When do European election campaigns become about Europe?

References

• Adam, Silke, Eva-Maria Antl-Wittenberg, Beatrice Eugster, Melanie Leidecker-Sandmann, Michaela Maier, and Franzisca Schmidt (2017). ‘Strategies of Pro-European Parties in the Face of a Eurosceptic Challenge’, European Union Politics, 18:2, 260–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam, Silke, Beatrice Eugster, Eva Antl-Wittenberg, Rachid Azrout, Judith Möller, Claes de Vreese, Michaela Maier, and Sylvia Kritzinger (2019). ‘News Media’s Position-Taking regarding the European Union: The Synchronization of Mass Media’s Reporting and Commentating in the 2014 European Parliament Elections’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:1, 44–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam, Silke, and Michaela Maier (2011). ‘National Parties as Politicizers of EU Integration? Party Campaign Communication in the Run-up to the 2009 European Parliament Election’, European Union Politics, 12:3, 431–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam, Silke, and Michaela Maier (2016). ‘Campaigning on or Downplaying European Union Integration? Explaining the Salience Parties Attach to EU Matters in European Parliamentary Election Campaigns’, in Wouter Van der Brug and Claes H. de Vreese (eds.), (Un)intended Consequences of EU Parliamentary Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 148–70.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, Silke, and Michaela Maier (2018). Data from: The Role of National Parties for the Politicization of EU Integration [Dataset]. Retrieved from https://forsbase.unil.ch/project/study-public-overview/11960/0/
   Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Shanto Iyengar (1994). ‘Riding the Wave and Claiming Ownership over Issues: The Joint Effects of Advertising and News Coverage in Campaigns’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 58:3, 335–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boomgaarden, Hajo G., and Claes H. De Vreese (2016). ‘Do European Elections Create a European Public Sphere?’, in Wouter Van der Brug, and Claes H. De Vreese (eds.), (Un)intended Consequences of EU Parliamentary Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19–35.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Daniela, Swen Hutter, and Alena Kerscher (2016). ‘What Type of Europe? The Salience of Polity and Policy Issues in European Parliament Elections’, European Union Politics, 17:4, 570–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, and Dennis Farlie (1983). ‘Party Competition – Selective Emphasis or Direct Confrontation? An Alternative View with Data’, in Hans Daalder and Peter Mair (eds.), Western European Party Systems: Continuity & Change. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications Ltd, 267–305.
   Google Scholar
• Damore, David F. (2004). ‘The Dynamics of Issue Ownership in Presidential Campaigns’, Political Research Quarterly, 57:3, 391–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sio, Lorenzo, and Till Weber (2020). ‘Issue Yield, Campaign Communication, and Electoral Performance: A Six-Country Comparative Analysis’, West European Politics, 43:3, 720–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vreese, Claes H. (2009). ‘Second-Rate Election Campaigning? An Analysis of Campaign Styles in European Parliamentary Elections’, Journal of Political Marketing, 8:1, 7–19.
   Google Scholar
• De Vreese, Claes H., Susan A. Banducci, Holli A. Semetko, and Hajo G. Boomgaarden (2006). ‘The News Coverage of the 2004 European Parliamentary Election Campaign in 25 Countries’, European Union Politics, 7:4, 477–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, Catherine E., and Sara B. Hobolt (2012). ‘When Dimensions Collide: The Electoral Success of Issue Entrepreneurs’, European Union Politics, 13:2, 246–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolezal, Martin, Laurenz Ennser‐Jedenastik, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Anna Katharina Winkler (2014). ‘How Parties Compete for Votes: A Test of Saliency Theory’, European Journal of Political Research, 53:1, 57–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring, Holger, and Philip Manow (2016). Data from: Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies. Development Version [Dataset]. Retrieved from http://www.parlgov.org/explore/deu/cabinet/
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2015). Data from: Eurobarometer 81.4 (2014) [Dataset]. Retrieved from https://www.gesis.org/index.php?id=10324&tx_.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2014). The 2014 European Elections: This Time It’s Different, available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=IM-PRESS&reference=20140210BKG35568&format=XML&language=EN (accessed 25 February 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, Mark N., and Julie Hassing Nielsen (2017). ‘Conclusions: The 2014 EP Elections as a Lens on Euroscepticism’, in Julie Hassing Nielsen and Mark N. Franklin (eds), The Eurosceptic 2014 European Parliament Elections: Second Order or Second Rate?. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 239–53.
   Google Scholar
• Geys, Benny (2012). ‘Success and Failure in Electoral Competition: Selective Issue Emphasis under Incomplete Issue Ownership’, Electoral Studies, 31:2, 406–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, and Peter B. Mortensen (2010). ‘Who Sets the Agenda and Who Responds to It in the Danish Parliament? A New Model of Issue Competition and Agenda-Setting’, European Journal of Political Research, 49:2, 257–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, Danny (2008). ‘Party Reputations, Journalistic Expectations: How Issue Ownership Influences Election News’, Political Communication, 25:4, 377–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara B., and Catherine E. de Vries (2015). ‘Issue Entrepreneurship and Multiparty Competition’, Comparative Political Studies, 48:9, 1159–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara B., and Catherine E. de Vries (2016). ‘Turning against the Union? The Impact of the Crisis on the Eurosceptic Vote in the 2014 European Parliament Elections’, Electoral Studies, 44, 504–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeglinger, Dominic (2016). ‘The Politicisation of European Integration in Domestic Election Campaigns’, West European Politics, 39:1, 44–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holian, David B. (2004). ‘He’s Stealing My Issues! Clinton’s Crime Rhetoric and the Dynamics of Issue Ownership’, Political Behavior, 26:2, 95–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks (2009). ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 39:1, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, David N., Christian Elmelund-Praestekaer, Erik Albaek, Rens Vliegenthart, and Claes H. De Vreese (2012). ‘Party Media Agenda-Setting: How Parties Influence Election News Coverage’, Party Politics, 18:2, 173–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalali, Carlos, and Tiago Silva (2011). ‘Everyone Ignores Europe? Party Campaigns and Media Coverage in the 2009 European Parliament Elections’ in Michaela Maier, Jesper Strömbäck, and Lynda Lee Kaid (eds.), Political Communcation in European Parliamentary Elections. Farnham: Ashgate, 111–28.
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, Ruud (2002). Codebook for the Analysis of Political Mobilisation and Communication in European Public Spheres, available at: https://europub.wzb.eu/Data/Codebooks%20questionnaires/D2-1-claims-codebook.pdf (accessed 23 August 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter, Edgar Grande, Martin Dolezal, Marc Helbling, Dominc Hoeglinger, Swen Hutter, and Bruno Wüest (2012). Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefevere, Jonas, Anke Tresch, and Stefaan Walgrave (2015). ‘Associative Issue Ownership as a Determinant of Voters’ Campaign Attention’, West European Politics, 38:4, 888–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leidecker-Sandmann, Melanie, Eva Antl-Wittenberg, Silke Adam and Michaela Maier (2016). ‘Struggle for Economic Issue Ownership? Political Parties’ Strategic Communication in Times of the European Financial Crisis’, unpublished paper, University of Landau.
   Google Scholar
• Machill, Marcel, Markus Beiler, and Corinna Fischer (2006). ‘Europe-Topics in Europe’s Media: The Debate about the European Public Sphere: A Meta-Analysis of Media Content Analyses’, European Journal of Communication, 21:1, 57–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, Michaela, and Jürgen Maier (2008). ‘News Coverage of EU Parliamentary Elections’, in Jesper Strömbäck and Lynda Lee Kaid (eds.), The Handbook of Election News Coverage Around the World. New York: Routledge, 403–20.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, Peter (1997). Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, Michael (1998). ‘Testing the Second-Order Election Model after Four European Elections’, British Journal of Political Science, 28:4, 591–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, Maurits, and Christian Rauh (2016). ‘Has Eurosceptic Mobilization Become More Contagious? Comparing the 2009 and 2014 EP Election Campaigns in The Netherlands and France’, Politics and Governance, 4:1, 83–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netjes, Catherine E., and Hamen A. Binnema (2007). ‘The Salience of the European Integration Issue: Three Data Sources Compared’, Electoral Studies, 26:1, 39–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, Craig, and Till Weber (2011). ‘Cross-Cutting Issues and Party Strategy in the European Union’, Comparative Political Studies, 44:4, 383–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petithomme, Mathieu (2012). ‘Second-Order Elections, but Also ‘Low-Cost’ Campaigns? National Parties and Campaign Spending in European Elections: A Comparative Analysis’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 13:2, 149–68.
