Authoritarian values and the welfare state: the social policy preferences of radical right voters

References

• Afonso, Alexandre (2015). ‘Choosing Whom to Betray: Populist Right-Wing Parties, Welfare State Reforms and the Trade-Off between Office and Votes’, European Political Science Review, 7:2, 271–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afonso, Alexandre, and Yannis Papadopoulos (2015). ‘How the Populist Radical Right Transformed Swiss Welfare Politics: From Compromises to Polarization’, Swiss Political Science Review, 21:4, 617–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afonso, Alexandre, and Line Rennwald (2018). ‘Social Class and the Changing Welfare State Agenda of Radical Right Parties in Europe’, in Philip Manow, Bruno Palier, and Hanna Schwander (eds.), Welfare Democracies and Party Politics: Explaining Electoral Dynamics in Times of Changing Welfare Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 171–96.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, Tjitske (2015). ‘Gender and the Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Policy Agendas’, Patterns of Prejudice, 49:1-2, 37–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, Robert A. (1981). Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arzheimer, Kai (2012). ‘Working Class Parties 2.0? Competition Between Centre Left and Extreme Right Parties’, in Jens Rydgren (ed.), Class Politics and the Radical Right. New York: Routledge, 75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Beramendi, Pablo, Silja Häusermann, Herbert Kitschelt, and Hanspeter Kriesi, eds. (2015). The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, Marianne, Esther Duflo, and Sendhil Mullainathan (2004). ‘How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119:1, 249–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, Hans-Georg, and Susi Meret (2012). ‘Right-Wing Populist Parties and the Working Class Vote: What Have You Done for Us Lately?, in Jens Rydgren (ed.), Class Politics and the Radical Right. Abingdon: Routledge, 107–121.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, Kenneth A., Paul P. Biemer, Alan F. Karr, Stephen Tueller, and Marcus E. Berzofsky (2016). ‘Are Survey Weights Needed? A Review of Diagnostic Tests in Regression Analysis’, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 3:1, 375–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonoli, Giuliano (2010). ‘The Political Economy of Active Labor-Market Policy’, Politics & Society, 38:4, 435–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornschier, Simon, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Jens Rydgren (2012). ‘The Populist Right, the Working Class, and the Changing Face of Class Politics’, in Jens Rydgren (ed.), Class Politics and the Radical Right. Abingdon: Routledge, 11–29.
   Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, Marius R. (2014). Skills and Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, Marius R., Julian L. Garritzmann, Erik Neimanns, and Roula Nezi (2018). ‘Investing in Education in Europe: Evidence from a Survey of Public Opinion in Eight European Countries’, Journal of European Social Policy, 28:1, 34–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lange, Sarah L. (2007). ‘A New Winning Formula?: The Programmatic Appeal of the Radical Right’, Party Politics, 13:4, 411–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring, Holger, and Philip Manow (2020). Data from: Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies. Development Version [Dataset]. Retrieved from http://www.parlgov.org/
   Google Scholar
• DuMouchel, William H., and Greg J. Duncan (1983). ‘Using Sample Survey Weights in Multiple Regression Analyses of Stratified Samples’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78:383, 535–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elff, Martin, Jan Paul Heisig, Merlin Schaeffer, and Susumu Shikano (2021). ‘Multilevel Analysis with Few Clusters: Improving Likelihood-Based Methods to Provide Unbiased Estimates and Accurate Inference’, British Journal of Political Science, 51:1, 412–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engler, Sarah, and David Weisstanner (2020). ‘The Threat of Social Decline: Income Inequality and Radical Right Support’, Journal of European Public Policy, 1–21. Advance online publication. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1733636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennser‐Jedenastik, Laurenz (2016). ‘A Welfare State for Whom? A Group‐Based account of the Austrian Freedom Party's Social Policy Profile’, Swiss Political Science Review, 22:3, 409–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz (2018). ‘Welfare Chauvinism in Populist Radical Right Platforms: The Role of Redistributive Justice Principles’, Social Policy & Administration, 52:1, 293–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esarey, Justin, and Andrew Menger (2019). ‘Practical and Effective Approaches to Dealing with Clustered Data’, Political Science Research and Methods, 7:3, 541–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, Gosta (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fossati, Flavia, and Silja Häusermann (2014). ‘Social Policy Preferences and Party Choice in the 2011 Swiss Elections’, Swiss Political Science Review, 20:4, 590–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garritzmann, Julian L., Marius R. Busemeyer, and Erik Neimanns (2018). ‘Public Demand for Social Investment: New Supporting Coalitions for Welfare State Reform in Western Europe?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:6, 844–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garritzmann, Julian L., Silja Häusermann, Bruno Palier, and Christine Zollinger (2017). ‘WoPSI - The World Politics of Social Investment: An International Research Project to Explain Variance in Social Investment Agendas and Social Investment Reforms across Countries and World Regions’, LIEPP Working Paper, 64. Paris, Sciences Po, March 2017, available at https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/142576/1/2017-wp64-wopsi.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gidron, Noam, and Peter A. Hall (2017). ‘The Politics of Social Status: Economic and Cultural Roots of the Populist Right’, The British Journal of Sociology, 68:1, 57–84.
   Google Scholar
• Gingrich, Jane, and Silja Häusermann (2015). ‘The Decline of the Working-Class Vote, the Reconfiguration of the Welfare Support Coalition and Consequences for the Welfare State’, Journal of European Social Policy, 25:1, 50–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, Robert M. (2006). ‘Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 70:5, 646–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häusermann, Silja (2012). ‘The Politics of Old and New Social Policies’, in Giuliano Bonoli and David Natali (eds.), The Politics of the New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 111–32.
   Google Scholar
• Häusermann, Silja, and Hanspeter Kriesi (2015). ‘What Do Voters Want? Dimensions and Configurations in Individual-Level Preferences and Party Choice’, in Pablo Beramendi, Silja Häusermann, Herbert Kitschelt, and Hanspeter Kriesi (eds.), The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press, 202–30.
   Google Scholar
• Häusermann, Silja, Georg Picot, and Dominik Geering (2013). ‘Rethinking Party Politics and the Welfare State – Recent Advances in the Literature’, British Journal of Political Science, 43:1, 221–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemerijck, Anton, ed. (2017). The Uses of Social Investment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemerijck, Anton (2018). ‘Social Investment as a Policy Paradigm’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:6, 810–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, Arlie R. (2018). Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks, and Carole J. Wilson (2002). ‘Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?’, Comparative Political Studies, 35:8, 965–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Marc, and Tim Reeskens (2007). ‘Are Cross-National Surveys the Best Way to Study the Extreme-Right Vote in Europe?’, Patterns of Prejudice, 41:2, 177–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivarsflaten, Elisabeth (2005). ‘The Vulnerable Populist Right Parties: No Economic Realignment Fuelling Their Electoral Success’, European Journal of Political Research, 44:3, 465–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, Torben, and David Soskice (2015). ‘Democratic Limits to Redistribution: Inclusionary versus Exclusionary Coalitions in the Knowledge Economy’, World Politics, 67:2, 185–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert (2007). ‘Growth and Persistence of the Radical Right in Postindustrial Democracies: Advances and Challenges in Comparative Research’, West European Politics, 30:5, 1176–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert, and Anthony J. McGann (1995). The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knotz, Carlo M. (2018). ‘A Rising Workfare State? Unemployment Benefit Conditionality in 21 OECD Countries, 1980–2012’, Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 34:2, 91–108.
   Google Scholar
• Kurer, Thomas, and Bruno Palier (2019). ‘Shrinking and Shouting: The Political Revolt of the Declining Middle in Times of Employment Polarization’, Research & Politics, 6:1, 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipset, Seymour M. (1959). ‘Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy’, American Political Science Review, 53:1, 69–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkenberg, Michael (2011). ‘The Tea Party and American Populism Today: Between Protest, Patriotism and Paranoia’, DMS – Der Moderne Staat: Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 4:2, 283–96.
   Google Scholar
• Morel, Nathalie, Bruno Palier, and Joakim Palme, eds. (2012). Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas (2016). ‘The Study of Populist Radical Right Parties: Towards a Fourth Wave’, C-Rex Working Paper Series, University of Oslo, 1:1, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Oesch, Daniel (2008). ‘Explaining Workers' Support for Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Norway, and Switzerland’, International Political Science Review, 29:3, 349–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oesch, Daniel, and Line Rennwald (2018). ‘Electoral Competition in Europe's New Tripolar Political Space: Class Voting for the Left, Centre-Right and Radical Right’, European Journal of Political Research, 57:4, 783–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otjes, Simon, Gilles Ivaldi, Anders Ravik Jupskas, and Oscar Mazzoleni (2018). ‘It's Not Economic Interventionism, Stupid! Reassessing the Political Economy of Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties’, Swiss Political Science Review, 24:3, 270–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, Karl (1957 [1944]). The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rathgeb, Philip (2021). ‘Makers against Takers: The Socio-Economic Ideology and Policy of the Austrian Freedom Party’, West European Politics, 44:3, 635–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röth, Leonce, Alexandre Afonso, and Dennis C. Spies (2018). ‘The Impact of Populist Radical Right Parties on Socio-Economic Policies’, European Political Science Review, 10:3, 325–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovny, Jan (2013). ‘Where Do Radical Right Parties Stand? Position Blurring in Multidimensional Competition’, European Political Science Review, 5:1, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovny, Jan, and Jonathan Polk (2019). ‘New Wine in Old Bottles: Explaining the Dimensional Structure of European Party Systems’, Party Politics, 25:1, 12–24.
   Google Scholar
• Rydgren, Jens (2012). ‘Introduction: Class Politics and the Radical Right’, in Jens Rydgren (ed.), Class Politics and the Radical Right. Abingdon: Routledge, 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, Gijs, and Kees van Kersbergen (2016). ‘Do Mainstream Parties Adapt to the Welfare Chauvinism of Populist Parties?’, Party Politics, 22:3, 300–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwander, Hanna, and Silja Häusermann (2013). ‘Who Is In and Who Is Out? A Risk-Based Conceptualization of Insiders and Outsiders’, Journal of European Social Policy, 23:3, 248–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skocpol, Theda, and Vanessa Williamson (2016). The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stegmueller, Daniel (2013). ‘How Many Countries for Multilevel Modeling? A Comparison of Frequentist and Bayesian Approaches’, American Journal of Political Science, 57:3, 748–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Wardt, Marc, Catherine E. De Vries, and Sara B. Hobolt (2014). ‘Exploiting the Cracks: Wedge Issues in Multiparty Competition’, The Journal of Politics, 76:4, 986–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oorschot, Wim (2000). ‘Who Should Get What, and Why? On Deservingness Criteria and the Conditionality of Solidarity among the Public’, Policy & Politics, 28:1, 33–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oorschot, Wim (2006). ‘Making the Difference in Social Europe: Deservingness Perceptions among Citizens of European Welfare States’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16:1, 23–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar