Settling it on the multi-level parliamentary field? A fields approach to interparliamentary cooperation in foreign and security policy

References

• Amendments (2013). Amendments of National Parliaments to the Rules of Procedure of the Inter-Parliamentary Conference for the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP), Vilnius, 4 September, available at https://secure.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/conference/getconference.do?id=082dbcc5420d8f480142511f23ac4e55
   Google Scholar
• Auel, Katrin, and Thomas Christiansen (2015). ‘After Lisbon: National Parliaments in the European Union’, West European Politics, 38:2, 261–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brok, Elmar, and Roberto Gualtieri (2010). Draft Decision on Organisation of the Parliamentary Scrutiny of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP). 18.11.2010.
   Google Scholar
• Brzozowski, Alexandra (2019). ‘EU Lawmakers Rubber-Stamp European Defence Fund, Give Up Parliamentary Veto’, Euractiv, 18 April 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesrat (2018). Vorschlag für eine Verordnung des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates zur Einrichtung des Europäischen Verteidigungsfonds, Drucksache 292/18, 19.10.2018.
   Google Scholar
• Bundestag (2018). Kleine Anfrage - Entscheidungs- und Kontrollverfahren im Europäischen Verteidigungsfonds, Drucksache 19/3759, 09.08.2018.
   Google Scholar
• Chambre des Répresentants de Belgique (2017). Proposition de résolution relative à une politique de défense intégrée au sein de l’Union européenne, 2655/001, 05.09.2017.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Ian (2019). ‘The Inter-Parliamentary Conferences of the European Union: Discussion Forums or Oversight Bodies?’ in Kolja Raube, Meltem Müftüler-Baç and Jan Wouters (eds.), Parliamentary Cooperation and Diplomacy in EU External Relations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 139–157.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Ian (2016). ‘The Politicization of Interparliamentary Relations in the EU: Constructing and Contesting the “Article 13 Conference” on Economic Governance’, Comparative European Politics, 14:2, 196–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, Ian (2015). ‘A Yellow Card for the Striker: National Parliaments and the Defeat of EU Legislation on the Right to Strike’, Journal of European Public Policy, 22:10, 1406–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, Ian (2013). ‘Deliberation in the Multilevel Parliamentary Field: The Seasonal Workers Directive as a Test Case’, in Ben Crum and John Erik Fossum (eds.), Practices of Interparliamentary Coordination in International Politics. The European Union and Beyond. Colchester: ECPR Press, 51–67.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU (2016). Implementation Plan on Security and Defence, 14392/16, 14.11.2016.
   Google Scholar
• Crum, Ben (2018). ‘Parliamentary Accountability in Multilevel Governance: What Role for Parliaments in Post-Crisis EU Economic Governance?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:2, 268–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crum, Ben (2016). The EU as Multilevel Democracy: Conceptual and Practical Challenges, Online Papers on Parliamentary Democracy IV/2016, available at http://www.pademia.eu/publications/online-papers-on-parliamentary-democracy/online-papers-on-parliamentary-demcoracy-iv2016/ (accessed September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Crum, Ben and John Erik Fossum, eds. (2013). Practices of Interparliamentary Coordination in International Politics. The European Union and Beyond. Colchester: ECPR Press, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Crum, Ben, and John E. Fossum (2009). ‘The Multilevel Parliamentary Field: A Framework for Theorizing Representative Democracy in the EU’, European Political Science Review, 1:2, 249–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eerste Kamer (2017). EU-voorstel: Commissiemededeling – Europees Defensie Actieplan COM(2016)950, vergaderjaar 2016–2017, 34 690, C.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2018). Establishing the European Defence Fund. COM(2018) 476 final, 13.07.2018.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2020). Annual Report 2019. Relations between the European Parliament and EU National Parliaments, available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/relnatparl/en/home/annual-reports.html
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2018a). Report on the implementation of the Treaty Provisions Concerning National Parliaments, A8-0127/2018, 28.03.2018.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2018b). Amendments 16-263, Establishing the European Defence Fund, 2018/0254(COD), 14.09.2018.
   Google Scholar
• Fasone, Cristina, and Nicola Lupo (2016). ‘Introduction. Parliaments in the Composite European Constitution’, in Nicola Lupo and Cristina Fasone (eds.), Interparliamentary Cooperation in the Composite European Constitution. Oxford: Hart, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Fiott, Daniel (2019). The Scrutiny of the European Defence Fund by the European Parliament and National Parliaments. European Parliament: Policy Department for External Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer-Lescano, Andreas (2018). Legal Issues Relating to the Establishment of a European Defence Fund (EDF). Expert Report for the GUE/NGL Parliamentary Group in the EP, available at https://www.guengl.eu/content/uploads/2019/01/EVF_Gutachten_EN.pdf (accessed September 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, Neil, and Doug McAdam (2012). A Theory of Fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fossum, John Erik, and Guri Rosén (2019). ‘Off or on Field? The Multilevel Parliamentary Field of EU External Relations’, in Kolja Raube, Meltem Müftüler-Baç and Jan Wouters (eds.), Parliamentary Cooperation and Diplomacy in EU External Relations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Fromage, Diane (2016). ‘Increasing Inter-Parliamentary Cooperation in the European Union: Current Trends and Challenges’, European Public Law, 22:4, 749–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groen, Afke (2020). ‘Loose Coordination or Ideological Contestation? Transnational Party Activities of German Political Parties on the EU Military Operation EUNAVFOR Med’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 16:4, 608–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GUE/NGL (2019). More on Disarmament, Less On Arms - Left Politicians say in Helsinki, 06.09.2019, available at https://www.guengl.eu/more-on-disarmament-less-on-arms-left-politicians-say-in-helsinki/ (accessed January 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Haroche, Pierre (2018). ‘The Inter-Parliamentary Alliance: How National Parliaments Empowered the European Parliament’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:7, 1010–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herranz-Surrallés, Anna (2019). ‘Paradoxes of Parliamentarization in European Security and Defence: When Politicization and Integration Undercut Parliamentary Capital’, Journal of European Integration, 41:1, 29–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herranz-Surrallés, Anna (2014). ‘The EU’s Multilevel Parliamentary (Battle)Field: Inter-Parliamentary Cooperation and Conflict in Foreign and Security Policy’, West European Politics, 37:5, 957–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jancic, Davor, ed. (2017). National Parliaments after the Lisbon Treaty and the Euro Crisis: Resilience or Resignation? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreilinger, Valentin (2017). A Watchdog over Europe’s Policemen: The New Joint Parliamentary Scrutiny Group for Europol, Policy Paper 197. Berlin: Jacques Delors Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, Philippe, and Reinhard Bütikofer (2019). Letter to Mr Antonio Tajani/Wikström on Defence Fund, 09.04.2019, available at https://reinhardbuetikofer.eu/2019/04/09/letter-to-tajani-wikstroem-on-defence-fund/ (accessed September 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Lord, Christopher (2019). ‘How can Interparliamentary Cooperation Contribute to the Legitimacy of the EU as an International Actor?’, in Kolja Raube, Meltem Müftüler-Baç and Jan Wouters (eds.), Parliamentary Cooperation and Diplomacy in EU External Relations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, Katharina L., and Guri Rosén (2021). ‘Exploring Interaction between National Parliaments and the European Parliament in EU Trade Policy’, in Diane Fromage and Anna Herranz-Surrallés (eds.), Executive-Legislative (Im)Balance after Lisbon. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 195–208.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, Katharina L., and Ben Crum (2019). ‘EU Parliaments in a Post-Constitutionalizing Stage: Competitors or Allies?’, Paper Presented at the Workshop on Inter-Parliamentary Relations in the post-Lisbon European Union, 3–4 October.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, Dirk (2019). ‘Actor, Network, Symbol: The IPC at Three’, in Kolja Raube, Meltem Müftüler-Baç and Jan Wouters (eds.), Parliamentary Cooperation and Diplomacy in EU External Relations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 158–173.
   Google Scholar
• Raube, Kolja, and Jan Wouters (2017). ‘The Many Facets of Parliamentary Involvement and Interaction in EU External Relations’, in Davor Jancic (ed.) National Parliaments after the Lisbon Treaty and the Euro Crisis: Resilience or Resignation? Oxford, Oxford University Press, 281–298.
   Google Scholar
• Raube, Kolja (2012). ‘The European External Action Service and the European Parliament’, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 7:1, 65–80.
   Google Scholar
• Raube, Kolja, and Daan Fonck (2018). ‘Transnational Parliamentarism and the Dynamics of the IPC CFSP/CSDP: Policy-Making, Accountability and Cooperation’, Perspectives of Federalism, 10:3, 138–54.
   Google Scholar
• Rosén, Guri, and Kolja Raube (2018). ‘Influence beyond Formal Powers: The Parliamentarisation of European Union Security Policy’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 20:1, 69–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozenberg, Olivier (2017). The Role of National Parliaments in the EU after Lisbon: Potentialities and Challenges, Study for the AFCO Committee. Brussels: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Garibay, Daniel (2013). ‘Coordination Practices in the Parliamentary Control of Justice and Home Affairs Agencies: The Case of Europol’, in Ben Crum and John Erik Fossum (eds.), Practices of Interparliamentary Coordination in International Politics. The European Union and Beyond. Essex: ECPR Press, 87–103.
   Google Scholar
• Scientists for Global Responsibility (2019). 1000 Researchers and Scientists Oppose the European Defence Fund, available at https://www.sgr.org.uk/resources/1000-researchers-and-scientists-oppose-european-defence-fund (accessed January 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, Wolfgang (2019). ‘The Logic of Interparliamentary Cooperation in Security Policies’, in Kolja Raube, Meltem Müftüler-Bac and Jan Wouters (eds.), Parliamentary Cooperation and Diplomacy in EU External Relations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 88–103.
   Google Scholar
• White, Jonathan (2015). ‘Emergency Europe’, Political Studies, 63:2, 300–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters, Jan, Laura Beke, Anna-Luise Chané, Nicolas Hachez, and Kolja Raube (2014). Enhancing Cooperation between the European Parliament and EU National Parliaments on EU Human Rights Policy. European Parliament: Policy Department for External Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Wouters, Jan, and Kolja Raube (2012). ‘Seeking CSDP Accountability through Interparliamentary Scrutiny’, The International Spectator, 47:4, 149–63.
   Google Scholar