   Google Scholar
• Petrocik, John R. (1996). ‘Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study’, American Journal of Political Science, 40:3, 825–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polk, Jonathan, Jan Rovny, Ryan Bakker, Erica Edwards, Liesbet Hooghe, Seth Jolly, Jelle Koedam, Filip Kostelka, Gary Marks, Gijs Schumacher, Marco Steenbergen, Milada Vachudova, and Marko Zilovic (2017). ‘Explaining the Salience of Anti-Elitism and Reducing Political Corruption for Political Parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey Data’, Research & Politics, 4:1, 205316801668691–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reif, Karlheinz, and Hermann Schmitt (1980). ‘Nine Second-Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results’, European Journal of Political Research, 8:1, 3–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, Matthijs (2015). ‘The Rise of the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe’, European View, 14:1, 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Hermann, and Eftichia Teperoglou (2015). ‘The 2014 European Parliament Elections in Southern Europe: Second-Order or Critical Elections?’, South European Society and Politics, 20:3, 287–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Hermann, and Ilke Toygür (2016). ‘European Parliament Elections of May 2014: Driven by National Politics or EU Policy Making?’, Politics and Governance, 4:1, 167–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuck, Andreas R. T., and Claes H. De Vreese (2011). ‘Finding Europe: Mapping and Explaining Antecedents of “Europeanness” in News about the 2009 European Parliamentary Elections’, Studies in Communication | Media, 0:2, 265–94.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph A. (2003). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sides, John (2006). ‘The Origins of Campaign Agendas’, British Journal of Political Science, 36:3, 407–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigelman, Lee, and Emmett H. Buell (2004). ‘Avoidance or Engagement? Issue Convergence in U.S. Presidential Campaigns, 1960–2000’, American Journal of Political Science, 48:4, 650–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen, Marco R., and David J. Scott (2004). ‘Contesting Europe? The Salience of European Integration as a Party Issue’, in Gary Marks and Marco R. Steenbergen (eds.), European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 165–92.
   Google Scholar
• Thesen, Gunnar (2013). ‘When Good News is Scarce and Bad News is Good: Government Responsibilities and Opposition Possibilities in Political Agenda-setting’, European Journal of Political Research, 52:3, 364–89.
   Google Scholar
• Tresch, Anke, Jonas Lefevere, and Stefaan Walgrave (2015). ‘“Steal Me If You Can!” The Impact of Campaign Messages on Associative Issue Ownership’, Party Politics, 21:2, 198–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, Peter, and Stefaan Walgrave (2011). ‘Minimal or Massive? The Political Agenda-setting Power of the Mass Media According to Different Methods’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16:3, 295–313.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Wardt, Marc, Catherine E. De Vries, and Sara B. Hobolt (2014). ‘Exploiting the Cracks: Wedge Issues in Multiparty Competition’, The Journal of Politics, 76:4, 986–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Eijk, Cees, and Mark N. Franklin (2004). ‘Potential for Contestation on European Matters at National Elections in Europe’, in Gary Marks and Marco R. Steenbergen (eds.), European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 32–50.
   Google Scholar
• Vesa, Juho, Helena Blomberg, and Christian Kroll (2015). ‘Minimal and Massive! Politicians' Views on the Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power Revisited’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20:3, 279–96.
   Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, Rens, and Noemi Mena Montes (2014). ‘How Political and Media System Characteristics Moderate Interactions Between Newspapers and Parliaments: Economic Crisis Attention in Spain and the Netherlands’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19:3, 318–39.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, Markus, and Thomas M. Meyer (2014). ‘Which Issues Do Parties Emphasise? Salience Strategies and Party Organisation in Multiparty Systems’, West European Politics, 37:5, 1019–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, Stefaan, Jonas Lefevere, and Michiel Nuytemans (2009). ‘Issue Ownership Stability and Change: How Political Parties Claim and Maintain Issues through Media Appearances’, Political Communication, 26:2, 153–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, Alan (1996). Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar