Going transnational? Candidates’ transnational linkages on Twitter during the 2019 European Parliament elections

References

• Adam, Silke, Beatrice Eugster, Eva Antl-Wittenberg, Rachid Azrout, Judith Möller, Claes de Vreese, Michaela Maier, and Sylvia Kritzinger (2019). ‘News Media’s Position-Taking regarding the European Union: The Synchronization of Mass Media’s Reporting and Commentating in the 2014 European Parliament Elections’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:1, 44–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberá, Pablo (2015). ‘Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data’, Political Analysis, 23:1, 76–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauvallet, Willy, and Sébastien Michon (2010). ‘Professionalization and Socialization of the Members of the European Parliament’, French Politics, 8:2, 145–65.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. Lance, Sabine Lang, and Alexandra Segerberg (2014). ‘European Issue Publics Online: The Cases of Climate Change and Fair Trade’, in Thomas Risse (ed.), European Public Spheres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 108–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bossetta, Michael, Anamaria Dutceac Segesten, and Hans-Jörg Trenz (2017). ‘Engaging with European Politics Through Twitter and Facebook: Participation Beyond the National?’, in Mauro Barisione and Asimina Michailidou (eds.), Social Media and European Politics: Rethinking Power and Legitimacy in the Digital Era. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 53–76.
   Google Scholar
• Brambor, Thomas, William Roberts Clark, and Matt Golder (2006). ‘Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses’, Political Analysis, 14:1, 63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Daniela, and Sebastian A. Popa (2018). ‘This Time It Was Different? The Salience of the Spitzenkandidaten System among European Parties’, West European Politics, 41:5, 1125–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Daniela, and Tobias Schwarzbözl (2019). ‘Put in the Spotlight or Largely Ignored? Emphasis on the Spitzenkandidaten by Political Parties in Their Online Campaigns for European Elections’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:3, 428–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, Thomas (2016). ‘After the Spitzenkandidaten: Fundamental Change in the EU’s Political System?’, West European Politics, 39:5, 992–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, Michael, et al. (2011). ‘Political Polarization on Twitter’, in Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Publications, 89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Cotta, Maurizio (1984). ‘Direct Elections of the European Parliament: A Supranational Political Elite in the Making?’, in Karlheinz Reif (ed.), European Elections 1979/81 and 1984. Berlin: Quorum, 122–6.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, Kevin, Simon Hix, Michael Marsh, and Susi Dennison (2019). ‘Kingmakers of the Mainstream: Predictions for the European Parliament Election’, European Council on Foreign Relations, available at: https://www.ecfr.eu/publications/summary/kingmakers_of_mainstream_predictions_for_european_parliament_election (accessed 13 July 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, William T., and Lukas Obholzer (2020). ‘Reaching out to the Voter? Campaigning on Twitter during the 2019 European Elections’, Research & Politics, 7:2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020917256 (accessed 13 July 2020).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, William T., Lukas Obholzer, and Steffen Hurka (2019). ‘Static and Dynamic Incentives for Twitter Usage in the European Parliament’, Party Politics, 25:6, 771–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Zúñiga, Homero Gil (2015). ‘Toward a European Public Sphere? The Promise and Perils of Modern Democracy in the Age of Digital and Social Media’, International Journal of Communication, 9:1, 3152–3160.
   Google Scholar
• Döring, Holger, and Philip Manow (2019). ‘Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies. Development version’.
   Google Scholar
• Fazekas, Zoltán, Sebastian Adrian Popa, Hermann Schmitt, Pablo Barberá, and Yannis Theocharis (2020). ‘Elite‐Public Interaction on Twitter: EU Issue Expansion in the Campaign’, European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12402 (accessed 10 July 2020).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froio, Caterina, and Bharath Ganesh (2019). ‘The Transnationalisation of Far Right Discourse on Twitter’, European Societies, 21:4, 513–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giebler, Heiko, and Bernhard Wessels (2010). ‘2009 European Election Candidate Study—Methodological Annex’, Berlin: WZB, 2009, available at: https://dbk.gesis.org/dbksearch/download.asp?id=37352 (accessed 10 July 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Gilardi, Fabrizio (2010). ‘Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes?’, American Journal of Political Science, 54:3, 650–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grande, Edgar, and Hanspeter Kriesi (2014). ‘The Restructuring of Political Conflict in Europe and the Politicization of European Integration’, in Thomas Risse (ed.), European Public Spheres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 190–224.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, Ernst B. (1958). The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950–1957. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen, and Ciaran Cronin (2012). The Crisis of the European Union: A Response. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Halikiopoulou, Daphne, Kyriaki Nanou, and Sofia Vasilopoulou (2012). ‘The Paradox of Nationalism: The Common Denominator of Radical Right and Radical Left Euroscepticism’, European Journal of Political Research, 51:4, 504–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hänska, Max, and Stefan Bauchowitz (2019). ‘Can Social Media Facilitate a European Public Sphere? Transnational Communication and the Europeanization of Twitter during the Eurozone Crisis’, Social Media + Society, 5:3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, Simon, and Michael Marsh (2011). ‘Second-Order Effects plus Pan-European Political Swings: An Analysis of European Parliament Elections across Time’, Electoral Studies, 30:1, 4–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara B., and Catherine E. de Vries (2015). ‘Issue Entrepreneurship and Multiparty Competition’, Comparative Political Studies, 48:9, 1159–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks (2009). ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 39:1, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, Swen, and Edgar Grande (2014). ‘Politicizing Europe in the National Electoral Arena: A Comparative Analysis of Five West European Countries, 1970-2010’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52:5, 1002–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, Swen, Edgar Grande, and Hanspeter Kriesi, eds. (2016). Politicising Europe: Integration and Mass Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, Swen, and Hanspeter Kriesi (2019). ‘Politicizing Europe in Times of Crisis’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:7, 996–1017. T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielmansegg, Peter Graf (2003). ‘Integration und Demokratie’, in Markus Jachtenfuchs and Beate Kohler-Koch (eds.), Europäische Integration. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 49–76.
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, Ruud, and Jessica Erbe (2004). ‘Towards a European Public Sphere?’, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 17:2, 97–118.
   Google Scholar
• Laffan, Brigid (2016). ‘Europe’s Union in Crisis: Tested and Contested’, West European Politics, 39:5, 915–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, Anders Olof (2015). ‘The EU Parliament on Twitter – Assessing the Permanent Online Practices of Parliamentarians’, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12:2, 149–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilleker, Darren G., and Karolina Koc-Michalska (2013). ‘Online Political Communication Strategies: MEPs, E-Representation, and Self-Representation’, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10:2, 190–207.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, Michaela, Jesper Strömbäck, and Lynda Lee Kaid (2016). Political Communication in European Parliamentary Elections. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, Duncan, and Annika Werner (2019). International Populism: The Radical Right in the European Parliament. London: C Hurst & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Murthy, Dhiraj (2012). ‘Towards a Sociological Understanding of Social Media: Theorizing Twitter’, Sociology, 46:6, 1059–73.
   Google Scholar
• Nulty, Paul, Yannis Theocharis, Sebastian Adrian Popa, Olivier Parnet, and Kenneth Benoit (2016). ‘Social Media and Political Communication in the 2014 Elections to the European Parliament’, Electoral Studies, 44, 429–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obholzer, Lukas, and William T. Daniel (2016). ‘An Online Electoral Connection? How Electoral Systems Condition Representatives’ Social Media Use’, European Union Politics, 17:3, 387–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirro, Andrea Lp., Paul Taggart, and Stijn Van Kessel (2018). ‘The Populist Politics of Euroscepticism in Times of Crisis: Comparative Conclusions’, Politics, 38:3, 378–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polk, Jonathan, et al. (2017). ‘Explaining the Salience of anti-Elitism and Reducing Political Corruption for Political Parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey Data’, Research & Politics, 4:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popa, Sebastian Adrian, Zoltán Fazekas, Daniela Braun, and Melanie-Marita Leidecker-Sandmann (2020). ‘Informing the Public: How Party Communication Builds Opportunity Structures’, Political Communication, 37:3, 329–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reif, Karlheinz, and Hermann Schmitt (1980). ‘Nine Second-Order National Elections – A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results’, European Journal of Political Research, 8:1, 3–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, Thomas (2014a). ‘European Public spheres, the Politicization of EU Affairs, and Its Consequences’, in Thomas Risse (ed.), European Public Spheres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141–64.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, Thomas (2014b). ‘Introduction’, in Thomas Risse (ed.), European Public Spheres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Soler, Javier, Luigi Curini, and Andrea Ceron (2019). ‘Commenting on Political Topics through Twitter: Is European Politics European?’, Social Media + Society, 5:4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A. (2019). ‘Politicization in the EU: Between National Politics and EU Political Dynamics’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:7, 1018–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Hermann (2005). ‘The European Parliament Elections of June 2004: Still Second-Order?’, West European Politics, 28:3, 650–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Hermann, Sara Hobolt, and Sebastian Adrian Popa (2015). ‘Does Personalization Increase Turnout? Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament Elections’, European Union Politics, 16:3, 347–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scully, Roger (2005). Becoming Europeans? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Julie (1995). ‘Appendix. The 1994 European Elections: Twelve into One Won’t Go’, West European Politics, 18:3, 199–217.
   Google Scholar
• Spoon, Jae-Jae (2012). ‘How Salient Is Europe? An Analysis of European Election Manifestos, 1979–2004’, European Union Politics, 13:4, 558–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statham, Paul, and Hans-Jörg Trenz (2015). ‘Understanding the Mechanisms of EU Politicization: Lessons from the Eurozone Crisis’, Comparative European Politics, 13:3, 287–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier, Sebastian, Arnim Bleier, Haiko Lietz, and Markus Strohmaier (2018a). ‘Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter’, Political Communication, 35:1, 50–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier, Sebastian, Sebastian A. Popa, and Daniela Braun (2020). ‘Political Campaigning on Twitter during the 2019 European Parliament Election Campaign’, GESIS Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.7802/1.1995 (accessed 20 July 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Stier, Sebastian, Wolf J. Schünemann, and Stefan Steiger (2018b). ‘Of Activists and Gatekeepers: Temporal and Structural Properties of Policy Networks on Twitter’, New Media & Society, 20:5, 1910–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theocharis, Yannis, Pablo Barberá, Zoltán Fazekas, Sebastian Adrian Popa, and Olivier Parnet (2016). ‘A Bad Workman Blames His Tweets: The Consequences of Citizens’ Uncivil Twitter Use When Interacting with Party Candidates: Incivility in Interactions with Candidates on Twitter’, Journal of Communication, 66:6, 1007–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hauwaert, Steven M. (2019). ‘On Far Right Parties, Master Frames and Trans-National Diffusion: Understanding Far Right Party Development in Western Europe’, Comparative European Politics, 17:1, 132–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, Till (2007). ‘Campaign Effects and Second-Order Cycles’, European Union Politics, 8:4, 509–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürn, Michael (2019). ‘Politicization Compared: At National, European, and Global Levels’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:7, 977–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar