Congruence and party responsiveness in Western Europe in the 21st century

References

• Adams, James (2012). ‘Causes and Electoral Consequences of Party Policy Shifts in Multiparty Elections: Theoretical Results and Empirical Evidence’, Annual Review of Political Science, 15:1, 401–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Luca Bernardi, Lawrence Ezrow, Oakley B. Gordon, Tzu‐Ping Liu, and M. Christine Phillips (2019). ‘A Problem with Empirical Studies of Party Policy Shifts: Alternative Measures of Party Shifts Are Uncorrelated’, European Journal of Political Research, 58:4, 1234–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Michael Clark, Lawrence Ezrow, and Garrett Glasgow (2004). ‘Understanding Change and Stability in Party Ideologies: Do Parties Respond to Public Opinion or to Past Election Results?’, British Journal of Political Science, 34:4, 589–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Michael Clark, Lawrence Ezrow, and Garrett Glasgow (2006). ‘Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties’ Policy Shifts, 1976-1998’, American Journal of Political Science, 50:3, 513–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Lawrence Ezrow, and Zeynep Somer-Topcu (2014). ‘Do Voters Respond to Party Manifestos or to a Wider Information Environment? An Analysis of Mass-Elite Linkages on European Integration’, American Journal of Political Science, 58:4, 967–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, and Samuel Merrill (2009). ‘Policy-Seeking Parties in a Parliamentary Democracy with Proportional Representation: A Valence-Uncertainty Model’, British Journal of Political Science, 39:3, 539–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James F., Samuel Merrill, and Bernard Grofman (2005). A Unified Theory of Party Competition: A Cross-National Analysis Integrating Spatial and Behavioral Factors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, Ryan, Catherine De Vries, Erica Edwards, Liesbet Hooghe, Seth Jolly, Gary Marks, Jonathan Polk, Jan Rovny, et al. (2015). ‘“Measuring Party Positions in Europe the Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File”, 1999-2010’, Party Politics, 21:1, 143–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbera, Pablo, Andreu Casas, Jonathan Nagler, Patrick J. Egan, Richard Bonneau, John T. Jost, and Joshua A. Tucker (2019). ‘Who Leads? Who Follows? Measuring Issue Attention and Agenda Setting by Legislators and the Mass Public Using Social Media Data’, American Political Science Review, 113:4, 883–901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischof, Daniel, and Markus Wagner (2020). ‘What Makes Parties Adapt to Voter Preferences? The Role of Party Organisation, Goals and Ideology’, British Journal of Political Science, 50:1, 391–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian (1994). ‘A New Spatial Theory of Party Competition: Uncertainty, Ideology and Policy Equilibria Viewed Comparatively and Temporally’, British Journal of Political Science, 24:4, 443–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, Eric Fording, Rirchard C. Tanenbaum, Derek J. Hearl, et al. (2001). Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2020). Available at http://www.cses.org.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, Rory, Jacques Thomassen, and Martin Rosema (2012). ‘European Parliament Elections and Political Representation: Policy Congruence between Voters and Parties’, West European Politics, 35:6, 1226–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W. (1990). ‘Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems’, American Journal of Political Science, 34:4, 903–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J. (1985). ‘Political Parties and Political Representation Party Supporters and Party Elites in Nine Nations’, Comparative Political Studies, 18:3, 267–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J. (2017). ‘Party Representation across Multiple Issue Dimensions’, Party Politics, 23:6, 609–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J. (2018). Political Realignment: Economics, Culture, and Electoral Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J., David M., Farrell, and Ian McAllister (2011). Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J., and Ian McAllister (2015). ‘Random Walk or Planned Excursion? Continuity and Change in the Left-Right Positions of Political Parties’, Comparative Political Studies, 48:6, 759–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dassonneville, Ruth (2018). ‘Electoral Volatility and Parties; Ideological Responsiveness’, European Journal of Political Research, 57:4, 808–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egmond, Marcel van, Wouter van der Brug, Sara Hobolt, Mark Franklin, and Eliyahu V. Sapir (2014). European Parliament Election Study 2009, Voter Study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5055 Data file Version 1.1.0.
   Google Scholar
• European Social Survey Cumulative File, ESS 1-9 (2020). Data file edition 1.0. NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data. Norway - Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.21338/NSD-ESS-CUMULATIVE.
   Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence (2008). ‘Parties; Policy Programmes and the Dog That Didn’t Bark: No Evidence That Proportional Systems Promote Extreme Party Positioning’, British Journal of Political Science, 38:3, 479–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence, Catherine De Vries, Marco Steenbergen, and Erica Edwards (2011). ‘Mean Voter Representation and Partisan Constituency Representation: Do Parties Respond to the Mean Voter Position or to Their Supporters?’, Party Politics, 17:3, 275–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence, and Timothy Hellwig (2014). ‘Responding to Voters or Responding to Markets? Political Parties and Public Opinion in an Era of Globalization’, International Studies Quarterly, 58:4, 816–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Vazquez, Pablo (2014). ‘And yet It Moves: The Effect of Election Platforms on Party Policy Images’, Comparative Political Studies, 47:14, 1919–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato, David, and Randolph T. Stevenson (2013). ‘Perceptions of Partisan Ideologies: The Effect of Coalition Participation’, American Journal of Political Science, 57:2, 459–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, Matt, and Benjamin Ferland (2018). ‘Electoral Rules and Citizen-Elite Ideological Congruence’, in Erik S. Herron, Robert J. Pekkanen, and Matthew S. Shugart (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 213–46.
   Google Scholar
• Golder, Matt, and Jacek Stramski (2010). ‘Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions’, American Journal of Political Science, 54:1, 90–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grofman, Bernard (2004). ‘Downs and Two-Party Convergence’, Annual Review of Political Science. 7, 25–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara B., and Catherine E. de Vries (2015). ‘Issue Entrepreneurship and Multiparty Competition’, Comparative Political Studies, 48:9, 1159–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks (2018). ‘Cleavage Theory Meets Europe’s Crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the Transnational Cleavage’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:1, 109–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert, and Philipp Rehm (2015). ‘Party Alignments: Change and Continuity’, in Pablo Beramendi, Silja Hausermann, Herbert Kitschelt, and Hanspeter Kriesi (eds.), The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 179–201.
   Google Scholar
• Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, Ian Budge, and Michael McDonald (2006). Mapping Policy Preferences II. Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Eastern Europe, the European Union and the OECD, 1990-2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael, and Ernest Sergenti (2012). Party Competition: An Agent-Based Model. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, Roni (2012). ‘Intra-Party Democracy and Party Responsiveness’, West European Politics, 35:6, 1295–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Tse-Min, James M. Enelow, and Han Dorussen (1999). ‘Equilibrium in Multicandidate Probabilistic Spatial Voting’, Public Choice, 98:1/2, 59–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila, Mikko, and Tapio Raunio (2006). ‘Cautious Voters-Supportive Parties: Opinion Congruence between Voters and Parties on the EU Dimension’, European Union Politics, 7:4, 427–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Grady, Tom, and Tarik Abou-Chadi (2019). ‘Not so Responsive after All: European Parties Do Not Respond to Public Opinion Shifts across Multiple Issue Dimensions’, Research and Politics, 6:4, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polk, Jonathan, Jan Rovny, Ryan Bakker, Erica Edwards, Liesbet Hooghe, Seth Jolly, Jelle Koedam, et al. (2017). ‘Explaining the Salience of Anti-Elitism and Reducing Political Corruption for Political Parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey Data’, Research and Politics, 4:1, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrschneider, Robert, and Stephen Whitefield (2012). The Strain of Representation: How Parties Represent Diverse Voters in Western and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrschneider, Robert, and Stephen Whitefield (2016). ‘Responding to Growing European Union-Skepticism? The Stances of Political Parties toward European Integration in Western and Eastern Europe following the Financial Crisis’, European Union Politics, 17:1, 138–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Hermann, Stefano Bartolini, Wouter van der Brug, Cees van der Eijk, Mark Franklin, Dieter Fuchs, Gabor Toka, et al. (2009). ‘European Election Study 2004’ (2nd edition). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4566 Data file Version 2.0.0.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Hermann, Sara B. Hobolt, Sebastian A. Popa, and Eftichia Teperoglou (2016). ‘European Parliament Election Study 2014, Voter Study, First Post-Election Survey’. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5160 Data file Version 4.0.0.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, Gijs, Catherine de Vries, and Barbara Vis (2013). ‘Why Do Parties Change Position? Party Organization and Environmental Incentives’, The Journal of Politics, 75:2, 464–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare, and Wolfgang C. Müller (1999). ‘Political Parties and Hard Choices’, in Wolfgang C. Müller and Kaare Strøm (eds.), Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, Jacques, and Hermann Schmitt (1997). ‘Policy Representation’, European Journal of Political Research, 32:2, 165–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Christopher, and Jae-Jae Spoon (2015). ‘Differentiated Party Response: The Effect of Euroskeptic Public Opinion on Party Positions’, European Union Politics, 16:2, 176–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar