The long shadow of attitudes: differential campaign effects and issue voting in EU referendums

References

• Alvarez, R. Michael, and Charles H. Franklin (1994). ‘Uncertainty and Political Perceptions’, The Journal of Politics, 56:3, 671–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arceneaux, Kevin, and Ryan J. V. Wielen (2017). Taming Intuition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bassili, John N. (1996). ‘Meta-Judgmental versus Operative Indexes of Psychological Attributes: The Case of Measures of Attitude Strength’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71:4, 637–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boomgaarden, Hajo, Andreas R. T. Schuck, Matthijs Elenbaas, and Claes H. de Vreese (2011). ‘Mapping EU Attitudes: Conceptual and Empirical Dimensions of Euroscepticism and EU support’, European Union Politics, 12:2, 241–266.
   Google Scholar
• de Vreese, Claes H. (2007). ‘Context, Elites, Media and Public Opinion in Referendums: Why Campaigns Really Matter’, in Claes H. de Vreese (eds.), The Dynamics of Referendum Campaigns in International Perspective. London: Palgrave, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, James N. (2012). ‘The Politics of Motivation’, Critical Review, 24:2, 199–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, James N., Jordan Fein, and Thomas J. Leeper (2012). ‘A Source of Bias in Public Opinion Stability’, American Journal of Political Science, 56:4, 875–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, Nicholas, and Thomas Gilovich (2016). ‘The Mechanics of Motivated Reasoning’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30:3, 133–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbach, A., and M. J. Ferguson (2007). ‘The Goal Construct in Social Psychology’, in A. W. Kruglanski, and E. T. Higgins (eds.), Social Psychology: A Handbook of Basic Principles, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford, 490–515.
   Google Scholar
• Gaines, Brian J., James H. Kuklinski, Paul J. Quirk, Buddy Peyton, and Jay Verkuilen (2007). ‘Same Facts, Different Interpretations: Partisan Motivations and Opinion on Iraq’, The Journal of Politics, 69:4, 957–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garry, John (2013). ‘Direct Democracy and Regional Integration: Citizens’ Perceptions of Treaty Implications and the Irish Reversal on Lisbon’, European Journal of Political Research, 52:1, 94–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garry, John (2014). ‘Emotions and Voting in EU Referendums’, European Union Politics, 15:2, 235–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopinath, Mahesh, and Prashanth U. Nyer (2009). ‘The Effect of Public Commitment on Resistance to Persuasion: The Influence of Attitude Certainty, Issue Importance, Susceptibility to Normative Influence, Preference for Consistency and Source Proximity’, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26:1, 60–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara Binzer (2006). ‘How Parties Affect Vote Choice in European Integration Referendums’, Party Politics, 12:5, 623–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara Binzer (2009). Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara Binzer, and Sylvain Brouard (2011). ‘Contesting the European Union?’, Political Research Quarterly, 64:2, 309–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara Binzer, and Catherine de Vries (2016). ‘Public Support for European Integration’, Annual Review of Political Science, 19:1, 413–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, Allyson L., Matthew K. Berent, Jon A. Krosnick, Penny S. Visser, and David S. Boninger (2005). ‘Attitude Importance and the Accumulation of Attitude-Relevant Knowledge in Memory’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88:5, 749–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Lisbeth, and Gary Marks (2005). ‘Calculation, Community and Cues: Public Opinion on European Integration’, European Union Politics, 6:4, 419–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, David A., and Russell H. Fazio (1989). ‘Biased Processing as a Function of Attitude Accessibility: Making Objective Judgments Subjectively’, Social Cognition, 7:1, 51–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, Lauren C., and Jon A. Krosnick (2017). ‘Attitude Strength’, Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 327–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter (2005). Direct Democratic Choice. Lanham: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Krosnick, Jon A., and Richard E. Petty (1995). ‘Attitude Strength: An Overview’, in Richard E. Petty and Jon A. Krosnick (eds.), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, Arie W., Amiram Raviv, Daniel Bar-Tal, Alona Raviv, Keren Sharvit, Shmuel Ellis, Ruth Bar, Antonio Pierro, and Lucia Mannetti (2005). ‘Says Who? Epistemic Authority Effects in Social Judgment’, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 345– 92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Ziva (1990). ‘The Case for Motivated Reasoning’, Psychological Bulletin, 108:3, 480–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeDuc, Lawrence (2002). ‘Opinion Change and Voting Behavior in Referendums’, European Journal of Political Research, 41:6, 711–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeper, Thomas J., and Rune Slothuus (2014). ‘Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Public Opinion Formation’, Political Psychology, 35:S1, 129–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, Michael (2007). ‘Referendum Campaigns: Changing What People Think or Changing What They Think About?’, in Claes H. de Vreese (ed.), The Dynamics of Referendum Campaigns in International Perspective. London: Palgrave, 63–83.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Joanne M., and David A. M. Peterson (2004). ‘Theoretical and Empirical Implications of Attitude Strength’, The Journal of Politics, 66:3, 847–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neijens, Peter, and Claes de Vreese (2009). ‘Helping Citizens Decide in Referendums’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 73:3, 521–36.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, Erik (2019). ‘The Scope of Partisan Influence on Policy Opinion’, Political Psychology, 40:2, 335–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redlawsk, David P. (2002). ‘Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making’, The Journal of Politics, 64:4, 1021–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roese, Neal J., and James M. Olson (1994). ‘Attitude Importance as a Function of Repeated Attitude Expression’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30:1, 39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuck, Andreas R. T., and Claes H. de Vreese (2008). ‘The Dutch No to the EU Constitution: Assessing the Role of EU-Skepticism and the Campaign’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 18:1, 101–28.
   Google Scholar
• Steenbergen, Marco R., and Tomasz Siczek (2017). ‘Better the Devil You Know? Risk-Taking, Globalization and Populism in Great Britain’, European Union Politics, 18:1, 119–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, Palle (2002). ‘Five Danish Referendums on the European Community and European Union: A Critical Assessment of the Franklin Thesis’, European Journal of Political Research, 41:6, 733–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, Charles S., Damon Cann, and Simona Kucsova (2009). ‘The Motivated Processing of Political Arguments’, Political Behavior, 31:2, 137–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, Charles S., and Milton Lodge (2006). ‘Motivated Scepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs’, American Journal of Political Science, 50:3, 755–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, Penny S., George Y. Bizer, and Jon A. Krosnick (2006). ‘Exploring the Latent Structure of Strength-Related Attitude Attributes’, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38:06, 1–67.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, Penny S., Jon A. Krosnick, and Catherine J. Norris (2017). ‘Attitude Importance and Attitude-Relevant Knowledge: Motivator and Enabler’, in Jon A. Krosnick, I.-Chant Chiang, and Tobias Stark (eds.), Political Psychology: New Explorations, New York: Psychological Press, 203–45.
   Google Scholar