy in European Political Ecology. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, Matthew M. (2011). ‘Who Says ‘It’s the Economy’? Cross-National and Cross-Individual Variation in the Salience of Economic Performance’, Comparative Political Studies, 44:3, 284–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, Matthew (2013). ‘The Global Economic Crisis and Domestic Political Agendas’, Electoral Studies, 32:3, 404–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoon, Jae-Jae (2011). Political Survival of Small Parties in Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spoon, Jae-Jae, Sara B. Hobolt, and Catherine E. de Vries (2014). ‘Going Green: Explaining Issue Competition on the Environment’, European Journal of Political Research, 53:2, 363–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare (1990). ‘A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties’, American Journal of Political Science, 34:2, 565–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traber, Denise, Nathalie Giger, and Silja Häusermann (2018). ‘How Economic Crises Affect Political Representation: Declining Party-Voter Congruence in Times of Constrained Government’, West European Politics, 41:5, 1100–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Haute, Emilie, ed. (2016). Green Parties in Europe. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Volkens, Andrea, Pola Lehmann, Theres Matthieß, Nicolas Merz, Sven Regel, and Bernhard Weßels (2018). The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2018a. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB). Retrieved from
   Google Scholar
• Walgrave, Stefaan, Jonas Lefevere, and Anke Tresch (2012). ‘The Associative Dimension of Issue Ownership’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 76:4, 771–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Christopher, and John Ishiyama (2018). ‘Responding to the Left: The Effect of Far-Left Parties on Mainstream Party Euroskepticism’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 28:4, 443–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Laron K., Katsunori Seki, and Guy D. Whitten (2016). ‘You’ve Got Some Explaining to Do: The Influence of Economic Conditions and Spatial Competition on Party Strategy’, Political Science Research and Methods, 4:1, 47–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittman, Donald (1983). ‘Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative Theories.’ American Political Science Review, 77:1, 142–57.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (2019). Total Energy Production from Nuclear Energy. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/eg.elc.nucl.zs (accessed 19 April 2019).
   Google Scholar