Radical right parties and their welfare state stances – not so blurry after all?

References

• Abou-Chadi, Tarik, and Ellen M. Immergut (2019). ‘Recalibrating Social Protection: Electoral Competition and the New Partisan Politics of the Welfare State’, European Journal of Political Research, 58:2, 697–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afonso, Alexandre (2015). ‘Choosing Whom to Betray: Populist Right-Wing Parties, Welfare State Reforms and the Trade-off between Office and Votes’, European Political Science Review, 7:2, 271–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afonso, Alexandre, and Line Rennwald (2018). ‘Social Class and the Changing Welfare State Agenda of Radical Right Parties in Europe’, in Philip Manow, Bruno Palier, and Hanna Schwander (eds.), Welfare Democracies and Party Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 171–96.
   Google Scholar
• Armingeon, Klaus, and Nathalie Giger (2008). ‘Conditional Punishment: A Comparative Analysis of the Electoral Consequences of Welfare State Retrenchment in OECD Nations, 1980–2003’, West European Politics, 31:3, 558–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attewell, David (2021). ‘Deservingness Perceptions, Welfare State Support and Vote Choice in Western Europe’, West European Politics, 44:3, 611–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélanger, Eric, and Kees Aarts (2006). ‘Explaining the Rise of the LPF: Issues, Discontent, and the 2002 Dutch Election’, Acta Politica, 41:1, 4–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beramendi, Pablo, Silja Häusermann, Herbert Kitschelt, and Hanspeter Kriesi (2015). The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonoli, Giuliano (2005). ‘The Politics of the New Social Policies: Providing Coverage against New Social Risks in Mature Welfare States’, Policy & Politics, 33:3, 431–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonoli, Giuliano, and Fabienne Liechti (2018). ‘Good Intentions and Matthew Effects: Access Biases in Participation in Active Labour Market Policies’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:6, 894–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornschier, Simon (2010). Cleavage Politics and the Populist Right. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bremer, Björn, and Reto Bürgisser (2020). ‘Public Opinion on Welfare State Recalibration in Times of Austerity: Evidence from Survey Experiments’, SocArXiv. doi:https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/uj6eq.
   Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, Marius R., and Julian L. Garritzmann (2017). ‘Public Opinion on Policy and Budgetary Trade-Offs in European Welfare States: Evidence from a New Comparative Survey’, Journal of European Public Policy, 24:6, 871–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, Marius R., Philip Rathgeb, and Alexander H. J. Sahm (2021). ‘Authoritarian Values and the Welfare State: The Social Policy Preferences of Radical Right Voters’, West European Politics, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1886497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chueri, Juliana (2020). ‘Social Policy Outcomes of Government Participation by Radical Right Parties’, Party Politics.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lange, Sarah L. (2007). ‘A New Winning Formula?: The Programmatic Appeal of the Radical Right’, Party Politics, 13:4, 411–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lange, Sarah L. (2012). ‘New Alliances: Why Mainstream Parties Govern with Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties’, Political Studies, 60:4, 899–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eger, Maureen A., and Sarah Valdez (2015). ‘Neo-Nationalism in Western Europe’, European Sociological Review, 31:1, 115–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eger, Maureen A., and Sarah Valdez (2019). ‘From Radical Right to Neo-Nationalist’, European Political Science, 18:3, 379–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz (2018). ‘Welfare Chauvinism in Populist Radical Right Platforms: The Role of Redistributive Justice Principles’, Social Policy & Administration, 52:1, 293–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, Duncan Gallie, Anton Hemerijck, and John Myles (2002). Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenger, Menno (2018). ‘The Social Policy Agendas of Populist Radical Right Parties in Comparative Perspective’, Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 34:3, 188–209.
   Google Scholar
• Fossati, Flavia, and Silja Häusermann (2014). ‘Social Policy Preferences and Party Choice in the 2011 Swiss Elections’, Swiss Political Science Review, 20:4, 590–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garritzmann, Julian L., Marius R. Busemeyer, and Erik Neimanns (2018). ‘Public Demand for Social Investment: New Supporting Coalitions for Welfare State Reform in Western Europe?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:6, 844–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garritzmann, Julian L., Silja Häusermann, Bruno Palier, and Christine Zollinger (2017, March). ‘WoPSI – The World Politics of Social Investment: An International Research Project to Explain Variance in Social Investment Agendas and Social Investment Reforms across Countries and World Regions’, LIEPP Working Paper, n° 64.
   Google Scholar
• Garritzmann, Julian L., Erik Neimanns, and Marius R. Busemeyer (2018). ‘Trust, Public Opinion, and Welfare State Reform’, Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, and Carsten Jensen (2019). ‘Electoral Competition and the Welfare State’, West European Politics, 42:4, 803–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingrich, Jane, and Silja Häusermann (2015). ‘The Decline of the Working-Class Vote, the Reconfiguration of the Welfare Support Coalition and Consequences for the Welfare State’, Journal of European Social Policy, 25:1, 50–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häusermann, Silja (2010). The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Häusermann, Silja, Matthias Enggist, Macarena Ares, and Michael Pinggera (2019). ‘Fiscal Austerity Perceptions and How They Depress Solidarity’, Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Häusermann, Silja, Thomas Kurer, and Hanna Schwander (2015). ‘High-Skilled Outsiders? Labor Market Vulnerability, Education and Welfare State Preferences’, Socio-Economic Review, 13:2, 235–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häusermann, Silja, Thomas Kurer, and Denise Traber (2019). ‘The Politics of Trade-Offs: Studying the Dynamics of Welfare State Reforms with Conjoint Experiments’, Comparative Political Studies, 52:7, 1059–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häusermann, Silja, Michael Pinggera, Macarena Ares, and Matthias Enggist (2020). ‘The Limits of Solidarity. Changing Welfare Coalitions in a Transforming European Party System’, Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Häusermann, Silja, Macarena Ares, Matthias Enggist, and Michael Pinggera (2020). ‘Mass Public Attitudes on Social Policy Priorities and Reforms in Western Europe. WELFAREPRIORITIES Dataset 2020’, Welfarepriorities Working Paper Series, n°1/20.
   Google Scholar
• Häusermann, Silja, Michael Pinggera, Macarena Ares, and Matthias Enggist (2021). ‘Class and Social Policy in the Knowledge Economy’, Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Hemerijck, Anton (2013). Changing Welfare States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara B., and Catherine E. de Vries (2015). ‘Issue Entrepreneurship and Multiparty Competition’, Comparative Political Studies, 48:9, 1159–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, Alexander, Anthony Kevins, Carsten Jensen, and Kees van Kersbergen (2017). ‘Peeping at the Corpus – What Is Really Going on behind the Equality and Welfare Items of the Manifesto Project’, Journal of European Social Policy, 27:5, 403–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivarsflaten, Elisabeth (2005). ‘The Vulnerable Populist Right Parties: No Economic Realignment Fuelling Their Electoral Success’, European Journal of Political Research, 44:3, 465–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivarsflaten, Elisabeth (2008). ‘What Unites Right-Wing Populists in Western Europe? Re-Examining Grievance Mobilization Models in Seven Successful Cases’, Comparative Political Studies, 41:1, 3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Alan M., and J. Scott Matthews (2017). ‘Policy Attitudes in Institutional Context: Rules, Uncertainty, and the Mass Politics of Public Investment’, American Journal of Political Science, 61:1, 194–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, Carsten (2014). The Right and the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jønsson, Heidi Vad, and Klaus Petersen (2012). ‘Denmark: A National Welfare State Meets the World’, in Grete Brochmann and Anniken Hagelund (eds.), Immigration Policy and the Scandinavian Welfare State 1945 − 2010. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 123–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert (1994). The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert (2004). ‘Diversification and Reconfiguration of Party Systems in Postindustrial Democracies’, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Europäische Politik, 03, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert, and Anthony J. McGann (1997). The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koedam, Jelle (2020). ‘Avoidance, Ambiguity, Alternation Position Blurring Strategies in Multidimensional Party Competition’, Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Kölln, Ann-Kristin, and Christopher Wlezien (2016). ‘Conjoint Experiments on Political Support for Governmental Spending Profiles’, Working Paper presented at EPOP in Kent.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, Werner, Pola Lehmann, Jirka Lewandowski, Theres Matthieß, Nicolas Merz, Sven Regel, and Annika Werner (2019). Manifesto Corpus. Version: 2019-2. Berlin: WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter, et al. (2008). West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuisma, Mikko, and Mikael Nygard (2019). ‘The Nordic Model of Welfare Chauvinism? Populist Welfare Discourses in Finland and Sweden’, Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Laenen, Tijs, Bart Meuleman, and Wim van Oorschot (2020). Welfare State Legitimacy in Times of Crisis and Austerity. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lefkofridi, Zoe, and Elie Michel (2014). Exclusive Solidarity? Radical Right Parties and the Welfare State. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Morel, Nathalie, Bruno Palier, and Joakim Palme (2012). Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas (1999). ‘The Single-Issue Party Thesis: Extreme Right Parties and the Immigration Issue’, West European Politics, 22:3, 182–97.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordensvard, Johan, and Markus Ketola (2015). ‘Nationalist Reframing of the Finnish and Swedish Welfare States – the Nexus of Nationalism and Social Policy in Far-Right Populist Parties’, Social Policy & Administration, 49:3, 356–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oesch, Daniel (2008). ‘The Changing Shape of Class Voting’, European Societies, 10:3, 329–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oesch, Daniel, and Line Rennwald (2018). ‘Electoral Competition in Europe‘s New Tripolar Political Space: Class Voting for the Left, Centre-Right and Radical Right’, European Journal of Political Research, 57:4, 783–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otjes, Simon, Gilles Ivaldi, Anders Ravik Jupskås, and Oscar Mazzoleni (2018). ‘It’s Not Economic Interventionism, Stupid! Reassessing the Political Economy of Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties’, Swiss Political Science Review, 24:3, 270–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavolini, Emmanuele, and Wim Van Lancker (2018). ‘The Matthew Effect in Childcare Use: A Matter of Policies or Preferences?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:6, 878–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, Paul (2001). The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rathgeb, Philip (2021). ‘Makers against Takers: The Socio-Economic Ideology and Policy of the Austrian Freedom Party’, West European Politics, 44:3, 635–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roosma, Femke, John Gelissen, and Wim van Oorschot (2013). ‘The Multidimensionality of Welfare State Attitudes: A European Cross-National Study’, Social Indicators Research, 113:1, 235–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röth, Leonce, Alexandre Afonso, and Dennis C. Spies (2018). ‘The Impact of Populist Radical Right Parties on Socio-Economic Policies’, European Political Science Review, 10:3, 325–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovny, Jan (2012). ‘Who Emphasizes and Who Blurs? Party Strategies in Multidimensional Competition’, European Union Politics, 13:2, 269–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovny, Jan (2013). ‘Where Do Radical Right Parties Stand? Position Blurring in Multidimensional Competition’, European Political Science Review, 5:1, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovny, Jan, and Jonathan Polk (2020). ‘Still Blurry? Economic Salience, Position and Voting for Radical Right Parties in Western Europe’, European Journal of Political Research, 59:2, 248–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydgren, Jens (2012). Class Politics and the Radical Right. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, Gijs, and Kees van Kersbergen (2016). ‘Do Mainstream Parties Adapt to the Welfare Chauvinism of Populist Parties?’, Party Politics, 22:3, 300–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwander, Hanna (2019). ‘VII. Healthcare as Social Investment’, in The Hertie School of Governance, The Governance Report 2019. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 121–34.
   Google Scholar
• Söderlund, Peter, and Elina Kestilä‐Kekkonen (2009). ‘Dark Side of Party Identification? An Empirical Study of Political Trust among Radical Right‐Wing Voters’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 19:2, 159–81.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, John D., Evelyne Huber, and Leonard Ray (1999). ‘The Welfare State in Hard Times’, in Herbert Kitschelt, Peter Lange, Gary Marks, and John D. Stephens (eds.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 164–93.
   Google Scholar
• Svallfors, Stefan (1997). ‘Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations’, European Sociological Review, 13:3, 283–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svallfors, Stefan (2007). The Political Sociology of the Welfare State: Institutions, Social Cleavages, and Orientations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Traber, Denise, Nathalie Giger, and Silja Häusermann (2018). ‘How Economic Crises Affect Political Representation: Declining Party‒Voter Congruence in Times of Constrained Government’, West European Politics, 41:5, 1100–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oorschot, Wim (2006). ‘Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16:1, 23–42.
   Google Scholar
• van Oorschot, Wim, and Bart Meuleman (2012). ‘Welfarism and the Multidimensionality of Welfare State Legitimacy: Evidence from The Netherlands, 2006’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 21:1, 79–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar