Comparing oppositional behaviour in European Union affairs: empirical evidence from six member states

References

• Albrecht, Frederike, Christer Karlsson, and Thomas Persson (2019). ‘Examining Patterns of Political Opposition: Empirical Evidence from the Deliberations in the German European Affairs Committee’, Parliamentary Affairs.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arter, David (1999). Scandinavian Politics Today. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Auel, Katrin, and Tapio Raunio (2014). ‘Debating the State of the Union? Comparing Parliamentary Debates on EU Issues in Finland, France, Germany and the United Kingdom’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 20:1, 13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Auel, Katrin, Olivier Rozenberg, and Angela Tacea (2015a). ‘To Scrutinise or Not to Scrutinise? Explaining Variation in EU-Related Activities in National Parliaments’, West European Politics, 38:2, 282–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auel, Katrin, Olivier Rozenberg, and Angela Tacea (2015b). ‘Fighting Back? And if So, How? Measuring Parliamentary Strength and Activity in EU Affairs’ in Claudia Hefftler, Christine Neuhold, Olivier Rozenberg, and Julie Smith (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of National Parliaments and the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 60–93.
   Google Scholar
• Auel, Katrin, Olga Eisele and Lucy Kinski (2016). ‘From constraining to Catalysing Dissensus? The Impact of Political Contestation on Parliamentary Communication in EU affairs’, Comparative European Politics, 14:2, 154–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, Flemming Juul, and Erik Damgaard (2008). ‘Parliamentary Opposition under Minority Parliamentarism: Scandinavia’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 14:1–2, 46–76.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A., (ed.) (1966). Political Opposition in Western Democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Giorgi, Elisabetta and Catherine Moury (2015). ‘Conclusions: Great Recession, Great Cooperation?’,The Journal of Legislative Studies, 21:1, 115–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Giorgi, Elisabetta and Gabriella Ilonszki (eds.) (2018). Opposition Parties in European Legislatures: Conflict or Consensus? Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, Catherine (2007). ‘Sleeping Giant: Fact or Fairytale? How European Integration Affects National Elections’, European Union Politics, 8:3, 363–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, Catherine, and Sara B. Hobolt (2012). ‘When Dimensions Collide: The Electoral Success of Issue Entrepreneurs’, European Union Politics, 13:2, 246–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garritzmann, Julian L. (2017). ‘How Much Power Do Oppositions Have? Comparing the Opportunity Structures of Parliamentary Oppositions in 21 Democracies’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 23:1, 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara B., and Catherine de Vries (2015). ‘Issue Entrepreneurship and Multiparty Competition’, Comparative Political Studies, 48:9, 1159–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeglinger, Dominic (2016). ‘The Politicisation of European Integration in Domestic Election Campaigns’, West European Politics, 39:1, 44–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoerner, Julian M. (2017). ‘Real Scrutiny or Smoke and Mirrors: The Determinants and Role of Resolutions of National Parliaments in European Union Affairs’, European Union Politics, 18:2, 307–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Lisbeth, and Gary Marks (2009). ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 39:1, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, Swen, and Edgar Grande (2014). ‘Politicizing Europe in the National Electoral Arena: A Comparative Analysis of Five West European Countries, 1970–2010’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 52:5, 1002–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, Swen, Edgar Grande and Hanspeter Kriesi (eds.) (2016). Politicising Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, Christer, and Thomas Persson (2018). ‘The Alleged Opposition Deficit in European Union Politics: Myth or Reality?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 56:4, 888–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, Richard S., and Peter Mair (1995). ‘Changing Models of Party Organizations and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party’, Party Politics, 1:1, 5–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchheimer, Otto (1957). ‘The Waning of Opposition in Parliamentary Regimes’, Social Research, 24:1, 127–56.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, Christopher (2018). ‘The European Parliament: A Working Parliament without a Public?’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 24:1, 34–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, Peter (2007). ‘Political Opposition and the European Union’, Government and Opposition, 42:1, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, Peter (2013). Ruling the Void. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Meijers, Maurits (2017). ‘Contagious Euroscepticism: The Impact of Eurosceptic Support on Mainstream Party Positions on European Integration’, Party Politics, 23:4, 413–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miklin, Eric (2013). ‘Inter-Parliamentary Cooperation in EU Affairs and the Austrian Parliament: Empowering the Opposition?’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 19:1, 22–41.
   Google Scholar
• Neunreither, Karlheinz (1998). ‘Governance without Opposition: The Case of the European Union’, Government and Opposition, 33:4, 419–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, Philip (2008). ‘Making Sense of Opposition’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 14:1–2, 236–250.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, Thomas, Moa Mårtensson, and Christer Karlsson (2019). ‘Eurosceptic Challenger Parties and Political Opposition in European Union Politics: Part of the Problem or Part of the Solution?’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 42:3-4, 245–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polsby, Nelson W. (1975). ‘Legislatures’, in Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby (eds.), Handbook of Political Science, vol. 5, pp. 275–319. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Rauh, Christian, and Pieter de Wilde (2018). ‘The Opposition Deficit in EU Accountability: Evidence from over 20 Years of Plenary Debate in Four Member States’, European Journal of Political Research, 57:1, 194–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raunio, Tapio (2005). ‘Holding Governments Accountable in European Affairs: Explaining Cross-National Variation’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 11:3-4, 319–42.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, Leonard (2007). ‘Mainstream Euroscepticism: Trend or Oxymoron?’, Acta Politica, 42:2-3, 153–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roger, Léa (2016). Voice(s) in the European Parliament: Deliberation and Negotiation in EP Committees. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Senninger, Roman (2017). ‘Issue Expansion and Selective Scrutiny – How Opposition Parties Used Parliamentary Questions about the European Union in the National Arena from 1973 to 2013’, European Union Politics, 18:2, 283–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strom, Kaare, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Torbjörn Bergman (2003). Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taggart, Paul, and Aleks Szczerbiak (2004). ‘Contemporary Euroscepticism in the Party Systems of the European Union Candidate States of Central and Eastern Europe’, European Journal of Political Research, 43:1, 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winzen, Thomas (2012). ‘National Parliamentary Control of European Union Affairs: A Cross-National and Longitudinal Comparison’, West European Politics, 35:3, 657–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar