The rightward shift and electoral decline of social democratic parties under increasing inequality

References

• Abou-Chadi, Tarik, and Markus Wagner (2019). ‘The Electoral Appeal of Party Strategies in Postindustrial Societies: When Can the Mainstream Left Succeed?’, The Journal of Politics, 81:4, 1405–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afonso, Alexandre, and Line Rennwald (2018). ‘Varieties of Electoral Dilemmas: Partisan Jousting over Welfare States and Immigration in a Changing Europe’, in Philip Manow, Bruno Palier and Hanna Schwander (eds.), Welfare Democracies and Party Politics: Explaining Electoral Dynamics in Times of Changing Welfare Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 171–94.
   Google Scholar
• Armingeon, Klaus, Virginia Wenger, Fiona Wiedemeier, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner, and Sarah Engler (2019). Comparative Political Data Set 1960–2017. Zurich: Institute of Political Science, University of Zurich, http://www.cpds-data.org/index.php/data.
   Google Scholar
• Arndt, Christoph (2013). The Electoral Consequences of Third Way Welfare State Reforms: Social Democracy’s Transformation and Its Political Costs. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press,
   Google Scholar
• Arndt, Christoph. (2014). ‘Social Democracy’s Mobilization of New Constituencies: The Role of Electoral Systems’, Party Politics, 20:5, 778–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bale, Tim, Christoffer Green-Pedersen, André Krouwel, Kurt R. Luther, and Nick Sitter (2010). ‘If You Can’t Beat Them, Join Them? Explaining Social Democratic Responses to the Challenge from the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe’, Political Studies, 58:3, 410–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, Erling, Henning Finseraas, and Karl O. Moene (2015). ‘Political Reinforcement: How Rising Inequality Curbs Manifested Welfare Generosity’, American Journal of Political Science, 59:3, 565–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolini, Stefano (2000). The Political Mobilization of the European Left, 1860–1980: The Class Cleavage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bélanger, Éric, and Bonnie M. Meguid (2008). ‘Issue Salience, Issue Ownership, and Issue-Based Vote Choice’, Electoral Studies, 27:3, 477–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedetto, Giacomo, Simon Hix, and Nicola Mastrorocco (2020). ‘Rise and Fall of Social Democracy’, American Political Science Review, 114:3, 928–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, Kenneth, and Michael Laver (2006). Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, Sheri, and Maria Snegovaya (2019). ‘Populism and the Decline of Democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 30:3, 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, Julian, Nathalie Giger, and Jan Rosset (2015). ‘Mind the Gap: Do Proportional Electoral Systems Foster a More Equal Representation of Women and Men, Poor and Rich?’, International Political Science Review, 36:1, 78–98. no.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowyer, Benjamin, and Mark Vail (2011). ‘Economic Insecurity, the Social Market Economy, and Support for the German Left’, West European Politics, 34:4, 683–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremer, Björn. (2018). ‘The Missing Left? Economic Crisis and the Programmatic Response of Social Democratic Parties in Europe’, Party Politics, 24:1, 23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, Mark L., and Stephen P. Jenkins. (2016). ‘Multilevel Modelling of Country Effects: A Cautionary Tale’, European Sociological Review, 32:1, 3–22. no.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuperus, René (2018). ‘Social Democracy and the Populist Challenge’, in Rob Manwaring and Paul Kennedy (eds.), Why the Left Loses: The Decline of the Centre-left in Comparative Perspective. Bristol: University of Bristol Policy Press, 185–202.
   Google Scholar
• Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2019). CSES Integrated Module Dataset (IMD) [Dataset]. October 17, 2019 version. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.7804/cses.imd.2019-10-17
   Google Scholar
• Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (2020). CSES Module 5 Second Advance Release [Dataset], May 14, 2020 version. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.7804/cses.module5.2020-05-14
   Google Scholar
• Engler, Fabian, and Reimut Zohlnhöfer (2019). ‘Left Parties, Voter Preferences, and Economic Policy-Making in Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:11, 1620–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Geoffrey, and James Tilley (2012). ‘The Depoliticization of Inequality and Redistribution: Explaining the Decline of Class Voting’, The Journal of Politics, 74:4, 963–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence, and Georgios Xezonakis (2011). ‘Citizen Satisfaction with Democracy and Parties’ Policy Offerings’, Comparative Political Studies, 44:9, 1152–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferland, Benjamin, and Ruth Dassonneville (2021). ‘Shifting Parties, Rational Switchers: Are Voters Responding to Ideological Shifts by Political Parties?’, Party Politics, 27:1, 114–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funke, Manuel, Moritz Schularick, and Christoph Trebesch (2016). ‘Going to Extremes: Politics after Financial Crises, 1870–2014’, European Economic Review, 88, 227–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingrich, Jane, and Silja Häusermann (2015). ‘The Decline of the Working-Class Vote, the Reconfiguration of the Welfare Support Coalition and Consequences for the Welfare State’, Journal of European Social Policy, 25:1, 50–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingrich, Jane (2017). ‘A New Progressive Coalition? The European Left in a Time of Change’, The Political Quarterly, 88:1, 39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, Donald P., Soo Yeon Kim, and David H. Yoon (2001). ‘Dirty Pool’, International Organization, 55:2, 441–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, Oliver P., and Michael I. Norton (2017). ‘(Mis)Perceptions of Inequality’, Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 21–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häusermann, Silja, and Hans-Peter Kriesi (2015). ‘What Do Voters Want? Dimensions and Configurations in Individual-Level Preferences and Party Choice’, in Pablo Beramendi, Silja Häusermann, Herbert Kitschelt, and Hans-Peter Kriesi (eds.), The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press, 202–230.
   Google Scholar
• Häusermann, Silja, Achim Kemmerling, and David Rueda (2020). ‘How Labor Market Inequality Transforms Mass Politics’, Political Science Research and Methods, 8:2, 344–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häusermann, Silja, Gerard Picot, and Dominik Geering (2013). ‘Rethinking Party Politics and the Welfare State: Recent Advances in the Literature’, British Journal of Political Science, 43:1, 221–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjorth, Frederik, and Martin Vinaes Larsen (2020). ‘When Does Accommodation Work? Electoral Effects of Mainstream Left Position Taking on Immigration’, British Journal of Political Science. Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkin, Jonathan (2020). Anti-System Politics: The Crisis of Market Liberalism in Rich Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkin, Jonathan, and, and Mark Blyth (2019). ‘The Global Economics of European Populism: Growth Regimes and Party System Change in Europe (the Government and Opposition/Leonard Schapiro Lecture 2017)’, Government and Opposition, 54:2, 193–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, Alexander (2020). ‘The Asymmetric Long-Term Electoral Consequences of Unpopular Reforms: Why Retrenchment Really is a Losing Game for Left Parties’, Journal of European Public Policy. Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1773904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, Evelyne, Jingjing Huo and John D. Stephens (2019). ‘Power, Policy, and Top Income Shares’, Socio-Economic Review, 17:2, 231–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, Torben, and Frances Rosenbluth (2006). ‘The Political Economy of Gender: Explaining Cross‐National Variation in the Gender Division of Labor and the Gender Voting Gap’, American Journal of Political Science, 50:1, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, Torben, and David Soskice (2006). ‘Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More than Others’, American Political Science Review, 100:2, 165–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, Will, and Gerry Stoker (2016). ‘The Bifurcation of Politics: Two Englands’, The Political Quarterly, 87:3, 372–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, John T (2006). ‘The End of the End of Ideology’, American Psychologist, 61:7, 651–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusko, Karen Long (2017). Who Speaks for the Poor? Electoral Geography, Party Entry, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karreth, Johannes, Jonathan T. Polk, and Christopher S. Allen (2013). ‘Catchall or Catch and Release? The Electoral Consequences of Social Democratic Parties’ March to the Middle in Western Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, 46:7, 791–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keele, Luke, and Nathan J. Kelly (2006). ‘Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent Variables’, Political Analysis, 14:2, 186–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keman, Hans (2011). ‘Third Ways and Social Democracy: The Right Way to Go?’, British Journal of Political Science, 41:3, 671–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerrissey, Jasmine, and Evan Schofer (2018). ‘Labor Unions and Political Participation in Comparative Perspective’, Social Forces, 97:1, 427–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosiara-Pedersen, Karina (2020). ‘Stronger Core, Weaker Fringes: The Danish General Election 2019’, West European Politics, 43:4, 1011–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, Jonas. (2017) ‘Social Democratic Austerity: The Conditional Role of Agenda Dynamics and Issue Ownership’, Journal of European Public Policy, 24:10, 1430–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Mary Stegmaier (2000). ‘Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes’, Annual Review of Political Science, 3:1, 183–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, Michael S, and Mary Stegmaier (2013). ‘The V-P Function Revisited: A Survey of the Literature on Vote and Popularity Functions after over 40 Years’, Public Choice, 157:3-4, 367–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipset, Seymour Martin (2001). ‘The Americanization of the European Left’, Journal of Democracy, 12:2, 74–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, Will, Kenneth Benoit, Slava Mikhaylov, and Michael Laver (2011). ‘Scaling Policy Preferences from Coded Political Texts’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36:1, 123–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loxbo, Karl, Jonas Hinnfors, Magnus Hagevi, Sofie Blombäck, and Marie Demker (2019). ‘The Decline of Western European Social Democracy: Exploring the Transformed Link between Welfare State Generosity and the Electoral Strength of Social Democratic Parties, 1975–2014’, Party Politics. Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819861339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauro, Paolo, Rafael Romeu, Ariel Binder, and Asad Zaman, IMF Fiscal Affairs Departmental Data (2015). ‘A Modern History of Fiscal Prudence and Profligacy’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 76, 55–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer, Allan H., and Scott F. Richard (1981). ‘A Rational Theory of the Size of Government’, Journal of Political Economy, 89:5, 914–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moene, Karl O., and Michael Wallerstein (2001). ‘Inequality, Social Insurance, and Redistribution’, American Political Science Review, 95:4, 859–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, Kimberly J. (2018). ‘Varieties of Electoral Dilemmas: Partisan Jousting over Welfare States and Immigration in a Changing Europe’, in Philip Manow, Bruno Palier and Hanna Schwander (eds.), Welfare Democracies and Party Politics: Explaining Electoral Dynamics in Times of Changing Welfare Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 119–149.
   Google Scholar
• Mosimann, Nadja, Line Rennwald, and Adrian Zimmermann (2019). ‘The Radical Right, the Labour Movement and the Competition for the Workers’ Vote’, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 40:1, 65–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudge, Stephanie (2018). Leftism Reinvented: Western Parties from Socialism to Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickell, Stephen (1981). ‘Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects’, Econometrica, 49:6, 1417–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan, Brian, and David Weisstanner (2021). ‘Has the Middle Secured Its Share of Growth or Been Squeezed?’, West European Politics, 44:2, 426–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2020). Trade Union Density in OECD Countries (Indicator). Paris: OECD Publishing. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=TUD.
   Google Scholar
• Pacek, Alexander, and Benjamin Radcliff (1995). ‘Turnout and the Vote for Left-of-Centre Parties: A Cross-National Analysis’, British Journal of Political Science, 25:1, 137–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Ju Yeon (2019). ‘Punishing Without Rewards? A Comprehensive Examination of the Asymmetry in Economic Voting’, Electoral Studies, 57, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piketty, Thomas (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, Thomas (2020). Capital and Ideology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polacko, Matthew (2021). ‘Inequality, Policy Polarization, and the Income Gap in Turnout’, Party Politics, Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688211011924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontusson, Jonas, and David Rueda (2010). ‘The Politics of Inequality: Voter Mobilization and Left Parties in Advanced Industrial States’, Comparative Political Studies, 43:6, 675–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennwald, Line (2020). Social Democratic Parties and the Working Class: New Voting Patterns. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rovny, Jan (2013). ‘Where Do Radical Right Parties Stand? Position Blurring in Multidimensional Competition’, European Political Science Review, 5:1, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueda, David, and Daniel Stegmueller (2019). Who Wants What? Redistribution preferences in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rueda, David (2018). ‘Food Comes First, Then Morals: Redistribution Preferences, Parochial Altruism, and Immigration in Western Europe’, The Journal of Politics, 80:1, 225–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydgren, Jens (2013). Class Politics and the Radical Right. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, Gijs, Barbara Vis, and Kees van Kersbergen (2013). ‘Political Parties’ Welfare Image, Electoral Punishment and Welfare State Retrenchment’, Comparative European Politics, 11:1, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwander, Hanna, and Philip Manow (2017). ‘‘‘Modernize and Die”? German Social Democracy and the Electoral Consequences of the Agenda 2010’, Socio-Economic Review, 15:1, 117–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwander, Hanna (2019). ‘Are Social Democratic Parties Insider Parties? Electoral Strategies of Social Democratic Parties in Western Europe in the Age of Dualization’, Comparative European Politics, 17:5, 714–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solt, Frederick (2020). ‘Measuring Income Inequality across Countries and over Time: The Standardized World Income Inequality Database’, Social Science Quarterly, Version 9.0, 101:3, 1183–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somer-Topcu, Zeynep, Margit Tavits, and Markus Baumann (2020). ‘Does Party Rhetoric Affect Voter Perceptions of Party Positions?’, Electoral Studies, 65, 102153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoon, Jae‐Jae, and Heike Klüver (2020). ‘Responding to Far Right Challengers: Does Accommodation Pay off?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 27:2, 273–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, Joseph (2013). The Price of Inequality. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tavits, Margit, and Joshua D. Potter (2015). ‘The Effect of Inequality and Social Identity on Party Strategies’, American Journal of Political Science, 59:3, 744–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thau, Mads (2018). ‘The Demobilization of Class Politics in Denmark: The Social Democratic Party’s Group-Based Appeals 1961–2004’, World Political Science, 14:2, 169–88.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, Jelle (2019). ICTWSS Database. Version 6.1. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies (AIAS), University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Volkens, Andrea, Tobias Burst, Werner Krause, Pola Lehmann, Theres Matthieß, Nicolas Merz, Sven Regel, Bernhard Weßels, and Lisa Zehnter (2020). The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2020b. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25522/manifesto.mpds.2020b.
   Google Scholar
• Weisstanner, David (2020). ‘Insiders under Pressure: Flexibilization at the Margins and Wage Inequality’, Journal of Social Policy. Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279420000409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilford, Allan M. (2019). ‘Turnout, Party System Diversity and Left-of-Centre Parties: Explaining Turnout through the Strength of Left-of-Centre Parties’, European Political Science, 18:1, 66–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar